A Complex Systems Sensibility: The Contribution of Philip Bromberg

References

• Bak, P. (1996). How nature works: The science of self-organized criticality. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bressler, S. L., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2001). Cortical coordination dynamics and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 26–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. M. (1996). Standing in the spaces: The multiplicity of self and the psychoanalytic relationship. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 32, 509–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. M. (1998). Standing in the spaces: Essays on clinical process, trauma, and dissociation. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. M. (2006). Awakening the dreamer: Clinical journeys. Mahwah, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. M. (2009). Multiple self-states, the relational mind, and dissociation: A psychoanalytic perspective. In P. F. Dell & J. A. O'Neil (Eds.), Dissociation and dissociative disorders: DSM-V and beyond (pp. 637–652). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. M. (2011). The shadow of the tsunami and the growth of the relational mind. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. M. (2012). Credo. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 22, 273–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, W. J. (2007). Psychoanalytic complexity: Pouring new wine directly into one's mouth. In P. Buirski & A. Kottler (Eds.), New developments in self psychology practice (pp 183–200). Lanham, MD: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, W. J. (2009). Attitudes in psychoanalytic complexity: An alternative to postmodernism in psychoanalysis. In R. Frie & D. Orange (Eds.), Beyond postmodernism: New dimensions in clinical theory and practice (pp. 3–22). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, W. J. (2007). A biological theory of brain function and its relevance to psychoanalysis. In C. Piers, J. P. Muller, & J. Brent (Eds.), Self-organizing complexity in psychological systems (pp. 15–36). New York, NY: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Galatzer-Levy, R. M. (1996). Psychoanalysis and dynamical systems theory: Prediction and self similarity. Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association, 43, 1085–1113.
   Google Scholar
• Galatzer-Levy, R. M. (2004). Chaotic possibilities: Toward a new model of development. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 85, 419–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galatzer-Levy, R. M. (2009). Good vibrations: Analytic process as coupled oscillations. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 90, 983–1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guastello, S. J., Koopmans, M., & Pincus, D., (Eds.) (2009). Chaos and complexity in psychology: The theory of nonlinear dynamical systems. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghent, E. (2002). Wish, need, drive: Motive in light of dynamic systems theory and Edelman's selectionist theory. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12, 763–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2005). Gender as soft assembly. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. (1955). The problem of responsibility in psychotherapy. Psychiatry, 18, 205–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman, S. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S. (2003). Cognitive coordination dynamics. In W. Tschacher & J.-P. Dauwalder (Eds.), The dynamical systems approach to cognition: Concepts and empirical paradigms based on self-organization, embodiment, and coordination dynamics (pp. 45–67). River Edge, NJ: World Scientific Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S., & Engstrom, D. A. (2006). The complementary nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palombo, S. R. (1999). The emergent ego: Complexity and coevolution in the psychoanalytic process. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piers, C. (1998). Contemporary trauma theory and its relation to character. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 15, 14–33.
   Google Scholar
• Piers, C. (2000). Character as self-organizing complexity. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought, 23, 3–34.
   Google Scholar
• Piers, C. (2005). The mind's multiplicity and continuity. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15, 229–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piers, C. (2007). Emergence: When a difference in degree becomes a difference in kind. In C. Piers, J. P. Muller, & J. Brent (Eds.), Self-organizing complexity in psychological systems (pp. 83–110). New York, NY: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Piers, C. (2011). David Shapiro's characterology and complex systems theory. In C. Piers (Ed.), Personality and psychopathology: Critical dialogues with David Shapiro (pp. 223–246). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Piers, C, & Begley, C. (2012). Simulating character: Evolving quality of subjective experience. Presentation given at the Austen Riggs Center, Stockbridge, MA, August.
   Google Scholar
• Piers, C. (n.d.). A complex systems sensibility: Studies in psychology. Unpublished ms.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, W. (1972). Character analysis (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. (Originally published 1945.)
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, S. (2005). Dynamic systems theories as a metaframework of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15, 285–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, D. (2000). Dynamics of character: Self-regulation in psychopathology. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Strogatz, S. (2003). Sync: How order emerges from chaos in the universe, nature, and daily life. New York, NY: Theia.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R. (1997). Dynamic, dyadic, intersubjective systems: An evolving paradigm of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 14, 337–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfram, S. (2002). A new kind of science. Champaign, IL: Wolfram Media.
   Google Scholar