Salt Tolerance and K/Na Ratio of Some Introduced Forage Grass Species Under Salinity Stress in Irrigated Areas

References

• Akram, M., M. A. Malik, M. Y. Ashraf, M. F. Saleem, and M. Hussain. 2007. Competitive seedling growth and K+/Na+ ratio in different maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids under salinity stress. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 39:2553–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Ghumaiz, N., and M. I. Motawei. 2011. Productivity, forage Quality and the presence of Dehydrin genes in some introduced pasture grass cultivars growing under heat stress in central region of Saudi Arabia. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5:1001–06.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, Y., Z. Aslam, M. Y. Ashraf, and G. R. Tahir. 2004a. Effect of salinity on chlorophyll concentration, leaf area, yield and yield components of rice genotypes grown under saline environment. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 1:221–25. doi:10.1007/BF03325836.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, Y., Z. Aslam, A. R. Awan, F. Hussain, and A. A. Cheema. 2004b. Screening rice (Oryza sativa L.) lines/cultivars against salinity in relation to morphological and physiological traits and yield components. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 6:572–75.
   Google Scholar
• Ashraf, M., H. R. Athar, P. J. C. Harrisand, and T. R. Kwon. 2008. Some prospective strategies for improving crop salt tolerance. Advances in Agronomy 97:45–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashraf, M., and A. Khanum. 1997. Relationship between ion accumulation and growth in two spring wheat lines differing in salt tolerance at different growth stages. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 178:39–51. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037X.1997.tb00349.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashraf, M. Y., K. Akhtar, G. Sarwar, and M. Ashraf. 2005. Role of the rooting system in salt tolerance potential of different guar accessions. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 25:243–49. doi:10.1051/agro:2005019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashraf, M. Y., and G. Sarwar. 2002. Salt tolerance potential in members of Brassicaceae. Physiological studies on water relations and mineral contents. Pages 237-245. In Prospects for saline agriculture, eds R. Ahmad, and K. A. Malik. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1990. Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists. Arlington, VA, USA: AOAC.
   Google Scholar
• Baúc, S. A., H. Eküz, and H. Yilmaz. 2003. Determination of the Salt tolerance of some Barley Genotypes and the characteristics affecting tolerance. Turkish Journal Of Agriculture And Forestry 27:253–60.
   Google Scholar
• Begum, F., and J. L. Karmoker. 1999. Effect of salinity stress on the accumulation and distribution of proline in wheat. Rachis (International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas) 18:22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Benito, B., R. Haro, A. Amtmann, T. A. Cuin, and I. Dreyer. 2014. The twins K+ and Na+ in plants. Journal of Plant Physiology 171:723–31. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2013.10.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthomieu, P., G. Conéjéro, A. Nublat, W. J. Brackenbury, C. Lambert, C. Savio, N. Uozumi, S. Oiki, K. Yamada, F. Cellier, F. Gosti, T. Simonneau, P. A. Essah, M. Tester, A. A. Véry, H. Sentenac, and F. Casse. 2003. Functional analysis of AtHKT1 in Arabidopsis shows that Na(+) recirculation by the phloem is crucial for salt tolerance. European Molecular Biology Organization Journal 22 2004–2014. doi:10.1093/emboj/cdg207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpıcı, E. B., N. Celık, and G. Bayram. 2009. Effects of salt stress on germination of some maize (Zea mays L.)cultivars. African Journal of Biotechnology. 8:4918–22.
   Google Scholar
• El-Gendy, S. A., E. M. AbdElmoniem, M. M. A. Abdulla, and S. S. Eisa. 2012. Morphological and physiological responses of acacia saligna (labill.) to water stress.Australian. Journal of Basic and Applied 6:90–97.
   Google Scholar
• Flowers, T. J., and A. Läuchli. 1983. Sodium versus potassium: Substitution and compartmentation. In Inorganic plant nutrition, encyclopediaof plant physiology, new series, ed A. Läuchli, and R. L. Bieleski, Vol. 15B, Pages 651–681. Berlin: Springer- Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gorham, J. 1990. Salt tolerance in the Triticeae: Ion discrimination inrye and triticale. Journal of Experimental Botany 41:609–14. doi:10.1093/jxb/41.5.609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorham, J. 1995. Betaines in higher plants: Biosynthesis and role in stress metabolism. In Amino acids and their derivatives in higher plants, ed. R. M. Wallsgrove, Pages 171–203. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorham, J., R. G. Wyn Jones, and A. Bristol. 1990. Partial characterization of the trait for enhanced K(+)-Na(+) discrimination in the D genome of wheat. Planta 180:590–97. doi:10.1007/BF02411458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, F., and T. Horie. 2010. A conserved primary salt tolerance mechanism mediated by HKT transporters: A mechanism for sodium exclusion and maintenance of high K(+)/Na(+) ratio in leaves during salinity stress. Plant, Cell & Environment 33:552–65. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02056.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, A. H., M. Y. Ashraf, and A. R. Azmi. 1990. Effect of NaCl on growth and nitrogenmetabolism of sorghum. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 12:233–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M. A., M. U. Shirazi, M. U. Khan, S. M. Mujtaba, E. Islam, S. Mumtaz, A. Shereen, R. U. Ansari, and A. M. Yasin. 2009. Role of proline, K/Na ratio and chlorophyll content insalt tolerance of wheat(Triticum aestivum l.). Pakistan Journal of Botany 41:633–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronzucker, H. J., D. Coskun, L. M. Schulze, J. R. Wong, and D. T. Britto. 2013. Sodium as nutrient and toxicant. Plant Soil 369:1–23. doi:10.1007/s11104-013-1801-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold, A. C., and R. P. Willing. 1984. Evidence for toxicity effects of salt on membranes. In Salinity tolerance in Plants. Strategies for Crop Improvement, eds. R. C. Staples, and G. H. Toenniessen, Pages 67–76. Toronto, Singapore: A Wiley-Interscience Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Lockhart, J. A. 1965. An analysis of irreversible plant cell elongation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 8:264–75. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(65)90077-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcum, K. B. 2006. Use of saline and non-potable water in the turfgrass industry: Constraints and developments. Agricultural Water Management 80:132–46. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marschner, H. 1995. Mineral nutrition of higher plants, second ed. San Diego, CA.: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• MSTATC. 1990. A microcomputer program for the design. Management and analysis of agronomic Research experiments. East Lansing, MI, USA: Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Munns, R. 1993. Physiological processes limiting plant growth in saline soils: Some dogmas and hypotheses. Plant, Cell & Environment 16:15–24. doi:10.1111/pce.1993.16.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munns, R. 2005. Genes and salt tolerance: Bringing them together. New Phytologist 167:645–63. doi:10.1111/nph.2005.167.issue-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munns, R., R. A. Hare, R. A. James, and G. J. Rebetzke. 2000. Genetic variation for improving the salt tolerance of durum wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51:69–74.
   Google Scholar
• Niknam, S.R., and J. McComb. 2000. Salt tolerance screening of selected Australian woody species–a review. Forest Ecology and Management. 139: 1–19. doi:10.1071/AR99057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omielan, J. A., E. Epstein, and J. Dvořák. 1991. Salt tolerance and ionic relations of wheat as affected by individual chromosomes of salt-tolerant Lophopyrum elongatum. Genome 34:961–74. doi:10.1139/g91-149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesarrakli., M. (Ed.). 2010. Handbook for plant and crop stress. 3rd, Boca Raton, Florida, USA: Revised and Expanded, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Publishing Group. 1215.
   Google Scholar
• Pitman, M. G. 1984. Transport across the root and shoot/root interactions. In Salinity tolerance in Plants. Strategies for Crop improvement, eds R. C. Staples, and G. H. Toenniessen, Pages 93–123. Toronto, CA: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, C. R. F., E. N. Silva, S. L. Ferreira-Silva, E. L. Voigt, R. A. Viégas, and J. A. G. Silveira. 2013. High K+ supply avoids Na+ toxicity and improves photosynthesis by allowing favorable K+: Na+ ratios through the inhibition of Na+ uptake and transport to the shoots of jatropha curcas plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 176:157–64. doi:10.1002/jpln.201200230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarwar, G., and M. Y. Ashraf. 2003. Genetic variability of some primitive bread wheat varieties to salt tolerance. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 35:771–77. http://Www.Pakbs.Org/Pjbot/Pjhtmls/Contents.Html.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif, M. A., T. R. El-Beshbeshy, and C. Richter. 1998. Response of some Egyptian varieties of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to salt stress through potassium application. Bulletin - Faculty of Agriculture 49: University of Cairo.129–51.
   Google Scholar
• Subbarao, G. V., O. Ito, W. L. Berry, and R. M. Wheeler. 2003. Sodium – A functional plant nutrient. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 22:391–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., W. Zheng, J. Ren, and C. Zhang. 2002. Selectivity of various types of salt-resistant plants for K+ over Na+. Journal of Arid Environments 52:457–72. doi:10.1006/jare.2002.1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, K. L., T. L. Veum, and G. F. Krause. 1987. Total nitrogen determination of various sample types: A comparison of the Hach, Kjeltec, and Kjeldahl methods. Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists 0:410–12.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, W., P. E. Bilsborrow, P. Hooley, D. A. Fincham, E. Lombi, and B. P. Forster. 2003. Salinity induced differences in growth, ion distribution and partitioning in barley between the cultivar Maythorpe an dits derived mutant golden promise. Plant and Soil 250:183–91. doi:10.1023/A:1022832107999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, G. Y., J. M. Kinet, and S. Lutts. 2001. Characterization of rice (Oryzasativa L.) F-3 populations selected for salt resistance I. Physiological behaviour during vegetative growth. Euphytica 121:251–63. doi:10.1023/A:1012016431577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar