“I Never Thought I Would Read This Much”: Becoming a Reader

References

• Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allington, R. (2006). What really matters for struggling readers: Designing research-based programs(2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Allington, R. (2009). If they don’t read much … 30 years later. In E.Hiebert (Ed.), Reading more, reading better (pp. 30–54). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R., Wilson, P., & Fielding, L. (1988). Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(5), 285–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applegate, A., & Applegate, M. (2004). The Peter effect: Reading habits and attitudes of preservice teachers. The Reading Teacher, 57(6), 554–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barone, D., & Barone, R. (2012). Building background knowledge within literature circles. Voices from the Middle, 20(1), 10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Barone, D. (2011). Case study research. In N. Duke & M. Mallette (Eds.), Literacy research methodologies (2nd ed., pp. 7–27). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, L., Greenfield, R., & Rinaldi, C. (2010). “Drawing is a frame of mind”: An evaluation of students’ perceptions about reading instruction within a response to intervention model. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49(2), 113–128.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, H. (2002). Literature circles: Voice and choice in book clubs and reading groups. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donahue, P., Finnegan, R., Lutkus, A., Allen, N., & Campbell, J. (2001). The Nation’s Report Card: Fourth grade reading2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
   Google Scholar
• Gambrell, L. (1984). How much time do children spend reading during teacher directed reading instruction? In J. Niles & L. Harris (Eds.), Changing perspectives on research in reading/language processing and instruction. Thirty-third yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 193–198). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Gambrell, L. (2009). Creating opportunities to read more so that students read better. In E. Hiebert (Ed.), Reading more, reading better (pp. 251–266). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gambrell, L., Wilson, R., & Gantt, W. (1981). Classroom observations of task-attending behaviors of good and poor readers. Journal of Educational Research, 74(6), 400–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies. London, England: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfried, A., Fleming, J., & Gottfried, A. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. (2004). Teaching for literacy engagement. Journal of Literacy Research, 36(1), 1–28. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3601_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. (2011). Best practices in motivating students to read. In L. Morrow & L. Gambrell (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (4th ed., pp. 177–198). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J., & Humenick, N. (2004). Motivating students to read: Evidence from classroom practices that increase motivation and achievement. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 329–354). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J., & Klauda, S. (2014). Effects of classroom practices on reading comprehension, engagement, and motivations for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(4), 387–416. doi:10.1002/rrq.81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J., Wigfield, A., & You, W. (2012). Instructional contexts for engagement and achievement in reading. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 601–634). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J., & Cox, K. (2000). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 231–256.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, K., Hedrick, W., & Williams, L. (2014). Every day we’re shufflin’: Empowering students during in-school independent reading. Childhood Education, 90(2), 91–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. (1992). Curriculum-based oral reading fluency norms for students in grades 2 through 5. Teaching Exceptional Children, 24(3), 41–44.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E., & Martin, L. (2009). Opportunity to read: A critical but neglected construct in reading instruction. In E. Hiebert (Ed.), Reading more, reading better (pp. 3–29). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A., & Guthrie, J. (2013). Patterns of association among multiple motivations and aspects of achievement in reading. Reading Psychology, 34(2), 101–147.
   Google Scholar
• International Reading Association. (2014).Leisure reading: A joint statement of the International Reading Association, The Canadian Children’s Book Centre, and the National Council of Teachers of English. Newark, DE: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Katzir, T., Lesaux, N., & Kim, Y. (2009). The role of reading self-concept and home literacy practices in fourth grade reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22(3), 261–276. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9112-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthey, S. (2001). Identity construction in elementary readers and writers. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(2), 122–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGeown, S. (2015). Sex or gender identity? Understanding children’s reading choices and motivation. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(1), 35–46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01546.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGill-Franzen, A., & Botzakis, S. (2009). Series books, graphic novels, comics, and magazines: Unauthorized texts, authorized literacy practices. In E. Hiebert (Ed.), Reading more, reading better (pp. 101–117). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, M., Conradi, K., Lawrence, C., Jang, B., & Meyer, J. P. (2012). Reading attitudes of middle school students: Results of a U.S. survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(3), 283–306. doi:10.1002/rrq.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, M., Kear, D., & Ellsworth, R. (1995). Children’s attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 934–956. doi:10.2307/748205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2009). The book whisperer. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2010). Becoming a classroom of readers. Educational Leadership, 67(6), 30–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, B., & Young, T. (2010). Creating lifelong readers through independent reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I., Martin, M., Foy, P., & Drucker, K. (2012). PIRLS 2011 international results in reading. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
   Google Scholar
• National Endowment for the Arts. (2007). To read or not to read: A question of national consequence (Research Report No. 47). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P.D. (2005). Facilitating comprehension. Presentation made to the Delaware Valley Reading Association, Springfield, PA. Retrieved from www.cieraorg/library/presos/2001/2001MRACIERA/pdp/01mrapdp.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reutzel, D., & Smith, J. (2004). Accelerating struggling readers’ progress: A comparative analysis of expert opinion and current research recommendations. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 20, 63–89.
   Google Scholar
• Reutzel, D., Jones, C., & Newman, T. (2010). Scaffolded silent reading: Improving the conditions of silent reading practice in classrooms. In E. Hiebert & R. Reutzel (Eds.), Revisiting silent reading: New directions for teachers and researchers (pp. 129–150). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sanden, S. (2012). Independent reading: Perspectives and practices of highly effective teachers. The Reading Teacher, 66(3), 222–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shank, G. (2006). Qualitative research: A personal skills approach (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., Smith, L., Gilmore, A., & Jameson, M. (2012). Students’ self-perception of reading ability, enjoyment of reading and reading achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 202–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. (2000). Case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J., & Paris, S. (1995). How literacy tasks influence children’s motivation for literacy. The Reading Teacher, 48(8), 662–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar