References
- Asheim, B. T. 2019. Smart specialisation, innovation policy and regional innovation systems: What about new path development in less innovative regions? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 32 (1): 8–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1491001.
- Australian Government. 2017. Australian innovation system report 2017. Department of Industry Innovation and Science. https://publications.industry.gov.au/publications/australianinnovationsystemreport2017/documents/australian-innovation-system-report-2017.pdf.
- Barca, F. 2009. An agenda for reformed cohesion policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges. Seville, Spain: European Commission.
- Barca, F., McCann, P., and Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2012. The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science 52 (1): 134–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x.
- Bartels, K. P. R., Greenwood, D. J., and Wittmayer, J. M. 2020. How action research can make deliberative policy analysis more transformative. Policy Studies 41 (4): 392–410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2020.1724927.
- Barzotto, M., Corradini, C., Fai, F. M., Labory, S., and Tomlinson, P. R. 2019. 3. An extra-regional collaborative approach to smart specialisation. Regional Studies Policy Impact Books 1 (2): 29–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2578711X.2019.1621099.
- Barzotto, M. 2020. Smart specialisation, Industry 4.0 and lagging regions: Some directions for policy. Regional Studies, Regional Science 7 (1): 318–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2020.1803124.
- Beer, A. 2011. Local government and economic shock within a federal system: The Australian case. In The recession and beyond: Local and regional responses to the downturn, ed. D. Bailey and C. Chapain, 332–46. London: Routledge.
- Bok, R., and Coe, N. M. 2017. Geographies of policy knowledge: The state and corporate dimensions of contemporary policy mobilities. Cities 63 (March): 51–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.01.001.
- Boschma, R. 2015. Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies 49 (5): 733–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.959481.
- Capello, R., and Kroll, H. 2016. From theory to practice in smart specialization strategy: Emerging limits and possible future trajectories. European Planning Studies 24 (8): 1393–406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1156058.
- Caragliu, A., and Del Bo, C. 2018. Much ado about something? An appraisal of the relationship between smart city and smart specialisation policies. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie 109 (1): 129–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12272.
- Coenen, L. 2017. From sustainable to resilient regions? Shifting conceptualisations of regional futures: A closing review. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies 23 (3): 447–51.
- Coenen, L., and Morgan, K. 2020. Evolving geographies of innovation: Existing paradigms, critiques and possible alternatives. Norsk Geografisk Tijdsskrift—Norwegian Journal of Geography 74 (1): 13–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2019.1692065.
- Commonwealth of Australia. 2017. Regions 2030: Unlocking opportunity. Canberra, Australia: Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development.
- Cooke, P. 2001. Regional innovation systems, clusters and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change 10 (4): 945–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.945.
- Cooke, P., Asheim, B., Boschma, R., Martin, R., Schwartz, D., and Todtling, F. 2011. Introduction to the handbook of regional innovation and growth. In Handbook of regional innovation and growth, ed. P. Cooke, B. Asheim, R. Boschma, R. Martin, D. Schwartz, and F. Todtling, 1–26. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
- Cooke, P. 2010. Regional resilience: A promising concept to explain differences in regional economic adaptability? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 3 (1): 45–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsp033.
- Cordeiro, B. O. 2020. Global mobility of microfinance policies. Policy and Society 39 (1): 19–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1659472.
- Crawley, A., and Hallowell, A. 2020. Smart specialisation: Insights from the North American periphery. Regional Studies 55 (3): 427–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1711877.
- Crescenzi, R., de Blasio, G., and Giua, M. 2020. Cohesion policy incentives for collaborative industrial research: Evaluation of a smart specialisation forerunner programme. Regional Studies 54 (10): 1341–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1502422.
- D’Adda, D., Guzzini, E., Iacobucci, D., and Palloni, R. 2019. Is smart specialisation strategy coherent with regional innovative capabilities? Regional Studies 53 (7): 1004–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1523542.
- Diercks, G. 2018. Lost in translation: How legacy limits the OECD in promoting new policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy 48 (10): 103667. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.002.
- Dolowitz, D. P., and Marsh, D. 2000. Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance 13 (1): 5–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/09521895.00121.
- Dosso, M., and Lebert, D. 2020. The centrality of regions in corporate knowledge flows and the implications for smart specialisation strategies. Regional Studies 54 (10): 1366–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1619923.
- Eversole, R. 2017. Economies with people in them: Regional futures through the lens of contemporary regional development theory. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies 23 (3): 305–20.
- Fagerberg, J. 2018. Mobilizing innovation for sustainability transitions: A comment on transformative innovation policy. Research Policy 47 (9): 1568–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.012.
- Flanagan, K., and Uyarra, E. 2016. Four dangers in innovation policy studies—And how to avoid them. Industry and Innovation 23 (2): 177–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1146126.
- Foray, D. 2014. Smart specialisation: Opportunties and challenges for regional innovation policies. London: Routledge.
- Frenken, K. 2017. A complexity-theoretic perspective on innovation policy. Complexity, Governance and Networks 3 ( Special Issue): 35–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.20377/cgn-41.
- Ghinoi, S., Steiner, B., Makkonen, T., and Hassink, R. 2020. Smart specialisation strategies on the periphery: A data-triangulation approach to governance issues and practices. Regional Studies 55 (3): 402–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1791321.
- Gianelle, C., Guzzo, F., and Mieszkowski, K. 2020. Smart specialisation: What gets lost in translation from concept to practice? Regional Studies 54 (10): 1377–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1607970.
- Giest, S. 2017. Overcoming the failure of ‘silicon somewheres’: Learning in policy transfer processes. Policy and Politics 45 (1): 39–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1332/030557316X14779412013740.
- Giuliani, E., and Bell, M. 2005. The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: Evidence from a Chilean wine cluster. Research Policy 34 (1): 47–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.10.008.
- Grillitsch, M., and Sotarauta, M. 2020. Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography 44 (4): 704–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519853870.
- Gulson, K. N., Lewis, S., Lingard, B., Lubienski, C., Takayama, K., and Webb, P. T. 2017. Policy mobilities and methodology: A proposition for inventive methods in education policy studies. Critical Studies in Education 58 (2): 224–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1288150.
- Hansen, T. 2021. The foundational economy and regional development. Regional Studies 1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1939860.
- Hassink, R. 2009. Locked in decline? On the role of regional lock-ins in old industrial areas. In The handbook of evolutionary economic geography, ed. R. Boschma and R. Martin, 450–70. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
- Hudson, R. 2011. From knowledge-based economy to … knowledge-based economy? Reflections on changes in the economy and development policies in the North East of England. Regional Studies 45 (7): 997–1012. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400802662633.
- Kogut, B., and Macpherson, J. M. 2011. The mobility of economists and the diffusion of policy ideas: The influence of economics on national policies. Research Policy 40 (10): 1307–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.06.008.
- Larner, W., and Laurie, N. 2010. Travelling technocrats, embodied knowledges: Globalising privatisation in telecoms and water. Geoforum 41 (2): 218–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.11.005.
- Lay, M., and Papadopoulos, I. 2007. An exploration of fourth generation evaluation in practice. Evaluation 13 (4): 495–504. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389007082135.
- Ma, L. 2017. Site visits, policy learning, and the diffusion of policy innovation: Evidence from public bicycle programs in China. Journal of Chinese Political Science 22 (4): 581–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-017-9498-3.
- Magro, E., and Wilson, J. R. 2019. Policy-mix evaluation: Governance challenges from new place-based innovation policies. Research Policy 48 (10): 103612. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.06.010.
- Marques, P., and Morgan, K. 2018. The heroic assumptions of smart specialisation: A sympathetic critique of regional innovation policy. In new avenues for regional innovation systems—Theoretical advances, empirical cases and policy lessons, ed. A. Iskasen, R. Martin, and M. Trippl, 275–94. New York: Springer.
- Mazzucato, M. 2013. The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths. London: Anthem Press.
- McCann, E. 2011. Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101 (1): 107–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2010.520219.
- McCann, E. 2017. Mobilities, politics, and the future: Critical geographies of green urbanism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49 (8): 1816–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x17708876.
- McCann, P., and Ortega-Argilés, R. 2014. Smart specialisation in European regions: Issues of strategy, institutions and implementation. European Journal of Innovation Management 17 (4): 409–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2014-0052.
- McCann, P. 2015. Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies 49 (8): 1291–302. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.799769.
- McCann, P. 2019. 2. Perspectives on smart specialisation policies in lagging regions. Regional Studies Policy Impact Books 1 (2): 17–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2578711X.2019.1621098.
- McCann, E., and Ward, K. 2012. Policy assemblages, mobilities and mutations: Toward a multidisciplinary conversation. Political Studies Review 10 (3): 325–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00276.x.
- McKenzie, M. 2017. Affect theory and policy mobility: Challenges and possibilities for critical policy research. Critical Studies in Education 58 (2): 187–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1308875.
- Melissen, F., and Koens, K. 2016. Adding researchers’ behaviour to the research agenda: Bridging the science–policy gap in sustainable tourism mobility. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 24 (3): 335–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2015.1071384.
- Morales, D., and Sariego-Kluge, L. 2021. Regional state innovation in peripheral regions: Enabling Lapland’s green policies. Regional Studies, Regional Science 8 (1): 54–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2021.1882882.
- Morgan, K. 2004. The exaggerated death of geography: Learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems. Journal of Economic Geography 4 (1): 3–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/4.1.3.
- Morgan, K. 2015. Smart specialisation: Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. Regional Studies 49 (3): 480–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1007572.
- Morgan, K. 2017. Nurturing novelty: Regional innovation policy in the age of smart specialisation. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35 (4): 569–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16645106.
- Patton, M. Q. 2011. Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhancing innovation and use. New York: Guildford Press.
- Peck, J. 2011. Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography 35 (6): 773–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510394010.
- Peck, J., and Theodore, N. 2010. Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum 41 (2): 169–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.01.002.
- Pfotenhauer, S., and Jasanoff, S. 2017. Panacea or diagnosis? Imaginaries of innovation and the ‘MIT model’ in three political cultures. Social Studies of Science 47 (6): 783–810. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717706110.
- Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A., and Tomaney, J. 2017. Shifting horizons in local and regional development. Regional Studies 51 (1): 46–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1158802.
- Potter, J., and Smith, H. L. 2019. 4. Smart specialisation in Eastern Europe: Insights from two lagging Polish regions. Regional Studies Policy Impact Books 1 (2): 43–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2578711X.2019.1621100.
- Pugh, R. E. 2014. ‘Old wine in new bottles’? Smart specialisation in Wales. Regional Studies, Regional Science 1 (1): 152–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2014.944209.
- Radaelli, C. M. 2009. Measuring policy learning: Regulatory impact assessment in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 16 (8): 1145–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760903332647.
- Radosevic, S. 2017. Assessing EU smart specialization policy in a comprative perspective. In Advances in theory and practice of smart specialization, ed. S. Radosevic, A. Curaj, R. Gheorghiu, L. Andreescu, and I. Wade, 2–37. London: Academic Press.
- Robertson, D. B. 1991. Political conflict and lesson-drawing. Journal of Public Policy 11 (1): 55–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00004931.
- Rodrik, D. 2007. One economics, many recipes: Globalization, institutions, and economic growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Rose, R. 1991. What is lesson-drawing? Journal of Public Policy 11 (1): 3–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00004918.
- Sabel, C. F., and Zeitlin, J. 2012a. Experimentalism in the EU: Common ground and persistent differences. Regulation and Governance 6 (3): 410–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01157.x.
- Sabel, C. F. 2012b. Experimentalist governance. London: Oxford University Press.
- Saftescu, R., Simion, E., Cosmina, P., and Mitroi, M. 2016. Governance of smart specialisation: Experience of four European regions. Europolity 10 (2): 247–64.
- Sarkar, S., Bilau, J. J., and Basílio, M. 2020. Do anchor infrastructures matter for regional smart specialisation strategy? The case of Alentejo. Regional Studies 55 (3): 453–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1722804.
- Schot, J., and Steinmueller, W. E. 2018. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy 47 (9): 1554–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011.
- Stone, D. 2017. Understanding the transfer of policy failure: Bricolage, experimentalism and translation. Policy and Politics 45 (1): 55–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1332/030557316X14748914098041.
- Stone, D., Porto de Oliveira, O., and Pal, L. A. 2020. Transnational policy transfer: The circulation of ideas, power and development models. Policy and Society 39 (1): 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1619325.
- Strang, D., and Meyer, J. W. 1993. Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society 22 (4): 487–511. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993595.
- Temenos, C., and McCann, E. 2013. Geographies of policy mobilities. Geography Compass 7 (5): 344–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12063.
- Todtling, F., and Trippl, M. 2005. One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innnovation policy approach. Research Policy 34 (8): 1203–19.
- Todtling, F. 2011. Regional innovation systems. In The handbook of regional innovation and growth, ed. P. Cooke, B. Asheim, R. Boschma, R. Martin, D. Shwartz, and F. Todtling, 455–66. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
- Torgerson, D. 2017. Policy sciences and democracy: A reexamination. Policy Sciences 50 (3): 339–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9291-3.
- Trippl, M., and Otto, A. 2009. How to turn the fate of old industrial areas: A comparison of cluster-based renewal processes in Styria and the Saarland. Environment and Planning 41 (5): 1217–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/a4129.
- Trippl, M., Zukauskaite, E., and Healy, A. 2020. Shaping smart specialization: The role of place-specific factors in advanced, intermediate and less-developed European regions. Regional Studies 54 (10): 1328–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1582763.
- Victorian Government. 2015. Gippsland regional plan 2015–2020. Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Government.
- Völker, T., Kovacic, Z., and Strand, R. 2020. Indicator development as a site of collective imagination? The case of European Commission policies on the circular economy. Culture and Organization 26 (2): 103–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2019.1699092.
- Wanzenböck, I., and Frenken, K. 2018. The subsidiarity principle: Turning challenge-oriented policy on its head. Papers in Evoutionary Economic Geography. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Utrecht University.
- Whittle, A. 2020. Operationalizing the knowledge space: Theory, methods and insights for smart specialisation. Regional Studies, Regional Science 7 (1): 27–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2019.1703795.
- Wilson, B., Hogan, A., Cuthill, M., Baker, D., Buys, L., and Burton, L. 2015. Someone else’s boom but always our bust: Australia as a derivative economy, implications for regions. Regional Science Policy and Practice 7 (2): 75–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12057.
- Wittmayer, J. M., Schäpke, N., van Steenbergen, F., and Omann, I. 2014. Making sense of sustainability transitions locally: How action research contributes to addressing societal challenges. Critical Policy Studies 8 (4): 465–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2014.957336.