Efficiency of Sulfur Application on Soybean in Two Types of Oxisols in Southern Brazil

References

• Alvarez Venegas, V. H., R. F. Novaes, N. F. Barros, R. B. Cantarutti, and A. S. Lopes. 1999. Interpretation of soil analysis. In Recommendation for use of amendments and fertilizer in Minas Gerais, 5th ed., ed. A. C. Ribeiro, P. T. G. Guimarães, and V. H. Alvarez Venegas, 25–32. Viçosa, Brazil: Soil Fertility Commission for the State of Minas Gerais.
   Google Scholar
• Alves, M. E., and A. Lavorenti. 2004. Sulfate adsorption and its relationships with properties of representative soils of the São Paulo State, Brazil. Geoderma 118:89–99. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00186-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anghinoni, I., I. Fiorese, and A. P. Moraes. 1976. Response of soybean to boron, zinc, and sulfur application. Agronomia Sulriograndense 12:189–99.
   Google Scholar
• Broch, D. L., P. S. Pavinato, J. C. Possentti, T. N. Martin, and E. M. Del Quiqui. 2011. Produtividade da soja no cerrado influenciada pelas fontes de enxofre. Revista Ciência Agronômica 42:791–96. doi:10.1590/S1806-66902011000300027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesnin, L., and C. H. Yien. 1950. Turbidimetric determination of available sulfates. Soil Science of America Proceeding 15:149–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, R. 1966. The importance of sulfur as a plant nutrient in world crop production. Soil Science 101:230–39. doi:10.1097/00010694-196604000-00002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick, W. A., D. Kost, and L. Chien. 2008. Availability of sulfur to crops from soil and other sources. In Sulfur: A missing link between soils crop, and nutrition, ed. J. Joseph, 59–82. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.
   Google Scholar
• EMBRAPA (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária). 2000. Recomendações técnicas para a cultura da soja no Paraná 2000/01. Londrina, Brazil: Embrapa Soja.
   Google Scholar
• Fageria, N. K., V. C. Baligar, and R. B. Clark. 2006. Physiology of crop production. New York: Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fageria, N. K., A. Moreira, and C. Castro. 2011. Response of soybean to phosphorus fertilization in Brazilian Oxisol. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 42:2716–23. doi:10.1080/00103624.2011.622819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr, W. R., C. E. Caviness, D. J. Burmood, and J. S. Pennington. 1971. Stage of development description for soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Crop Science 11:929–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamal, A., Y. S. Moon, and M. Z. Abdin. 2010. Sulphur: A general overview and interaction with nitrogen. Australian Journal of Crop Science 4:523–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malavolta, E. 2006. Manual of mineral nutrition of plants [Manual de nutrição mineral de plantas]. Piracicaba, Brazil: Editora Ceres.
   Google Scholar
• Marschner, H. 1995. Mineral nutrition for higher plants. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martini, J. A., and R. G. Mutters. 1984. Effect of liming and fertilization on sulfur availability mobility, and uptake in cultivated soils of South Carolina. Soil Science 138:403–10. doi:10.1097/00010694-198412000-00003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mengel, K., and E. Kirkby. 2001. Principles of plant nutrition. London: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira, A., J. G. Carvalho, and A. R. Evangelista. 1997. Levels of sulfur effects on alfalfa production and mineral composition. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 32:533–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira, A., A. R. Evangelista, and J. G. Carvalho. 1998. Effect of sulphur rates and sources on yield and mineral composition of white clover. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 33:1137–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motavalli, P. P., J. M. Duxbury, and D. M. G. Souza. 1993. The influence of organic soil amendments on sulfate adsorption and sulfur availability in a Brazilian Oxisol. Plant and Soil 154:301–8. doi:10.1007/BF00012535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peluzio, J. M., H. B. Barros, R. R. Silva, M. M. Santos, G. R. Santos, and W. C. Dias. 2003. Physiological quality of soybean seeds under different harvest times in southern Tocantis. Revista Ceres 50:347–55.
   Google Scholar
• Raij, B. V. 2011. Soil fertility and management of nutrients. Piracicaba, Brazil: INPI.
   Google Scholar
• Rheinheimer, D. D. S., J. W. R. Alvarez, B. D. Osorio Filho, L. S. D. Silva, and E. C. Bortoluzzi. 2005. Resposta de culturas à aplicação de enxofre e a teores de sulfato num solo de textura arenosa sob plantio direto. Ciência Rural 35:562–69. doi:10.1590/S0103-84782005000300011.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, H. W. 2009. Sulfur in soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 172:326–35. doi:10.1002/jpln.v172:3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqi, M. Y., and D. M. Glass. 1981. Utilization index: A modified approach to the estimation and comparison of nutrient utilization efficiency in plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition 4:289–302. doi:10.1080/01904168109362919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siqueira, O. J. F., E. E. Scherer, G. Tassinari, I. Anghinoni, J. F. Patella, M. J. Tedesco, P. A. Milan, and P. R. Ernani. 1987. Liming and fertilization recommendation for the states of Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina [Recomendação de adubação e calagem para os estados do Rio Grande do Sul e Santa Catarina]. Passo Fundo, Brazil: Embrapa trigo.
   Google Scholar
• Souza, D. M. G., E. Lobato, and T. A. Rein. 2005. Use of gypsum in cerrado soils [Uso de gesso nos solos de cerrado]. Planaltina, Brazil: Embrapa Cerrados.
   Google Scholar
• TPS (Tecnologia de Produção de Soja). 2011. Technology of soybean yield in central region of Brazil. 2012 and 2013. Londrina, Brazil: Embrapa Soja.
   Google Scholar
• Urano, E. O. M., C. H. Kurihara, S. Maeda, A. C. T. Vitorino, M. C. Gonçalves, and M. E. Marchetti. 2006. Soybean nutrition status evaluation. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 41:1421–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar