Interpersonal Psychoanalysis: History and Current Status

References

• Aron, L. (1996). A meeting of minds: Mutuality in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Basescu, S. (2010). Sabert Basescu: Selected papers on human nature and psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1962). Learning from experience. London, England: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss, Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. M. (1998). Standing in the spaces: Essays on clinical process, trauma, and dissociation. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. M. (2006). Awakening the dreamer: Clinical journeys. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. M. (2011a). The shadow of the tsunami: And the growth of the relational mind. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. M. (2011b). “Grown-up” words: A perspective on unconscious fantasy. In P. M. Bromberg (Ed.), The shadow of the tsunami: And the growth of the relational mind (pp. 145–163). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buber, M. (1970). I and thou (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). New York, NY: Charles Scribner & Sons. (Original work published 1923)
   Google Scholar
• Buechler, S. (2004). Clinical values: Emotions that guide psychoanalytic treatment. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buechler, S. (2008). Making a difference in patients' lives: Emotional experience in the therapeutic setting. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buechler, S. (2014). Understanding and treating patients in clinical psychoanalysis: Lessons from literature. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, W. (2013). Psychoanalytic complexity: Clinical attitudes for therapeutic change. Hove, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crastnopol, M. (2006). Untangling views of self in interpersonal and relational theories. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 42(4), 529--533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, R. M. (1952). Human reactions of analysts to patients. Samiksa, 6, 212–219.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, D. B. (1992). The intimate edge: Extending the reach of psychoanalytic interaction. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, D. B. (2006). The interpersonal/relational interface. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 42, 535–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiscalini, J. (2004). Coparticipant psychoanalysis: Toward a new theory of clinical inquiry. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, J. B. (1998a). Are interpersonal and relational psychoanalysis the same? Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 34, 485–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel, J. B. (1998b). Reply to Hirsch. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 34, 539–541.
   Google Scholar
• Frie, R. (1997). Subjectivity and intersubjectivity in modern philosophy and psychoanalysis: A study of Sartre, Binswanger, Lacan, and Habermas. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, E. (1960). Psychoanalysis and Zen Buddhism. In E. Fromm, D. T. Suzuki, & R. De Martino (Eds.), Zen Buddhism and psychoanalysis (pp. 77–141). New York, NY: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Galatzer-Levy, R. M. (1995). Psychoanalysis and dynamical systems theory: Prediction and self similarity. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 43, 1085–1113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galatzer-Levy, R. M. (2002). Emergence. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 22, 708–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galatzer-Levy, R. M. (2004). Chaotic possibilities: Toward a new model of development. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 85, 419–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galatzer-Levy, R. M. (2009). Finding your way through chaos, fractals, and other exotic mathematical objects: A guide for the perplexed. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 57, 1227–1249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghent, E. (1995). Interaction in the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 5, 479–491.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, M. M. (1982). The analysis of transference (Vol. 1). New York, NY: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. R., & Mitchell, S. A. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2011). The relational tradition: Landscape and canon. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 59, 701–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A., & Kuchuck, S. (Eds.). (2015). The legacy of Sandor Ferenczi: From ghost to ancestor. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, I. (1985). The rediscovery of the advantages of the participant observation model. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought, 8, 441–459.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, I. (1996). Observing participation, mutual enactment, and the new classical models. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 32, 359–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, I. (1997). The integration of the interpersonal school into the psychoanalytic mainstream: A review essay on The meeting of minds: Mutuality in psychoanalysis by Lewis Aron. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 33, 656–668.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, I. (1998a). The concept of enactment and theoretical convergence. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 67, 78–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, I. (1998b). Further thoughts about interpersonal and relational perspectives: Reply to Jay Frankel. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 34, 501–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, I. (2000). Interview with Benjamin Wolstein. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 36, 187–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, I. (2006). The interpersonal roots of relational thinking. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 42, 551–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, I. (2015). The interpersonal tradition: The origins of psychoanalytic subjectivity. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E. (1957). Sigmund Freud: Life and work. Vol. 3: The last phase, 1919–1939. London, England: Hogarth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York, NY: Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology. New York, NY: H. Liveright.
   Google Scholar
• LaFarge, L. (2014). Psychoanalytic controversy: How and why unconscious phantasy and transference are the defining features of psychoanalytic practice. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 95, 1265–1278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson, E. A. (1972). The fallacy of understanding: An inquiry into the changing structure of psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, E. A. (1983). The ambiguity of change. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, E. A. (2006). Fifty years of evolving interpersonal psychoanalysis. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 42, 557–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson, E. A. (2016a). The purloined self: Interpersonal perspectives in psychoanalysis (A. Slomowitz, Ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1991)
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, E. A. (2016b). Facts and fantasies: On the nature of psychoanalytic data. In A. Slomowitz (Ed.), The purloined self: Interpersonal perspectives in psychoanalysis (pp. 102–116). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1981)
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, E. A. (2016c). Playground or playpen. In A. Slomowitz (Ed.), The purloined self: Interpersonal perspectives in psychoanalysis (pp. 132–139). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1982)
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, E. A. (2016d). The interpersonal (Sullivanian) model. In A. Slomowitz (Ed.), The purloined self: Interpersonal perspectives in psychoanalysis (pp. 156–171). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1985)
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, E. A. (2016e). The purloined self. In A. Slomowitz (Ed.), The purloined self: Interpersonal perspectives in psychoanalysis (pp. 179–188). New York, NY: Routledge, (Original work published 1987)
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, E. A. (2016f). Real frogs in imaginary gardens: Facts and fantasies in psychoanalysis. In A. Slomowitz (Ed.), The purloined self: Interpersonal perspectives in psychoanalysis (pp. 215–227). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1988)
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, E. A. (in press). The enigma of the unconscious. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers of Kurt Lewin. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• May, R. (1984). The discovery of being: Writings in existential psychology. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis: An integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A. (1993). Hope and dread in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mosher, P. W., & Richards, A. (2005). The history of membership and certification in the APsaA: Old demons, new debates. Psychoanalytic Review, 92, 865–894.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murphy, G., & Cattell, E. (1952). Sullivan's field theory. In P. Mullahy (Ed.), The contributions of Harry Stack Sullivan: A symposium on interpersonal theory in psychiatry and social science (pp. 161–179). New York, NY: Hermitage House.
   Google Scholar
• Ortmeyer, D. (1995). History of the founders of interpersonal psychoanalysis. In M.-L. Lionells, J. Fiscalini, C. Mann, & D. B. Stern, (Eds.), The handbook of interpersonal psychoanalysis (pp. 11–27). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, A. (2013). The American Psychoanalytic Association's long march to inclusion. Bulletin of the Association for Psychoanalytic Medicine, 48, 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Sartre, J.-P. (1957). Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology (H. Barnes, Trans.). London, England: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Schachtel, E. (2013). Metamorphosis: On the conflict of human development and the development of creativity. New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1959)
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, S. (2005). Dynamic systems theories as a metaframework for psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15, 285–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. A. (2000). Publications of Benjamin Wolstein. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 36, 361–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, E. (1965). Identity vs. identification: A thorny psychological issue. Review of Existential Psychology & Psychoanalysis, 2, 160–175.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, E. (1977). The fiction of analytic anonymity. In K. Frank (Ed.), The human dimension in psychoanalytic practice (pp. 181–192). New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. B. (1983). Unformulated experience: From familiar chaos to creative disorder. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 19, 71–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. B. (1995). Cognition and language. In M. -L. Lionells, J. Fiscalini, C. Mann, & D. B. Stern (Eds.), The handbook of interpersonal psychoanalysis (pp. 79–138). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. B. (1997). Unformulated experience: From dissociation to imagination in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. B. (2006). States of relatedness: Are ideas part of the family? Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 42, 565–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. B. (2010). Unconscious fantasy versus unconscious relatedness: Comparing interpersonal/relational and Freudian approaches to clinical practice. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 46, 101–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. B. (2014). A response to LaFarge. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 95, 1283–1297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. B. (2015a). The interpersonal field: Its place in American psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 25, 388–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. B. (2015b). Relational freedom: Emergent properties of the interpersonal field. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. B., Mann, C., Kantor, S., & Schlesinger, G. (Eds.). (1995). Pioneers of interpersonal psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Tauber, E. S. (1954). Exploring the therapeutic use of counter-transference data. Psychiatry, 17, 332–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, E., & Smith, L. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. (1956). The role of the analyst's personality in therapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 10, 347–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. M. (1964). Interpersonal psychoanalysis: Selected papers of Clara M. Thompson (M. Green, Ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. M. (2017). The history of the William Alanson White Institute. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 53, 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolstein, B. (1959). Countertransference. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Wolstein, B. (1975). Countertransference: The psychoanalyst's shared experience and inquiry with the patient. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 3, 77–90.
   Google Scholar
• Wolstein, B. (1983). The first person in interpersonal relations. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 19, 522–535.
   Google Scholar