Effects of microbial bio-fertilizers on soil physicochemical properties under different soil water regimes in greenhouse grown eggplant (Solanum Melongena L.)

References

• Abd El-Ghany, B. F., R. A. M. Arafa, T. A. El-Rahmany, and M. M. El-Shazly. 2010. Effect of some soil microorganisms on soil properties and wheat production under north sinai conditions. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 6 (5):559–79.
   Google Scholar
• Abhilash, P. C., R. K. Dubey, V. Tripathi, V. K. Gupta, and H. B. Singh. 2016. Plant growth-promoting microorganisms for environmental sustainability. Trends in Biotechnology 34 (11):847–50. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.05.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adesemoye, A., H. Torbert, and J. Kloepper. 2008. Enhanced plant nutrient use efficiency with PGPR and AMF in an integrated nutrient management system. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 54 (10):876–86. doi:10.1139/W08-081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggelides, S. M., and P. A. Londra. 2000. Effects of compost produced from town wastes and sewage sludge on the physical properties of a loamy and a clay soil. Bioresource Technology 71:253–59. doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00074-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, N. K. 2013. Plant microbe symbiosis: fundamentals and advances in Plant Microbe Symbiosis: Fundamentals and Advances, ed N. K. Arora (Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media). p. 15.doi:10.1007/978-81-322-1287-4.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, R., N. P. Stamford, C. E. R. S. Santos, A. D. S. Freitas, L. O. Franco, and T. C. M. Stamford. 2013. Plant and soil characteristics affected by biofertilizers from rocks and organic matter inoculated with diazotrophic bacteria and fungi that produce chitosan, J. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 13:592–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhalerao, V. P., M. B. Jadhav, and P. G. Bhoi. 2006. Effect of spent wash, press mud and compost on soil properties, yield and quality of seasonal sugarcane. Indian Sugar 6 (9):57–65.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar, V. K., S. Kundu, and K. Vedprakash. 1992. Effect of long-term manuring and fertilization on soil physical properties under soybean (Glycine max) – Wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping sequence. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 62:212–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buyer, J. S., J. R. Teasdale, D. P. Roberts, I. A. Zasada, and J. E. Maul. 2010. Factors affecting soil microbial community structure in tomato cropping systems. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 (5):831–41. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.01.020.
   Google Scholar
• Candemir, F., and C. Gülser. 2011. Effects of different agricultural wastes on some soil quality indexes at clay and loamy sand fields. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analyses 42 (1):13–28. doi:10.1080/00103624.2011.528489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenu, C., and E. B. Roberson. 1996. Diffusion of glucose in microbial extracellular polysaccharide as affected by water potential. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 28:877–84. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(96)00070-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Gryze, S., J. Six, C. Brits, and R. Merckx. 2005. A quantification of short-term macroaggregate dynamics: Influences of wheat residue input and texture. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 37:55–66. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.07.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, Z. 2019. Effects of vermicompost on soil physicochemical properties and lettuce (Lactuca sativa Var. Crispa) yield in greenhouse under different soil water regimes. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 50 (17):2151–68. doi:10.1080/00103624.2019.1654508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, Z. 2020. The evaluation of basal respiration and some chemical properties of soils under cover crop treatments in a cherry orchard. Eurasian Journal Soil Science 9 (2):151–64. doi:10.18393/ejss.706686.
   Google Scholar
• Demir, Z., and C. Gülser. 2015. Effects of rice husk compost application on soil quality parameters in greenhouse conditions. European Journal Soil Science 4 (3):185–90.
   Google Scholar
• Demir, Z., and D. Işık. 2019a. Effects of cover crop treatments on some soil quality parameters and yield in a Kiwifruit Orchard in Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin (FEB) 28 (9):6988–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, Z., and D. Işık. 2019b. Effects of cover crops on soil hydraulic properties and yield in a persimmon orchard. Bragantia, Campinas 78 (4). doi: 10.1590/1678-4499.2010197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, Z., and D. Işık. 2019c. Comparison of different cover crops on DTPA-extractable micronutrients in Hazelnut and Apple Orchards. Türk Tarım Ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 6 (2):137–47. doi:10.30910/turkjans.556592.
   Google Scholar
• Demir, Z., and D. Işık. 2019d. The comparative effects of different cover crops on DTPA-EXTRACTABLE MICRONUTRIENts in Orchards with loam and clay textured soils. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University 36 (2):107–16. doi:10.13002/jafag4472.
   Google Scholar
• Demir, Z., and D. Işık. 2020. Using cover crops to improve soil quality and hazelnut yield. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 29 (4):1974–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, Z., N. Tursun, and D. Işık. 2019a. Effects of different cover crops on soil quality parameters and yield in an apricot orchard. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 21:399–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, Z., N. Tursun, and D. Işık. 2019b. Role of different cover crops on DTPA-extractable micronutrients in an apricot orchard. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology 7 (5):698–706. doi:10.24925/turjaf.v7i5.698-706.2117.
   Google Scholar
• Demiralay, I. 1993. Soil physical analysis. Atatürk University, Faculty of Agriculture Publication, Erzurum-Turkey 143:131.
   Google Scholar
• Doifode, V. D. 2016. Influence of biofertilizers on the soil status of cotton field. International Journal of Life Sciences A6:93–96.
   Google Scholar
• Dumas, J. B. A. 1831. Proce´de´s de l’analyse organique. Annales Chimiques et Physiques 247:198–213.
   Google Scholar
• Egamberdiyeva, D. 2007. The effect of plant growth promoting bacteria on growth and nutrient uptake of maize in two different soils. Applied Soil Ecology 36 (2):184–89. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopinath, K. A., S. Saha, B. L. Mina, H. Pande, N. Kumar, A. K. Srivastva, and H. S. Gupta. 2009. Yield potential of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) varieties, and soil properties under organic and integrated nutrient management systems. Archives Agron Soil Sciences 55 (2):157–67. doi:10.1080/03650340802382207.
   Google Scholar
• Gülser, C., and F. Candemir. 2012. Changes in penetration resistance of a clay field with organic waste applications. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 1:16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Gülser, C., F. Candemir, Y. Kanel, and S. Demirkaya. 2015. Effect of manure on organic carbon content and fractal dimensions of aggregates. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 4 (1). doi: 10.18393/ejss.85620.
   Google Scholar
• Hamdia, M. A., M. Shaddad, and M. Doaa. 2005. Mechanisms of salt tolerance and interactive effects of Azospirillum brasilense inocu- lation on maize cultivars grown under salt stress conditions. Environmental Microbiology 7:1839–46. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00848.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, R. J., and R. Naidu. 1998. Influence of lime, fertilizer, and manure applications on soil organic matter content and soil physical conditions: A review. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 51:123–37. doi:10.1023/A:1009738307837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heulin, T., A. Gucker, and J. Balandeau. 1987. Stimulation of root exudation of rice seedlings by Azospirillum strains: Carbon budget under gnotobiotic conditions. Biology and Fertility of Soils 4:9–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillel, D. 1982. Introduction to soil physics, 14–28. Oval Road, London: Academic Press Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Hinsinger, P. 2001. Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizo-sphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: A review. Plant and Soil 237:173–95. doi:10.1023/A:1013351617532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. L. 1958. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Private Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Jaipaul, S. S., A. K. Dixit, and A. K. Sharma. 2011. Growth and yield of capsicum and garden pea as influenced by organic manures and biofertilizers. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 81 (7):637–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jnawali, A. D., R. B. Ojha, and S. Marahatta. 2015. Role of azotobacter in soil fertility and sustainability – A review. Advances in Plants & Agriculture Research 2 (6):250–53. doi:10.15406/apar.2015.02.00069.
   Google Scholar
• Kacar, B. 1994. chemical analysis of plant and soil-III. Soil analysis, 705 Vol. 3. Ankara, Turkey: Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Kaczmarek, Z., M. Jakubus, M. Grzelak, and L. Mrugalska. 2008. Impact of the addition of various doses of effective microorganisms to arable-humus horizons of mineral soils on their physical and water properties. Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering 53 (3):118–21.
   Google Scholar
• Kaur, H., H. Ram, R. Sikka, and H. Kaur. 2016. Productivity, agronomic efficiency and quality of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars in relation to nitrogen. IJAEB 9 (1):101–06. doi:10.5958/2230-732X.2016.00016.4.
   Google Scholar
• Kemper, W. D., and R. C. Rosenau. 1986. Aggregate stability and size distribution. In Methods of soil analysis, ed. A. Klute, 425–42. 2nd Edn. Part I.. Madison, WI: ASA.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. M., A. S. Roh, S. C. Choi, E. J. Kim, M. T. Choi, B. K. Ahn, S. K. Kim, Y. H. Lee, J. H. Joa, S. S. Kang, et al. 2016. Soil pH and electrical conductivity are key edaphic factors shaping bacterial communities of greenhouse soils in Korea. Journal of Microbiology 54 (12):838–45. doi:10.1007/s12275-016-6526-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kızılkaya, R. 2008. Yield response and nitrogen concentrations of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) inoculated with Azotobacter chroococcum strains. Ecological Engineering 33 (2):150–56. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kızılkaya, R. 2009. Nitrogen fixation capacity of Azotobacter spp. Strains isolated from soils in different ecosystems and relationship between them and the microbiological properties of soils. Journal of Environmental Biology 30 (1):73–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., R. K. Behl, and N. Narula. 2001. Establishment of phosphate-solubilizing strains of Azotobacter chroococcum in the rhizosphere and their effect on wheat cultivars under greenhouse conditions. Microbiological Research 156:87–93. doi:10.1078/0944-5013-00081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifheit, E. F., S. D. Veresoglou, A. Lehmann, E. K. Morris, and M. C. Rillig. 2014. Multiple factors influence the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil aggregation – A meta-analysis. Plant and Soil 374:523–37. doi:10.1007/s11104-013-1899-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo, W. M. 1963. A rapid method for estimating structural stability of soils. Soil Science 96:342–46. doi:10.1097/00010694-196311000-00010.
   Google Scholar
• Lévai, L., V. Szilvia, B. Nóra, and G. Éva. 2008. Can wood ash and biofertilizer play a role in organic agriculture? Agronomski Glasnic 3:263–71.
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowski, A., and M. Zumwinkle. 1999. Assessing the soil system. A Review of Soil Quality Literature. Minnesota Department of Agriculture Energy and Sustainable Agriculture Program, Minnesota Department of Agriculture (65 p.),90 West Plato Boulevard, St. Paul, Minnesota 55107, (Ed.: Alison Fish). Accessible at: http:// www.mda.state.mn.us
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., T. Yang, R. Liu, B. Redden, F. Maalouf, and X. Zong. 2017. Food legume production in China. The Crop Journal 5 (2):115–26. doi:10.1016/j.cj.2016.06.001.
   Google Scholar
• Mathivanan, R., S. Umavathi, P. K. Ramasamy, and Y. Thangam. 2015. Influence of vermicompost on the activity of the plant growth regulators in the leaves of the Indian butter bean plant., Dolichos lab labL. International Journal of Advanced Research in BiologicalSciences 2 (1):84–89.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, J., S. Scheid, F. Widmer, A. Fliebach, and H. R. Oberholzer. 2010. How effective are ‘Effective microorganisms® (EM)’? Results from a field study in temperate climate. Applied Soil Ecology: A Section of Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 46:230–39. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazinani, Z., M. Aminafshar, A. Asgharzadeh, and M. Chamani. 2012. Effect of Azotobacter population on physico–chemical characteristics of some soil samples in Iran. Annals of Biological Research 3:3120–25.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, T., and D. Hess. 1984. Yield increases in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) inoculated with Azospirillum lipoferum under greenhouse and field conditions of a temperate region. Plant and Soil 82:87–99. doi:10.1007/BF02220773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirzakhani, M., M. R. Ardakani, A. A. Band, F. Rejali, and A. H. Shirani Rad. 2009. Response of spring safflower to co-inoculation with Azotobacter chroococcum and Glomus intraradices under different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4:255–61. doi:10.3844/ajabssp.2009.255.261.
   Google Scholar
• Moraditochaee, M., E. Azarpour, and H. R. Bozorgi. 2014. Study effects of bio-fertilizers, nitrogen fertilizer and farmyard manure on yield and physiochemical properties of soil in lentil farming. Internationaljournal of Biosciences 4 (4):41–48.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. N., and A. Winding. 2002. Microorganisms as indicators of soil health. national environmental research institute, Technical Report No: 388, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• NIIR BOARD. 2004. Bacterial biofertilizers for sustainable crop production. www.arpnjournals.com/jabs/research_papers/rp … /jabs_0512_396.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nisha, R., A. Kaushik, and C. P. Kaushik. 2007. Effect of indigenous cyanobacterial application on structural stability and productivity of an organically poor semi-arid soil. Geoderma 138:49–56. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oades, J. M. 1993. The role of biology in the formation, stabilization and degradation of soil structure. Geoderma 56:377–400. doi:10.1016/0016-7061(93)90123-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, S. R., C. V. Cole, F. S. Watanabe, and L. A. Dean. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Circular, Vol 939 (p.19). Washington D.C., United States Department of Agriculture.U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Patnaik, S., D. Panda, and R. N. Dash. 1989. Long-term fertilizer experiments with wetland rice. Fertilizer News 34:47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Piotrowska, A., J. Długosz, R. Zamorski, and P. Bogdanowicz. 2012. Changes in some biological and chemical properties of an arable soil treated with the microbial biofertilizer UGmax. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 21 (2):455–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, S., P. Rani, M. Kumar, A. K. Rai, and S. K. Shahi. 2014. Effect of Integrated use of Vermicompost, FYM, PSB and Azotobacter on Physico-Chemical Properties of Soil under Onion Crop. Environment and Ecology. 32 (4B):1797-1803. Website: environmentandecology.com.
   Google Scholar
• Ramalakshmı, A., M. Inıyakumar, and S. A. Raj. 2008. Influence of bio-fertilizers on soil physico-chemical and biological properties during cropping period. Asian Journal of Bio Science 3 (2):348–51.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, L. A. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkaline soils. United States salinity laboratory staff. United States Department of Agriculture 60:160.
   Google Scholar
• Saha, D., D. D. Kukal, and S. Sharma. 2010. Landuse impacts on SOC fractions and aggregate stability in typic ustochrepts of Northwest India. In Plant soil. Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 online.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, S., and N. K. Tripathi. 2014. Assessment of crop insurance international practices, policies and technologies as risk mitigation tools in India and Thailand. International Journal of Advanced Research 2 (9):769–89.
   Google Scholar
• Sivakumar, T., T. Shankar, V. Thangapand, and V. Ramasubram. 2013. Optimization of cultural condition for keratinase production using Bacillus cereus TS1. Insight Microbiol 3 (1):1–8. doi:10.5567/imicro-ik.2013.1.8.
   Google Scholar
• Son, T. N., V. V. Thu, V. C. Duong, and H. Hiraoka. 2007. Effect of organic and bio-fertilizers on soybean and rice cropping system. Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan: Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Staff, S. S. 2014. Kellogg soil survey laboratory methods manual. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 42, version 5.0. Burt R. et al. (eds). 279–81. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service..
   Google Scholar
• Sui, Y., X. Jiao, X. Liu, X. Zhang, and G. Ding. 2012. Water-stable aggregates and their organic carbon distribution after five years of chemical fertilizer and manure treatments on eroded farmland of Chinese Mollisols. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 92 (3):551–57. doi:10.4141/cjss2010-005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tale, K. S., and S. Ingole. 2015. Review article: A review on role of physico-chemical properties in soil quality. Chemical Science Review Letter 4 (13):57–66.
   Google Scholar
• Tejada, M., C. Benitez, I. Gomez, and J. Parrado. 2011. Use of biostimulants on soil restoration: Effects on soil biochemical properties and microbial community. Applied Soil Ecology : A Section of Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 49:11–17. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tejera, N., C. Liuch, M. V. Martinez-Toledo, and J. Gonzalez-Lopez. 2005. Isolation and characterization of Azotobacter and Azospirillum strains from the sugarcane rhizosphere. Plant and Soil 270:223–32. doi:10.1007/s11104-004-1522-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tüzüner, A. 1990. Soil and water analysis laboratory manual. Ankara, Turkey: Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Affairs, General Directorate of Rural Services.
   Google Scholar
• US Salinity Lab. Staff. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. USDA agricultural handbook no. 60. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Vengadaramana, A., and P. T. J. Jashothan. 2012. Effects of organic fertilizers on the water holding capacity of soil in different terrains of Jaffna peninsula in Sri Lanka. Journal of Natural Product and Plant Resources 2 (4):500–03.
   Google Scholar
• Vessey, J. K. 2003. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant and Soil 255:571–86. doi:10.1023/A:1026037216893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volk, V. V., and C. H. Ullery. 1993. Dep of Soil Sci. Oregon state Univ. Coruallis, 50.
   Google Scholar
• Wilpiszeski, R. L., J. A. Aufrecht, S. T. Retterer, M. B. Sullivan, D. E. Graham, E. M. Pierce, D. A. Elias, A. V. Palumbo, and D. A. Elias. 2019. Soil aggregate microbial communities: Towards understanding microbiome interactions at biologically relevant scales. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. doi:10.1128/aem.00324-19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S. C., Z. H. Cao, Z. G. Li, K. C. Cheung, and M. H. Wong. 2005. Effects of biofertilizer containing N-fixer, P and K solublizers and AM fungi on maize growth: A greenhouse trial. Geoderma 125:155–66. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yılmaz, E., and M. Sönmez. 2017. The role of organic/bio–fertilizer amendment on aggregate stability and organic carbon content in different aggregate scales. Soil Tillage Res 168:118–24. doi:10.1016/j.still.2017.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yurtsever, N. 2011. Experimental statistical methods. Soil, fertilizer and water research institute, Technical Pub. 56:121, Ankara, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, B., J. Zhang, Y. Yu, D. L. Karlen, and X. Hao. 2016. Crop residue management and fertilization effects on soil organic matter and associated biological properties. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23 (17):17581–91. doi:10.1007/s11356-016-6927-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar