Splitting Up or Dancing Together? Local Institutional Structure and the Performance of Urban Areas

References

• Acemoglu, D., and Dell, M. 2010. Productivity differences between and within countries. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2 (1): 169–88. doi:10.1257/mac.2.1.169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrend, R., Farchy, E., Kaplanis, I., and Lembcke, A. C. 2017. What makes cities more productive? Evidence from five OECD countries on the role of urban governance. Journal of Regional Science 57 (3): 385–410. doi:10.1111/jors.12334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrend, R., Gamper, C., and Schumann, A. 2014. The OECD metropolitan governance survey: A quantitative description of governance structures in large urban agglomerations. OECD Regional Development Working Papers 2014/04. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5jz43zldh08p-en.pdf?expires=1662136635&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=6B1D1A906A94E064F5566795F2D60704.
   Google Scholar
• Aldag, A. M., Warner, M. E., and Bel, G. 2020. It depends on what you share: The elusive cost savings from service sharing. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 30 (2): 275–89. doi:10.1093/jopart/muz023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alesina, A., Baqir, R., and Hoxby, C. 2004. Political jurisdictions in heterogeneous communities. Journal of Political Economy 112 (2): 348–96. doi:10.1086/381474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allers, M. A., and De Greef, J. 2018. Intermunicipal cooperation, public spending and service levels. Local Government Studies 44 (1): 127–50. doi:10.1080/03003930.2017.1380630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allers, M. A., and Geertsema, J. B. 2016. The effects of local government amalgamation on public spending, taxation, and service levels: Evidence from 15 years of municipal consolidation. Journal of Regional Science 56 (4): 659–82. doi:10.1111/jors.12268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D., and Pischke, J.-S. 2008. Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. doi:10.1515/9781400829828.
   Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and Sebő, M. 2021. Does inter-municipal cooperation really reduce delivery costs? An empirical evaluation of the role of scale economies, transaction costs, and governance arrangements. Urban Affairs Review 57 (1): 153–88. doi:10.1177/1078087419839492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and Warner, M. E. 2015. Inter-municipal cooperation and costs: Expectations and evidence. Public Administration 93 (1): 52–67. doi:10.1111/padm.12104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and Warner, M. E. 2016. Factors explaining inter-municipal cooperation in service delivery: A meta-regression analysis. Journal of Economic Policy Reform 19 (2): 91–115. doi:10.1080/17487870.2015.1100084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, T. 2006. Principled agents? The political economy of good government. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283910.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Breuillé, M.-L., Duran-Vigneron, P., and Samson, A.-L. 2018. Inter-municipal cooperation and local taxation. Journal of Urban Economics 107 (September): 47–64. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2018.08.001.
   Google Scholar
• Callaway, B., and Sant’Anna, P. H. 2021. Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics 225 (2): 200–30. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaminade, C., and Edquist, C. 2006. From theory to practice: The use of the systems of innovation approach in innovation policy. In Innovation, science, and institutional change: A research handbook, ed. J. Hage and M. Meeus, 141–63. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00543_1.x.
   Google Scholar
• Charlot, S., Paty, S., and Piguet, V. 2015. Does fiscal cooperation increase local tax rates in urban areas? Regional Studies 49 (10): 1706–21. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.878798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheshire, P., and Magrini, S. 2009. Urban growth drivers in a Europe of sticky people and implicit boundaries. Journal of Economic Geography 9 (1): 85–115. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbn044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheshire, P. C., and Gordon, I. R. 1996. Territorial competition and the predictability of collective (in)action. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 20 (3): 383–99. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.1996.tb00324.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combes, P.-P., Duranton, G., and Gobillon, L. 2008. Spatial wage disparities: Sorting matters! Journal of Urban Economics 63 (2): 723–42. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2007.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., and Etxebarria, G. 1997. Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy 26 (4–5): 475–91. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crescenzi, R., Di Cataldo, M., and Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2016. Government quality and the economic returns of transport infrastructure investment in European regions. Journal of Regional Science 56 (4): 555–82. doi:10.1111/jors.12264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Porto, E., Parenti, A., Paty, S., and Abidi, Z. 2017. Local government cooperation at work: A control function approach. Journal of Economic Geography 17 (2): 435–63. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbw008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkgraaf, E., and Gradus, R. H. 2013. Cost advantage cooperations larger than private waste collectors. Applied Economics Letters 20 (7): 702–05. doi:10.1080/13504851.2012.732682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djankov, S., McLiesh, C., and Ramalho, R. M. 2006. Regulation and growth. Economics Letters 92 (3): 395–401. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2006.03.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, D. A. 1990. Local government fragmentation: Does it drive up the cost of government? Urban Affairs Review 26 (1): 28–45. doi:10.1177/004208169002600102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edler, J., and Fagerberg, J. 2017. Innovation policy: What, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 33 (1): 2–23. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grx001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epple, D., and Romer, T. 1989. On the flexibility of municipal boundaries. Journal of Urban Economics 26 (3): 307–19. doi:10.1016/0094-1190(89)90004-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., and Nelson, R. R., eds. 2005. The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, K. A. 1993. Exploring the links between political structure and metropolitan growth. Political Geography 12 (6): 523–47. doi:10.1016/0962-6298(93)90003-P.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frère, Q., Leprince, M., and Paty, S. 2014. The impact of intermunicipal cooperation on local public spending. Urban Studies 51 (8): 1741–60. doi:10.1177/0042098013499080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman-Bacon, A. 2021. Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. Journal of Econometrics 225 (2): 254–77. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grassmueck, G., and Shields, M. 2010. Does government fragmentation enhance or hinder metropolitan economic growth? Papers in Regional Science 89 (3): 641–57. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00278.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D. K., Miller, D. Y., and Paytas, J. 2004. Exploring the horizontal and vertical dimensions of the governing of metropolitan regions. Urban Affairs Review 40 (2): 147– 82. doi:10.1177/1078087404268077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, G. W., and Tosun, M. S. 2011. The impact of local decentralization on economic growth: Evidence from US counties. Journal of Regional Science 51 (1): 47–64. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00683.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanlon, B., Short, J. R., and Vicino, T. 2009. Cities and suburbs: New metropolitan realities in the US. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203877760.
   Google Scholar
• Horan, C., and Jonas, A. E. 1998. Governing Massachusetts: Uneven development and politics in metropolitan Boston. Economic Geography 74 (Suppl1): 83–95. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.1998.tb00032.x.
   Google Scholar
• Iammarino, S., Rodríguez-Pose, A., and Storper, M. 2019. Regional inequality in Europe: Evidence, theory and policy implications. Journal of Economic Geography 19 (2): 273–98. doi:10.1093/jeg/lby021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, S.-W., and Feiock, R. C. 2010. Overcoming the barriers to cooperation: Intergovernmental service agreements. Public Administration Review 70 (6): 876–84. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02219.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lago-Peñas, S., and Martinez-Vazquez, J. 2013. The challenge of local government size: Theoretical perspectives, international experience and policy reform. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. doi:10.4337/9781782544302.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, J., and Molotch, H. 1987. Urban fortunes: Toward a political economy of place. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, R. 2014. Urban sprawl in the United States: 1970–2010. Cities and the Environment (CATE) 7 (1): art. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Luca, D., and Modrego, F. 2020. Stronger together? Assessing the causal effect of inter-municipal cooperation on the efficiency of small Italian municipalities. Journal of Regional Science 61 (1): 261–93. doi:10.1111/jors.12509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, B. D., and Edner, S. 2002. Introduction: Federalism and surface transportation. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 32 (1): 1–5. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mewes, L. 2019. Scaling of atypical knowledge combinations in American metropolitan areas from 1836 to 2010. Economic Geography 95 (4): 341–61. doi:10.1080/00130095.2019.1567261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monastiriotis, V. 2002. Human capital and wages: Evidence for external effects from the UK regions. Applied Economics Letters 9 (13): 843–46. doi:10.1080/13504850210148198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moretti, E. 2004. Estimating the social return to higher education: Evidence from longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional data. Journal of Econometrics 121 (1–2): 175–212. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. C., and Foster, K. A. 1999. Metropolitan governance structure and income growth. Journal of Urban Affairs 21 (3): 309–24. doi:10.1111/0735-2166.00019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO978051180867.
   Google Scholar
• Orfield, M., and Gumus-Dawes, B. 2009. MPO reform: A national agenda for reforming metropolitan governance. Minneapolis: Institute on Race and Poverty, University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2010. Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review 100 (June): 641–72. doi:10.1257/aer.100.3.641.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. M., and Warren, R. 1961. The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review 55 (4): 831–42. doi:10.2307/1952530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, R. B., and Oakerson, R. J. 1989. Metropolitan organization and governance a local public economy approach. Urban Affairs Review 25 (1): 18–29. doi:10.1177/004208168902500103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paytas, J. 2001. Does governance matter? The dynamics of metropolitan governance and competitiveness. Pittsburg, PA: Carnegie Mellon Center for Economic Development.
   Google Scholar
• Petralia, S., Balland, P.-A., and Rigby, D. L. 2016. Unveiling the geography of historical patents in the United States from 1836 to 1975. Scientific Data 3 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.74.
   Google Scholar
• Puga, D. 2010. The magnitude and causes of agglomeration economies. Journal of Regional Science 50 (1): 203–19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00657.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2020. Institutions and the fortunes of territories. Regional Science Policy & Practice 12 (3): 371–86. doi:10.1111/rsp3.12277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., and Crescenzi, R. 2008. Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Regional Studies 42 (1): 51–67. doi:10.1080/00343400701654186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., and Di Cataldo, M. 2015. Quality of government and innovative performance in the regions of Europe. Journal of Economic Geography 15 (4): 673–706. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbu023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., and Storper, M. 2006. Better rules or stronger communities? On the social foundations of institutional change and its economic effects. Economic Geography 82 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2006.tb00286.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggles, S., Flood, S., Goeken, R., Grover, J., Meyer, E., Pacas, J., and Sobek, M. 2020. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series USA: Version 10.0. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS.
   Google Scholar
• Stansel, D. 2005. Local decentralization and local economic growth: A cross-sectional examination of US metropolitan areas. Journal of Urban Economics 57 (1): 55–72. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2004.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storper, M. 2013. Keys to the city: How economics, institutions, social interaction, and politics shape development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt2jc8qz.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M. 2014. Governing the large metropolis. Territory, Politics, Governance 2 (2): 115–34. doi:10.1080/21622671.2014.919874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, L., and Abraham, S. 2021. Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects. Journal of Econometrics 225 (2): 175–99. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C. M. 1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64 (5): 416–24. doi:10.1086/257839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trounstine, J. 2009. Political monopolies in American cities: The rise and fall of bosses and reformers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vlassis, A. 2007. Councils of governments. In Encyclopedia of governance, ed. M. Bevir, 181–82. London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412952613.
   Google Scholar
• Voorn, B., Van Genugten, M., and Van Thiel, S. 2019. Multiple principals, multiple problems: Implications for effective governance and a research agenda for joint service delivery. Public Administration 97 (3): 671–85. doi:10.1111/padm.12587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolman, H., Levy, A., and Hincapie, D. 2011. Government, governance, and regional economic growth. Working Paper 044. Washington, DC: George Washington Institute of Public Policy. https://gwipp.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs2181/f/downloads/Working_Paper_044_Governance.pdf.
   Google Scholar