Scaling of Atypical Knowledge Combinations in American Metropolitan Areas from 1836 to 2010

References

• Acs, Z. J., Anselin, L., and Varga, A. 2002. Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy 31 (7): 1069–85. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00184-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja, G., and Lampert., C. M. 2001. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal 22 (6–7): 521–43. doi:10.1002/smj.176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L., Varga, A., and Acs, Z. 1997. Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics 42 (3): 422–48. doi:10.1006/juec.1997.2032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbesman, S., Kleinberg, J. M., and Strogatz, S. H. 2009. Superlinear scaling for innovation in cities. Physical Review E 79 (1): 016115. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.79.016115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcaute, E., Hatna, E., Ferguson, P., Youn, H., Johansson, A., and Batty, M. 2014. Constructing cities, deconstructing scaling laws. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 12:102. doi:10.1098/rsif.2014.0745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. 2009. The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arts, S., and Veugelers, R. 2015. Technology familiarity, recombinant novelty, and breakthrough invention. Industrial and Corporate Change 24 (6): 1215–46. doi:10.1093/icc/dtu029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., and Feldman, M. 1996. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review 86 (3): 630–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacolod, M., Blum, B. S., and Strange, W. C. 2009. Skills in the city. Journal of Urban Economics 65 (2): 136–53. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2008.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balland, P.-A. 2017. EconGeo: Computing key indicators of the spatial distribution of economic activities. https://github.com/PABalland/EconGeo.
   Google Scholar
• Balland, P.-A., and Rigby, D. 2017. The geography of complex knowledge. Economic Geography 93 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1080/00130095.2016.1205947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettencourt, L. M. A., Helbing, D., Kuhnert, C., and West, G. B. 2007. Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (17): 7301–06. doi:10.1073/pnas.0610172104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., and West, G. B. 2008. Why are large cities faster? Universal scaling and self-similarity in urban organization and dynamics. European Physical Journal B 63 (3): 285–93. doi:10.1140/epjb/e2008-00250-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., and Strumsky, D. 2007. Invention in the city: Increasing returns to patenting as a scaling function of metropolitan size. Research Policy 36 (1): 107–20. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairncross, F. 1997. The death of distance: How the communications revolution will change our lives. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlino, G. A., Chatterjee, S., and Hunt, R. M. 2007. Urban density and the rate of invention. Journal of Urban Economics 61 (3): 389–419. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2006.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castaldi, C., and Los, B. 2017. Geographical patterns in US inventive activity 1977–1998: The ‘regional inversion’ was underestimated. Research Policy 46 (7): 1187–97. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 1996. The rise of the network society. Information age. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Christaller, W. 1933. Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland: Eine ökonomisch-geographische Untersuchung über die Gesetzmäßigkeit der Verbreitung und Entwicklung der Siedlungen mit städtischen Funktionen [Central places in Southern Germany: An economic-geographical study on the legality of the distribution and development of settlements with urban functions]. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Christopherson, S., Garretsen, H., and Martin, R. 2008. The world is not flat: Putting globalization in its place. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 1 (3): 343–49. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsn023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Co, C. 2002. Evolution of the geography of innovation: Evidence from patent data. Growth and Change 33 (4): 393–423. doi:10.1111/1468-2257.00204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W., Nelson, R., and Walsh, J. 2000. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). Working Paper 7552. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w7552.
   Google Scholar
• Combes, P.-P., Duranton, G., and Gobillon, L. 2008. Spatial wage disparities: Sorting matters! Journal of Urban Economics 63 (2): 723–42. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2007.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, R., and Foray, D. 1997. The economics of codification and the diffusion of knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change 6 (3): 595–622. doi:10.1093/icc/6.3.595.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlin, K. B., and Behrens, D. M. 2005. When is an invention really radical? Research Policy 34 (5): 717–37. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosi, G. 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy 11 (3): 147–62. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumais, G., Ellison, G., and Glaeser, E. L. 2002. Geographic concentration as a dynamic process. Review of Economics and Statistics 84 (2): 193–204. doi:10.1162/003465302317411479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, G., and Glaeser, E. L. 1999. The geographic concentration of industry: Does natural advantage explain agglomeration? American Economic Review 89 (2): 311–16. doi:10.1257/aer.89.2.311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, G., Glaeser, E. L., and Kerr, W. R. 2010. What causes industry agglomeration? Evidence from coagglomeration patterns. American Economic Review 100 (3): 1195–213. doi:10.1257/aer.100.3.1195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. P. 1994. The geography of innovation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. P., and Florida, R. 1994. The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84 (2): 210–29. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1994.tb01735.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. P., and Kogler, D. F. 2010. Stylized facts in the geography of innovation. Handbook of the economics of innovation, ed. B. Hall and N. Rosenberg, vol. 1, 381–410. Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01008-7.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, L. 2001. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science 47 (1): 117–32. doi:10.1287/mnsc.47.1.117.10671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R. 2002. The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R., Gulden, T., and Mellander, C. 2008. The rise of the mega-region. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 1 (3): 459–76. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsn018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., van Oort, F., and Verburg, T. 2007. Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies 41 (5): 685–97. doi:10.1080/00343400601120296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, T. L. 2005. The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Gertler, M. S. 2003. Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography 3 (1): 75–99. doi:10.1093/jeg/3.1.75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L. 2011. Triumph of the city: How our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier. New York: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., and Maré, D. C. 2001. Cities and skills. Journal of Labor Economics 19 (2): 316–42. doi:10.1086/319563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1990. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Working Paper 3301. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w3301.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., and Markusen, A. R., eds. 1985. Silicon landscapes. Boston: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Hargadon, A. 2003. How breakthroughs happen: The surprising truth about how companies innovate. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1969. The economy of cities. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. 1989. Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review 79 (5): 957–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., and Henderson, R. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (3): 577–98. doi:10.2307/2118401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. F., Wuchty, S., and Uzzi, B. 2008. Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science. Science 322 (5905): 1259–62. doi:10.1126/science.1158357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D., Cerigo, D. B., Jeong, H., and Youn, H. 2016. Technological novelty profile and invention’s future impact. EPJ Data Science 5(1). doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0069-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznets, S. 1960. Population change and aggregate output. Demographic and economic change in developed countries, ed. Universities-National Bureau, 324–51. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lanjouw, J. O., and Schankerman, M. 2004. Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. Economic Journal 114 (495): 441–65. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00216.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, N., Sissons, P., and Jones, K. 2016. The geography of wage inequality in British cities. Regional Studies 50 (10): 1714–27. doi:10.1080/00343404.2015.1053859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, G.-C., Lai, R., D’Amour, A., Doolin, D. M., Sun, Y., Torvik, V. I., Yu, A. Z., and Fleming, L. 2014. Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the U.S. patent inventor database (1975–2010). Research Policy 43 (6): 941–55. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liben-Nowell, D., Novak, J., Kumar, R., Raghavan, P., and Tomkins, A. 2005. Geographic routing in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102 (33): 11623–28. doi:10.1073/pnas.0503018102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louf, R., and Barthelemy, M. 2014. Scaling: Lost in the smog. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 41 (5): 767–69. doi:10.1068/b4105c.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, R. E. 1988. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22 (1): 3–42. doi:10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2 (1): 71–87. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. 1890. Principles of economics. London: McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Maskell, P. 1999. Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics 23 (2): 167–85. doi:10.1093/cje/23.2.167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, T., Nishikimi, K., and Smith, T. E. 2008. The number-average size rule: A new empirical relationship between industrial location and city size. Journal of Regional Science 48 (1): 165–211. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2008.00550.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., and Winter, S. G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, R. 1992. Global financial integration: The end of geography. London: Pinter Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• O’hUallichain, B. 1999. Patent places: Size matters. Journal of Regional Science 39 (4): 613–36. doi:10.1111/0022-4146.00152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’hUallichain, B., and Leslie, T. F. 2005. Spatial convergence and spillovers in American invention. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95 (4): 866–86. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00491.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petralia, S., Balland, P.-A., and Rigby, D. L. 2016. Unveiling the geography of historical patents in the United States from 1836 to 1975. Scientific Data 3 (August): 160074. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., and Crescenzi, R. 2008. Mountains in a flat world: Why proximity still matters for the location of economic activity. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 1 (3): 371–88. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsn011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, P. M. 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98 (5, pt. 2): 71–102. doi:10.1086/261725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, M. A., and Green, E. 2011. Recombinant search and breakthrough idea generation: An analysis of high impact papers in the social sciences. Research Policy 40 (10): 1321–31. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Nielsen, K. 1984. Scaling: Why is animal size so important? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenmakers, W., and Duysters, G. 2010. The technological origins of radical inventions. Research Policy 39 (8): 1051–59. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J. 1993. Technopolis: High-technology industry and regional development in Southern California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sonn, J. W., and Park, I. K. 2011. The increasing importance of agglomeration economies hidden behind convergence: Geography of knowledge production. Urban Studies 48 (10): 2180–94. doi:10.1177/0042098010382679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonn, J. W., and Storper, M. 2008. The increasing importance of geographical proximity in knowledge production: An analysis of US patent citations, 1975–1997. Environment and Planning A 40 (5): 1020–39. doi:10.1068/a3930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storper, M., and Scott, A. J. 2009. Rethinking human capital, creativity and urban growth. Journal of Economic Geography 9 (2): 147–67. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbn052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., Rumelt, R., Dosi, G., and Winter, S. 1994. Understanding corporate coherence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 23 (1): 1–30. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(94)90094-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usher, A. P. 1954. A history of mechanical inventions. New York: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Utterback, J. M. 1996. Mastering the dynamics of innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Uzzi, B., Mukherjee, S., Stringer, M., and Jones, B. 2013. Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science 342 (6157): 468–72. doi:10.1126/science.1240474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga, A. 1999. Time-space patterns of US innovation: Stability or change? Innovation, networks and localities, ed. M. M. Fischer, L. Suarez-Villa, and M. Steiner, 215–34. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-58524-1_10.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2000. Local academic knowledge transfers and the concentration of economic activity. Journal of Regional Science 40 (2): 289–309. doi:10.1111/0022-4146.00175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, D., Bakker, J., and Veugelers, R. 2016. Measuring technological novelty with patent-based indicators. Research Policy 45 (3): 707–23. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. 1994. ‘Sticky information’ and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science 40 (4): 429–39. doi:10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, A. F. 1899. The growth of cities in the nineteenth century. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• West, G. B. 1997. A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science 276 (5309): 122–26. doi:10.1126/science.276.5309.122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., and Uzzi, B. 2007. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316 (5827): 1036–39. doi:10.1126/science.1136099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youn, H., Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., Strumsky, D., Samaniego, H., and West, G. B. 2016. Scaling and universality in urban economic diversification. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 13 (114). doi:10.1098/rsif.2015.0937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zook, M. A. 2000. The web of production: The economic geography of commercial internet content production in the United States. Environment and Planning A 32 (3): 411–26. doi:10.1068/a32124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar