The Interactive Potential between Individual Therapy and Couple Therapy

References

• Anderson, H. & Goolishian, H. (1988), Human systems as linguistic systems: Preliminary and evolving ideas about the implications for clinical theory. Family Process, 27: 371–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, H. & Goolishian, H. (1990), Beyond cybernetics: Comments on Atkinson and Hearth's “Further thoughts on second-order family therapy.” Family Process, 29: 157–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron, L. (1991). The patient's experience of the analyst's subjectivity. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 1: 29–51.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (1991), Commentary on Irwin Z. Hoffman's discussion: “Toward a social-constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation.” Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 1: 525–533.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (1995), Like Subjects, Love Objects. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. (1991), On knowing one's patient inside out: The aesthetics of unconscious communication. Psychoanaltic Dialogues, 1: 399–422.
   Google Scholar
• Burch, B. (1997), Other Women: Lesbian/Bisexual Experience and Psychoanalytic Views of Women. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. (1991), Black Feminist Thought. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coyne, J. (1985), Toward a theory of frames and reframing: The social nature of frames. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 11: 337–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fosshage, J. (1995), Interaction in psychoanalysis: A broadening horizon. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 5: 459–478.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, K. (1993), Action, insight, and working through: Outlines of an integrative approach. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 3: 535–578.
   Google Scholar
• Gerson, S. (1996), Neutrality, resistance, and self-disclosure in an intersubjective psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 6: 623–645.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, M. M. (1983), The interpersonal paradigm and the degree of the therapist's involvement. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 19: 200–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, I. & Goldenberg, H. (1996), Family Therapy: An Overview. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Goldner, V. (1985), Feminism and family therapy. Family Process, 24: 31–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldner, V. (1991), Toward a critical relational theory of gender. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 1: 249–272.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, I. Z. (1983), The patient as interpreter of the analyst's experience. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 19: 389–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, I. Z. (1991), Toward a social-constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 1: 74–105.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, L. (1981), Foundations of Family Therapy. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Livingston, M. S. (1995), A self psychologist in couplesland: Multisubjective approach to transference and countertransference-like phenomena in marital relationships. Family Process, 34: 427–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. (1996), When interpretations fail: A new look at the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. In: Understanding Therapeutic Action, ed. L. Lifson. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Modell, A. (1994), Common ground or divided ground? Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 14: 201–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, A. (1996). Terrors and Experts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Racker, H. (1957), The meanings and uses of countertransference. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 26: 303–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, R. and Dyckman, J. (1995), Integrating self and system: An empty intersection? Family Process, 34: 21–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwaber, E. A. (1992), Countertransference: The analyst's retreat from the patient's vantage point. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 73: 349–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, D. M. H. & Shahmoon Shanok, R. (1995), Subjectivity, complexity, and the social world: Erikson's identity concept and contemporary relational theories. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 5: 537–556.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (1994), From philosophy to poetry: Changes in psychoanalytic discourse. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 4: 101–128.
   Google Scholar
• Spezzano, C. (1993), A relational model of inquiry and truth: The place of psychoanalysis in the human conversation. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 3: 177–208.
   Google Scholar
• Spezzano, C. (1996), The three faces of two-person psychology: Development, ontology, and epistemology. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 6: 599–622.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, S. (1994), Needed relationships and repeated relationships: An integrated relational perspective. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 4: 317–345.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R. (1994), The intersubjective context of intrapsychic experience. In: The Intersubjective Perspective, ed. R. Stolorow, G. Atwood & B. Brandchaft. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R. & Atwood, G. (1992), Contexts of Being. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R., Brandchaft, B. & Atwood, G. (1987), Psychoanalytic Treatment: An Intersubjective Approach. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Visher, E. B. & Visher, J. S. (1993), Stepfamilies: Myths and Realities. New York: Citadel Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wachtel, E. (1993). Therapeutic communication with couples. In: Therapeutic Communication by Paul Wachtel. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wachtel, E. & Wachtel, P. (1986), Family Dynamics in Individual Psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weingarten, K. (1991), The discourses of intimacy: Adding a social constructionist and feminist view. Family Process, 30: 285–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. (1986), Negative explanation, restraint, and double description: A template for family therapy. Family Process, 25: 169–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, J. L. & Dickerson, V. C. (1994), Using a narrative metaphor: Implications for theory and clinical practice. Family Process, 33: 233–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar