3,262
Views
72
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Barriers to Path Creation: The Case of Offshore Wind Power in Norway

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Berg Jensen, M., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., and Lundvall, B. Å. 2007. Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy 36 (5): 680–93. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006.
  • Bergek, A., and Jacobsson, S. 2011. Fremmer grønne sertifikater ny teknologi? [Do green certificates promote new technology?]. In Energirikdommens paradokser [The paradoxes of energy wealth], ed. J. Hanson, S. Kasa, and O. Wicken, 82–102. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
  • Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., and Rickne, A. 2008. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy 37 (3): 407–29. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003.
  • Binz, C., Truffer, B., and Coenen, L. 2016. Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring: Industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography 92 (2): 172–200. doi:10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177.
  • Binz, C., Truffer, B., Li, L., Shi, Y., and Lu, Y. 2012. Conceptualizing leapfrogging with spatially coupled innovation systems: The case of onsite wastewater treatment in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79 (1): 155–71. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.08.016.
  • Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., and Van Lente, H. 2006. The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3–4): 285–98. doi:10.1080/09537320600777002.
  • Boschma, R., Coenen, L., Frenken, K., and Truffer, B. 2017. Towards a theory of regional diversification. Regional Studies 51 (1): 31–45. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460.
  • Boschma, R., and Frenken, K. 2009. Some notes on institutions in evolutionary economic geography. Economic Geography 85 (2): 151–58. doi:10.1111/ecge.2009.85.issue-2.
  • ———. 2011. Technological relatedness and regional branching. In Beyond Territory, ed. H. Bathelt, M. Feldman, and D. F. Kogler, 64–81. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  • BT. 2012a. BKK tapte 90. mill på vindkraft [BKK lost NOK 90 million on wind power]. Bergens Tidende, December 4. https://www.bt.no/nyheter/okonomi/i/ok1oj/BKK-tapte-90-mill-pa-vindkraft.
  • ———. 2012b. Investorer rømmer regjeringens havvindsatsing [Investors flee the government’s offshore wind initiative]. Bergens Tidende, November 5. https://www.bt.no/nyheter/okonomi/i/J6L9R/Investorer-rommer-regjeringens-havvindsatsing.
  • Bugge, M. M., and Øiestad, S. 2014. The micro-foundations of regional branching—The case of digitization of publishing. European Planning Studies 23 (4): 764–84. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.970131.
  • Dawley, S. 2014. Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development. Economic Geography 90 (1): 91–112. doi:10.1111/ecge.12028.
  • Energirådet. 2008. . Vindkraft offshore—Industrielle muligheter for Norge [Offshore wind power—Industrial opportunities for Norway]. Oslo, Norway: Ministry of Petroleum and Energy.
  • European Wind Energy Association. 2013. Where’s the money coming from? Financing offshore wind farms. Brussels, Belgium: European Wind Energy Association.
  • ———. 2014. The European offshore wind industry—Key trends and statistics 2013. Brussels, Belgium: European Wind Energy Association.
  • Garud, R., and Karnøe, P. 2001. Path creation as a process of mindful deviation. In Path dependence and creation, ed. R. Garud and P. Karnøe, 1–38. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • ———. 2003. Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy 32 (2): 277–300. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2.
  • Geels, F. W., Hekkert, M. P., and Jacobsson, S. 2008. The dynamics of sustainable innovation journeys. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 20 (5): 521–36. doi:10.1080/09537320802292982.
  • Hansen, G. H., and Steen, M. 2015. Offshore oil and gas firms’ involvement in offshore wind: Technological frames and undercurrents. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 17: 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.05.001.
  • Hanson, J., Kasa, S., and Wicken, O. 2011. Energirikdommens paradokser [The paradoxes of energy wealth]. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
  • Hassink, R. 2005. How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning region to learning cluster. European Planning Studies 13 (4): 521–35. doi:10.1080/09654310500107134.
  • Herstad, S., and Brekke, T. 2012. Globalization, modes of innovation and regional knowledge diffusion infrastructures. European Planning Studies 20 (10): 1603–25. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.713334.
  • Huenteler, J., Schmidt, T. S., Ossenbrink, J., and Hoffmann, V. H. 2016. Technology life-cycles in the energy sector—Technological characteristics and the role of deployment for innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 104: 102–21. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.09.022.
  • Isaksen, A. 2014. Industrial development in thin regions: Trapped in path extension? Journal of Economic Geography 15 (3): 585–600. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbu026.
  • Jacobsson, S., and Karltorp, K. 2013. Mechanisms blocking the dynamics of the European offshore wind energy innovation system—Challenges for policy intervention. Energy Policy 63: 1182–95. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.077.
  • Kern, F., Smith, A., Shaw, C., Raven, R., and Verhees, B. 2014. From laggard to leader: Explaining offshore wind developments in the UK. Energy Policy 69 (June): 635–46. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.031.
  • Lema, R., Berger, A., Schmitz, H., and Song, H. 2011. Competition and cooperation between Europe and China in the wind power sector. IDS Working Papers 377 (October): 1–45. doi:10.1111/j.2040-0209.2011.00377_2.x.
  • Markard, J., and Petersen, R. 2009. The offshore trend: Structural changes in the wind power sector. Energy Policy 37 (9): 3545–56. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.04.015.
  • Markard, J., Raven, R., and Truffer, B. 2012. Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy 41 (6): 955–67. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013.
  • Martin, R. 2010. Roepke lecture in economic geography—Rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography 86 (1): 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01056.x.
  • Martin, R., and Sunley, P. 2006. Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography 6 (4): 395–437. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbl012.
  • ———. 2010. The place of path dependence in an evolutionary perspective on the economic landscape. In The handbook of evolutionary economic geography, ed. R. Boschma and R. Martin, 62–92. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Ministry of Petroleum and Energy. 2012. Energiutredningen—Verdiskaping, forsyningssikkerhet og miljø [The energy review—Value creation, security of supply and environment]. Oslo, Norway: Ministry of Petroleum and Energy.
  • Murphy, J. T. 2015. Human geography and socio-technical transition studies: Promising intersections. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 17: 73–91. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.03.002.
  • Neffke, F., Henning, M., and Boschma, R. 2011. How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography 87 (3): 237–65. doi:10.1111/ecge.2011.87.issue-3.
  • NFR. 2009. Centres for environment-friendly energy research (FME): About the programme. Oslo: Research Council of Norway.
  • Njøs, R., Jakobsen, S.-E., Fosse, J. K., and Engelsen, C. 2013. Challenges to bridging discrepant knowledge bases: A case study of the Norwegian centre for offshore wind energy. European Planning Studies 22 (11): 2389–410. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.843651.
  • Normann, H. E. 2015. The role of politics in sustainable transitions: The rise and decline of offshore wind in Norway. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 15 (4): 180–93. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.002.
  • NVE. 2012. Havvind—Strategisk konsekvensutredning [Offshore wind—Strategic impact assessment]. Oslo, Norway: Norges vassdrags- og energidirektorat.
  • SA. 2009. Ny lov om vindkraft til havs. [New act on offshore wind power]. Stavanger Aftenblad, June 27.
  • Simmie, J. 2012. Path dependence and new technological path creation in the Danish wind power industry. European Planning Studies 20 (5): 753–72. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.667924.
  • Smith, A., and Raven, R. 2012. What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy 41 (6): 1025–36. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012.
  • Steen, M. 2016. Reconsidering path creation in economic geography: Aspects of agency, temporality and methods. European Planning Studies 24 (9): 1605–22. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1204427.
  • Steen, M., and Weaver, T. 2017. Incumbents’ diversification and cross-sectorial energy industry dynamics. Research Policy 46 (6): 1071–86. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.04.001.
  • Strambach, S. 2010. Path dependence and path plasticity: The co-evolution of institutions and innovation—The German customized business software industry. In Handbook of evolutionary economic geography, ed. R. Boschma and R. Martin, 406–29. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Tanner, A. N. 2014. Regional branching reconsidered: Emergence of the fuel cell industry in European regions. Economic Geography 90 (4): 403–27. doi:10.1111/ecge.2014.90.issue-4.
  • Tushman, M. L., and O’Reilly, C. A. 1996. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review 38 (4): 8–30. doi:10.2307/41165852.
  • Wieczorek, A. J., Negro, S. O., Harmsen, R., Heimeriks, G. J., Luo, L., and Hekkert, M. P. 2013. A review of the European offshore wind innovation system. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 26 (October): 294–306. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.045.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.