Out of Sight, Out of Mind: When Proximities Matter for Mutual Fund Flows

References

• Aiken, L. S., and West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Aizenman, J., and Spiegel, M. M. 2002. Institutional efficiency, monitoring costs and the investment share of FDI. Review of International Economics 14(4):683–97.
   Google Scholar
• Agnes, P. 2000. The “end of geography” in financial services? Local embeddedness and territorialization in the interest rate swaps industry. Economic Geography 76(4):347–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. E. 1979. A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. American Economic Review 69(1):106–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. E., and Van Wincoop, E. 2004. Trade costs. Journal of Economic Literature 42(3):691–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoyama, Y., Murphy, J. T., and Hanson, S. 2011. Key concepts in economic geography. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Arvis, J. F., and Shepherd, B. 2013. The Poisson quasi-maximum likelihood estimator: A solution to the “adding up” problem in gravity models. Applied Economics Letters 20(6):515–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bénassy-Quéré, A., Coupet, M., and Mayer, T. 2007. Institutional determinants of foreign direct investment. World Economy 30(5):764–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boisso, D., and Ferrantino, M. 1997. Economic distance, cultural distance, and openness in international trade: Empirical puzzles. Journal of Economic Integration 12(4):456–84.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2005. Role of proximity in interaction and performance: Conceptual and empirical challenges. Regional Studies 39(1):41–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., and Hartog, M. 2014. Merger and acquisition activity as driver of spatial clustering: the spatial evolution of the Dutch banking industry 1850–1993. Economic Geography 90(3):247–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekel, T., and Boschma R. 2012. Knwoledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: the proximity paradox. Journal of Economic Geography 12(2):409–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, M. J., Van Oort F. G., and Linders, G. J. M. 2009. On the specification of the gravity model of trade: Zeros, excess zeros and zero-inflated estimation. Spatial Economic Analysis 4(2):167–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairncross, F. 2001. The death of distance. How the communication revolution is changing our lives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, K, Covrig, V., and Ng, L. 2005. What determines the domestic bias and foreign bias? Evidence from mutual funds equity allocation worldwide. Journal of Finance 60(3):1495–1534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clare, A., Nitzsche, D., and Scherman, M. 2013. Mutual fund performance and location. Journal of Asset Management 14(6):336–53.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G. L., Knox-Hayes, J., and Strauss, K. 2009. Financial sophistication, salience and the scale of deliberation in UK retirement planning. Environment and Planning A 41(10):2496–2515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coval, J. D., and Moscovitz, T. J. 1999. Home bias at home: Local equity preference in domestic portfolios. Journal of Finance 54(6):2045–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlquist, M., and Robertsson, G. 2001. Direct foreign ownership, institutional investors and firm characteristics. Journal of Financial Economics 59(3):413–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deardorff, A. 1998. Determinants of bilateral trade: Does gravity work in a neoclassical world? http://www.nber.org/chapters/c7818.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• De Crombrugghe D., Ferla, K., Meisel, N., Neubourg (de) C., Ould Aoudia, J., and Szirmai, A. 2009. Institutional Profiles Database III. http://www.cepii.fr/institutions/doc/ipd_2009_cahiers-2009-14_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A. 2008. The law and economics of self-dealing. Journal of Financial Economics 88(3):430–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuy, C., Lavigne, S., and Nicet-Chenaf, D. 2010. Does geography still matter? Evidence on the portfolio turnover of large equity investors and varieties of capitalism. Economic Geography 86(1):75–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkenstein, E. 1996. Preferences for stock characteristics are revealed by mutual fund portfolio holdings. Journal of Finance 51(1):111–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, M. A., and Matos, P. 2008. The colors of investors’ money. The role of institutional investors around the world. Journal of Financial Economics 88(3):499–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavin, T. J., Hurley, M. J., and Rousseau, F. 2002. Explaining stock market correlation: A gravity model approach. Manchester School 70(Suppl.1):87–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel, J. A. 1997. Regional trading blocs in the world economic system. Washington, DC:Institute for International Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Frazzini, A., Malloy, C. J., and Cohen, L. 2007. The small world of investing: Board connections and mutual fund returns. Working Paper 13121. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• French, K. R., and Poterba, J. 1991. Investor diversification and international equity markets. American Economic Review 81(2):222–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, T. 2005. The world is flat. A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Ghemawat, P. 2001. Distance still matters: The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review 79(8):137–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianett, M., and Laeven, L. 2013. Local bias, stock prices and market conditions. Evidence from US mutual funds. http://www.finance.uts.edu.au/research/seminars/131106.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Glassman, D. A., and Riddick, L. A. 2001. What causes home bias and how should it be measured? Journal of Empirical Finance 8(1):35–54.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez-Herrera E. 2013. Comparing alternative methods to estimate gravity models of bilateral trade. Empirical Economics 44(3):1087–1111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gompers, P. A., and Metrick, A. 2001. Institutional investors and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(1):229–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinblatt, M., and Keloharju, M. 2001. How distance, language and culture influence stockholdings and trades. Journal of Finance 56(3):1053–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., and Zingales, L. (2007). Cultural biases in economic exchange? Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(3):1095–1131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib M., and Zurawicki L. 2002. Corruption and foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies 33(2):291–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley J. P., and Williams, A. T. 2005. Shifting ground: Emerging global corporate governance standards and the rise of fiduciary capitalism. Environment and Planning A 37(1):1995–2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huberman, G. 2000. Home bias in equity markets: International and intranational evidence. In Intranational Macroeconomics, ed. G. D. Hess and E. Van Wincoop, 76–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ______. 2001. Familiarity breeds investment. Review of Financial Studies 4(3):659–80.
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund. 2009. IMF Annual Report 2009. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/ar/2009/engl/.
   Google Scholar
• ______. 2010. IMF Annual Report 2010. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/ar/2010/eng/pdf/ar10_eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Investment Company Institute. 2013. Investment Company Fact Book, A review of trends and activities in the U.S. Investment Company Industry. https://www.ici.org/pdf.2013_factbook.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and Tversky A. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ______. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, J. K., and Stulz, R. 1997. Why is there a home bias? An analysis of foreign portfolio equity ownership in Japan. Journal of Financial Economics 46(1):2–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, H. M. 1976. Introduction to Cultural Geography. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Klagge, B., and Martin, R. 2005. Decentralized versus centralized financial systems: Is there a case for local capital markets? Journal of Economic Geography 5(4):387–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox-Hayes, J. 2009. The developing carbon financial service industry: Expertise, adaptation and complementarity in London and New York. Journal of Economic Geography 9(6):749–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ______. 2013. The spatial and temporal dynamics of value in financialization: Analysis of the infrastructure of carbon markets. Geoforum 50(1):117–28.
   Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance 54(2):471–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., and Vishny R. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy 106(6):1113–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ______. 2000. Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics 58(1–2):3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyshon, A. 2008. Geographies of money and finance. Progress in Human Geography 22(3):443–46.
   Google Scholar
• Linders, G. J. M., Slangen, A., de Groot H. L. F, and Beugelsdijk, S. 2005. Cultural and institutional determinants of bilateral trade flows. Discussion Paper 05-074/3, Tinbergen Institute. http://dspace.ubvu.vu.nl/bitstream/handle/1871/9672/05074.pdf?sequence=1.
   Google Scholar
• Markowitz, H. M. 1952. Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance 7(1):77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. 1996. The death of geography. Financial Times, February 22.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. 2004. The exaggerated death of geography: Learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems. Journal of Economic Geography 4(1):3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdock, G. P. 1967. Ethnographic atlas. Pittsburg, PA: University of Pittsburg Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, R. 1992. Global financial integration: the end of geography. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, G. M., and Olson, J. S. 2000. Distance matters. Human Computer Interaction 15(2/3):139–78.
   Google Scholar
• Pool V. K., Stoffman, N., and Yonker S. E. 2011. No place like home: Familiarity in mutual fund manager portfolio choice. Review of Financial Studies 25(8):2563–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portes, R., and Rey, H. 2005. The determinants of cross-border equity flows. Journal of International Economics 65(2):269–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, W. J. 1931. The law of retail gravitation. New York: Pilsbury Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Santos Silva, J. M. C., and Tenreyro, S. 2006. The log of gravity. Review of Economics and Statistics. 88(4):641–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. D., and Warner, A. 1995. Economic reform and the process of global integration. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity no. 1:1–118.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkissian, S., and Schill, M. 2004. The overseas listing decision: New evidence of proximity preference. Review of Financial Studies 17(3):769–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, E. 2002. The spaces and times of globalization: Place, scale, networks and positionality. Economic Geography 78(3):307–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesar, L. L. 1995. Home bias and high turnover. Journal of International Money and Finance 14(4):467–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson One Banker Ownership [TOBO]. 2009. Thomson One Banker, Thomson Financial. http://banker.thomsonone.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Tinbergen, J. 1962. Shaping the world economy: Suggestions for an international economic policy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasz, L., and Kendall, R. 1999. A framework for cultural assessment. Journal of International Business Studies 30(4):781–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wójcik, D. 2009. The role of proximity in secondary markets. In Managing Financial risks: From global to local, G. L Clark, A. D. Dixon and A. H. B. Monk, 140–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar