9,792
Views
95
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Industrial Diversification in Europe: The Differentiated Role of Relatedness

, &

References

  • Andersson, M., Klaesson, J., and Larsson, J. P. 2014. The sources of the urban wage premium by worker skills: Spatial sorting or agglomeration economies? Papers in Regional Science 93 (4): 727–47. doi:10.1111/pirs.12025.
  • Audretsch, D. B., and Fritsch, M. 2002. Growth regimes over time and space. Regional Studies 36 (2): 113–24. doi:10.1080/00343400220121909.
  • Bacolod, M., Blum, B. S., and Strange, W. C. 2009. Skills in the city. Journal of Urban Economics 65 (2): 136–53. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2008.09.003.
  • Balland, P., Boschma, R., Crespo, J., and Rigby, D. Forthcoming. Smart specialization policy in the EU: Relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification. Regional Studies doi:10.1080/00343404.2018.1437900.
  • Binz, C., Truffer, B., and Coenen, L. 2014. Why space matters in technological innovation systems—Mapping global knowledge dynamics of membrane bioreactor technology. Research Policy 43 (1): 138–55. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.002.
  • Boschma, R. 2017. Relatedness as driver behind regional diversification: A research agenda. Regional Studies 51 (3): 351–64. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767.
  • Boschma, R., Balland, P. A., and Kogler, D. F. 2015. Relatedness and technological change in cities: The rise and fall of technological knowledge in U.S. metropolitan areas from 1981 to 2010. Industrial and Corporate Change 24 (1): 223–50. doi:10.1093/icc/dtu012.
  • Boschma, R., and Iammarino, S. 2009. Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Economic Geography 85 (3): 289–311. doi:10.1111/ecge.2009.85.issue-3.
  • Boschma, R., Minondo, A., and Navarro, M. 2013. The emergence of new industries at the regional level in Spain: A proximity approach based on product relatedness. Economic Geography 89 (1): 29–51. doi:10.1111/ecge.2013.89.issue-1.
  • Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., and Malerba, F. 2003. Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy 32 (1): 69–87. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5.
  • Colombelli, A., Krafft, J., and Quatraro, F. 2014. The emergence of new technology-based sectors in European regions: A proximity-based analysis of nanotechnology. Research Policy 43 (10): 1681–96. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.07.008.
  • Cortinovis, N., and van Oort, F. 2015. Variety, economic growth and knowledge intensity of European regions: A spatial panel analysis. Annals of Regional Science 55 (1): 7–32. doi:10.1007/s00168-015-0680-2.
  • Cortinovis, N., Xiao, J., Boschma, R., and van Oort, F. 2017. Quality of government and social capital as drivers of regional diversification in Europe. Journal of Economic Geography 17 (6): 1179–208. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbx001.
  • Duranton, G., and Puga, D. 2001. Nursery cities: Urban diversity, process innovation, and the life cycle of products. American Economic Review 91 (5): 1454–77. doi:10.1257/aer.91.5.1454.
  • _____. 2005. From sectoral to functional urban specialisation. Journal of Urban Economics 57 (2): 343–70. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2004.12.002.
  • Essletzbichler, J. 2015. Relatedness, industrial branching and technological cohesion in US metropolitan areas. Regional Studies 49 (5): 752–66. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.806793.
  • Feldman, M. P., Kogler, D. F., and Rigby, D. L. 2015. rKnowledge: The spatial diffusion and adoption of rDNA methods. Regional Studies 49 (5): 798–817. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.980799.
  • Fornahl, D., and Guenther, C. 2010. Persistence and change of regional industrial activities. The impact of diversification in the German machine tool industry. European Planning Studies 18 (12): 1911–36. doi:10.1080/09654313.2010.515790.
  • Frenken, K., and Boschma, R. A. 2007. A theoretical framework for economic geography: Industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process. Journal of Economic Geography 7 (5): 635–49. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbm018.
  • Greene, W. H. 2012. Econometric analysis. 7th ed. Harlow, England: Pearson Education.
  • Hartog, M., Boschma, R., and Sotarauta, M. 2012. The impact of related variety on regional employment growth in Finland 1993–2006. High-tech versus medium/low-tech. Industry and Innovation 19 (6): 459–76. doi:10.1080/13662716.2012.718874.
  • Hatzichronoglou, T. 1997. Revision of the high-technology sector and product classification. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Hausmann, R., and Hidalgo, C. A. 2010. Country diversification, product ubiquity, and economic divergence. Working Paper 201. Cambridge, MA: Center for International Department, Havard University.
  • Hausmann, R., and Klinger, B. 2007. The structure of the product space and the evolution of comparative advantage. Working Paper 146. Cambridge, MA: Center for International Development, Harvard University.
  • He, C., Yan, Y., and Rigby, D. Forthcoming. Regional industrial evolution in China. Papers in Regional Science doi:10.1111/pirs.12246.
  • Heidenreich, M. 2009. Innovation patterns and location of European low-and-medium-technology industries. Research Policy 38 (3): 483–94. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.005.
  • Heimeriks, G., and Boschma, R. 2014. The path- and place-dependent nature of scientific knowledge production in biotech 1986-2008. Journal of Economic Geography 14 (2): 339–64. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbs052.
  • Hidalgo, C. 2015. Why information grows: The evolution of order, from atoms to economies. New York: Basic Books.
  • Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabási, A.-L., and Hausmann, R. 2007. The product space conditions the development of nations. Science 317 (5837): 482–87. doi:10.1126/science.1144581.
  • Isaksen, A. 2015. Industrial development in thin regions: Trapped in path extension? Journal of Economic Geography 15 (3): 585–600. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbu026.
  • Isaksen, A., and Trippl, M. 2016. Path development in different regional innovation systems. In Innovation drivers and regional innovation strategies, ed. M. D. Parrilli, R. D. Fitjar, and A. Rodríguez-Pose, 66–84. New York: Routledge.
  • Karo, E., and Kattel, R. 2015. Economic development and evolving state capacities in Central and Eastern Europe: Can “smart specialization” make a difference? Journal of Economic Policy Reform 18 (2): 172–87. doi:10.1080/17487870.2015.1009068.
  • Kirner, E., Kinkel, S., and Jaeger, A. 2009. Innovation paths and the innovation performance of low-technology firms—An empirical analysis of German industry. Research Policy 38 (3): 447–58. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.011.
  • Kogler, D. F., Rigby, D. L., and Tucker, I. 2013. Mapping knowledge space and technological relatedness in US cities. European Planning Studies 21 (9): 1374–91. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.755832.
  • Los, B. 2000. The empirical performance of a new inter-industry technology spillover measure. In Technology and knowledge, ed. P. P. Saviotti and B. Nooteboom, 118–51. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Marsan, G. A., and Maguire, K. 2011. Categorisation of OECD regions using innovation-related variables. Working Paper 2011/03. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/5kg8bf42qv7k-en.pdf?expires=1517250949&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=567BA2E38A44BCF7C11547E307ACBE10.
  • Martin, R., and Sunley, P. 2006. Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography 6 (4): 395–437. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbl012.
  • McCann, P., and Ortega-Argilés, R. 2015. Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies 49 (8): 1291–302. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.799769.
  • Miguelez, E., and Moreno, R. Forthcoming. Relatedness, external linkages and regional innovation in Europe. Regional Studies doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1360478.
  • Montresor, F., and Quatraro, F. 2017. Regional branching and key enabling technologies. Evidence from European patent data. Economic Geography 93 (4): 367–96. doi:10.1080/00130095.2017.1326810.
  • Neffke, F., Hartog, M., Boschma, R., and Henning, M. 2018. Agents of structural change: The role of firms and entrepreneurs in regional diversification. Economic Geography 94 (1): 23–48. doi:10.1080/00130095.2017.1391691.
  • Neffke, F., Henning, M., and Boschma, R. 2011. How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography 87 (3): 237–65. doi:10.1111/ecge.2011.87.issue-3.
  • O’Donoghue, D., and Gleave, B. 2004. A note on methods for measuring industrial agglomeration. Regional Studies 38 (4): 419–27. doi:10.1080/03434002000213932.
  • Rigby, D. 2015. Technological relatedness and knowledge space: Entry and exit of US cities from patent classes. Regional Studies 49 (11): 1922–37. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.854878.
  • Rodríguez-Pose, A., di Cataldo, M., and Rainoldi, A. 2014. The role of government institutions for smart specialisation and regional development. S3 Policy Brief Series 4. Luxembourg: European Commission. http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/20182/114990/JRC88935_Role_GovInstitutions_S3_RegDev.pdf/282978d5-0c4d-448a-be21-62ab16fe19a2.
  • Rodríguez-Pose, A., and Wilkie, C. 2015. Institutions and the entrepreneurial discovery process for smart specialization. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography 15.23. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Utrecht University.
  • Rumelt, R. P. 1974. Strategy, structure, and economic performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Santamaria, L., Nieto, M. J., and Barge-Gil, A. 2009. Beyond formal R&D: Taking advantage of other sources of innovation in low- and medium-technology industries. Research Policy 38 (3): 507–17. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.004.
  • Saviotti, P. P., and Frenken, K. 2008. Trade variety and economic development of countries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 18 (2): 201–18. doi:10.1007/s00191-007-0081-5.
  • Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Tanner, A. N. 2016. The emergence of new technology-based industries: The case of fuel cells and its technological relatedness to regional knowledge bases. Journal of Economic Geography 16 (3): 611–35. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbv011.
  • Tavassoli, S., and Carbonara, N. 2014. The role of knowledge variety and intensity for regional innovation. Small Business Economics 43 (2): 493–509. doi:10.1007/s11187-014-9547-7.
  • Tian, Z. 2013. Measuring agglomeration using the standardized location quotient with a bootstrap method. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy 43 (2): 186–97.
  • Tödtling, F., and Trippl, M. 2005. One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy 34 (8): 1203–19. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018.
  • Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., and Isaksen, A. Forthcoming. Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Progress in Human Geography doi:10.1177/0309132517700982.
  • Van den Berge, M., and Weterings, A. 2014. Relatedness in eco-technological development in European regions. The Hague: Planbureau voor Leefomgeving.
  • Weitzman, M. L. 1998. Recombinant growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (2): 331–60. doi:10.1162/003355398555595.