References
- Akpalu, M. M., H. Siewobr, D. Oppong-Sekyere, and S. E. Akpalu. 2014. Phosphorus application and rhizobia inoculation on growth and yield of soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill). Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 4 (6):674–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEA/2014/7110.
- Akter, F., N. Islam, A. T. M. Shamsuddoha, M. S. I. Bhuiyan, and S. Shilpi. 2013. Effect of phosphorus and sulphur on growth and yield of soybean (Glycine max L.). International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management 4 (4):555–60.
- Ali, I., A. A. Khan, A. Khan, M. Asim, I. Ali, B. Zib, I. Khan, A. Rab, G. Sadiq, N. Ahmad, et al. 2019. Humic Acid and Nitrogen Levels Optimizing Productivity of Green Gram (Vigna radiate L.). Russian Agricultural Sciences 45 (1):43–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367419010051.
- Al-Tawaha, A., A. Al-Tawaha, S. Sirajuddin., D. McNeil., Y. Othman., I. Al-Rawashdeh., A. Qaisi, N. Jahan., M. Shah., and S. Khalid 2020. Ecology and adaptation of legumes crops: A review. In “IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science”, Vol. 492, pp. 012085. IOP Publishing.
- Alter, S., K. C. Bader, M. Spannagl, Y. Wang, E. Bauer, C. C. Schön, and K. F. Mayer. 2015. DroughtDB: An expert-curated compilation of plant drought stress genes and their homologs in nine species. Database : The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation 2015:2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bav046.
- Ashraf, M. 2010. Inducing drought tolerance in plants: Recent advances. Biotechnology Advances 28 (1):169–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.11.005.
- Azarmi, R., M. T. Giglou, and R. D. Taleshmikail. 2009. Influence of vermicompost on soil chemical and physical properties in tomato field. Afric. J. Bio 7:2397–401.
- Aziz, A. L. A., B. D. K. Ahiabor, A. Opoku, and R. C. Abaidoo. 2016. Contributions of rhizobium inoculants and phosphorus fertilizer to biological nitrogen fixation, growth and grain yield of three soybean varieties on a fluvic luvisol. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture 10 (2):1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEA/2016/20072.
- Bardan, M. M. 2003. Effect of nitrogenous and phosphetic fertilization on some economical characters of soybean Crawford cultivar under calcareous soil conditions. Egyptian J. Agric. Res 81 (2):433–40.
- Begum, A., M. D. A. Islam, Q. M. Ahmed, M. Rahman, M, and M. M. Rahman. 2015. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus on the growth and yield performance of soybean. . Research in Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries 2 (1):35–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.3329/ralf.v2i1.23027.
- Bekere, W., W. Endalkachew, and K. Tesfu. 2012. Growth and nodulation response of soybean (Glycine max L.) to Bradyrhizobium inoculation and phosphorus levels under controlled condition in South Western Ethiopia. Afric. J. Agric. Rese 7 (30):4266–70.
- Bouranis, D., S. N. Chorianopoulou, C. Kollias, P. Maniou, V. E. Protonotarios, V. F. Siyiannis, and M. J. HAWKESFORD. 2006. Dynamics of aerenchyma distribution in the cortex of sulfate-deprived adventitious roots of maize. . Annals of Botany 97 (5):695–704. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl024.
- Boyer, J., and M. Westgate. 2004. Grain yields with limited water. Journal of Experimental Botany 55 (407):2385–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh219.
- Cai, H. G., F. Chen, G. Mi, F. Zhang, H. P. Maurer, W. Liu, J. C. Reif, and L. Yuan. 2012. Mapping QTLs for root system architecture of maize (Zea mays L.) in the field at different developmental stages. . Theoretical and Applied Genetics 125 (6):1313–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-012-1915-6.
- Carsky, R. J., B. B. Singh, and R. Oyewole. 2001. Contribution of early–season cowpea to late season maize in the savanna zone of West Africa. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture 18 (4):303–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2001.9754894.
- CelikI., Gunal, H., Budak M., Akpinar C, 2010. Effect of long term organic and mineral fertilizer on bulk density and penetration resistance in semi arid Mediterranean conditions. Geoderma 160:263–243.
- Chela, G. S., M. S. Tiwana, I. S. Thind, K. P. Puri, and K. Kaur. 1993. Effect of long term organic and mineral fertilizer on bulk density and penetration resistance in semi arid Mediterranean conditions Ann. Biol 9:83–86.
- Chen, Y. P., P. D. Rekha, A. B. Arunshen, W. A. Lai, C. C. Young, and C. C. Young. 2006. PSB from subtropical soil and their tri-calcium phosphate solubilizing abilities. Applied Soil Ecology 34 (1):33–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.12.002.
- Chen, Z., M. Shengwu, and L. Lily. 2008. Studies on phosphorus solubilizing activity of a strain of hosphobacteria isolated from chestnut type soil in China. Bioresource Technology 99 (14):6702–07. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.03.064.
- Chiezey, U. F., and A. C. Odunze. 2012. Soybean response to application of poultry manure and phosphorus fertilizer in the Sub-humid Savanna of Nigeria. J. Eco. Natu. Envi 1 (2):025–031.
- Chimungu, J. G., K. M. Brown, and J. P. Lynch. 2014a. Reduced root cortical cell file number improves drought tolerance in maize. Plant Physiology 166 (4):1943–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.249037.
- Chimungu, J. G., K. M. Brown, and J. P. Lynch. 2014b. Large root cortical cell size improves drought tolerance in maize. Plant Physiology 166 (4):2166–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.250449.
- Cole, J. O., and C. R. Parks. 1946. Semimicro-Kjeldahl procedure for control laboratories. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Analytical Edition 18 (1):61–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/i560149a021.
- Cooper, M., C. Gho, R. Leafgren, T. Tang, and C. Messina. 2014. Breeding drought-tolerant maize hybrids for the US corn-belt: Discovery to product. Journal of Experimental Botany 65 (21):6191–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru064.
- Entringer, G. C., F. L. Guedes, A. A. Oliveira, J. P. Nascimento, and J. C. Souza. 2014. Genetic control of leaf curl in maize. Genetics and Molecular Research 13 (1):1672–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.4238/2014.January.22.3.
- Frey, F. P., C. Urbany, B. Hüttel, R. Reinhardt, and B. Stich. 2015. Genome-wide expression profiling and phenotypic evaluation of European maize inbreds at seedling stage in response to heat stress. BMC Genomics 16 (1):123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1282-1.
- Gong, F. P., L. Yang, F. J. Tai, X. L. Hu, and W. Wang. 2014. “Omics” of maize stress response for sustainable food production: Opportunities and challenges. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology 18 (12):714–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2014.0125.
- Hachez, C., D. Veselov, Q. Ye, H. Reinhardt, T. Knipfer, W. Fricke, and F. Chaumont. 2012. Short-term control of maize cell and root water permeability through plasma membrane aquaporin isoforms. Plant, Cell & Environment 35 (1):185–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02429.x.
- Horton, D. E., N. C. Johnson, D. Singh, D. L. Swain, B. Rajaratnam, and N. S. Diffenbaugh. 2015. Contribution of changes in atmospheric circulation patterns to extreme temperature trends. Nature 522 (7557):465–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14550.
- Hu, X. L., L. J. Wu, F. Y. Zhao, D. Y. Zhang, W. Wang, G. Zhu, C. Li, and W. Wang. 2015a. Phosphoproteomic analysis of the response of maize leaves to drought, heat and their combination stress. . Frontiers in Plant Science 6:298. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00298.
- Hu, X. L., Y. F. Yang, F. P. Gong, D. Y. Zhang, W. Wang, L. Wu, C. Li, and W. Wang. 2015b. Protein sHSP26 improves chloroplast performance under heat stress by interacting with specific chloroplast proteins in maize (Zea mays). . Journal of Proteomics 115:81–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2014.12.009.
- Huang, H., I. M. Mølle, and S. Q. Song. 2012. Proteomics of desiccation tolerance during development and germination of maize embryos. Journal of Proteomics 75 (4):1247–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2011.10.036.
- Imran, A. 2017. Climate Change Is a Real Fact confronting to Agricultural Productivity. Int J Environ Sci Nat Res 3 (3):555613. doi:https://doi.org/10.19080/IJESNR.2017.03.555613.
- Imran, A., A. Bari, and R. Ali. 2018. Peach sources, phosphorous and beneficial microbes enhance productivity of soybean. Soy Res 16 (2):39-48.
- Imran, A. 2018a. Global impact of climate change on water, soil resources and threat towards food security: Evidence from Pakistan. Advances in Plants & Agriculture Research 8 (5). doi:https://doi.org/10.15406/apar.2018.08.00349.
- Imran, A. 2018d. Phosphorous fertilization influenced weeds attributes And phenological characteristics Of mungbean cultivars (Vigna radiata l.). Russian Agricultural Sciences 44 (3):229–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367418030072.
- Imran, A. 2018e. Organic Matter Amendments Improve Soil Health, Productivity and Profitability of Maize and Soybean. Ann Rev Resear 1 (3):555564.
- Imran, A. 2019a. Advance production Technologies of legume crops. Springer Book, Vol. 1 (Production technology) Agronomic crops https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9151-5_16
- Imran, A. 2019b. Plant microbe’s interaction in Agronomic crops. Springer Book, Vol. 2 (Management Practices) Agronomic crops https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9151-8_21
- Imran, Amanullah, and A.M. Al Tawaha. 2021. Carbon source application increase wheat yield and Soil fertility. Communication in soil Science and Plant Analysis, 52 (7):695–703.
- Imran, A., A. Bari, and R. Ali. 2018. Peach sources, phosphorous and beneficial microbes enhance productivity of soybean. Soy Res 16 (2):39–48.
- Imran, A., A. Bari, A. Bari, A. Bari, and A. Bari. 2020. Soil application of Trichoderma and peach (Prunus persica L.) residues possesses biocontrol potential for weeds and enhances growth and profitability of soybean (Glycine max). Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 36 (1):10–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.sja/2020/36.1.10.20.
- Imran, A., A. Bari, H. Khan, and R. Ali. 2019. Climatic Variability and Agronomic Cropping Pattern. Springer Book, Vol. 1 (Production technology) Agronomic crops https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9151-5_3
- Imran, A., and A. A. Khan. 2017. Canola Yield And Quality Enhanced With Sulphur Fertilization Russ. Agricult. Sci 43:113. doi:https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367417020100.
- Imran, A., A. A. Khan, I. Ullah, H. zada, F. Ahmad, S. T. Shah, A. Usman, and I. Ullah. 2015a. Yield and yield attributes of rapeseed cultivars as influence by sulfur level under swat valley conditions. J. Pure & Applied Biology 4 (3):216-221.
- Jaramillo, R. E., E. A. Nord, J. G. Chimungu, K. M. Brown, and J. P. Lynch. 2013. Root cortical burden influences drought tolerance in maize. Annals of Botany 112 (2):429–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct069.
- Jones, T. J. 2009. Maize tissue culture and transformation: The first 20 years. In Molecular genetic approaches to maize improvement, 7–27. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
- Landi, P., S. Giuliani, S. Salvi, M. Ferri, R. Tuberosa, and M. C. Sanguineti. 2010. Characterization of root-yield-1.06, a major constitutive QTL for root and agronomic traits in maize across water regimes. Journal of Experimental Botany 61 (13):3553–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq192.
- Li, C., Y. Li, Y. Shi, Y. Song, D. Zhang, E. S. Buckler, Z. Zhang, T. Wang, and Y. Li. 2015. Genetic control of the leaf angle and leaf orientation value as revealed by ultra-high density maps in three connected maize populations. Plos One 10:3.
- Li, K., C. Xu, K. Zhang, A. Yang, and J. Zhang. 2007. Proteomic analysis of roots growth and metabolic changes under phosphorus deficit in maize (Zea mays L.) plants. Proteomics 7 (9):1501–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200600960.
- Lobell, D. B., M. Bänziger, C. Magorokosho, and B. Vivek. 2011. Nonlinear heat effects on African maize as evidenced by historical yield trials. Nature Climate Change 1 (1):42–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1043.
- Lobell, D. B., M. J. Roberts, W. Schlenker, N. Braun, B. B. Little, R. M. Rejesus, and G. L. Hammer. 2014. Greater sensitivity to drought accompanies maize yield increase in the US Midwest. Science 344 (6183):516–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251423.
- Luo, L. J. 2010. Breeding for water-saving and drought-resistance rice (WDR) in China. Journal of Experimental Botany 61 (13):3509–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq185.
- Lynch, J. P. 2013. Steep, cheap and deep: An ideotype to optimize water and N acquisition by maize root systems. Annals of Botany 112 (2):347–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcs293.
- Mano, Y., F. Omori, T. Takamizo, B. Kindiger, R. M. Bird, and C. H. Loaisiga. 2006. Variation for root aerenchyma formation in flooded and non-flooded maize and teosinte seedlings. Plant and Soil 281 (1–2):269–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-4268-y.
- Martre, P., B. Quilot-Turion, D. Luquet, M. M. O. S. Memmah, K. Chenu, and P. Debaeke. 2015. Model-assisted phenotyping and ideotype design, 349–73. Crop physiology Academic Press.
- Meister, R., M. S. Rajani, D. Ruzicka, and D. P. Schachtman. 2014. Challenges of modifying root traits in crops for agriculture. Trends in Plant Science 19 (12):779–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2014.08.005.
- Mulvaney, B. J., and A. L. Page. 1982. Nitrogen-total. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2:595–624.
- Munns, R., R. A. James, X. R. Sirault, R. T. Furbank, and H. G. Jones. 2010. New phenotyping methods for screening wheat and barley for beneficial responses to water deficit. Journal of Experimental Botany 61 (13):3499–507. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq199.
- Nelson, D. W., and L. E. Sommers. 1982. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2:539–79.
- Nuccio, M. L., J. Wu, R. Mowers, H. P. Zhou, M. Meghji, L. F. Primavesi, M. J. Paul, X. Chen, Y. Gao, E. Haque, et al. 2015. Expression of trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase in maize ears improves yield in well-watered and drought conditions. Nature Biotechnology 33 (8):862–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3277.
- Ort, D. R., and S. P. Long. 2014. Limits on yields in the corn belt. Science 344 (6183):484–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1253884.
- Piperno, D. R., A. J. Ranere, I. Holst, J. Iriarte, and R. Dickau. 2009. Starch grain and phytolith evidence for early ninth millennium BP maize from the Central Balsas River Valley, Mexico. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106:5019–24.
- Postma, J. A., A. Dathe, and J. P. Lynch. 2014. The optimal lateral root branching density for maize depends on nitrogen and phosphorus availability. Plant Physiology 166 (2):90–602. doi:https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.233916.
- Postma, J. A., and J. P. Lynch. 2011b. Theoretical evidence for the functional benefit of root cortical aerenchyma in soils with low phosphorus availability. Annals of Botany 107 (5):829–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq199.
- Saengwilai, P., X. Tian, and J. P. Lynch. 2014. Low crown root number enhances nitrogen acquisition from low-nitrogen soils in maize. Plant Physiology 166 (2):581–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.232603.
- Sakamoto, T., Y. Morinaka, T. Ohnishi, H. Sunohara, S. Fujioka, M. Ueguchi-Tanaka, M. Mizutani, K. Sakata, S. Takatsuto, S. Yoshida, et al. 2006. Erect leaves caused by brassinosteroid deficiency increase biomass production and grain yield in rice. Nature Biotechnology 24 (1):105–09. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1173.
- Shelden, M. C., and U. Roessner. 2013. Advances in functional genomics for investigating salinity stress tolerance mechanisms in cereals. Frontiers in Plant Science 4:123. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00123.
- Shi, J., J. E. Habben, R. L. Archibald, B. J. Drummond, M. A. Chamberlin, R. W. Williams, H. R. Lafitte, B. P, Weers, and B. P. Weers. 2015. Overexpression of ARGOS genes modifies plant sensitivity to ethylene, leading to improved drought tolerance in both Arabidopsis and maize. Plant Physiology 169 (1):266–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00780.
- Shi, J., and J. Lai. 2015. Patterns of genomic changes with crop domestication and breeding. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 24:47–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2015.01.008.
- Simons, M., R. Saha, L. Guillard, G. Clément, P. Armengaud, R. Cañas, C. D. Maranas, P. J. Lea, and B. Hirel. 2014. Nitrogen-use efficiency in maize (Zea mays L.): From ‘omics’ studies to metabolic modelling. Journal of Experimental Botany 65 (19):5657–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru227.
- Trevisan, S., A. Manoli, L. Ravazzolo, A. Botton, M. Pivato, A. Masi, and S. Quaggiotti. 2015. Nitrate sensing by the maize root apex transition zone: A merged transcriptomic and proteomic survey. Journal of Experimental Botany 66 (13):3699–715. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv165.
- Yin, H., C. J. Chen, J. Yang, D. J. Weston, J. G. Chen, W. Muchero, N. Ye, T. J. Tschaplinski, S. D. Wullschleger, Z. M. Cheng, et al. 2014. Functional genomics of drought tolerance in bioenergy crops. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 33 (2–3):205–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2014.870417.
- York, L. M., T. Galindo-Castañeda, J. R. Schussler, and J. P. Lynch. 2015. Evolution of US maize (Zea mays L.) root architectural and anatomical phenes over the past 100 years corresponds to increased tolerance of nitrogen stress. Journal of Experimental Botany 66 (8):2347–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv074.
- Zhan, A., and J. P. Lynch. 2015. Reduced frequency of lateral root branching improves N capture from low-N soils in maize. Journal of Experimental Botany 66 (7):2055–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv007.
- Zhan, A., H. Schneider, and J. P. Lynch. 2015. Reduced lateral root branching density improves drought tolerance in maize. Plant Physiology 168 (4):1603–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00187.
- Zhang, J., L. X. Ku, Z. P. Han, S. L. Guo, H. J. Liu, Z. Z. Zhang, L. R. Cao, X. J. Cui, and Y. H. Chen. 2014. The ZmCLA4 gene in the qLA4–1 QTL controls leaf angle in maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Experimental Botany 65 (17):5063–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru271.
- Zhu, J., K. M. Brown, and J. P. Lynch. 2010. Root cortical aerenchyma improves the drought tolerance of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant, Cell & Environment 33:740–49.
- Zurek, P. R., C. N. Topp, and P. N. Benfey. 2015. Quantitative trait locus mapping reveals regions of the maize genome controlling root system architecture. Plant Physiology 167 (4):1487–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.251751.