748
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Monstrous Technology in Thomas Pynchon’s Bleeding Edge: The Internet as Terror and Transformation

ORCID Icon

References

  • Andriano, Joseph. Immortal Monster: The Mythological Evolution of the Fantastic Beast in Modern Fiction and Film. Greenwood P, 1999.
  • Beal, Timothy. Religion and Its Monsters. Routledge, 2002.
  • Bullen, Ross. ““Act Two for America”: Narcissism, Money, and the Death of American Literature in Gary Shteyngart’s Super Sad True Love Story.” Canadian Review of American Studies, vol. 48, no. 2, 2018, pp. 231–53. doi:10.3138/cras.2017.031.
  • Collado-Rodríguez, Francisco. “Intratextuality, Trauma, and the Posthuman in Thomas Pynchon’s Bleeding Edge.” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, vol. 57, no. 3, 2016, pp. 229–41. doi:10.1080/00111619.2015.1121860.
  • Cowart, David. “Down on the Barroom Floor of History: Pynchon’s Bleeding Edge.” Postmodern Culture, vol. 24, no. 1, 2013, pp. 1–35. doi:10.1353/pmc.2013.0060.
  • Czerwiński, Piotr. “The Mind is the Effect, Not the Cause’ – Exploring Consciousness in Nikesh Shukla’s Meatspace.” Świat I Słowo, vol. 15, no. 1, 2017, pp. 39–54.
  • Dalsgaard, Inger. “Terrifying Technology: Pynchon’s Warning Myth of Today.” Pynchon Notes, vol. 42-43, 1998, pp. 91–110. doi:10.16995/pn.142.
  • Dalsgaard, Inger. “Science and Technology.” In The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Pynchon, edited by Inger Dalsgaard, Luc Herman, and Brian McHale, Cambridge U P, 2012, pp. 156–67. doi:10.1017/CCOL9780521769747.015.
  • Dalsgaard, Inger. “Real Estate and the Internet.” In Thomas Pynchon in Context, edited by Inger Dalsgaard, Cambridge U P, 2019, pp. 162–71. doi:10.1017/9781108683784.021.
  • Dalsgaard, Inger. “Sanctuary City: Pynchon’s Subjunctive New York in Bleeding Edge.” Otherness: Essays and Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, 2019, pp. 25–42.
  • Darlington, Joseph. “Capitalist Mysticism and the Historicizing of 9/11 in Thomas Pynchon’s Bleeding Edge.” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, vol. 57, no. 3, 2016, pp. 242–53. doi:10.1080/00111619.2015.1078767.
  • Fernández-Santiago, Miriam. “‘Acting Out’ and ‘Working Through’ Departure in Thomas Pynchon’s Bleeding Edge.” Nordic Journal of English Studies, vol. 18, no. 2, 2019, pp. 86–110. doi:10.35360/njes.516.
  • Gilmore, David D, editor. Monsters: Evil Beings, Mythical Beasts and All Manner of Imaginary Terrors. U of Pennsylvania P, 2009.
  • Gouck, Jennifer. “The Viewer Society: ‘New Panopticism’, Surveillance, and the Body in Dave Eggers’ The Circle.” IJAS Online, vol. 7, 2018, pp. 57–64.
  • Haeselin, David. “Welcome to the Indexed World: Thomas Pynchon’s Bleeding Edge and the Things Search Engines Will Not Find.” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, vol. 58, no. 4, 2017, pp. 313–24. doi:10.1080/00111619.2017.1282932.
  • Johansen, Emily. “Becoming the Virus: Responsibility and Cosmopolitan Labor in Hari Kunzru’s Transmission.” Journal of Postcolonial Writing, vol. 49, no. 4, 2013, pp. 419–31. doi:10.1080/17449855.2013.798591.
  • Kearney, Richard. Strangers, Gods and Monsters: Interpreting Otherness. Taylor and Francis, 2005. doi:10.4324/9780203994719.
  • Kittler, Friedrich A., I. Iurascu, et al. Operation Valhalla: Writings on War, Weapons, and Media. Duke U P, 2021. doi:10.1215/9781478013181.
  • Leonard, Philip. “‘A Revolution in code’? Hari Kunzru’s Transmission and the Cultural Politics of Hacking.” Textual Practice, vol. 28, no. 2, 2013, pp. 267–87. doi:10.1080/0950236X.2013.824501.
  • Levina, Marina, and Diem-My T. Bui, editors. “Introduction.“ Monster Culture in the 21st Century: A Reader, Bloomsbury Academic , 2013, pp. 1–13.
  • Ludwigs, Marina. “The Posthuman Turn in Dave Eggers’ The Circle”. Anthropoetics: The Journal of Generative Anthropology, vol. 21, http://anthropoetics.ucla.edu/ap2101/2101ludwigs/ Accessed 15 Jun. 2019.
  • Maguire, Michael. “September 11 and the Question of Innocence in Thomas Pynchon’s Against the Day and Bleeding Edge.” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, vol. 58, no. 2, 2017, pp. 95–107. doi:10.1080/00111619.2016.1160865.
  • Malewitz, Raymond. “‘Some New Dimension Devoid of Hip and Bone’: Remediated Bodies and Digital Posthumanism in Gary Shteyngart’s Super Sad True Love Story.” Arizona Quarterly, vol. 71, no. 4, 2015, pp. 107–28. doi:10.1353/arq.2015.0023.
  • Mittman, Asa Simon. “Introduction: The Impact of Monsters and Monster Studies.” In The Ashgate Research Companion to Monsters and the Monstrous, edited by Asa Simon Mittman, Ashgate, 2013, p. 8.
  • Murgatroyd, Paul. Mythical Monsters in Classical Literature. Bloomsbury Academic, 2007.
  • Pynchon, Thomas. Bleeding Edge. Penguin, 2013.
  • Rutledge, Gregory. “Shteyngart’s Super Sad True(th): The Äppärät, a “Work[ing] of Art” in an Internet Age of Digital Reproduction.” College Literature, vol. 47, no. 2, 2020, pp. 366–97. doi:10.1353/lit.2020.0017.
  • Strehle, Susan. Fiction in the Quantum Universe. U of North Carolina P, 1992.
  • Tabbi, Joseph. Postmodern Sublime: Technology and American Writing from Mailer to Cyberpunk. Cornell U P, 1995. doi:10.7591/9781501717642.
  • Wallhead, Celia. “The Twenty-First Century.” In Thomas Pynchon in Context, edited by Inger Dalsgaard, Cambridge U P, 2019, pp. 97–103.
  • Wasihun, Betiel. “Surveillance and Shame in Dave Eggers’s The Circle.” On Culture: The Open Journal for the Study of Culture 6, http://geb.uni-giessen.de/geb/volltexte/2018/13898/pdf/On_Culture_6_Wasihun.pdf Accessed 15 Feb. 2020.
  • Waterhouse, Ruth. “Beowulf as Palimpsest.” In Monster Theory, edited by Cohen Jeffrey, U of Minnesota P, 1996, pp. 26–39. doi:10.5749/j.ctttsq4d.5.
  • Weinstrock, Jeffrey. “Monster Culture (Seven Theses).” In Monster Theory Reader, edited by Jeffrey Weinstock, U of Minnesota P, 2020, pp. 37–56. doi:10.5749/j.ctvtv937f.5.
  • Weisenburger, Steven. “The Twentieth Century.” In Thomas Pynchon in Context, edited by Inger Dalsgaard, Cambridge U P, 2019, pp. 89–96. doi:10.1017/9781108683784.012.
  • Willmetts, Simon. “Digital Dystopia: Surveillance, Autonomy, and Social Justice in Gary Shteyngart’s Super Sad True Love Story.” American Quarterly, vol. 70, no. 2, 2018, pp. 267–89. doi:10.1353/aq.2018.0017.