Understanding the Philosophical Foundations of Disabilities to Maximize the Potential of Response to Intervention

References

• Anastasious, D. , & Kauffman, J. (2011). A social constructivist approach to disability: Implications for special education. Exceptional Children , 77 , 367–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, J. E. , Carnine, D. W. , Couthinho, M. J. , Edgar, E. B. , Forness, S. R. , Fuchs, L. , Jordan, D. , Kauffman, J. M. , Patton, J. M. , Paul, J. , Rosell, Rueda. R. , Schiller, E. , Skrtic, T. , & Wong, J. (2000). Bridging the special education divide. Remedial and Special Education , 21 , 258–260, 267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baglieri, S. , & Knopf, J. H. (2004). Normalizing difference in inclusive teaching. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 37 , 525–529.10.1177/00222194040370060701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baglieri, S. , & Shapiro, A. (2012). Disability studies and the inclusive classroom: Critical practices for creating least restrictive attitudes . New York, NY : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baglieri, S. , Valle, J. , Connor, D. J. , & Gallagher, D. (2011). Disability studies in education: The need for plurality of perspectives on disability. Remedial and Special Education , 32 , 267–278.10.1177/0741932510362200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown-Chidsey, R. , & Steege, M. W. (2011). Response to intervention: Principles and strategies for effective practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY : Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M. , & Dudley-Marling, C. (2012). Diversity in teacher education and special education: The issues that divide. Journal of Teacher Education , 63 , 237–244.10.1177/0022487112446512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, D. J. , & Ferri, B. A. (2007). The conflict within: Resistance to inclusion and other paradoxes in special education. Disability & Society , 22 , 63–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, D. J. , Gabel, S. L. , Gallagher, D. J. , Morton, M. (Eds.). (2008). Disability studies and inclusive education—implications for theory, research, and practice [Special Issue]. International Journal of Inclusive Education , 12 , 441–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danforth, S. , & Gabel, S. L. (Eds.). (2006). Vital questions for disability studies in education . New York, NY : Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, S. D. (2009). Definitions of disability: Ethical and other values. In K. Kristiansen , S. Vehmas , & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Arguing about disability: Philosophical perspectives (pp. 30–41). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Englert, C. S. , Garmon, A. , Mariage, T. , Rozendal, M. , Tarrant, K. , & Urba, J. (1995). The early literacy project: Connecting across the literacy curriculum. Research on Writing and Literacy , 18 , 253–275.
   Google Scholar
• European Graduate School . (2001). There is a person here - An interview with Judith Butler . Retrieved from http://www.egs.edu/faculty/judith-butler/articles/there-is-a-person-here.
   Google Scholar
• Ferri, B. A. (2011a). Interrupting the discourse: A response to Reid and Valle. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 37 , 509–515.
   Google Scholar
• Ferri, B. A. (2011b). Reform or reformulation? Retrieved from http://www.niusileadscape.org/bl/?p=653
   Google Scholar
• Ferri, B. A. (2012). Undermining inclusion? A critical reading of response to intervention (RTI). International Journal of Inclusive Education , 16 , 863–880.10.1080/13603116.2010.538862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferri, B. A. , & Connor, D. J. (2005). Tools of exclusion: Race, disability, and (re)segregated education. Teachers College Record , 107 , 453–474.10.1111/tcre.2005.107.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. , Coulter, W. , Reschly, D. , & Vaughn, S. (2004). Alternative approaches to the definition and identification of learning disabilities: Some questions and answers. Annals of Dyslexia , 54 , 304–331.10.1007/s11881-004-0015-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friend, M. (2011). Special education: Contemporary perspectives for school professionals . Boston, MA : Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D. , & Deshler, D. (2007). What we need to know about responsiveness to intervention (and shouldn’t be afraid to ask). Learning Disabilities Research and Practice , 22 , 129–136.10.1111/ldrp.2007.22.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D. , & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it. Reading Research Quarterly , 41 , 92–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harry, B. , & Klingner, J. K. (2006). Why are so many minority students in special education? Understanding race and disability in schools . New York, NY : Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollenbeck, A. (2007). From IDEA to implementation: A discussion of the foundational and future response to intervention research. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice , 22 , 86–118.
   Google Scholar
• IDEA . (2004). Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act . Public Law 108–446.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyanpur, M. , & Harry, B. (1999). Culture in special education: Building a posture of reciprocity in parent-professional relationships . Baltimore, MD : Paul Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, J. M. (1995). Commentary: Today’s special education and its messages for tomorrow. Journal of Special Education , 32 , 244–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman, J. M. (2002). Educational deform: Bright people sometimes say stupid things about education . Lanham, MD : Scarecrow Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, J. M. , & Hallahan, D. P. (2005). Special education: What it is and why we need it . Boston, MA : Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, J. M. , & Sasso, G. M. (2006). Toward ending cultural and cognitive relativism in special education. Exceptionality , 14 , 65–90.10.1207/s15327035ex1402_2
   Google Scholar
• Kavale, K. A. (2005). Identifying specific learning disability: Is responsiveness to intervention the answer? Journal of Learning Disabilities , 38 , 553–562.10.1177/00222194050380061201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kermit, P. (2009). Cochlear implants, linguistic rights and ‘open future’ arguments. In K. Kristiansen , S. Vehmas , & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Arguing about disability: Philosophical perspectives (pp. 137–153). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of State Directors of Special Education (NASDSE) . (2006). Myths about response to intervention (RTI) implementation . Retrieved from http://www.nasdse.org/Portals/0/Documents/Download%20Publications/Myths%20about%20RtI.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Center on Response to Intervention (NCRTI) . (2013). RTI state database . Retrieved from http://www.rti4success.org/.
   Google Scholar
• NCLB . (2002). No Child Left Behind Act . Public Law 107–115.
   Google Scholar
• Odom, S. L. , Brantlinger, E. , Gersten, R. , Horner, R. H. , Thompson, B. , & Harris, K. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children , 71 , 137–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okolo, C. M. (2008). Technology and individuals with mild disabilities. In J. D. Lindsey (Ed.), Technology and Exceptional Individuals (4th ed.). (pp. 325–375). Austin, TX : Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, S. J. (2004). Inclusive education: An ERA strategy for all children . Washington, DC : World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, D. (2009). Biopolitics and bare life: Does the impaired body provide contemporary examples of homo sacer. In K. Kristiansen , S. Vehmas , & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Arguing about disability: Philosophical perspectives (pp. 203–218). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, D. K. , & Valle, J. W. (2004). The discursive practice of learning disability: Implications for instruction and parent-school relations. Special Series: Journal of Learning Disabilities , 3 , 466–481.
   Google Scholar
• Rimland, B. (1995). Inclusive education: Right for some. In J. M. Kauffman , & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), The illusion of full inclusion: A comprehensive critique of a current special education bandwagon (pp. 289–291). Austin: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. , & Watson, N. (2001). The social model of disability: An outdated ideology? Research in social science and disability , 2 , 9–28.10.1016/S1479-3547(01)80018-X
   Google Scholar
• Siebers, T. (2010). Disability aesthetics . Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. R. (2009). Definitions of disability: Ethical and other values. In K. Kristiansen , S. Vehmas , & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Arguing about disability: Philosophical perspectives (pp. 15–29). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. , & Okolo, C. M. (2010). Response to intervention and evidence-based practices: Where does technology fit? Learning Disability Quarterly , 33 , 257–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solberg, B. (2009). Prenatal screening for Down syndrome: Why we shouldn’t. In K. Kristiansen , S. Vehmas , & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Arguing about disability: Philosophical perspectives (pp. 185–202). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. J. , & Zubal-Ruggieri, R. (2012). Academic programs in Disability Studies. Center on Human Policy, Law and Disability Studies, Syracuse University . Retrieved from http://disabilitystudies.syr.edu/resources/programsinds.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2004). The mobius effect: Addressing learner variance in schools. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 37 , 516–524.10.1177/00222194040370060601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education . (2013). Building the legacy: IDEA 2004 . Retrieved from http://idea.ed.gov/explore/view/p/,root,regs,300,A,300%252E39.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S. , & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice , 18 , 137–146.
   Google Scholar
• Vehmas, S. , Kristiansen, K. , & Shakespeare, T. (2009). Introduction: The unavoidable alliance of disability studies and philosophy. In K. Kristiansen , S. Vehmas , & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Arguing about disability: Philosophical perspectives (pp. 1–12). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vehmas, S. , & Makela, P. (2009). The ontology of disability and impairment: A discussion of the natural and social features. In K. Kristiansen , S. Vehmas , & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Arguing about disability: Philosophical perspectives (pp. 42–56). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, L. (2010). Disability studies in education. In S. Tozer , A. Bernardo Gallegos , M. B. Greiner , & P. Price (Eds.), The handbook of research in the social foundations of education (pp. 244–259). New York, NY : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, L. (2011). When art informs: Inviting ways to see the unexpected. Learning Disability Quarterly , 34 , 28–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, L. , & Valle, J. (2010). Disability studies as the default paradigm? In S. R. Steinberg (Ed.), 19 urban questions: Teaching in the city (2nd ed.). (pp. 113–130). New York & London: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer, M. L. , & Palmer, S. B. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities , 38 , 131–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar