6,528
Views
60
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Beyond the Single Path View: Interpath Dynamics in Regional Contexts

, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Arthur, W. B. 1989. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal 99 (394): 116–31. doi:10.2307/2234208.
  • Asheim, B. 2007. Differentiated knowledge bases and varieties of regional innovation systems. Innovation: the European Journal of Social Science Research 20 (3): 223–41. doi:10.1080/13511610701722846.
  • Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., and Cooke, P. 2011. Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies 45 (7): 893–904. doi:10.1080/00343404.2010.543126.
  • Asheim, B. T., and Isaksen, A. 2002. Regional innovation systems: The integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer 27 (1): 77–86. doi:10.1023/A:1013100704794.
  • Bergek, A., Hekkert, M., Jacobsson, S., Markard, J., Sandén, B., and Truffer, B. 2015. Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 16 (September): 51–64. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.003.
  • Binz, C., and Truffer, B. 2017. Global innovation systems—A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts. Research Policy 46 (7): 1284–98. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012.
  • Binz, C., Truffer, B., and Coenen, L. 2016. Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring: Industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography 92 (2): 172–200. doi:10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177.
  • Boschma, R. 2017. Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: A research agenda. Regional Studies 51 (3): 351–64. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767.
  • Boschma, R., Coenen, L., Frenken, K., and Truffer, B. 2017. Towards a theory of regional diversification: Combining insights from evolutionary economic geography and transition studies. Regional Studies 51 (1): 31–45. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460.
  • Boschma, R., and Frenken, K. 2011. The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 11 (2): 295–307. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbq053.
  • Bristow, G., and Healy, A. 2014. Regional resilience: An agency perspective. Regional Studies 48 (5): 923–35. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.854879.
  • Carvalho, L., and Vale, M. 2018. Biotech by bricolage? Agency, institutional relatedness and new path development in peripheral regions. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11 (2): 275–95. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsy009.
  • Chapman, K., and Walker, D. F. 1991. Industrial location: Principles and policies. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Content, J., and Frenken, K. 2016. Related variety and economic development: A literature review. European Planning Studies 24 (12): 2097–112. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1246517.
  • Couture, T., and Gagnon, Y. 2010. An analysis of feed-in tariff remuneration models: Implications for renewable energy investment. Energy Policy 38 (2): 955–65. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.047.
  • David, P. A. 1985. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review 75 (2): 332–37.
  • Dawley, S. 2014. Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development. Economic Geography 91 (1): 91–112. doi:10.1111/ecge.12028.
  • Dawley, S., MacKinnon, D., Cumbers, A., and Pike, A. 2015. Policy activism and regional path creation: The promotion of offshore wind in North East England and Scotland. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8 (2): 257–72. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsu036.
  • Dewald, U., and Truffer, B. 2011. Market formation in technological innovation systems—Diffusion of photovoltaic applications in Germany. Industry & Innovation 18 (3): 285–300. doi:10.1080/13662716.2011.561028.
  • Emirbayer, M., and Mische, A. 1998. What is agency? American Journal of Sociology 103 (4): 962–1023. doi:10.1086/231294.
  • European Commission. 2012. Innovating for sustainable growth. A bioeconomy for Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Feldman, M. 2000. Where science comes to life: University bioscience, commercial spin-offs, and regional economic development. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 2 (3): 345–61. doi:10.1080/13876980008412651.
  • Foray, D. 2014. Smart specialisation: Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. London: Routledge.
  • Fuenfschilling, L., and Truffer, B. 2016. The interplay of institutions, actors and technologies in socio-technical systems—An analysis of transformations in the Australian urban water sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 103:298–312. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.023.
  • Garud, R., and Karnøe, P. 2003. Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy 32 (2): 277–300. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2.
  • Grillitsch, M., and Sotarauta, M. 2019. Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography. doi:10.1177/0309132519853870.
  • Gustafsson, R., Jääskeläinen, M., Maula, M., and Uotila, J. 2016. Emergence of industries: A review and future directions. International Journal of Management Reviews 18 (1): 28–50. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12057.
  • Hansen, T., Klitkou, A., and Tanner, A. 2018. Towards a relatedness framework for understanding new industry development in regions. Paper presented at the Global Conference on Economic Geography. Cologne, Germany, July 25.
  • Hassink, R., Isaksen, A., and Trippl, M. 2019. Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies 53 (11): 1636–45. doi:10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704.
  • Isaksen, A., and Jakobsen, S.-E. 2017. New path development between innovation systems and individual actors. European Planning Studies 25 (3): 355–70. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1268570.
  • Isaksen, A., Jakobsen, S.-E., Njøs, R., and Normann, R. 2018. Regional industrial restructuring resulting from individual and system agency. Innovation: the European Journal of Social Science Research 32 (1): 48–65. doi:10.1080/13511610.2018.1496322.
  • Isaksen, A., and Trippl, M. 2016. Path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. In Innovation drivers and regional innovation strategies, ed. M. D. Parrilli, R. Dahl-Fitjar, and A. Rodriguez-Pose, 66–84. London: Routledge.
  • ———. 2017. Innovation in space: The mosaic of regional innovation patterns. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 33 (1): 122–40. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grw035.
  • Jacobs, J. 1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage/Random House.
  • Jacobsson, S., and Lauber, V. 2006. The politics and policy of energy system transformation—Explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy 34 (3): 256–76. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.029.
  • Jeannerat, H., and Kebir, L. 2016. Knowledge, resources and markets: What economic system of valuation? Regional Studies 50 (2): 274–88. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.986718.
  • Karnøe, P., and Garud, R. 2012. Path creation: Co-creation of heterogeneous resources in the emergence of the Danish wind turbine cluster. European Planning Studies 20 (5): 733–52. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.667923.
  • Kemp, R., Schot, J., and Hoogma, R. 1998. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 10 (2): 175–98. doi:10.1080/09537329808524310.
  • MacKinnon, D. 2012. Beyond strategic coupling: Reassessing the firm-region nexus in global production networks. Journal of Economic Geography 12 (1): 227–45. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbr009.
  • MacKinnon, D., Dawley, S., Pike, A., and Cumbers, A. 2019. Rethinking path creation: A geographical political economy approach. Economic Geography 95 (2): 113–35. doi:10.1080/00130095.2018.1498294.
  • Markard, J., and Truffer, B. 2008. Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy 37 (4): 596–615. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004.
  • Martin, R. 2010. Roepke Lecture in economic geography - Rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography 86 (1): 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01056.x.
  • ———. 2013. Regional economies as path-dependent systems: Some issues and implications. In Handbook of regional innovation and growth, ed. P. N. Cooke and B. T. Asheim, 198–210. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Martin, R., and Sunley, P. 2006. Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography 6 (4): 395–437. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbl012.
  • ———. 2010. The place of path dependence in an evolutionary perspective on the economic landscape. In Handbook of evolutionary economic geography, ed. R. Boschma and R. Martin, 62–92. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • ———. 2015. Towards a developmental turn in evolutionary economic geography? Regional Studies 49 (5): 712–32. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.899431.
  • Maskell, P., and Malmberg, A. 1999. The competitiveness of firms and regions. ‘Ubiquitification’ and the importance of localized learning. European Urban and Regional Studies 6 (1): 9–25. doi:10.1177/096977649900600102.
  • Miörner, J., and Trippl, M. 2017. Paving the way for new regional industrial paths: Actors and modes of change in Scania’s games industry. European Planning Studies 25 (3): 481–97. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1212815.
  • Musiolik, J., Markard, J., and Hekkert, M. 2012. Networks and network resources in technological innovation systems: Towards a conceptual framework for system building. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79 (6): 1032–48. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.01.003.
  • Musiolik, J., Markard, J., Hekkert, M., and Furrer, B. 2018. Creating innovation systems: How resource constellations affect the strategies of system builders. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 119209. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.02.002.
  • Neffke, F., Hartog, M., Boschma, R., and Henning, M. 2018. Agents of structural change: The role of firms and entrepreneurs in regional diversification. Economic Geography 94 (1): 23–48. doi:10.1080/00130095.2017.1391691.
  • Neffke, F., Henning, M., and Boschma, R. 2011. How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography 87 (3): 237–65. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x.
  • Sandén, B. A., and Hillman, K. M. 2011. A framework for analysis of multi-mode interaction among technologies with examples from the history of alternative transport fuels in Sweden. Research Policy 40 (3): 403–14. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.12.005.
  • Simmie, J., Carpenter, J., Chadwick, A., and Martin, R. 2008. History matters: Path dependence and innovation in British city-regions. London: NESTA Futurlab.
  • Sotarauta, M. 2016. An actor-centric bottom-up view of institutions: Combinatorial knowledge dynamics through the eyes of institutional entrepreneurs and institutional navigators. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35 (4): 584–99.
  • Sotarauta, M., and Suvinen, N. 2018. Institutional agency and path creation. In New avenues for regional innovation systems—Theoretical advances, empirical cases and policy lessons, ed. A. Isaksen, R. Martin, and M. Trippl, 85–104. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
  • Spencer, G. M. 2015. Knowledge neighbourhoods: Urban form and evolutionary economic geography. Regional Studies 49 (5): 883–98. doi:10.1080/00343404.2015.1019846.
  • Steen, M. 2016. Reconsidering path creation in economic geography: Aspects of agency, temporality and methods. European Planning Studies 24 (9): 1605–22. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1204427.
  • Steen, M., and Hansen, G. H. 2018. Barriers to path creation: The case of offshore wind power in Norway. Economic Geography 94 (2): 188–210. doi:10.1080/00130095.2017.1416953.
  • Storper, M., and Walker, R. 1989. The capitalist imperative: Territory, technology, and industrial growth. New York: Blackwell.
  • Strambach, S., and Halkier, H. 2013. Reconceptualizing change—Path dependency, path plasticity and knowledge combination. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie 57 (1–2): 1–14. doi:10.1515/zfw.2013.0001.
  • Tödtling, F., and Trippl, M. 2013. Transformation of regional innovation systems: From old legacies to new development paths. In Re-framing regional development: Evolution, innovation and transition, ed. P. Cooke, 297–317. London: Routledge.
  • Trippl, M., Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., Frangenheim, A., Isaksen, A., and Rypestøl, J. O. 2019. Green path development, asset modification and agency: Towards a systemic integrative approach. PEGIS —Papers in Economic Geography and Innovation Studies (2019/01): 1–26.
  • Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., and Isaksen, A. 2018. Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Progress in Human Geography 42 (5): 687–705. doi:10.1177/0309132517700982.
  • Trippl, M., Zukauskaite, E., and Healy, A. 2019. Shaping smart specialization: The role of place-specific factors in advanced, intermediate and less-developed European regions. Regional Studies 35 (4): 1–13. doi:10.1080/00343404.2019.1582763.
  • Xiao, J., Boschma, R., and Andersson, M. 2018. Industrial diversification in Europe: The differentiated role of relatedness. Economic Geography 94 (5): 514–49. doi:10.1080/00130095.2018.1444989.