545
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Reports

Funds of High School to College Knowledge: Exploring Low-Income Student Perceptions of College Writing

References

  • Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  • Bahr, P. R. (2012). Deconstructing remediation in community colleges: Exploring associations between course-taking patterns, course outcomes, and attrition from the remedial math and remedial writing sequences. Research in Higher Education, 53(6), 661–693.
  • Bailey, M. J., & Dynarski, S. M. (2011). Gains and gaps: Changing inequality in U.S. college entry and completion (Working Paper No. 17633). Retrieved from National Bureau of Economic Research: http://www.nber.org/papers/w17633
  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67(3), 1206–1222.
  • Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 29–58. doi:10.3102/00346543074001029
  • Bettinger, E., & Long, B. (2009). Addressing the needs of underprepared students in higher education: Does college remediation work?The Journal of Human Resources, 44(3), 736–771.
  • Bomer, R., & Maloch, B. (2011). Relating policy to research and practice: The Common Core Standards. Language Arts, 89(1), 38–43.
  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Brown, R. S., & Conley, D. T. (2007). Comparing state high school assessments to standards for success in entry-level university courses. Educational Assessment, 12(2), 137–160.
  • Chorzempa, B. F., & Lapidus, L. (2009). “To find yourself, think for yourself”: Using Socratic discussions in inclusive classrooms. Teaching Exceptional Children, 41(3), 54–59.
  • Clemens, R. F. (2014). Friends, lovers, and social media experimentation: The need for new ethical guidelines. In K.Woodfield (Ed.), Social media in social research: Blogs on blurring the boundaries [Kindle e-book]. London, England: Sage.
  • Clemens, R. F. (in press). Using social media for qualitative research: A practical and theoretical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Clifton, R. A., Perry, R. P., Roberts, L. W., & Peter, T. (2008). Gender, psychosocial dispositions, and the academic achievement of college students. Research in Higher Education, 49(8), 684–703.
  • Conley, D., & French, E. M. (2014). Student ownership of learning as a key component of college readiness. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(8), 1018–1034.
  • Corbin, J., & Morse, J. M. (2003). The unstructured interactive interview: Issues of reciprocity and risks when dealing with sensitive topics. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(3), 335–354.
  • DeAngelo, L., Franke, R., Hurtado, S., Pryor, J. H., & Tran, S. (2011). Completing college: Assessing graduation rates at four-year institutions. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
  • Deil-Amen, R., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (2002). The unintended consequences of stigma-free remediation. Sociology of Education, 75(3), 249–268.
  • Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive biography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Elbow, P. (1994). Teaching two kinds of thinking by teaching writing. In K.Walters (Ed.), Re-thinking reason: New perspectives in critical thinking (pp. 25–32). Albany, NY: State University ofNew YorkPress.
  • Engle, J., & Lynch, M. (2009). Charting a necessary path: The baseline report of public higher education systems in the access to success initiative. Washington, DC: National Association of System Heads, The Education Trust.
  • Engle, J., & Tinto, V. (2008). Moving beyond access: College success for low-income, first-generation students. Washington, DC: Pell Institute for the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education.
  • Enright, K. A. (2011). Language and literacy for a new mainstream. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 80–118.
  • Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1–22.
  • Ferreira, F. H., & Gignoux, J. (2014). The measurement of educational inequality: Achievement and opportunity. The World Bank Economic Review, 28(2), 210–246.
  • Fletcher, J., & Tienda, M. (2010). Race and ethnic differences in college achievement: Does high school attended matter?The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 627(1), 144–166.
  • Flores, S. M., & Oseguera, L. (2013). Public policy and higher education attainment in a twenty-first-century racial demography: Examining research from early childhood to the labor market. In M. B.Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 28, pp. 513–560). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387.
  • Gee, J. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, CT: Aldine Transaction.
  • Goudas, A. M., & Boylan, H. R. (2012). Addressing flawed research in developmental education. Journal of Developmental Education, 36(1), 2–13.
  • Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2009). Evidence-based writing practices: Drawing recommendations from multiple sources. BJEP Monograph Series II, Number 6-Teaching and Learning Writing, 1(1), 95–111.
  • Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2013). Common Core State Standards, writing, and students with LD: Recommendations. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28(1), 28–37. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12004
  • Graham, S., & Sandmel, K. (2011). The process writing approach: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(6), 396–407.
  • Haluska, J. C. (2007). In defense of the formula essay. Academic Questions, 20(1), 46–55.
  • Hogg, L. (2011). Funds of Knowledge: An investigation of coherence within the literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(3), 666–677.
  • Hopson, R., Miller, P., & Lovelace, T. S. (2016). University–school–community partnership as vehicle for leadership, service, and change: A critical brokerage perspective. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 15(1), 26–44.
  • Hout, M. (2012). Social and economic returns to college education in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(1), 379–400.
  • Horwitz, E. (2001). Language anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 112–126.
  • Ishitani, T. T. (2006). Studying attrition and degree completion behavior among first-generation college students in the United States. Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 861–885.
  • Johnson, T. S., Thompson, L., Smagorinsky, P., & Fry, P. G. (2003). Learning to teach the five-paragraph theme. Research in the Teaching of English, 38(2), 136–176.
  • Kanno, Y., & Harklau, L. (Eds.). (2012). Linguistic minority students go to college: Preparation, access, and persistence. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 1–26.
  • Kirst, M. W., & Bracco, K. R. (2004). Bridging the great divide: How the K–12 and postsecondary split hurts students, and what can be done about it. In M. W.Kirst & A.Venezia (Eds.), From high school to college: Improving opportunities for success in postsecondary education (pp. 1–30). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Kirst, M. W., & Venezia, A. (2006). Improving college readiness and success for all students: A joint responsibility between K–12 and postsecondary education. In A national dialogue: The Secretary of Education’s Commission on the Future of Higher Education, issue paper. Washington, DC: Secretary of Education’s Commission on the Future of Higher Education.
  • Kiyama, J. M. (2010). College Aspirations and Limitations. American Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 330–356.
  • Lavelle, E., & Guarino, A. J. (2003). A multidimensional approach to understanding college writing processes. Educational Psychology, 23(3), 295–305.
  • Levin, H. M., & Calcagno, J. C. (2008). Remediation in the community college: An evaluator’s perspective. Community College Review, 35(3), 181–207.
  • Lunsford, A. (1980). The content of basic writers’ essays. College Composition and Communication, 31(3), 278–290.
  • Matthews, D. (2009). A stronger nation through higher education: How and why Americans must meet a “big goal” for college attainment. Indianapolis, IN: Lumina Foundation for Education.
  • McCarron, G. P., & Inkelas, K. K. (2006). The gap between educational aspirations and attainment for first-generation college students and the role of parental involvement. Journal of College Student Development, 47(5), 534–549.
  • Meltzer, M. (2010). Girl power: The nineties revolution in music. New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Merisotis, J. P., & Phipps, R. A. (2000). Remedial education in colleges and universities: What’s really going on?The Review of Higher Education, 24(1), 67–85.
  • Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.
  • Moll, L. C., & González, N. (1994). Lessons from research with language-minority children. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26(4), 439–456.
  • Moore, C., O’Neill, P., & Huot, B. (2009). Creating a culture of assessment in writing programs and beyond. College Composition and Communication, 61(1), 107–132.
  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The nation’s report card: Writing 2011 ( NCES 2012–470). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
  • Núñez, A.-M. (2014). Employing multilevel intersectionality in educational research: Latino identities, contexts, and college access. Educational Researcher, 43(2), 85–92.
  • Oughton, H. (2010). Funds of knowledge: A conceptual critique. Studies in the Education of Adults, 42(1), 63–78.
  • Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139–158.
  • Reid, M. J., & Moore, J. L. (2008). College readiness and academic preparation for postsecondary education oral histories of first-generation urban college students. Urban Education, 43(2), 240–261.
  • Relles, S. R., & Tierney, W. G. (2013). The challenge of writing remediation: Can composition research inform higher education policy?Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–45.
  • Risko, V. J., & Walker-Dalhouse, D. (2007). Tapping students’ cultural funds of knowledge to address the achievement gap. The Reading Teacher, 61(1), 98–100.
  • Rodriguez, G. M. (2013). Power and agency in education: Exploring the pedagogical dimensions of Funds of Knowledge. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 87–120. doi:10.3102/0091732x12462686
  • Rosenbaum, J. E., & Becker, K. I. (2011). The early college challenge: Navigating disadvantaged students’ transition to college. American Educator, 35(3), 14–20, 39.
  • Saunders, M., & Serna, I. (2004). Making college happen: The college experiences of first-generation Latino students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 3(2), 146–163. doi:10.1177/1538192703262515
  • Scholz, U., Doña, B. G., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(3), 242–251.
  • Schweiker-Marra, K. E., & Marra, W. T. (2000). Investigating the effects of prewriting activities on writing performance and anxiety of at-risk students. Reading Psychology, 21(2), 99–114.
  • Stanton-Salazar, R. D. (2011). A social capital framework for the study of institutional agents and their role in the empowerment of low-status students and youth. Youth & Society, 43(3), 1066–1109.
  • Stern, M. (2013). Bad teacher: What Race to the Top learned from the “race to the bottom.” Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 11(3), 194–229.
  • Street, B. (2004). Futures of the ethnography of literacy?Language & Education: An International Journal, 18(4), 326–330.
  • Teachman, J. D. (1987). Family background, educational resources, and educational attainment. American Sociological Review, 52(4), 548–557.
  • Tierney, W. G., & Clemens, R. F. (2011). Qualitative research and public policy: The challenges of relevance and trustworthiness. In J. C.Smart & M. B.Paulsen (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 26, pp. 57–83). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  • Vélez-Ibáñez, C. G., & Greenberg, J. B. (1992). Formation and transformation of funds of knowledge among U.S.–Mexican households. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 23(4), 313–335.
  • Wesley, K. (2000). The ill effects of the five paragraph theme. English Journal, 90(1), 57–60.
  • White, L. H., & Worrell, F. C. (2012). Intersections of race, identity, and academic achievement. Human Development, 55(2), 97–104.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17.
  • Zwick, R., & Sklar, J. C. (2005). Predicting college grades and degree completion using high school grades and SAT scores: The role of student ethnicity and first language. American Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 439–464.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.