The Effect of Deficit Irrigation on Dry Matter Partitioning, Mobilization and Radiation Use Efficiency of Common Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.)

References

• Acosta-Gallegos, J., and M. Adams. 1991. Plant traits and yield stability of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars under drought stress. The Journal of Agricultural Science 117:213–19. doi:10.1017/S0021859600065308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, R. G., L. S. Pereira, D. Raes, and M. Smith. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56, Vol. 300, D05109. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Arntz, M. A., and L. F. Delph. 2001. Pattern and process: Evidence for the evolution of photosynthetic traits in natural populations. Oecologia 127:455–67. doi:10.1007/s004420100650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assefa, T., J. Wu, S. E. Beebe, I. M. Rao, D. Marcomin, and R. J. Claude. 2015. Improving adaptation to drought stress in small red common bean: Phenotypic differences and predicted genotypic effects on grain yield, yield components and harvest index. Euphytica 203:477–89. doi:10.1007/s10681-014-1242-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assefa, T., S. E. Beebe, I. M. Rao, J. B. Cuasquer, M. C. Duque, M. Rivera, A. Battisti, and M. Lucchin. 2013. Pod harvest index as a selection criterion to improve drought resistance in white pea bean. Field Crops Research 148:24–33. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2013.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, M. S. 1947. The use of transformations. Biometrics 3:39–52. doi:10.2307/3001536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayat, A. A., A. Sepehri, G. Ahmadvand, and H. R. Dorri. 2010. Effect of water deficit stress on yield and yield components of pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 12:13.
   Google Scholar
• Beebe, S., I. Rao, J. Polonía, M. Grajales, and C. Cajiao. 2008a. Improved harvest index in drought resistant common beans and possible effects on combining ability. Annual Report-bean Improvement Cooperative 51:8.
   Google Scholar
• Beebe, S., I. Rao, M. Blair, and J. Acosta. 2013. Phenotyping common beans for adaptation to drought. Frontiers in Physiology 4:35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beebe, S., I. Rao, M. Blair, and J. Acosta. 2013a. Phenotyping common beans for adaptation to drought. Frontiers in Physiology 4:35. doi:10.3389/fphys.2013.00035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beebe, S. E., I. M. Rao, C. Cajiao, and M. Grajales. 2008. Selection for drought resistance in common bean also improves yield in phosphorus limited and favorable environments. Crop Science 48 (2):582–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutraa, T., and F. E. Sanders. 2001. Influence of water stress on grain yield and vegetative growth of two cultivars of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 187:251–57. doi:10.1046/j.1439-037X.2001.00525.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, J., and D. Goulden. 1971. Yield components of haricot beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) grown at different plant densities. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 14:227–34. doi:10.1080/00288233.1971.10421318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condon, A. G., R. Richards, G. Rebetzke, and G. Farquhar. 2004. Breeding for high water-use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany 55:2447–60. doi:10.1093/jxb/erh277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debaeke, P., and A. Aboudrare. 2004. Adaptation of crop management to water-limited environments. European Journal of Agronomy 21:433–46. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2004.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreccer, M., A. H. Schapendonk, G. Slafer, and R. Rabbinge. 2000. Comparative response of wheat and oilseed rape to nitrogen supply: Absorption and utilisation efficiency of radiation and nitrogen during the reproductive stages determining yield. Plant and Soil 220:189–205. doi:10.1023/A:1004757124939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emam, Y., A. Shekoofa, F. Salehi, A. Jalali, and M. Pessarakli. 2012. Drought stress effects on two common bean cultivars with contrasting growth habits. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 58:527–34. doi:10.1080/03650340.2010.530256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, X., N. C. Turner, G. Yan, F. Li, and K. H. Siddique. 2009. Flower numbers, pod production, pollen viability, and pistil function are reduced and flower and pod abortion increased in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under terminal drought. Journal of Experimental Botany 61:335–45. doi:10.1093/jxb/erp307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. 2010. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nation quarterly bulletin of statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Frahm, M. A., J. C. Rosas, N. Mayek-Pérez, E. López-Salinas, J. A. Acosta-Gallegos, and J. D. Kelly. 2004. Breeding beans for resistance to terminal drought in the lowland tropics. Euphytica 136:223–32. doi:10.1023/B:euph.0000030671.03694.bb.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallegos, J. A. A., and J. K. Shibata. 1989. Effect of water stress on growth and yield of indeterminate dry-bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars. Field Crops Research 20:81–93. doi:10.1016/0378-4290(89)90054-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, F. P., R. B. Pearce, and R. L. Mitchell. 2003. Physiology of Crop Plants (Reprint). Scientific, Jodhpur.
   Google Scholar
• Ghanbari, A. A. 2013. Developmental stages and phenology of common bean genotypes under normal irrigation and water deficit conditions. Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi) 107:10.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, A. E. 2004. Physiology and Biotechnology Integration for Plant Breeding. Boca Raton: CRC Press. doi:10.1201/9780203022030.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, H., and J. Corlett. 1992. Current topics in drought physiology. The Journal of Agricultural Science 119:291–96. doi:10.1017/S0021859600012144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimzadeh Soureshjani, H., A. Nezami, M. Kafi, and M. Tadayon. 2019. Responses of two common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes to deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 213:270–79. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2018.09.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashiwagi, S., N. Onoda, Y. Asano, K. Kurata, T. Morisaki, S. Noda, H. Kawajiri, T. Takashima, and K. Hirakawa. 2015. Partial mastectomy using manual blunt dissection (MBD) in early breast cancer. BMC Surgery 15 (1):117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsura, K., S. Maeda, I. Lubis, T. Horie, W. Cao, and T. Shiraiwa. 2008. The high yield of irrigated rice in Yunnan, China:‘A cross-location analysis’. Field Crops Research 107:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2007.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsura, K., S. Maeda, T. Horie, and T. Shiraiwa. 2007. Analysis of yield attributes and crop physiological traits of Liangyoupeijiu, a hybrid rice recently bred in China. Field Crops Research 103:170–77. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2007.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili, A., and H. R.-E. Sadr. 1997. Estimation of global solar radiation over Iran based on climatological data‖. Quarterly Journal of Geographical Research 3:15–35.
   Google Scholar
• Klaedtke, S. M., C. Cajiao, M. Grajales, J. Polanía, G. Borrero, A. Guerrero, M. Rivera, I. Rao, S. E. Beebe, and J. Léon. 2012. Photosynthate remobilization capacity from drought-adapted common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) lines can improve yield potential of interspecific populations within the secondary gene pool. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science 4:49–61.
   Google Scholar
• Kreeb, K., H. Richter, and T.M. Hinckley. 1989. Structural and functional responses to environmental stresses: Water shortage: XIV International Botanical Congress, Berlin (West), Germany, 24 July to 1 August 1987: Proceedings of symposium session 6–38, poster session 6–138 with some contributions of sessions 6–30, 6–130 and 4–26. In International Botanical Congress, 1987, 14th ed. Berlin: SPB Academic Pub. (No. 581.24 632.12)..
   Google Scholar
• Ludlow, M., and R. Muchow. 1988. Critical evaluation of the possibilities for modifying crops for high production per unit of precipitation. Drought Research Priorities for the Dryland Tropics 179–211.
   Google Scholar
• Ludlow, M. M., and R. C. Muchow. 1990. A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. Advances in agronomy 43:107–153. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maleki, A., A. Naderi, R. Naseri, A. Fathi, S. Bahamin, and R. Maleki. 2013. Physiological performance of soybean cultivars under drought stress. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences 2:38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Mathobo, R., D. Marais, and J. M. Steyn. 2017. The effect of drought stress on yield, leaf gaseous exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agricultural Water Management 180:118–25. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2016.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh, M. 1983. Analysis of combined experiments. Agronomy Journal 75:153–55. doi:10.2134/agronj1983.00021962007500010041x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miklas, P. N., J. D. Kelly, S. E. Beebe, and M. W. Blair. 2006. Common bean breeding for resistance against biotic and abiotic stresses: From classical to MAS breeding. Euphytica 147:105–31. doi:10.1007/s10681-006-4600-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz-Perea, C. G., R. G. Allen, D. T. Westermann, J. L. Wright, and S. P. Singh. 2007. Water use efficiency among dry bean landraces and cultivars in drought-stressed and non-stressed environments. Euphytica 155:393–402. doi:10.1007/s10681-006-9340-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuñez Barrios, A., G. Hoogenboom, and D. S. Nesmith. 2005. Drought sress and the distribution of vegetative and reproductive traits of a bean cultivar. Scientia Agricola 62:18–22. doi:10.1590/S0103-90162005000100004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padilla-Ramírez, J., J. Acosta-Gallegos, E. Acosta-Díaz, N. Mayek-Pérez, and J. Kelly. 2005. Partitioning and partitioning rate to seed yield in drought-stressed and non stressed dry bean genotypes. Annual Report-bean Improvement Cooperative 48:152.
   Google Scholar
• Polania, J., I. M. Rao, C. Cajiao, M. Rivera, B. Raatz, and S. Beebe. 2016. Physiological traits associated with drought resistance in Andean and Mesoamerican genotypes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica 210:17–29. doi:10.1007/s10681-016-1691-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanía, J. A., I. M. Rao, S. Beebe, and R. García. 2009. Root development and distribution under drought stress in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in a soil tube system. Agronomía Colombiana 27:25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Polanía, J. A., I. M. Rao, S. Mejía, S. E. Beebe, and C. Cajiao. 2012. Características morfo-fisiológicas de frijol común (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) relacionadas con la adaptación a sequía. Acta Agronómica 61:197–206.
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez-Vallejo, P., and J. D. Kelly. 1998. Traits related to drought resistance in common bean. Euphytica 99:127–36. doi:10.1023/A:1018353200015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, I., S. Beebe, J. Polania, J. Ricaurte, C. Cajiao, R. Garcia, and M. Rivera. 2013. Can tepary bean be a model for improvement of drought resistance in common bean?. African Crop Science Journal 21:265–281.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, I. M. 2014. Advances in improving adaptation of common bean and Brachiaria forage grasses to abiotic stress in the tropics. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, I. M., S. Beebe, J. Ricaurte, C. Cajiao, J. Polania, and R. García, 2007. Phenotypic evaluation of drought resistance in advanced lines of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Proceedings of the ASA-CSSA-SSSA International Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, USA, 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Rezene, Y., S. Gebeyehu, and H. Zelleke. 2012. Morpho-physiological response to post-flowering drought stress in small red seeded common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Journal of Plant Studies 2:42. doi:10.5539/jps.v2n1p42.
   Google Scholar
• Rinaldi, M., and P. Garofalo. 2012. Radiation-use efficiency of irrigated biomass sorghum in a Mediterranean environment. Crop and Pasture Science 62:830–39. doi:10.1071/CP11091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosales, M. A., E. Ocampo, R. Rodríguez-Valentín, Y. Olvera-Carrillo, J. Acosta-Gallegos, and A. A. Covarrubias. 2012. Physiological analysis of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars uncovers characteristics related to terminal drought resistance. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 56:24–34. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.04.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosales-Serna, R., J. Kohashi-Shibata, J. A. Acosta-Gallegos, C. Trejo-López, J. N. Ortiz-Cereceres, and J. D. Kelly. 2004. Biomass distribution, maturity acceleration and yield in drought-stressed common bean cultivars. Field Crops Research 85:203–11. doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00161-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samper, C., and M. W. Adams. 1985. Geometric mean of stress and control yield as a selection criterion for drought tolerance. Annales Reports Bean Improvement Coop 28:53–54.
   Google Scholar
• Serna, R. R., P. R. Vallejo, J. A. A. Gallegos, F. C. González, and J. D. Kelly. 2000. Rendimeinto de grano y tolerancia a la sequía del frijol común en condiciones de campo. Agrociencia 34 (2):153–165.
   Google Scholar
• Shenkut, A. A., and M. A. Brick. 2003. Traits associated with dry edible bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity under diverse soil moisture environments. Euphytica 133:339–47. doi:10.1023/A:1025774110004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, T. R., and R. C. Muchow. 1999. Radiation use efficiency. Advances in Agronomy 65:215–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S. P. 1981. A key for identifcation of different growth habits of phaseolus vulgarisl.Apartado Aereo 6713. Cali, Colombia.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S. P. 2013. Common bean improvement in the twenty-ffrst century. University of Idaho, Kimberly: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Szilagyi, L. 2003. Influence of drought on seed yield components in common bean. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology 2003:320–30.
   Google Scholar
• Terán, H., and S. P. Singh. 2002. Comparison of sources and lines selected for drought resistance in common bean. Crop Science 42:64–70. doi:10.2135/cropsci2002.6400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urrea, C. A., C. D. Yonts, D. J. Lyon, and A. E. Koehler. 2009. Selection for drought tolerance in dry bean derived from the Mesoamerican gene pool in western Nebraska. Crop Science 49:2005–10. doi:10.2135/cropsci2008.12.0694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J. W., J. Castillo, J. Ehleringer, J. Garcia, and S. P. Singh. 1994. Relations of carbon isotope discrimination and other physiological traits to yield in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) under rainfed conditions. The Journal of Agricultural Science 122:275–84. doi:10.1017/S0021859600087463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J. W., S. P. Singh, A. V. Schoonhoven, and O. Voysest. 1991. Breeding for adaptation to drought. Common beans: Research for crop improvement. 501–60.
   Google Scholar