8,105
Views
229
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Rethinking Path Creation: A Geographical Political Economy Approach

, , &

References

  • Bailey, D., Bellandi, M., Caloffi, A., and De Propis, L. 2010. Place-renewing leadership: Trajectories of change for manufacturing regions in Europe. Policy Studies 31 (4): 457–74.
  • Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., and Sandén, B. A. 2008. ‘Legitimation’ and ‘development of positive externalities’: Two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 20 (5): 575–92.
  • Berlin Senate. 2017. Berlin: The economic turnaround. Presentation by Senatsverwaltung für Wirtschaft, Energie und Betriebe [Senate Department for Economics, Energy and Business]. Berlin: Berlin Senate.
  • Berndt, C., and Boeckler, M. 2012. Geographies of marketization. In The new companion to economic geography, ed T. J. Barnes, J. Peck, and E. Sheppard, 2199–212. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Binz, C., Truffer, B., and Coenen, L. 2016. Path creation as a process of resource alignment: Industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography 92 (2): 172–200.
  • Bork, S., Schoormans, J. P. L., Silvester, S., and Joore, P. 2015. How actors can influence the legitimation of new consumer product categories: A theoretical framework. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 16 (September): 172–200.
  • Boschma, R. 2017. Relatedness as a driver of regional diversification. Regional Studies 51 (3): 172–200.
  • Boschma, R., Coenen, L., Frenken, K., and Truffer, B. 2017. Towards a theory of regional diversification: Combining insights from evolutionary economic geography and transition studies. Regional Studies 51 (1):31–45.
  • Boschma, R., and Frenken, K. 2011. Technological relatedness and industry branching. In Dynamic geographies of knowledge creation and innovation, ed. H. Bathelt, M. P. Feldman, and D. F. Kogler, 64–81. London: Routledge.
  • Bryson, J. R. 2016. Service economies, spatial divisions of expertise and the second global shift. In An introduction to human geography, 5th ed., ed. P. Daniels, M. Bradshaw, D. Shaw, J. Sidaway, and T. Hall, 343–64. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
  • Carvalho, L., and Vale, M. 2018. Biotech by bricolage? Agency, institutions and new path development in peripheral regions. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11 (2): 275–95.
  • Christophers, B. 2014. From Marx to market and back again: Performing the economy. Geoforum 57 (November): 12–20.
  • Christopherson, S. 2002. Why do national labour market practices continue to diverge in the global economy? The “missing link” of investment rules. Economic Geography 78 (1): 1–21.
  • Coe, N., and Hess, M. 2011. Local and regional development: A global production network approach. In Handbook of local and regional development, ed. A. Pike, A. Rodríguez-Pose, and J. Tomaney, 128–38. London: Routledge.
  • Coe, N., and Jordhus-Lier, D. 2011. Constrained agency: Re-evaluating the geographies of labour. Progress in Human Geography 35 (2): 211–33.
  • Coe, N., and Yeung, H. W.-C. 2015. Global production networks: Theorising economic development in an interconnected world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Coenen, L., Benneworth, P., and Truffer, B. 2012. Towards a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy 41 (6): 211–33.
  • Colomb, C. 2012a. Staging the new Berlin. Place marketing and the politics of urban reinvention post-1989. London: Routledge.
  • ———. 2012b. Pushing the urban frontier: Temporary uses of space, city marketing and the creative city discourse in 2000s Berlin. Journal of Urban Affairs 34 (2): 131–52.
  • Cooke, P. 2012. Transversality and transition: Green innovation and new regional path creation. European Planning Studies 20 (5): 817–34.
  • Dawley, S. 2014. Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development. Economic Geography 90 (1): 91–112.
  • Dawley, S., MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., and Pike, A. 2015. Policy activism and regional path creation: The promotion of offshore wind in North East England and Scotland. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8 (2): 257–72.
  • Detrick, S. 1999. The post industrial revitalization of Pittsburgh: Myths and evidence. Community Development Journal 34 (1): 4–12.
  • Elzen, B., Van Mierlo, B., and Leeuwis, C. 2012. Anchoring of innovations: Assessing Dutch efforts to harvest energy from glasshouses. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 5 (December): 1–18.
  • Emirbayer, M., and Mische, A. 1998. What is agency? American Journal of Sociology 103 (4): 962–1023.
  • Essletzbichler, J. 2012. Renewable energy technology and path creation: A multi-scalar approach to energy transition in the UK. European Planning Studies 20 (5): 791–816.
  • ———. 2015. Relatedness, industrial branching and technological cohesion in US metropolitan areas. Regional Studies 49 (5): 752–66.
  • Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., and Verburg, T. 2007. Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies 41 (5): 685–97.
  • Garud, R., and Karnøe, P. 2001. Path creation as a process of mindful deviation. In Path dependence and creation, ed. R. Garud and P. Karnøe, 1–38. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
  • Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., and Karnøe, P. 2010. Path dependence or path creation? Journal of Management Studies 47 (4): 760–74.
  • Geels, F. W. 2004. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems—Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy 33 (6): 897–920.
  • Geels, F. W., and Verhees, B. 2011. Cultural legitimacy and framing struggles in innovation journeys: A cultural-performative perspective and a case study of Dutch nuclear energy (1945–1986). Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78 (6): 910–30.
  • Gertler, M. S. 2010. Rules of the game: The place of institutions in regional economic change. Regional Studies 41 (1): 1–15.
  • Giarratani, F., and Houston, D. B. 1989. Structural change and economic policy in a declining metropolitan region: Implications of the Pittsburgh experience. Urban Studies 26 (6): 549–58.
  • Grabher, G., and Stark, D. 1997. Organizing diversity: Evolutionary theory, network analysis and postsocialism. Regional Studies 31 (5): 533–44.
  • Greenblatt, A. 2014. The progress and promise of Pittsburgh’s turnaround. Governing November. http://www.governing.com/topics/politics/gov-pittsburgh-turnaround-bill-peduto.html.
  • Grillitsch, M., Asheim, B., and Trippl, M. 2018. Unrelated knowledge combinations: The unexplored potential for regional industrial path development. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11 (2): 257–74.
  • Grillitsch, M., and Sotarauta, M. 2018. Regional growth paths: From structure to agency and back. Papers in Innovation Studies 2018/01. Lund, Sweden: Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy (CIRCLE), Lund University.
  • Hall, P., and Soskice, D., eds, 2001. Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Harvey, D. 1982. The limits to capital. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • ———. 1989. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 71 (1): 3–17.
  • Hassink, R. 2005. How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning regions to learning cluster. European Planning Studies 13 (4): 521–35.
  • Hudson, R. 1994. Institutional change, cultural transformation, and economic regeneration: Myths and realities from Europe’s old industrial areas. In Globalization, institutions, and regional development in Europe, ed. A. Amin and N. Thrift, 196–261. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • ———. 2005. Economic geographies. London: Sage.
  • ———. 2006. On what’s right and keeping left: Or why geography still needs Marxian political economy. Antipode 38 (2): 374–95.
  • Iammarino, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A., and Storper, M. 2018. Regional inequality in Europe: Evidence, theory and policy implications. Journal of Economic Geography. doi:10.1093/jeg/lby021.
  • Isaksen, A. 2015. Industrial development in thin regions: Trapped in path extension? Journal of Economic Geography 15 (3): 585–600.
  • Jacobs, B. 2000. Strategy and partnership in cities and regions. Economic development and urban regeneration in Pittsburgh, Birmingham and Rotterdam. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan Press.
  • Jessop, B. 2007. State power: A strategic-regional approach. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Jessop, B., Brenner, N., and Jones, M. 2008. Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D, Society and Space 26 (3): 389–401.
  • Kelly, P. 2013. Production networks, place and development: Thinking through global production networks in Cavita, Philippines. Geoforum 44 (January): 82–92.
  • Krätke, S. 1999. Berlin’s regional economy in the 1990s: Structural adjustment or ‘open-ended’ structural break? European Urban and Regional Studies 6 (4): 323–38.
  • Kunzman, K. 2011. The creative city fever in Europe: Potentials and limits of promoting creative cities and creative and cultural industries. Paper presented at the International Conference on Creative Cities: Possibilities, Policies and Places, April 14, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Lange, B., Kalandides, A., Stöber, B., and Mieg, H. A. 2008. Berlin’s creative industries: Governing creativity? Industry and Innovation 15 (5): 531–48.
  • Lange, B., and Schüssler, E. 2018. Unpacking the middleground of creative cities: Spatiotemporal dynamics in the configuration of the Berlin design field. Regional Studies. doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1413239.
  • MacKinnon, D. 2012. Beyond strategic coupling: Reassessing the firm-region nexus in global production networks. Journal of Economic Geography 12 (1): 227–45.
  • MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., Birch, K., Pike, A., and McMaster, R. 2009. Evolution in economic geography: Institutions, political economy and regional adaptation. Economic Geography 85 (2): 129–50.
  • MacKinnon, D., Dawley, S., Steen, M., Menzel, M. P., Karlsen, A., Sommer, P., Hansen, G. H., and Normann, H. E. 2018. Path creation, global production networks and regional development: A comparative international analysis of the offshore wind sector. Progress in Planning. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2018.01.001.
  • Markard, J., Wirth, S., and Truffer, B. 2016. Institutional dynamics and technology legitimacy—A framework and a case study on biogas technology. Research Policy 45 (1): 330–44.
  • Martin, R. 2000. Institutional approaches in economic geography. In A companion to economic geography, ed. T. Barnes and E. Sheppard, 77–94. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • ———. 2010. Rethinking path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography 86 (1): 1–27.
  • Martin, R., and Sunley, P. 2006. Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography 6 (4): 395–437.
  • ———. 2015. Towards a developmental turn in evolutionary economic geography? Regional Studies 49 (5): 712–32.
  • Maskell, P., and Malmberg, A. 1999. The competitiveness of firms and regions: ‘Ubiquitification’ and the importance of localized learning. European Urban and Regional Studies 6 (1): 9–25.
  • Massey, D. 1995. Spatial Divisions of Labour. 2nd ed. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
  • Morgan, K. 2017. Nurturing novelty: Regional innovation policy in the age of smart specialization. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35 (4): 569–83.
  • Murphy, J. T. 2015. Human geography and socio-technical transition studies: Promising intersections. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 17 (December):73–91.
  • Neffke, F., Henning, M., and Boschma, R. 2011. How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography 87 (3): 237–65.
  • Neumann, T. 2016. Remaking the rust belt: The postindustrial transformation of North America. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Novy, J., and Colomb, C. 2013. Struggling for the right to the (creative) city in Berlin and Hamburg: New urban social movements, new ‘spaces of hope’? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (5): 1816–38.
  • Phelps, N. A., Atienza, M., and Arias, M. 2018. An invitation to the dark side of economic geography. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 50 (1): 236–44.
  • Pike, A., Mackinnon, D., Cumbers, A., Dawley, S., and McMaster, R. 2016. Doing evolution in economic geography. Economic Geography 92 (2): 123–44.
  • Raven, R., Kern, F., Verhees, B., and Smith, A. 2016. Niche construction and empowerment through socio-political work: A meta-analysis of six low-carbon technology cases. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 18 (March): 164–80.
  • Rhodes-Conway, S., Dresser, L., Meder, M., and Ebeling, M. 2016. A Pittsburgh that works for working people, Madison: COWS, University of Wisconsin.
  • Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2018. The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11: 189–209.
  • Sheppard, E. 2011. Geographical political economy. Journal of Economic Geography 11 (2): 319–31.
  • Simmie, J. 2012. Path dependence and new technological path creation in the Danish wind power industry. European Planning Studies 20 (5): 753–72.
  • Simmie, J., Martin, R., Carpenter, J., and Chadwick, A. 2008. History matters: Path dependence and innovation in British city regions. London, National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts.
  • Smith, A., Kern, F., Raven, R., and Verhees, B. 2014. Spaces for sustainable innovation in the UK. Technology Forecasting and Social Change 81 (1): 115–30.
  • Smith, A., and Raven, R. 2012. What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy 41 (6): 1025–36.
  • Sotarauta, M., and Pulkkinen, R. 2011. Institutional entrepreneurship for knowledge regions: In search of a fresh set of questions for regional innovation studies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 29 (1): 96–112.
  • Steen, M. 2016. Reconsidering path creation in economic geography: Aspects of agency, temporality and methods. European Planning Studies 24 (9): 1605–22.
  • Strambach, S. 2010. Path dependence and path plasticity: The co-evolution of institutions and innovation—The German customized business software industry. In The handbook of evolutionary economic geography, ed. R. Boschma and R. Martin, 406–31. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Tanner, A. N. 2014. Regional branching reconsidered: Emergence of the fuel cell industry in European regions. Economic Geography 90 (4): 403–27.
  • The Economist. 2009. The revival of Pittsburgh: Lessons for the G20. September 17, 2009.
  • Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., and Isaksen, A. 2017. Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Progress in Human Geography. doi:10.1177/0309132517700982.
  • Truffer, B., and Coenen, L. 2012. Environmental innovation and sustainability transitions in regional studies. Regional Studies 46 (1): 1–21.
  • Werner, M. 2018. Geographies of production I: Global production and uneven development. Progress in Human Geography. doi:10/1177/0309132518760095.
  • Zhu, S., He, C., and Zhou, Y. 2017. How to jump further and catch up? Path-breaking in an uneven industry space. Journal of Economic Geography 17 (3): 521–45.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.