The Effect of Humic Acid and Nano-Chelate Iron on the Absorption of Some Nutrients, Grain Yield, Oil, and Essential Oil of (Nigella sativa) under Drought Stress

References

• Abbaspour, F., H. Asghri, H. Rezvani Moghaddam, J. Abbasdokht, J. Shabahang, and A. Baig Babaei. 2017. Effects of biochar application on yield and yield components of black seed (Nigella sativa L.) under low irrigation conditions. The Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 33 (5):837–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.22092/ijmapr.2017.114596.2075.
   Google Scholar
• Abedi, T., and H. Pakniyat. 2010. Antioxidant enzyme changes in response to drought stress inten cultivars of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 46 (27–34):11: 100–105.
   Google Scholar
• Ait Mbarek, L., H. Ait Mouse, N. Elabbadi, M. Bensalah, A. R. Gamouh, A. Aboufatima, A. C. Benharref, M. Kamal, A. Dalal, and A. Zyad. 2007. Anti-tumor properties of black seed (Nigella sativa L.) extracts. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 40 (6):839–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amerioun, F., M. Amerian, H. Asghari, and M. Rahimi. 2013. Effect of humic acid and urea on two varieties of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) yield. First National Conference Planning, Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development. February, Hamedan, Iran, Community Environmental Assessment Hegmataneh. (In Persian).
   Google Scholar
• Asad, A., and R. Rafique. 2000. Effect of zinc, copper, iron and manganese on the yield and yield components of wheat in Tehsil Peshawar. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 3 (10):1615–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ayobizadeh, N., G. Haei, M. Aminidehaghi, J. Masoud Sinki, and S. H. Rezvani. 2019. Effect of foliar application of iron nano-chelate and folic acid on seed yield and some physiological traits of sesame cultivars under drought tension conditions. Crop Physiology 10 (40):55–74.
   Google Scholar
• Azizi, M., and Z. Safaei. 2017. The effect of foliar application of humic acid and nano fertilizer (Pharmks®) on morphological traits, yield, essential oil content and yield of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.). The Journal of Horticultural Sciences 30 (4):671–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.22067/jhorts4.v0i0.41136.
   Google Scholar
• Baghaei, N., N. Keshavarz, H. Shukrivahed, and M. H. Nazaran. 2012. Effect of nano-iron chelate on yield and yield components of rice. 12th Iranian Crop Sciences Congress, September 4-6. Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran. 1–5. (In Persian).
   Google Scholar
• Bahrani, A. 2015. Effect of some micro and macro nutrients on seed yield and oil content of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). International Journal of Chemical Environmental and Biological Sciences 3 (1):71–74.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., C. E. Clapp, and H. Magen. 2004. Mechanisms of plant growth stimulation by humic substances: The role of organic-iron complexes. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 50:1089–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneshmand, A. R., A. H. Shirani-Rad, G. Nour-Mohammadi, G. Zarei, and J. Daneshian. 2008. Effect of irrigation regimes and nitrogen levels on seed yield and seed quality of two rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 10 (3):244–61. in Persian.
   Google Scholar
• Dastyaran, M., and M. Hosseini Farahi. 2015. Effects of humic acid and putrescine on vegetative properties and vase life of rose in soilless culture system. The Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 5 (4):241–50. http://jspi.iut.ac.ir/article-1-903-fa.html.
   Google Scholar
• Davoodi, S. H., A. Biyabani, A. Rahemi Karizaki, S. A. Modares Sanavi, E. Gholamalipour Alamdari, and M. Zaree. 2020. Effect of iron and zinc nano chelates on yield and yield components of black cumin medicinal plant (Nigella sativa l.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 18 (3):267–78. in Persian.
   Google Scholar
• Delfine, S., R. Tognetti, E. Desiderio, and A. Alvino. 2005. Effect of foliar application of N and humic acids on growth and yield of durumwheat. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 25:183–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferhat, M. A., B. Y. Meklati, J. Smadja, and F. Chemat. 2006. An improved microwave clevenger apparatus for distillation of essential oils from Orange peel. Journal of Chromatography 1:121–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giasuddin, A. B. M., S. Kanel, and H. Choi. 2007. Adsorption of humic acid onto nan oscale zerovalent iron and its effect on arsenic removal. Environment Science Technology 41 (6):2022–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghighi, M., A. Nikbakhat, and M. Pessarakli. 2015. Effects of humic acid on remediation of the nutritional deficiency of gerbera in hydroponic culture. Journal of Plant Nutrition 39:702–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, S. M., G. Kerven, L. Edwards, and Z. Ostatek-Boczynski. 2000. Characterisation of fulvic and humic acids from leaves of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and from decomposed hay. Soil Biol and Bioche 32:1331–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini Farahi, M., R. Ameri Fahliani, and F. Yosefi. 2015. Effects of humic acid and fertilizer containing calcium and boron (Calboron) on vegetative and reproductive properties of strawberry in soil-less culture system. Journal of Plant Ecology 7 (21):235–50.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantarahmadi, S. A., A. Ebadi, J. Daneshian, S. A. Siadat, and S. Jahanbakhsh. 2017. Effect of drought stress and foliar application of growth regulators on photosynthetic pigments and seed yield of rapeseed (Brassica napus L. cv. Hyola 401). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 18 (3):196–217.
   Google Scholar
• Khazaie, H. R., E. Eyshi Rezaie, and M. Bannayan. 2011. Application times and concentration of humic acid impact on above ground biomass and oil production of hyssop (Hyssopus officinalis). Journal of. Medicinal Plants Research 5 (20):5148–54.
   Google Scholar
• Khazaie, H. R., F. Nadjafi, and M. Bannayan. 2008. Effect of irrigation frequency and planting density on aboveground biomass and oil production of thyme (Thymus vulgaris) and hyssop (Hyssopus officinalis). Industrial Crops and Products 27:315–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladan Moghadam, A., H. Vattani, N. Baghaei, and N. Keshavarz. 2012. Effect of different levels of fertilizer nanoiron chelates on growth and yield characteristics of two varieties of Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) varamin 88 and viroflay. Applied Research in Science and Technology 4:4813–18.
   Google Scholar
• Marschner, H. 1995. Mineral nutrition of higher plants, 889. 2ed ed. New York: Academic. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masoud Sinaki, S., E. Majidi Heravan, H. Shirani Red, G. Noormohammadi, A. Zarei, A. Mohagheghi, and M. Aboutalebian. 2014. Study of sowing date and seed priming effect on seed yield, its components and some of agronomic and qualitative properties of two spring canola cultivars in hamedan. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 12 (3):516–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.22067/gsc.v12i3.24226.
   Google Scholar
• Misra, A., S. Dwivedi, A. K. Srivastava, D. K. Tewari, A. Khan, and R. Kumar. 2006. Low iron stress nutrition for evaluation of Fe- efficient genotype physiology, photosynthesis, and essential monoterpene oil yield of Ocimum sanctum. Photosynte 44:474–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadkhani, N., and R. Heidari. 2007. Effects of water stress on respiration, photosynthetic pigments and water content in two Maize cultivar. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 10 (22):4022–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moraditochaee, M. 2012. Effects of humic acid foliar spraying and nitrogen fertilizer management on yield of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Iran. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 7 (4):289–93.
   Google Scholar
• Naderi, M., A. Danesh-Shahraki, and R. Naderi. 2013. The role of nanotechnology in improving the use efficiency of nutrients and chemical fertilizers. Mon Nanotechnology 11 (12):16–32.
   Google Scholar
• Nazaran, M. H., H. Khalaj, M. R. Labafi, M. Shamsabadi, and A. Razazi 2012.Investigation of iron chelatednanoorganic fertilizer spraying time effect on quantitative and qualitative dry and wheat (TriticumaestivumL.).Second
   Google Scholar
• Nooroozpoor, G., and P. Rezvani Moghadam. 2005. Effect of different irrigation intervals and plant density on yield and yield components of Black Cumin (Nigella sativa). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 3 (2):305–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.22067/gsc.v3i2.1313.
   Google Scholar
• Pazoki, A. 2016. Effects of humic acid and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) on yield and yield components of durum wheat under drought stress condition in Shahr-e-Rey region. Cereal Research 6 (1):105–17.
   Google Scholar
• Peyvandi, M., H. Parande, and M. Mirza. 2011. Comparison of nano Fe chelate with Fe chelate effect on growth parameters and antioxidant enzymes activity of Ocimum basilicum. New Cellular and Molecular Biotechnology Journal 1 (4):89–98.
   Google Scholar
• Pinton, R., S. Cesco, G. Lacolettig, S. Astolfi, and Z. Varanini. 1999. Modulation of NO3 uptake by water-extractable humic substances: Involvement of root plasma membrane H+ATPase. Plant and Soil 215:155–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajaie, M., and A. H. Ziaeyan. 2009. Combined effect of zinc and boron on yield and nutrients accumulation in corn. International Journal of Plant Production 3 (3):35–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajpar, I., M. B. Bhatti, Z. Ul-Hassan, A. N. Shah, and S. D. Tunio. 2011. Humic acid improves growth, yield and oil content of Brassica compestris L. Journal of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering and Veterinary Science 27 (2):125–33.
   Google Scholar
• Rezai, R., S. M. Hoseyni, H. Shabanali, and L. Safa. 2010. Identify and analyze the barriers to the development of nanotechnology in the agricultural sector from the perspective of researchers. Journal of Science and Technology Policy 2 (1):17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Rezapor, A., M. Heidari, M. Galavi, and M. Ramrodi. 2011. Effect of water stress and different amounts of sulfur fertilizer on grain yield, grain yield components and osmotic adjustment in Nigella sativa L. The Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 27 (3):384–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.22092/ijmapr.2011.6380.
   Google Scholar
• Sajadian, H., and H. Hokmabadi. 2015. Effects of humic acid on root and shoot growth and leaf nutrient contents in seedling of Pistacia Vera cv. Badami-Riz-Zarand. Journal of Nuts 6:123–30.
   Google Scholar
• Salehi, L., M. Chehrazi, F. Sedighi Dehkordi, and A. Moezzi. 2018. The effect of organic (Humi potas) and chemical potassium fertilizer (potassium sulfate) on growth indices of stock flower (Matthiola incana var. annua). Iranian Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology 19 (2):201–12. http://journal.irshs.ir/article-1-39-fa.html.
   Google Scholar
• Sangeetha, M., P. Ingram, and R. D. Devi (2006) Effect of lignite humic acid and fertilizers on the yield of onion and nutrient availability. 18th World Congress of Soil Science, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. D. (2018) Characterizing the effects of a humic- material media amendment used in horticultural applications.Master of ScienceThesis. California.
   Google Scholar
• Turkmen, O., S. Demir, and S. Sensoy. 2005. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and humic acid on the seedling development and nutrient content of pepper grown under saline soil conditions. The Journal of Biological Sciences 4:568–74.
   Google Scholar
• Turkmen, O., A. Dursun, M. Turan, and C. Erdinc. 2007. Calcium and humic acid affect seed germination, grow and nutrient content of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) seedlings under saline soil conditions. Soil and Plant Science 54:168–74.
   Google Scholar
• Vaseghi, A., and S. Davazdahemami. 2016. Comparison of seed oil and mineral content of Guizotia abyssinica Cass. with two genotypes of Iranian and Indian Nigella sativa L. Journal of Oil, Plant Production 2 (2):13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Verlinden, G., T. Coussens, A. Vliegher, and G. Baert. 2010. Effect of humic substances on nutrient uptake by herbage and on production and nutritive value of herbage from sown grass pastures. Grass and Forage Science 65:133–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar