114
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Soybean Seed Analysis as a Nutritional Diagnostic Tool

, &
Pages 2712-2725 | Received 12 May 2020, Accepted 29 Jun 2020, Published online: 29 Nov 2020

References

  • Bataglia, O. C., A. R. Dechen, and W. R. Santos. 1996. Princípios da diagnose foliar. [Principles of leaf diagnosis]. In O solo nos grandes domínios morfoclimáticos do Brasil e o desenvolvimento sustentado. [Soil in the great morphoclimatic domains of Brazil and sustainable development], ed. V. H. Alvarez Venegas, L. E. F. Fontes, and M. P. F. Fontes, 647–60. Viçosa, MG, Brazil: Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo.
  • Beaufils, E. R. 1973. Diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS), 132. Pietermaritzburg, South Africa: University of Natal. Soil Science Buletin No. 1.
  • Beverly, R. B. 1993. DRIS diagnoses of soybean nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium status are unsatisfactory. Journal of Plant Nutrition 16 (8):1431–47. doi:10.1080/01904169309364625.
  • Beverly, R. B., M. E. Sumner, W. S. Letzsch, and C. O. Plank. 1986. Foliar diagnosis of soybean by DRIS. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 17 (3):237–56. doi:10.1080/00103628609367711.
  • Embrapa. 2013. Tecnologias de produção de soja – Região Central do Brasil 2014 [Soybean production technologies - Central Brazil 2014], 265. Londrina, PR, Brazil: Embrapa Soja.
  • Gott, R. M., L. A. Aquino, J. M. Clemente, L. P. D. Santos, A. M. X. Carvalho, and F. O. Xavier. 2016. Foliar diagnosis indexes for corn by the methods diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS) and nutritional composition (CND). Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 48 (1):11–19. doi:10.1080/00103624.2016.1253714.
  • Hallmark, W. B., J. F. Adams, and H. F. Morris. 1985. Detection of zinc deficiency in soybeans by the Diagnosis and recommendation integrated system using seeds. Journal of Fertilizer Issues 2:11–16.
  • Hallmark, W. B., L. M. Shuman, D. O. Wilson, H. F. Morris, J. F. Adams, S. E. Dabney, R. G. Hanson, S. W. Gettier, and D. A. Wall. 1992. Preliminary M‐DRIS norms for soybean seeds. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 23 (17–20):2399–413. doi:10.1080/00103629209368746.
  • Hanson, R. G. 1981. DRIS evaluation of N, P, K status of determinate soybeans in Brazil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 12 (9):933–48. doi:10.1080/00103628109367206.
  • Harger, N. 2008. Faixas de suficiência para teores foliares de nutrientes em soja, definidas pelo uso do método DRIS, para solos de origem basáltica. [Sufficiency ranges for soybean leaf nutrient content, defined by the use of DRIS, for soils of basaltic origin]. Ph. D. thesis, State University of Londrina.
  • Hill, J. 1980. The remobilization of nutrients from leaves. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2 (4):407–44. doi:10.1080/01904168009362788.
  • Hitsuda, K., G. J. Sfredo, and D. Klepker. 2004. Diagnosis of sulfur deficiency in soybean using seeds. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68 (4):1445–51. doi:10.2136/sssaj2004.1445.
  • Jones, C. A. 1981. Proposed modifications of the diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS) for interpreting plant analyses. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 12 (8):785–94. doi:10.1080/00103628109367194.
  • Khiari, L., L. E. Parent, and N. Tremblay. 2001. Critical compositional nutrient indexes for sweet corn at early growth stage. Agronomy Journal 93 (4):809–14. doi:10.2134/agronj2001.934809x.
  • Kurihara, C. H., V. H. Alvarez Venegas, J. C. L. Neves, R. F. Novais, and L. A. Staut. 2013. Faixas de suficiência para teores foliares de nutrientes em algodão e em soja, definidas em função de índices DRIS. [Sufficiency range for nutrient concentration in cotton and soybean leaves, defined through DRIS indexes]. Revista Ceres 60 (3):412–19. doi:10.1590/S0034-737X2013000300015.
  • Malavolta, E., G. C. Vitti, and S. A. Oliveira. 1997. Avaliação do Estado Nutricional das Plantas: princípios e aplicações [Assessment of the Nutritional Status of Plants: principles and applications], 2nd ed. Piracicaba, SP, Brazil: POTAFOS
  • Pagano, M. C., and M. Miransari. 2016. The importance of soybean production worldwide. In Abiotic and biotic stresses in soybean production, ed. M. Miransari, 1–26. London: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-801536-0.00001-3.
  • Parent, L. E., and M. Dafir. 1992. A theoretical concept of compositional nutrient diagnosis. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 117 (2):239–42. doi:10.21273/JASHS.117.2.239.
  • Peel, M. C., B. L. Finlayson, and T. A. McMahon. 2007. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 11 (5):1633–44. doi:10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007.
  • Rashid, A., and R. L. Fox. 1992. Evaluating internal zinc requirements of grain crops by seed analysis. Agronomy Journal 84 (3):469–74. doi:10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400030022x.
  • Reis Junior, R. A. 2002. DRIS norms universality in the corn crop. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 33 (5–6):711–35. doi:10.1081/CSS-120003061.
  • Reis Junior, R. A., and P. H. Monnerat. 2003. DRIS norms validation for sugarcane crop. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 38 (3):379–85. doi:10.1590/S0100-204X2003000300007.
  • Ribeiro, A. C., P. T. G. Guimarães, and V. H. Alvarez Venegas. 1999. Recomendação para o uso de corretivos e fertilizantes em Minas Gerais: 5. Aproximação [Recommendation for the use of correctives and fertilizers in Minas Gerais: 5. Approximation]. Viçosa, MG, Brazil: Comissão de Fertilidade do Solo do Estado de Minas Gerais.
  • Urano, E. O. M., C. H. Kurihara, S. Maeda, A. C. T. Vitorino, M. C. Gonçalves, and M. E. Marchetti. 2006. Avaliação do estado nutricional da soja. [Soybean nutritional status evaluation]. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 41 (9):1421–28. doi:10.1590/S0100-204X2006000900011.
  • Urano, E. O. M., C. H. Kurihara, S. Maeda, A. C. T. Vitorino, M. C. Gonçalves, and M. E. Marchetti. 2007. Determinação de teores ótimos de nutrientes em soja pelos métodos chance matemática, sistema integrado de diagnose e recomendação e diagnose da composição nutricional. [Determination of optimal nutrient contents for soybean by the mathematical chance, diagnosis and recommendation integrated system and compositional nutrient diagnosis methods]. Revista Brasileira De Ciência Do Solo 31:63–72. doi:10.1590/S0100-06832007000100007.
  • Wadt, P. G. S., V. H. Alvarez Venegas, R. F. Novais, S. Fonseca, and N. F. Barros. 1998. O método da chance matemática na interpretação de dados de levantamento nutricional de eucalipto. [The method of mathematical chance to evaluate data from nutritional survey of eucalypt trees]. Revista Brasileira De Ciência Do Solo 22 (4):773–78. doi:10.1590/S0100-06831998000400023.
  • Walworth, J. L., and M. E. Sumner. 1987. The Diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS). Advances in Soil Science 6:149–88. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4682-4_4.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.