605
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Information Policy and the Spatial Constitution of Digital Geographic Information Markets

ORCID Icon

References

  • Alvarez León, L. F. 2016. Property regimes and the commodification of geographic information: An examination of Google street view. Big Data and Society 3 (2): 1–13. doi:10.1177/2053951716637885.
  • Annoni, A. 2011. INSPIRE and the digital agenda for Europe. Annals of Geomatics 9 (5): 7–16.
  • Barkan, J. 2011. Law and the geographic analysis of economic globalization. Progress in Human Geography 35 (5): 590–607. doi:10.1177/0309132510389221.
  • Berndt, C., and Boeckler, M. 2009. Geographies of circulation and exchange: Constructions of markets. Progress in Human Geography 33 (4): 535–51. doi:10.1177/0309132509104805.
  • ———. 2012. Geographies of marketization. In The Wiley-Blackwell companion to economic geography, ed. T. J. Barnes, J. Peck, and E. S. Sheppard, Wiley-Blackwell (Firm), 199–212. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Braman, S. 2011. Defining information policy. Journal of Information Policy 1 (1): 1–5. doi:10.5325/jinfopoli.1.2011.0001.
  • Brückner, M. 2006. The geographic revolution in early America: Maps, literacy, and national identity. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
  • Çalışkan, K., and Callon, M. 2009. Economization, part 1: Shifting attention from the economy towards processes of economization. Economy and Society 38 (3): 369–98. doi:10.1080/03085140903020580.
  • ———. 2010. Economization, part 2: A research programme for the study of markets. Economy and Society 39 (1): 1–34. doi:10.1080/03085140903424519.
  • Christophers, B. 2013. The law’s markets: Envisioning and effecting the boundaries of competition. Journal of Cultural Economy 8 (2): 125–43. doi:10.1080/17530350.2013.781533.
  • ———. 2014. Competition, law, and the power of (imagined) geography: Market definition and the emergence of too-big-to-fail banking in the United States. Economic Geography 90 (4): 429–50. doi:10.1111/ecge.2014.90.issue-4.
  • ———. 2015. The territorial fix: Price, power and profit in the geographies of markets. Progress in Human Geography 38 (6): 754–70. doi:10.1177/0309132513516176
  • ———. 2016. The great leveler: Capitalism and competition in the court of law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Connors, J. P., Lei, S., and Kelly, M. 2012. Citizen science in the age of neogeography: Utilizing volunteered geographic information for environmental monitoring. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102 (6): 1267–89. doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.627058.
  • Craglia, M., and Annoni, A. 2007. INSPIRE: An innovative approach to the development of spatial data infrastructures in Europe. In Research and Theory in Advancing Spatial Data Infrastructure Concepts, ed. H. Onsrud, 93–105. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.
  • Craib, R. B. 2002. A nationalist metaphysics: State fixations, national maps, and the geo-historical imagination in nineteenth-century Mexico. Hispanic American Historical Review 82 (1): 33–68. doi:10.1215/00182168-82-1-33.
  • Crampton, J. W. 2014. Collect it all: National security, big data and governance. GeoJournal 80 (4): 519–31. doi:10.1007/s10708-014-9598-y.
  • Crampton, J. W., Graham, M., Poorthuis, A., Shelton, T., Stephens, M., Wilson, M. W., and Zook, M. 2013. Beyond the geotag: Situating “big data” and leveraging the potential of the geoweb. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 40 (2): 130–39. doi:10.1080/15230406.2013.777137.
  • Crompvoets, J., De Man, E., and Macharis, C. 2010. Value of spatial data: Networked performance beyond economic rhetoric. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research 5:96–119.
  • Ebner, A. 2010. Transnational markets and the Polanyi problem. In Karl Polanyi, globalisation and the potential of law in transnational markets, ed. C. Joerges and J. Falke, 19–41. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  • Elwood, S., Goodchild, M. F., and Sui, D. Z. 2012. Researching volunteered geographic information: Spatial data, geographic research, and new social practice. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102 (3): 571–90. doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.595657.
  • Elwood, S., and Leszczynski, A. 2013. New spatial media, new knowledge politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38 (4): 544–59. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00543.x.
  • European Commission. n.d. Who’s who in INSPIRE. http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/index.cfm/pageid/481.
  • ———. 2015. A digital single market strategy for Europe—Analysis and evidence. Brussels: European Commission.
  • Gabrynowicz, J. I. 2010. One half century and counting: The evolution of U.S. national space law and three long-term emerging issues. Harvard Law and Policy Review 4:405–26.
  • Gakstatter, E. 2013. GIS market in Europe to reach $3.3B by 2016. Geospatial Solutions, July 1. http://geospatial-solutions.com/gis-market-in-europe-to-reach-3-3b-by-2016/.
  • Gemici, K. 2008. Karl Polanyi and the antinomies of embeddedness. Socio-Economic Review 6 (1): 5–33. doi:10.1093/ser/mwl034.
  • Gertler, M. S. 2010. Rules of the game: The place of institutions in regional economic change. Regional Studies 44 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1080/00343400903389979.
  • Goodchild, M. F. 2007. Citizens as sensors: Web 2.0 and the volunteering of geographic information. GeoFocus 7:8–10.
  • Guthman, J. 2007. The Polanyian way? Voluntary food labels as neoliberal governance. Antipode 39 (3): 456–78. doi:10.1111/anti.2007.39.issue-3.
  • Henttu, H., Izaret, J.-M., and Potere, D. 2012. Geospatial services: A $1.6 trillion growth engine for the U.S. Economy. San Francisco: Boston Consulting Group.
  • Hess, M. 2004. “Spatial” relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embeddedness. Progress in Human Geography 28 (2): 165–86. doi:10.1191/0309132504ph479oa.
  • Huijboom, N., and Van den Broek, T. 2011. Open data: An international comparison of strategies. European Journal of ePractice 12 (April): 1–13.
  • Jessop, B. 2001. Regulationist and autopoieticist reflections on Polanyi’s account of market economies and the market society. New Political Economy 6 (2): 213–32. doi:10.1080/13563460120060616.
  • Jessop, B., Ebner, A., and Beck, N. 2008. Polanyian, regulationist, and autopoieticist reflections on states and markets and their implications for the knowledge-based economy. In The Institutions of the Market. Organizations, Social Systems, and Governance, ed. B. A. Ebner and N. Beck, 228–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Karjala, D. S. 1995. Copyright in electronic maps. Jurimetrics 35 (4): 395–415.
  • Kreide, R. 2010. Re-embedding the market through law? The ambivalence of juridification in the international context. In Karl Polanyi, globalisation and the potential of law in transnational markets, ed. C. Joerges and J. Falke, 41–64. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  • Leszczynski, A. 2012. Situating the geoweb in political economy. Progress in Human Geography 36 (1): 72–89. doi:10.1177/0309132511411231.
  • Lindblom, C. E. 2002. The market system: What it is, how it works, and what to make of it. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Long, D. E. 2014. Mapping the new geographies of intellectual property rights in the 21st century. WIPO Journal 6 (1): 26–36.
  • Lopez, X. R. 1998. The dissemination of spatial data. Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing Group.
  • Martens, B. 2013. What does economic research tell us about cross-border e-commerce in the EU digital single market? JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy No. 2013-05. Joint Research Centre, Seville. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/decwpa/2013-05.html.
  • Maurer, S. M., Hugenholtz, P. B., and Onsrud, H. J. 2001. Europe’s Database Experiment. Science 294 (5543): 789–90. doi:10.1126/science.1062695.
  • Muellerleile, C. 2013. Turning financial markets inside out: Polanyi, performativity and disembeddedness. Environment and Planning A 45 (7): 1625–42. doi:10.1068/a45610.
  • Onsrud, H. J. 1995. The role of law in impeding and facilitating the sharing of geographic information. In Sharing geographic information, ed. H. J. Onsrud and G. Rushton, 292–306. Rutgers: CUPR Press.
  • ———. 1998. Access to geographic information in the United States. In Proceedings of Free accessibility of geo-information in the Netherlands, the United States, and the European Community, ed. J. A. Zevenbergen, 33–41. Delft, the Netherlands: Delft University Press.
  • ———. 2010. Legal interoperability in support of spatially enabling society. In Spatially enabling society, ed. A. Rajabifard, J. Crompvoets, M. Kalantari, and B. Kok, 163–71. Leuven, Belgium: GSDI Association and Leuven University Press.
  • Oxera. 2013. What is the economic impact of geo services? Oxford: Oxera.
  • Peck, J. 2005. Economic sociologies in space. Economic Geography 81 (2): 129–75. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2005.tb00263.x.
  • ———. 2013a. Disembedding Polanyi: Exploring Polanyian economic geographies. Environment and Planning A 45 (7): 1536–44. doi:10.1068/a46253.
  • ———. 2013b. For Polanyian economic geographies. Environment and Planning A 45 (7): 1545–68. doi:10.1068/a45236.
  • Polanyi, K. 1957. The economy as instituted process. In Trade and market in the early empires: Economies in history and theory, ed. K. Polanyi, C. M. Arensberg, and H. W. Pearson, 243–69. New York: Free Press.
  • Prudham, S. 2013. Men and things: Karl Polanyi, Primitive accumulation, and their relevance to a radical green political economy. Environment and Planning A 45 (7): 1569–87. doi:10.1068/a45303.
  • Quark, A. A. 2013. Institutional mobility and mutation in the global capitalist system: A neo-Polanyian analysis of a transnational cotton standards war, 1870–1945. Environment and Planning A 45 (7): 1588–604. doi:10.1068/a45521.
  • Rosen, J. 2012. The right to be forgotten. Stanford Law Review Online. https://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/privacy-paradox-the-right-to-be-forgotten/.
  • Scassa, T., and Fraser Taylor, D. R. 2014. Intellectual property law and geospatial information: Some challenges. WIPO Journal 6 (1): 79–88.
  • Sheppard, E. 2000. Competition in space and between places. In A companion to economic geography, 1st. ed. E. Sheppard and T. J. Barnes,169–16. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  • ———. 2011. Geographical political economy. Journal of Economic Geography 11 (2): 319–31. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbq049.
  • Sparke, M. 2013. Introducing globalization: Ties, tensions, and uneven integration. 1st Kindle. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Thatcher, J. 2014. Living on fumes: Digital footprints, data fumes, and the limitations of spatial big data. International Journal of Communication 8 (1): 1765–83.
  • Tréguer, F. 2012. Interoperability case study: The European Union as an institutional design for legal interoperability. Scholarly Paper 2148543. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
  • Vancauwenberghe, G., Cipriano, P., and Craglia, M. 2014. Exploring the market potential for geo-ICT companies in relation to INSPIRE. Proceedings of the AGILE’2014 International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Castellón, Spain. http://repositori.uji.es/xmlui/handle/10234/98914.
  • Vatsavai, R. R., Ganguly, A., Chandola, V., Stefanidis, A., Klasky, S., and Shekhar, S. (2012). Spatiotemporal data mining in the era of big spatial data: Algorithms and applications. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL international workshop on analytics for big geospatial data, ed. V. Chandola, R. R. Vatsavai, and C. Gupta, 1–10. Redondo Beach, CA: Association for Computer Machinery. doi:10.1145/2447481.2447482.
  • Vidal, M., and Peck, J. 2012. Sociological institutionalism and the socially constructed economy. In The Wiley-Blackwell companion to economic geography, ed. T. J. Barnes, J. Peck, and E. Sheppard, 594–611. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Wainwright, J., and Bryan, J. 2009. Cartography, territory, property: Postcolonial reflections on indigenous counter-mapping in Nicaragua and Belize. Cultural Geographies 16 (2): 153–78. doi:10.1177/1474474008101515.
  • Wilson, M. W., and Graham, M. 2013. Neogeography and volunteered geographic information: A conversation with Michael Goodchild and Andrew Turner. Environment and Planning A 45 (1): 10–18. doi:10.1068/a44483.
  • Winichakul, T. 1994. Siam mapped. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Zhang, J. 2013. Marketization beyond neoliberalization: A neo-Polanyian perspective on China’s transition to a market economy. Environment and Planning A 45 (7): 1605–24. doi:10.1068/a45589.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.