Effect of Soil Salinity on Growth, Proline, and Some Nutrient Accumulation in Two Genotypes Seedlings of Ziziphus Spina-christi (L.) Willd

References

• A.O.A.C. 1990. Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists, eds. Khedrich, 40–42. Washington DC: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akram, M. K., and K. Azam. 2002. Individual and combined effect of waterlogging and salinity on crop yield in the Induc Basin. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage 51 (4):329–38. doi:10.1002/ird.62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam, S. M. 1999. Nutrient uptake by plants under stress conditions. In Handbook of plant and crop stress, ed. M. Pessarakli, 285–313. NewYork, Basel: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Ali-Shtayeh, M. S., R. M. R. Yaghmour, Y. R. Faidi, K. Salem, and M. A. Al-Nuri. 1998. Antimicrobial activity of 20 plants used in folkloric medicine in the Palestinian area. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 60:265–71. doi:10.1016/S0378-8741(97)00153-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Sobhi, O. A., H. S. Al-Zahrani and S. B. Al-Ahmadi. 2005. Effect of salinity on Chlorophyll and carbohydrate contents of Calotropis procera seedlings. Indian Journal of Science and Technology; 3 (1): 64-66.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Zubaidi, B. H. 2002. The effect of irrigation water salinity and CCC on the growth and some chemical components of tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). M.Sc. Thesis, College of Agriculture, Basra Univ., Iraq.
   Google Scholar
• Asgarpanah, J., and E. Haghighat. 2012. Phytochemistry and pharmacologic properties of Ziziphus spina-christi (L.) Willd. African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 6 (31):2332–39. doi:10.5897/AJPP12.509.
   Google Scholar
• Ashraf, M. Y., and A. S. Bhatti. 2000. Effect of salinity on growth and chlorophyll content in rice. Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 43:130–31.
   Google Scholar
• Award, A. S., D. G. Edwards, and L. C. Campbell. 1990. Phosphorus enhancement of salt tolerance of tomato. Crop Science 30:123–28. doi:10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000010028x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awasthi, O. P., R. K. Pathak, and S. D. Pandey. 1995. Effect of sodicity and salinity levels on four scion cultivars budded on Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana). Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 65:363–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, L. S., R. P. Waldren, and F. D. Teare. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline from water stress studies. Plant and Soil 39:205–07. doi:10.1007/BF00018060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremner, J. M., and A. P. Edwards. 1965. Determination and isotope-ratio analysis of different forms of nitrogen in the soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 29:504–50. doi:10.2136/sssaj1965.03615995002900050011x.
   Google Scholar
• Chartzoulakis, K. 2005. Salinity and olive: Growth, salt tolerance, photosynthesis and yield. Agricultural Water Management 78:108–21. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2005.04.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chartzoulakis, K., M. Loupassaki, M. Bertaki, and I. Androulakis. 2002. Effects of NaCl salinity on growth, ion content and CO2 assimilation rate of six olive cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae 96:235–47. doi:10.1016/S0304-4238(02)00067-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbishley, J., and D. Pearce. 2007. Growing trees on salt-affected land. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, ACIAR Impact Assessment Series Report No. 51, 46.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, G. F., D. T. Bell, and C. T. Alkyds. 1990. Response to salt and water logging stress of 10 taxa of acacias selected from naturally saline areas of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 38:619–30. doi:10.1071/BT9900619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgan, H.Y., H. Aktas, K. Abak, and I. Cakmar. 2002. Determination of screening techniques to salinity tolerance in tomatoes and investigation and investigation of genotypes response. Plant Sci 163 (4):695–703. doi:10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00091-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day,P.R. 1965. Particle Fractionation and Particle-Size Analysis, In: C. A. Black, Ed., Methods of Soil Analysis, American Society of Agronomy Inc., Madison, pp. 545-567.
   Google Scholar
• De Lacerda, C. F., J. Cambraia, M. A. Oliva, and H. A. Ruiz. 2005. Changes in growth and in solute concentrations in sorghum leaves and roots during salt stress recovery. Environmental and Experimental Botany 54:69–76. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. 2005. Global network on integrated soil management for sustainable use of salt-affected soils. Rome, Italy: FAO Land and Plant Nutrition Management Service.
   Google Scholar
• Flowers, T. J., and T. D. Colmer. 2008. Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytologist 179:945–63. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02531.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowers, X. J., F. M. Salama, and A. R. Yeo. 1988. Water-use efficiency in rice {Oryza sativa L.} in relation to resistance to salt. Plant, Cell & Environment 11:453–59. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1988.tb01783.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg, B. K., and I. C. Gupta. 1997. Saline wastelands environment and plant growth, 283. Jodhpur, India: Scientific Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, E. P., R. Pfister, J. J. Brown, T. L. Thomson, and J. W. O’Leary. 1996. Na and K accumulation and salt tolerance of atriplex canescens genotypes. American Journal of Botany 83 (8):997–1005. doi:10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb12796.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grattan, S. R., and C. M. Grieve. 1992. Mineral element acquisition and growth response of plants grown in saline environments. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 38:275–300. doi:10.1016/0167-8809(92)90151-Z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenway, H., and R. Munns. 1980. Mechanism of salt tolerance in nonhalophyte. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 31:149–90. doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.31.060180.001053.
   Google Scholar
• Hasegawa, P. M., R. A. Bressan, J. K. Zhu, and H. J. Bohnert. 2000. Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 51:463–99. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.51.1.463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. L. 1958. Soil chemical analysis. Englewood Clifts, New Jersey: Prenrice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, B. L, and H. C. Dass. 1988. Effect of saline water on performance of saplings of jujube (ziziphus mauritiana), indian cherry (codia dictoma var wallichii) and pomegranate (punica granatum) at nursery stage. Indian Journal Of Agricultural Science 58 (5):420-421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakanis, P. G. 1983. Determining field capacity and wilting point using soil saturation by capillary rise. Canadian Agricultural Engineering 25:19–21.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M. A., I. A. Ungar, and A. M. Showalter. 2005. Salt stimulation and tolerance in an intertidal stem-succulent halophyte. Journal of Plant Nutrition 28:1365–74. doi:10.1081/PLN-200067462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamta, J.B., D.P. Ashish, M.B. Pranali, and A.N. Pandey. 2008. Effect of soil salinity on growth, water status and nutrient accumulation in seedlings of Ziziphus Mauitiana (rhamnaceae). Journal Of Fruit and Ornamental Plants Research 16:383-401.
   Google Scholar
• Meena, S. K., N. K. Gupta, S. Gupta, S. K. Khandelwal, and E. V. D. Sastry. 2003. Effect of sodium chloride on the growth and gas exchange of young ziziphus seedling rootstocks. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 78:454–57. doi:10.1080/14620316.2003.11511649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moameni A., H. Siadat, M.J. Malakouti. 1999. The extent, distribution, and management of salt-affected soils of Iran, FAO Global Network on Integrated Soil Management for Sustainable Use of Salt-Affected Soils, Izmir, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Munns, R. 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, Cell & Environment 25:239–50. doi:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munns, R. 2005. Genes and salt tolerance: Bringing them together. New Phytologist 167:645–63. doi:10.1111/nph.2005.167.issue-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, P. 1997. Salinity resistance and plant growth revisited. Plant, Cell & Environment 20:1193–98. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-139.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, S.R. and Dean, L.R. (1965) Phosphorus. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, No. 9, 920-926.
   Google Scholar
• Overlach, S., W. Diekmann, and K. Raschke. 1993. Phosphate translocator of isolated guard-cell chloroplasts from pisum sativum L. transport glucose-6-phosphate. Plant Physiology 101:1201–07. doi:10.1104/pp.101.4.1201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peech, M. L., T. Alexander, L. A. Dean, and F. F. Reed. 1947. Methods of soil analysis for fertility investigations. USDA Circ. 757. Washington, D.C: U.S. Golernmenr Prinling Office.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, P.E. 1965. Potassium. In Methods of Soil Analysis. C.A. S. Afr. Tydskr. Plant Grond 1995, 12(1) Black (ed). Part 2. Agronomy 9, Amer. Soc. of Agron., Madison, Wis., pp. 1022 -1030.
   Google Scholar
• Raja Babu, C., C. Vijayalakshmi, and S. Mohandass. 2005. Evaluation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes for salt tolerance. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 3:190–94.
   Google Scholar
• Rajendrakumar, C. S., B. V. Reddy, and A. R. Reddy. 1994. Proline-protein interaction: Protection of structural and functional integrity of M4 lactate dehydrogenase. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 201:957–63. doi:10.1006/bbrc.1994.1795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramoliya, P. J., H. M. Patel, and A. N. Pande. 2006. Effect of salinization of soil on growth and nutrient accumulation in seedlings of Prosopis cineraria. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 29:283–303.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoades, J.D. 1996. Salinity: Electrical conductivity and total dissolved salts. In: D.L. Sparks, editor, Methods of soil analysis. Part 3.Chemical methods. SSSA Book Ser. 5. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI. p. 417–435.
   Google Scholar
• Saied, A. S., J. Gebauer, K. Hammer, and A. Buerkert. 2008. Ziziphus spina-christi (L.) Willd.: A multipurpose fruit tree. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 55:929–37. doi:10.1007/s10722-007-9299-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayyad-Amin, P., M. R. Jahansooz, A. Borzouei and F. Ajili. 2016. Changes in photosynthetic pigments and chlorophyll-a fluorescence attributes of sweet-forage and grain sorghum cultivars under salt stress. Journal of biological physics, 42(4), 601–620.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpley, A. N., J. J. Meisinger, J. F. Power, and D. L. Suarez. 1992. Root extraction of nutrients associated with long-term soil management. In Advances in soil science. Limitations to plant root growth, ed. J. I. Hatfield and B. A. Stewart, vol. 19, 151–217. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Shekafandeh, A., and S. Takhti. 2013. Growth and physiological responses of grafted and non-grafted cultivars of ziziphus spina-christi to salinity. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality 86:71–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, C. Q., S. Y. Cao, J. Y. Guo, Y. L. Chen, H. B. Xue, P. Si, L. Zhang, and S. X. Xie. 2009. Salt tolerance of four jujube cultivars. Acta Horticulturae 840:161–66. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.840.19.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, A., J. Prakash, M. Srivastav, O. P. Awasthi, A. K. Singh, S. K. Chaudhari, and D. K. Sharma. 2014. Physiological and biochemical responses of citrus rootstocks under salinity stress. Indian Journal of Horticulture 71:162–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohail, M., A. S. Saied, J. Gebauer, and A. Buerkert. 2009. Effect of NaCl salinity on growth and mineral composition of Ziziphus spina-christi(L) willd. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics 110 (2):107–114.
   Google Scholar
• Taiz, L., and E. Zeiger. 2006. Plant physiology, 764. 4th ed. Sunderland, USA: Sinauer Associates, Inc., Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tattini, M., P. Bertoni, and S. Caselli.1992. Genotypic responses of olive plants to sodium chloride. Journal of Plant Nutrition 15:1467–85. doi:10.1080/01904169209364412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tattini, M., R. Gucci, M. A. Coradeschi, C. Ponzio, and J. D. Edvard. 1995. Growth, gas exchange and ion content in Olea europaea plants during salinity stress and subsequent relief. Physiologia Plantarum 95:203–10. doi:10.1111/ppl.1995.95.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tester, M., and R. Devenport. 2003. Na+ tolerance Na+ transport in higher plants. Annals of Botany 91:503–27. doi:10.1093/aob/mcg058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therios, I. N., and N. D. Misopolinos. 1988. Genotypic response to sodium chloride salinity of four major olive cultivars (Olea europea L.). Plant and Soil 106:105–11. doi:10.1007/BF02371201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Moezel, P., L. Watson, G. Pearce-Pinto, and D. Bell. 1988. The response of six eucalyptus species and casuarina obesa to the combined effect of salinity and waterlogging. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 15:465–74.
   Google Scholar
• Verma, S. S., R. P. Verma, S. K. Verma, A. L. Yadav, and A. K. Verma. 2018. Responses of ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk.) varieties to different level of salinity. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7 (7):580–91. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.
   Google Scholar
• Vigo, C., I. N. Therios, and M. Bosabalidis. 2005. Plant growth, nutrient concentration,and leaf anatomy of olive plants irrigated with diluted seawater. Journal of Plant Nutrition 28:1001–21. doi:10.1081/PLN-200058897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkley, A., and I. A. Black. 1934. An examination of degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37:29–38. doi:10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WCD (World Commission on Dams). 2000. Dams and developments: A new framework for decision-making. London, UK: Earthscan Publishers.
   Google Scholar