Does Successful Innovation Require Large Urban Areas? Germany as a Counterexample

References

• Alonso, W. 1973. Urban zero population growth. Daedalus 102 (4): 191–206.
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B. 1988. Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 14 (2): 18–29. doi:10.1093/oxrep/14.2.18.
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., and Lehmann, E. 2016. The seven secrets of Germany: Economic resilience in an era of global turbulence. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxrep/14.2.18.
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E., and Schenkenhofer, J. 2018. Internationalization strategies of hidden champions: Lessons from Germany. Multinational Business Review 26 (1): 2–24. doi:10.1108/MBR-01-2018-0006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskaran, T., Feld, L. P., and Schnellenbach, J. 2016. Fiscal federalism, decentralization, and economic growth: A meta-analysis. Economic Inquiry 54 (3): 1445–63. doi:10.1111/ecin.12331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bersch, J., Gottschalk, S., Mueller, B., and Niefert, M. 2014. The Mannheim enterprise panel (MUP) and firm statistics for Germany. ZEW Discussion Paper 14–104. Mannheim, Germany: ZEW.
   Google Scholar
• Carlino, G. A., and Kerr, W. R. 2015. Agglomeration and Innovation. In Handbook of regional and urban economics, vol. 5A, ed. G. Duranton, V. Henderson, and W. Strange, 349–404. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, B., Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., and Braunerhjelm, P. 2009. Knowledge creation, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: A historical review. Industrial and Corporate Change 18 (6): 1193–229. doi:10.1093/icc/dtp043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterji, A., Glaeser, E. L., and Kerr, W. R. 2014. Clusters of entrepreneurship and innovation. In Innovation policy and the economy 2013, vol. 14, ed. J. Lerner and S. Stern, 129–66. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ciccone, A., and Hall, R. E. 1996. Productivity and the density of economic activity. American Economic Review 86 (1): 54–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congleton, R. D., Kyriacou, A., and Bacaria, J. 2003. A theory of menu federalism: Decentralization by political agreement. Constitutional Political Economy 14 (3): 167–90. doi:10.1023/A:1024750712089.
   Google Scholar
• Crescenzi, R., Rodríguez-Pose, A., and Storper, M. 2007. The territorial dynamics of innovation: A Europe–United States comparative analysis. Journal of Economic Geography 7 (6): 673–709. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbm030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, L., Garcilazo, E., and McCann, P. 2013. The economic performance of European cities and city regions: Myths and realities. European Planning Studies 21 (3): 334–54. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.716245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D., and Dionne, S. 2008. Is regional innovation system development possible in peripheral regions? Some evidence from the case of La Pocatière, Canada. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 20 (3): 259–83. doi:10.1080/08985620701795525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. F. 1998. From capitalism to knowledge society. In The knowledge economy, ed. N. Dale, 15–34. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Duranton, G., and Puga, D. 2004. Micro-foundation of urban agglomeration economies. In Handbook of regional and urban economics, vol. 4, Cities and geography, ed. V. Henderson and J.-F. Thisse, 2063–117. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Eder, J. 2019. Innovation in the periphery: A critical survey and research agenda. International Regional Science Review 42 (2): 119–46. doi:10.1177/0160017618764279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estevez-Abe, M., Iversen, T., and Soskice, D. 2001. Social protection and the formation of skills: A reinterpretation of the welfare state. In Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage, ed. P. A. Hall and D. Soskice, 145–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faguet, L.-P. 2014. Decentralization and governance. World Development 53 (January): 2–13. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.002.
   Google Scholar
• Falck, O., Fritsch, M., and Heblich, S. 2011. The phantom of the opera: Cultural amenities, human capital, and regional economic growth. Labour Economics 18 (6): 755–66. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2011.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M., and Kogler, D. 2010. Stylized facts in the geography of innovation. In Handbook of the economics of innovation, ed. B. H. Hall and N. Rosenberg, vol. 1, 381–410. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North Holland Publishers. doi:10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01008-7.
   Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R. D., and Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2011. When local interaction does not suffice: Sources of firm innovation in urban Norway. Environment & Planning A 43 (6): 1248–67. doi:10.1068/a43516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floegel, F. 2018. Distance and modern banks’ lending to SMEs: Ethnographic insights from a comparison of regional and large banks in Germany. Journal of Economic Geography 18 (1): 35–57. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbx017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R., Adler, P., and Mellander, C. 2017. The city as innovation machine. Regional Studies 51 (1): 86–96. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1255324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foray, D., and Landabaso, M. 2014. From smart specialization to smart specialization policy. European Journal of Innovation Management 17 (4): 492–507. doi:10.1108/EJIM-09-2014-0096.
   Google Scholar
• Frick, S. A., and Rodríguez‐Pose, A. 2018. Big or small cities? On city size and economic growth. Growth and Change 49 (1): 4–32. doi:10.1111/grow.12232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., Obschonka, M., and Wyrwich, M. 2019. Historical roots of entrepreneurial culture and innovation activity: An analysis for German regions. Regional Studies 53 (9): 1296–307. doi:10.1080/00343404.2019.1580357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., and Schilder, D. 2008. Does venture capital investment really require spatial proximity? An empirical investigation. Environment & Planning A 40 (9): 2114–31. doi:10.1068/a39353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., and Schilder, D. 2012. The regional supply of venture capital—Can syndication overcome bottlenecks? Economic Geography 88 (1): 59–76. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01139.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., and Wyrwich, M. 2018. Regional knowledge, entrepreneurial culture and innovative start-ups over time and space—An empirical investigation. Small Business Economics 51 (2): 337–53. doi:10.1007/s11187-018-0016-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., and Wyrwich, M. 2021. Is innovation (increasingly) concentrated in large cities? An international comparison. Research Policy 50 (6): 104237. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallego, F. A. 2010. Historical origins of schooling: The role of democracy and political decentralization. Review of Economics and Statistics 92 (2): 228–43. doi:10.1162/rest.2010.11894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrke, B., Rammer, C., Frietsch, R., and Neuhäusler, P. 2010. Listen wissens- und technologieintensiver Güter und Wirtschaftszweige. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem [Lists of knowledge- and technology-intensive goods and economic sectors. Studies on the German innovation system], 19-2010. Karlsruhe, Germany: Fraunhofer ISI, NIW, ZEW.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., and Maré, D. C. 2001. Cities and skills. Journal of Labor Economics 19 (2): 316–42. doi:10.1086/319563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goethner, M., and Wyrwich, M. 2020. Cross-faculty proximity and academic entrepreneurship: The role of business schools. Journal of Technology Transfer 45 (4): 1016–62. doi:10.1007/s10961-019-09725-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., and Nilsson, M. 2015. Innovation in peripheral regions: Do collaborations compensate for a lack of local knowledge spillovers? Annals of Regional Science 54 (1): 299–321. doi:10.1007/s00168-014-0655-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinanne, T. 2001. Cooperatives as information machines: German rural credit cooperatives, 1883–1914. Journal of Economic History 61 (2): 366–89. doi:10.1017/S0022050701028042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackethal, A. 2004. Banks and banking structure. In The German financial system, ed. J. P. Krahnen and R. H. Schmidt, 71–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, A. M. 2018. A plea for varieties of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics 52 (2): 331–43. doi:10.1007/s11187-018-0093-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinder, H. 2007. dtv-Atlas zur Weltgeschichte, Band 1: Von den Anfängen bis zur revolution [dtv- Atlas of world history, Volume 1: From the beginnings to the revolution], 36th ed. Munich, Germany: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kindleberger, C. P. 2015. A financial history of Western Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maraut, S., Dernis, H., Webb, C., Spiezia, V., and Guellec, D. 2008. The OECD REGPAT database: A presentation. STI Working Paper 2008/2. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, H., and Knox, P. 2010. Small-town sustainability: Prospects in the second modernity. European Planning Studies 18 (10): 1545–65. doi:10.1080/09654313.2010.504336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., and Ortega-Argilés, R. 2015. Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies 49 (8): 1291–302. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.799769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, E. J., and Burger, M. J. 2017. Stretching the concept of ‘borrowed size’. Urban Studies 54 (1): 269–91. doi:10.1177/0042098015597642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, E. J., Burger, M. J., and Hoogerbrugge, M. M. 2016. Borrowing size in networks of cities: City size, network connectivity and metropolitan functions in Europe. Papers in Regional Science 95 (1): 181–99. doi:10.1111/pirs.12181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meili, R., and Shearmur, R. 2019. Diverse diversities—Open innovation in small towns and rural areas. Growth and Change 50 (2): 492–514. doi:10.1111/grow.12291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokyr, J. 2017. A culture of growth: The origins of the modern economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mokyr, J. 2018. Bottom-up or top-down? The origins of the industrial revolution. Journal of Institutional Economics 14 (6): 1003–24. doi:10.1017/S174413741700042X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mookherjee, D. 2015. Political decentralization. Annual Review of Economics 7 (1): 231–49. doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahnke, A., and Welter, F. 2018. The German Mittelstand: Antithesis to Silicon valley entrepreneurship? Small Business Economics 52 (2): 345–58. doi:10.1007/s11187-018-0095-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pol, A. 1931. Atlas Châtel et Dollfus: Les houillères européennes [European coal mines]. Paris: Société de Documentation Industrielle.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, Y., and Weingast, B. 1997. Federalism as a commitment to preserving market incentives. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (4): 83–92. doi:10.1257/jep.11.4.83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodden, J. 2004. Comparative federalism and decentralization: On meaning and measurement. Comparative Politics 36 (4): 481–500. doi:10.2307/4150172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez‐Pose, A., and Ezcurra, R. 2010. Does decentralization matter for regional disparities? A cross-country analysis. Journal of Economic Geography 10 (5): 619–44. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbp049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez‐Pose, A., and Wilkie, C. 2019. Innovating in less developed regions: What drives patenting in the lagging regions of Europe and North America. Growth and Change 50 (1): 4–37. doi:10.1111/grow.12280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheuplein, C., and Kahl, J. 2017. Wagniskapital zwischen lokaler Nähe und dem neuen Sog Berlins [Venture capital between local proximity and the new pull of Berlin]. Leipzig, Germany: Leibniz-Institut für Länderkunde.
   Google Scholar
• Servillo, L., Atkinson, R., and Hamdouch, A. 2017. Small and medium‐sized towns in Europe: Conceptual, methodological and policy issues. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie 108 (4): 365–79. doi:10.1111/tesg.12252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R. 2012. Are cities the font of innovation? A critical review of the literature on cities and innovation. Cities 29 (Suppl2): S9–S18. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R. 2015. Far from the madding crowd: Slow innovators, information value, and the geography of innovation. Growth and Change 46 (3): 424–42. doi:10.1111/grow.12097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R., and Doloreux, D. 2016. How open innovation processes vary between urban and remote environments: Slow innovators, market-sourced information and frequency of interaction. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 28 (5–6): 337–57. doi:10.1080/08985626.2016.1154984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorge, A., and Streek, W. 2018. Diversified quality production revisited: Its contribution to German socio-economic performance over time. Socio-Economic Review 16 (3): 587–612. doi:10.1093/ser/mwy022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spengler, A. 2008. The establishment history panel. Schmollers Jahrbuch/Journal of Applied Social Science Studies 128 (3): 501–09. doi:10.3790/schm.128.3.501.
   Google Scholar
• Statistik des Deutschen Reichs. 1909. Berufs- und Betriebszaehlung vom 12. Juni 1907: Gewerbliche Betriebsstatistik [Occupation and establishment census as of June 12th, 1907: Commercial business statistics]. Vols. 218–219. Berlin: Puttkamer & Muehlbrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Statistik des Deutschen Reichs. 1927. Volks-, Berufs- und Betriebszaehlung vom 16 Juni 1925: Die berufliche und soziale Gliederung der Bevoelkerung in den Laendern und Landesteilen [Population, occupation, and establishment census as of June 16th 1925: The occupational and social strattification oft he population in the German lands]. Vols. 403–405. Berlin: Reimar Hobbing.
   Google Scholar
• Vanberg, V., and Kerber, W. 1994. Institutional competition among jurisdictions: An evolutionary approach. Constitutional Political Economy 5 (2): 193–219. doi:10.1007/BF02393147.
   Google Scholar
• Vonnahme, L., and Lang, T. 2019. Peripher global: Ergebnisse der standardisierten Befragung zu Innovationsaktivitäten von Weltmarktführern in Deutschland [Peripheral global: Results of the standardized survey on innovation activities of global market leaders in Germany]. Working Paper 18, SFB 1199 University of Leipzig.
   Google Scholar