Estimation of Leaf Area Index and Foliage Area Index of Rice using an Indirect Gravimetric Method

References

• Akita, S. 1989. Improving yield potential in tropical rice. In Progress in irrigated rice research, 41–73. Manila, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Arkebauer, T. J., J. P. Chanton, S. B. Verma, and J. Kim. 2001. Field measurements of internal pressurization in Phragmites australis (poaceae) and implications for regulation of methane emissions in a midlatitude prairie wetland. American Journal of Botany 88 (4): 653–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCE-EWRI. 2005. The ASCE standardized reference evapotranspiration equation (Technical Committee Report to the Environmental and Water Resources Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers from the Task Committee on Standardization of Reference Evapotranspiration). Reston, Va.: ASCE-EWRI.
   Google Scholar
• Aschonitis, V. G., V. Z. Antonopoulos, and D. M. Papamichail. 2012. Evaluation of pan coefficient equations in a semi-arid Mediterranean environment using the ASCE- standardized Penman–Monteith method. Agricultural Sciences 3 (1): 58–65.
   Google Scholar
• Belder, P., B. A. M. Bouman, R. Cabangon, L. Guoan, E. J. P. Quilang, L. Yuanhua, J. H. J. Spiertz, and T. P. Tuong. 2004. Effect of water saving irrigation on rice yield and water use in typical lowland conditions in Asia. Agricultural Water Management 63:193–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brantley, S. T., J. C. Zinnert, and D. R. Young. 2011. Application of hyperspectral vegetation indices to detect variations in high leaf area index temperate shrub thicket canopies. Remote Sensing of Environment 115:514–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brėda, N. J. J. 2003. Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: A review of methods, instruments, and current controversies. Journal of Experimental Botany 54:2403–2417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casanova, D., G. F. Epema, and J. Goudriaan. 1998. Monitoring rice reflectance at field level for estimating biomass and LAI. Field Crops Research 55:83–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. M., and T. A. Black. 1992. Defining leaf-area index for non-flat leaves. Plant, Cell and Environment 15:421–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daughtry, C. S. T. 1990. Direct measurements of canopy structure. Remote Sensing Reviews 5:45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Dawe, T. 2000. The contribution of rice research to poverty alleviation. In Redesigning rice photosynthesis to increase yield, ed. J. E. Sheehy, P. L. Mitchell, and B. Hardy. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• De Datta, S. K., and F. E. Broadbent. 1993. Development changes related to nitrogen-use efficiency in rice. Field Crops Research 34:47–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingkuhn, M., D. E. Johnson, A. Sow, and A. Y. Audebert. 1999. Relationships between upland rice canopy characteristics and weed competitiveness. Field Crops Research 61:79–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobermann, A., and M. F. Pampolino. 1995. Indirect leaf area index measurement as a tool for characterizing rice growth at the field scale. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 26 (9–10): 1507–1523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fassnacht, K. S., S. T. Gower, J. M. Norman, and R. E. McMurtrie. 1994. A comparison of optical and direct methods for estimating foliage surface area index in forests. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 71:183–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gower, S. T., C. J. Kucharik, and J. M. Norman. 1999. Direct and indirect estimation of leaf area index, fAPAR, and net primary production of terrestrial ecosystems. Remote Sensing of Environment 70:29–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratani, L., and A. Bombelli. 2000. Correlation between leaf age and other leaf traits in three Mediterranean maquis shrub species: Quercus ilex, Phillyrea latifolia, and Cistus incanus. Environmental and Experimental Botany 43:141–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonckheere, I., S. Fleck, K. Nackaerts, B. Muys, P. Coppin, M. Weiss, and F. Baret. 2004. Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination, part I: Theories, sensors, and hemispherical photography. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 121:19–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S., B. Gu, T. Du, and J. Zhang. 2003. Crop coefficient and ratio of transpiration to evapotranspiration of winter wheat and maize in a semi-humid region. Agricultural Water Management 59:239–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsura, K., S. Maeda, I. Lubis, T. Horie, W. Cao, and T. Shiraiwa. 2008. The high yield of irrigated rice in Yunnan, China: A cross-location analysis. Field Crops Research 107:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., B. S. Verma, and D. P. Billesbach. 1998. Seasonal variation in methane emission from a temperate phragmites-dominated marsh: Effect on growth stage and plant-mediated transport. Global Change Biology 5:433–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiniry, J. R., G. McCauley, Y. Xie, and J. G. Arnold. 2001. Rice parameters describing crop performance of four U.S. cultivars. Agronomy Journal 93:1354–1361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kussner, R., and R. Mosandl. 2000. Comparison of direct and indirect estimation of leaf area index in mature Norway spruce stands of eastern Germany. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30:440–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mae, T., A. Inaba, Y. Kaneta, S. Masaki, M. Sasaki, M. Aizawa, S. Okawa, S. Hasegawa, and A. Makino. 2006. A large-grain rice cultivar, Akita 63, exhibits high yields with high physiological N-use efficiency. Field Crops Research 97 (2–3): 227–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, S., D. A. Herbert Jr., and D. L. Holshouser. 2002. Evaluation of the LAI-2000 plant canopy analyzer to estimate leaf area in manually defoliated soybean. Agronomy Journal 94:1012–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsi, M., and T. Saeki. 1953. Über den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung für die Stoffproduktion. Japanese Journal of Botany 14:22–52.
   Google Scholar
• Ntanos, D. A., and S. D. Koutroubas. 2002. Dry matter and N accumulation and translocation for Indica and Japonica rice under Mediterranean conditions. Field Crops Research 74:93–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntanos, D. A. 2001. Strategies for rice production and research in Greece. Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes 50:115–122.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, S., R. C. Laza, R. M. Visperas, A. L. Sanico, K. G. Cassman, and G. S. Khush. 2000. Grain yield of rice cultivars and lines developed in the Philippines since 1966. Crop Science 40:307–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San-oh, Y., Y. Mano, T. Ookawa, and T. Hirasawa. 2004. Comparison of dry matter production and associated characteristics between direct-sown and transplanted rice plants in a submerged paddy field and relationships to planting patterns. Field Crops Research 87:43–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehy, J. E. 2000. Limits to yield for C3 and C4 rice: An agronomist’s view. In Redesigning rice photosynthesis to increase yield, ed. J. E. Sheehy, P. L. Mitchell, and B. Hardy. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, T. R., and J. E. Sheehy. 1999. Erect leaves and photosynthesis in rice. Science 283:1456–1457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroppiana, D., M. Boschetti, R. Confalonieri, S. Bocchi, and P. A. Brivio. 2006. Evaluation of LAI-2000 for leaf area index monitoring in paddy rice. Field Crops Research 99:167–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudharsan, D., J. Adinarayana, D. R. Reddy, G. Sreenivas, S. Ninomiya, M. Hirafuji, T. Kiura, K. Tanaka, U. B. Desai, and S. N. Merchant. 2012. Evaluation of weather-based rice yield models in India. International Journal of Biometeorology 57:107–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaesen, K., S. Gilliams, K. Nackaerts, and P. Coppin. 2001. Ground-measured spectral signatures as indicators of ground cover and leaf area index: the case of paddy rice. Field Crops Research 69:13–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkateswarlu, B., K. Rao, and A. V. Rao. 1976. Canopy analysis on the rlationships between leaf area index and productivity in lowland rice, Oryza sativa L. Plant and Soil 45:49–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D. J. 1947. Comparative physiological studies in the growth of field crops, I: Variation in net assimilation rate and leaf area between species and varieties, and within and between years. Annals of Botany 11:41–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welles, J. M., and S. Cohen. 1996. Canopy structure measurement by gap fraction analysis using commercial instrumentation. Journal of Experimental Botany 302:1335–1342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ying, J., S. Peng, O. He, H. Yang, C. Yang, R. M. Visperas, and K. G. Cassman. 1998. Comparison of high-yield rice in tropical and subtropical environments, I: Determinants of grain and dry matter yields. Field Crops Research 57 (1): 71–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida, S. 1981. Fundamentals of rice crop science. Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines: IRRI.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, F., G. Liu, H. Zhu, X. Ding, R. Zeng, Z. Zhang, W. Li, and G. Zhang. 2008. Unconditional and conditional QTL mapping for tiller numbers at various stages with single segment substitution lines in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Agricultural Sciences in China 7 (3): 257–265.
   Google Scholar