Regional Industrial Policy in the Western Balkans: Neither Specialization nor Spatialization?

References

• Allmendinger, Phil, Graham Haughton, Jörg Knieling, and Frank Othengrafen. 2015. “Soft Spaces, Planning and Emerging Practices of Territorial Governance.” In Soft Spaces in Europe: Re-negotiating Governance, Boundaries and Borders, edited by P. Allmendinger, G. Haughton, J. Knieling, and F. Othengrafen, 3–22. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, Dan, Chiara Criscuolo, and Peter Gal. 2016. The Global Productivity Slowdown, Technology Divergence and Public Policy: A Firm Level Perspective. Working Paper 24. Washington: Brookings Institution, Hutchins Center.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, Bjørn, Markus Grillitsch, and Michaela Trippl. 2016. “Smart Specialization as an Innovation-Driven Strategy for Economic Diversification: Examples from Scandinavian Regions.” Innovation Studies 23:73–97.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, David, Marco Bellandi, Annalisa Caloffi, and Lisa de Propris. 2010. “Place-renewing Leadership: Trajectories of Change for Mature Manufacturing Regions in Europe.” Policy Studies 31 (4): 457–74. doi:10.1080/01442871003723408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, David, Christos Pitelis, and Philip Tomlinson. 2018. “A Place-based Developmental Regional Industrial Strategy for Sustainable Capture of Co-created Value.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 42 (6): 1521–42. doi:10.1093/cje/bey019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balassa, Bela. 1965. “Trade Liberalization and Revealed Comparative Advantage.” Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 33 (2): 99–123. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x
   Google Scholar
• Balland, Pierre-Alexandre, Ron Boschma, Joan Crespo, and David L. Rigby. 2019. “Smart Specialization Policy in the European Union: Relatedness, Knowledge Complexity and Regional Diversification.” Regional Studies 53 (9): 1252–68. doi:10.1080/00343404.2018.1437900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, Fabrizio. 2009. An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A Place-based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations (Barca Report). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, Fabrizio, Philip McCann, and Andrés Rodríguez-Pose. 2012. “The Case for Regional Development Intervention: Place-based versus Place-neutral Approaches.” Journal of Regional Science 52 (1): 134–52. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barro, Robert, and Xavier Sala-i-Martin. 1997. “Technological Diffusion, Convergence and Growth.” Journal of Economic Growth 1 (1): 1–26. doi:10.1007/BF00163340
   Google Scholar
• Benner, Maximilian. 2018. Smart Specialization and Institutional Context: Towards a Process of Institutional Discovery and Change. JRC/RSA SMARTER 2.0 Conference, Sevilla, September 28. Accessed January 26, 2023. https://www.regionalstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/180912_presentation_s3_institutions.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Benner, Maximilian. 2019. “Industrial Policy in the EU and Its Neighbourhood: Learning from Policy Experimentation.” Economies 7 (2): 44. doi:10.3390/economies7020044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickenbach, Franck, Bode Eckhardt, and Cristiane Krieger-Boden. 2013. “Closing the Gap between Absolute and Relative Measures of Localization, Concentration or Specialization.” Papers in Regional Science 92 (3): 465–79. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00460.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camagni, Roberto, and Roberta Capello. 2013. “Regional Innovation Patterns and the EU Regional Policy Reform: Toward Smart Innovation Policies.” Growth and Change 44 (2): 355–89. doi:10.1111/grow.12012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capello, Roberta, and Ugo Fratesi. 2012. “Modelling Regional Growth: An Advanced MASST Model.” Spatial Economic Analysis 7 (3): 293–318. doi:10.1080/17421772.2012.694143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEDEFOP. 2021. “Coronavirus Impact on Jobs in EU Sectors and Occupations: A Skills Forecast Analysis.” March 10, 2021. https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/news/coronavirus-impact-jobs-eu-sectors-and-occupations-skills-forecast-analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Ha-Joon. 2009. “Industrial Policy: Can We Go beyond an Unproductive Confrontation?” Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, Seoul, South Korea. Accessed January 26, 2023. https://www.rrojasdatabank.info/wbdevecon10-9.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cherif, Reda, and Fuad Hasanov. 2019. The Return of the Policy That Shall Not Be Named: Principles of Industrial Policy. IMF Working paper, 19/74. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, Edward. 2003. Foreign Direct Investment in Southeast Europe. Working Paper, 24. Vienna: The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Dabrowski, Marek, and Yana Myachenkova. 2018. The Western Balkans on the Road to the European Union. Policy Contribution, 4. Breugel. Accessed January 26, 2023. https://euagenda.eu/upload/publications/untitled-133335-ea.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, Simin, Daniel Galland, and Dominic Stead. 2020. “Reinventing Planning and Planners: Ideological Decontestations and Rhetorical Appeals.” Planning Theory 19 (1): 17–37. doi:10.1177/1473095219869386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot, Henri L.F., Jacques Poot, and Martijn J. Smit. 2015. “Which Agglomeration Externalities Matter Most and Why?” Journal of Economic Surveys 29:1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Demekas, Dimitri, Balazs Horvath, Elena Ribakova, and Yi Wu. 2005. “Foreign Direct Investment in South-Eastern Europe: What Do the Data Tell Us?” In European Economic Integration and South-East Europe: Challenges and Prospects, edited by K. Liebscher, J. Christl, P. Moosclechner, and D. Ritzberger-Grünwald, 209–41. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Doloreux, David. 2002. “What We Should Know about Regional Systems of Innovation.” Technology in Society 24 (3): 243–63. doi:10.1016/S0160-791X(02)00007-6
   Google Scholar
• Dragan, Irina-Maria, and Alexandru Isaic-Maniu. 2017. “An Alternative for Indicators that Characterize the Structure of Economic Systems.” Entropy 19 (7): 346. doi:10.3390/e19070346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2014. Taking Stock of the Europe 2020 Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2018. A Credible Enlargement Perspective for and Enhanced EU Engagement with the Western Balkans. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2020a. A New Industrial Strategy for a Globally Competitive, Green and Digital Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2020b. A New EU-US Agenda for Global Change. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2020c. An Economic and Investment Plan for the Western Balkans. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, Glen, and Edward L. Glaeser. 1999. “The Geographic Concentration of Industry: Does Natural Advantage Explain Agglomeration?” American Economic Review 89 (2): 311–16. doi:10.1257/aer.89.2.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Energy Community Treaty. 2006/500/EC. “Council Decision 2006/500/EC of 29 May 2006 on the Conclusion by the European Community of the Energy Community Treaty.” Official Journal of the European Union L 198.
   Google Scholar
• EU Ministers. 2020. Territorial Agenda 2030: A future for all places, Agreed on the Occasion of the Informal meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development and/or Territorial Cohesion. Germany, December 1, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2016. European Statistics. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2021. European Statistics. Brussels: European Commission. Accessed January 26, 2023. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10_a10/default/table?lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• Fabry, Nathalie, and Sylvain Zeghni. 2010. “Inward FDI in Seven Transitional Countries of South-Eastern Europe: A Quest of Institution-based Attractiveness.” Eastern Journal of European Studies 2:77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Flegg, A.T., and C.D. Webber. 2000. “Regional Size, Regional Specialization and the FLQ Formula.” Regional Studies 34 (6): 563–69. doi:10.1080/00343400050085675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foray, Dominique. 2018. “Smart Specialisation Strategies and Industrial Modernisation in European Regions – Theory and Practice.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 42:1505–20. doi:10.1093/cje/bey022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foray, Dominique. 2019. “In Response to ‘Six Critical Questions about Smart Specialization.’” European Planning Studies 27 (10): 2066–78. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1664037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foray, Dominique, Paul A. David, and Bronwyn Hall. 2009. Smart Specialization – The Concept. Knowledge Economists Policy Brief, 9. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Gligorov, Vladimir. 2013. “Now Industrialization.” New Magazine, 1 April.
   Google Scholar
• Göler, Daniel. 2005. “South-East Europe as European Periphery? Empirical and Theoretical Aspects.” In Serbia and Modern Processes in Europe and the World, 137–42. Belgrade: Faculty of Geography, University of Belgrade.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Cheryl, and William Jarosz. 1995. “Law and the Regulation of Foreign Direct Investment: The Experience from Central and Eastern Europe.” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 33 (1): 1–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, Markus, and Markku Sotarauta. 2020. “Trinity of Change Agency, Regional Development Paths and Opportunity Spaces.” Progress in Human Geography 44 (4): 704–23. doi:10.1177/0309132519853870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, Markus, Markku Sotarauta, Bjørn Asheim, Rune Dahl Fitjar, Silje Haus-Reve, Jari Kolehmainen, Heli Kurikka, Karl-Johan Lundquist, Mikhail Martynovich, Skirmante Monteilhet, et al. 2022. “Agency and Economic Change in Regions: Identifying Routes to New Path Development Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” Regional Studies. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2022.2053095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadžić, Miroljub, and Slavka Zeković. 2019. “Rethinking Deindustrialization, and the Reindustrialization Policy in Serbia.” Spatium 41: 14–22. doi:10.2298/SPAT1941014H
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, John, Daniel Galland, and Mark Tewdwr-Jones. 2021a. “Regional Planning Is Dead: Long Live Planning Regional Futures.” Regional Studies 55 (1): 6–18. doi:10.1080/00343404.2020.1750580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, John, Daniel Galland, and Mark Tewdwr-Jones. 2021b. “Whither Regional Planning?” Regional Studies 55 (1): 1–5. doi:10.1080/00343404.2020.1862412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassink, Robert, and Huiwen Gong. 2019. “Six Critical Questions about Smart Specialization.” European Planning Studies 27 (10): 2049–65. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1650898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinloopen, Jeroen, and Charles van Marrewijk. 2001. “On the Empirical Distribution of the Balassa Index.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 137 (1): 1–35. doi:10.1007/BF02707598
   Google Scholar
• Iacobucci, Donato, and Enrico Guzzini. 2016. “Relatedness and Connectivity in Technological Domains: Missing Links in S3 Design and Implementation.” European Planning Studies 24 (8): 1511–26. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1170108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemeny, Thomas, and Michael Storper. 2015. “Is Specialization Good for Regional Economic Development?” Regional Studies 49 (6): 1003–18. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.899691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, Henning. 2015. “Efforts to Implement Specialization Strategy in Practice – Leading Unlike Horses to the Water.” European Planning Studies 23 (10): 2079–98. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.1003036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, Paul. 1991. “Increasing Returns and Economic Geography.” Journal of Political Economy 99 (3): 483–99. doi:10.1086/261763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, Paul. 1993. “On the Relationship between Trade Theory and Location Theory.” Review of International Economics 1 (2): 110–22. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9396.1993.tb00009.x
   Google Scholar
• Lehocký, Filip, and Jaroslav Rusnák. 2016. “Regional Specialization and Geographic Concentration: Experiences from Slovak Industry.” Miscellanea Geographica, Regional Studies on Development 20 (3): 5–13. doi:10.1515/mgrsd-2016-0011
   Google Scholar
• Marcon, Eric, and Florence Puech. 2010. “Measures of the Geographic Concentration of Industries: Improving Distance-based Methods.” Journal of Economic Geography 10 (5): 745–62. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbp056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurel, Francoise, and Beatrice Sedillot. 1999. “A Measure of the Geographic Concentration in French Manufacturing Industries.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 29 (5): 575–604. doi:10.1016/S0166-0462(99)00020-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, Mariana. 2011. “The Entrepreneurial State.” Soundings 49: 131–42. doi:10.3898/136266211798411183
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, Mariana. 2015. “Which Industrial Policy Does Europe Need?” Internomics 50:120–25.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, Mariana. 2017. Mission-oriented Innovation Policy: Challenges and Opportunities. Working Paper Series, IIPP 2017-01. London: UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose (IIPP).
   Google Scholar
• McCann, Philip, and Raquel Ortega-Argilés. 2015. “Smart Specialization, Regional Growth and Applications to European Union Cohesive Policy.” Regional Studies 49 (8): 1291–302. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.799769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, Philip, and Frank van Oort. 2019. “Theories of Agglomeration and Regional Economic Growth: A Historical Review.” In Handbook of Regional Growth and Development Theories, edited by R. Capello and P. Nijkamp, 6–23. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mencinger, Jože. 2003. “Does Foreign Direct Investment Always Enhance Economic Growth?” Kyklos 56 (4): 491–508. doi:10.1046/j.0023-5962.2003.00235.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, Kevin. 2015. “Smart Specialization: Opportunities and Challenges for Regional Innovation Policy.” Regional Studies 49 (3): 480–82. doi:10.1080/00343404.2015.1007572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, Michael, and Wil Zonneveld. 2018. “The Resurgence of Regional Design.” European Planning Studies 26 (7): 1297–311. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1464127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, Michael. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puljiz, Jakša. 2009. Čimbenici regionalnog razvoja i regionalnih nejednakosti u Republici Hrvatskoj [ Factors of Regional Development and Regional Inequalities in Croatia]. Split: Sveučilište u Splitu, Ekonomski Fakultet.
   Google Scholar
• Purkarthofer, Eva, Alois Humer, and Raine Mäntysalo. 2021. “Regional Planning: An Arena of Interests, Institutions and Relations.” Regional Studies 55 (5): 773–77. doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1875128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radosevic, Slavo. 2017. “Assessing EU Smart Specialization Policy in a Comparative Perspective.” In Advances in the Theory and Practice of Smart Specialization, edited by S. Radosevic, A. Curaj, R. Gheorgiu, L. Andreescu, and I. Wage, 2–37. London: Academic Press (Elsevier).
   Google Scholar
• Radosevic, Slavo, Adrian Curaj, Radu Gheorghiu, Liviu Andreescu, and Imogen Wade, Eds. 2017. Advances in the Theory and Practice of Smart Specialization. London: Academic Press (Elsevier).
   Google Scholar
• RCC (Regional Cooperation Council). 2013. South East Europe 2020: Jobs and Prosperity in a European Perspective. Sarajevo: RCC.
   Google Scholar
• RCC (Regional Cooperation Council). 2020. Green Agenda for the Western Balkans. Sarajevo: RCC.
   Google Scholar
• RCC (Regional Cooperation Council). 2021. South East Europe Strategy 2030. Sarajevo: RCC.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés. 2008. “The Rise of the ‘City-region’ Concept and Its Development Policy Implications.” European Planning Studies 16 (8): 1025–46. doi:10.1080/09654310802315567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés. 2017. “The Revenge of the Places that Don’t Matter (And What to Do about It).” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11 (1): 189–209. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsx024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, Paul M. 1990. “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy 98 (5, Part 2): 71–102. doi:10.1086/261725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanfey, Peter. 2011. “South East Europe: Lessons from the Global Economic Crisis.” In From Crisis to Recovery: South East European Studies at Oxford (SEESOX), edited by O. Anastasakis, J. Bastian, and M. Watson, 13–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savić, Ljubodrag, and Slavka Zeković. 2004. “Industrijska politika EU – pouke za zemlje u tranziciji [Industrial Policy of the EU – Lessons for the Countries in Transition].” In Strateški okvir za održivi razvoj Srbije , edited by N. Milašin, N. Spasić, M. Vujošević, and M. Pucar, 56–78. Belgrade: IAUS.
   Google Scholar
• Sielker, Franziska, and Daniel Rauhut. 2018. “The Rise of Macro-regions in Europe.” In European Territorial Cooperation, edited by E. Medeiros, 153–69. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Smas, Lukas, and Peter Schmitt. 2021. “Positioning Regional Planning across Europe.” Regional Studies 55 (5): 778–90. doi:10.1080/00343404.2020.1782879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soja, Edward. 2015. “Accentuate the Regional.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (2): 372–81. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stellian, Remy, and Jenny Danna-Buitrago. 2019. “Revealed Comparative Advantages and Regional Specialization: Evidence from Colombia in the Pacific Alliance.” Journal of Applied Economics 22 (1): 349–79. doi:10.1080/15140326.2019.1627722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telo, Mario. Ed. 2014. European Union and New Regionalism: Competing Regionalism and Global Governance in a Post-hegemonic Era. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Trippl, Micheala, Markus Grillitsch, and Arne Isaksen. 2018. “Exogenous Sources of Regional Industrial Change.” Progress in Human Geography 42 (5): 687–705. doi:10.1177/0309132517700982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNIDO (United Nations Industrial Development Organization). 2020. Statistics Data Portal. Accessed January 26, 2023. https://stat.unido.org/database/CIP%202020;https://stat.unido.org/SDG/.
   Google Scholar
• UN (United Nations). 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1.
   Google Scholar
• UN (United Nations). 2017. New Urban Agenda. Ecuador: Habitat III Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Van Egeraat, Chris, Edgar Morgenroth, Rutger Kroeas, Declan Curran, and Justin Gleeson. 2018. “A Measure for Identifying Substantial Geographic Concentrations.” Regional Science 97 (2): 281–300. doi:10.1111/pirs.12241
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Jian-Ye. 1990. “Growth, Technology Transfer, and the Long-run Theory of International Capital Movements.” Journal of International Economics 29 (3–4): 255–71. doi:10.1016/0022-1996(90)90033-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, Vanessa. 2019. “The Return of the City-region in the New Urban Agenda: Is This Relevant in the Global South?” Regional Studies 55 (1): 19–28. doi:10.1080/00343404.2019.1664734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, John. 1990. “What Washington Means by Policy Reform.” In Latin America Readjustment: How Much Has Happened?, edited by J. Williamson, 7–20. Washington DC: Institute of International Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Zeković, Slavka, and Miodrag Vujošević. 2015. “Development of South-Eastern Europe: The Role of Industrial Policy.” American Journal of Economics, Finance and Management 1 (5): 445–59.
   Google Scholar