Leadership in a Performative Context: A framework for decision-making

References

• Ball, S. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18, 215–228.10.1080/0268093022000043065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breidenstein, A., Fahey, K., Glickman, C., & Hensley, F. (2012). Leading for powerful learning: A guide for instructional leaders. New York, NY: Teachers College Press
   Google Scholar
• Cattonar, B. (2007). Les directeurs et les directrices d’école au Canada: Contexte, profil et travail – Enquêtes pancanadiennes auprès des directions et des enseignants d’écoles primaires et secondaires (2005–2006) [School Principals in Canada: Surveys of principals and elementary and secondary teachers from coast to coast (2005–2006)]. SSHRC Major Collaborative Research Initiative Program.
   Google Scholar
• Chitpin, S. (2011). Should Popper’s view of rationality be used for promoting teacher knowledge? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45, 833–844. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00803.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitpin, S., & Knowles, J. G. (2009). A principal’s view on the use of the Objective Knowledge Growth Framework (OKGF) as a reflection tool. In M. P. Caltone (Ed.), Handbook of lifelong learning developments (pp. 1–15). New York, NY: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Chitpin, S., & Simon, M. (2009). Even if no one looked at it, it was important for my own development: Pre-service teacher perceptions of professional portfolios. The Australian Journal of Education, 53, 197–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitpin, S., & Simon, M. (2012). Capturing problem-solving processes using critical rationalism. Teacher Education & Practice, 25, 302–319.
   Google Scholar
• Chitpin, S., Simon, M., Evers, C., Starr, K., & Grimmett, P. (2010). Capturing principals’ decision-making using a peer to peer network for principals. Ontario: The Knowledge Network for the Education Research, Ontario Ministry of Education with University of Toronto and University of Western Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Chitpin, S., Simon, M., & Yahya, R. (2010). Pre-service teachers’ thinking about student assessment issue. The International Journal of Education, 2(2), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Chitpin, S., & White, R. E. (2012). Self-directed professional development for educational leaders: Using the objective knowledge growth framework. The Scholar-Practitioner-Quarterly, 6, 329–349.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Creating a comprehensive system for evaluating and supporting effective teaching. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Lieberman, A. (2012). Educating superman. In W. S. Swail (Ed.), Finding superman: Debating the future of public education in America (pp. 44–52). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C. (2010). The challenge to be the best: Reckless curiosity and mischievous motivation. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 421–434.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. Mineola, NY: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 543–76.10.2307/256434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estyn. (2010). A self evaluation manual for secondary schools. Cardiff: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Estyn. (2012). How well are the all-Wales core data sets used to inform self-evaluation and planning for improvement. Cardiff: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, C. W. (2000). Leading and learning in organizational contexts: A contribution from the new cognitive science. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 3, 239–254.10.1080/13603120050083927
   Google Scholar
• Grimmett, P. P. (2009). International teacher education: Liberal cosmopolitanism re-visited or postmodern trans-nationalism? Teacher Education Quarterly, 36, 7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, M. L. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 103–127.10.2307/2393810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, C., & Heath, D. (2013). Decisive. Toronto: Random House Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacson, S. (2004). Instruction that helps students meet state standards in writing. Exceptionality, 12, 39–54.10.1207/s15327035ex1201_4
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995–1006.10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, M., & McCormick, R. (2009). Teachers learning how to learn. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 973–982.10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. J., & Rasmussen, O. E. (2004). An inquiry into the foundations of organizational learning and the learning organization. The Learning Organization, 11, 478–490.10.1108/09696470410548836
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. (2010). Central, local and individual Continuing Professional Development (CPD) priorities: Changing policies of CPD in Wales. Professional Development in Education, 37, 759–776.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, C. (2012). Waiting for superman. In W. S. Swail (Ed.), Finding superman: Debating the future of public education in America (pp. 60–67). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawn, M. (2011). Governing through data in English education. Education Enquiry, 2, 277–288.
   Google Scholar
• Lawn, M. (2013). The internationalization of education data: Exhibitions, tests, standards and associations. In M. Lawn (Ed.), The rise of data in education systems (pp. 11–25). Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lortie, D. C. (2009). School principal: Managing in public. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226493503.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Lumby, J., & English, F. (2009, April–June). From simplicism to complexity in leadership identity and preparation: Exploring the lineage and dark secrets. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12, 95–114.10.1080/13603120802449678
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. (2012). A guide to effective school leadership theories. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitgang, L., & Maeroff, G. (2008). Becoming a leader: Preparing school principals for today’s schools. New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Oldroyd, D. (2003). Educational leadership for results or for learning? Contrasting directions in times of transition. Managing Global Transition, 1, 49–67.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, T. L. (2013). Thinking beyond league tables: A review of key PISA research questions. In H.-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, power and policy: The emergence of global educational governance (pp. 27–49). Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (2002). Conjectures and refutations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, K. (2008). National Behaviour and Attendance Review (NBAR) report. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government. Retrieved November 14, 2013, from http://wales.gov.uk/dcells/publications/publications/reports/3773934/nbarreport?lang=en
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008, December). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635–674.10.1177/0013161X08321509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salpeter, J. (2004). Data mining with a mission: Data driven decision making is the buzz phrase of choice for the new decade. But one we’ve got the information, how do we use it to yield results? Her, 20 school administrators share their expertise (Community Consolidated School District 15). Technology & Learning, 24, 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Schmoker, M. (2006). How we can achieve unprecedented improvements in teaching and learning. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J., Cooley, V., Reeves, P., Burt, W., Ryan, L., Rainey, J., & Yuan, W. (2010). Using data for decision-making: Perspectives from 16 principals in Michigan. International Review of Education, 56, 435–456.10.1007/s11159-010-9172-x
   Google Scholar
• Waters, T., & Cameron, G. (2007). The balanced leadership framework: Connecting vision with action. Denver, CO: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, C. (2011). Professionalism and the post-performative teacher: New teachers reflect on autonomy and accountability in the English school system. Professional Development in Education, 37, 389–409.10.1080/19415257.2010.514204
   Google Scholar
• Wiseman, A. W. (2013). Policy responses to PISA in comparative perspective. In H.-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, power and policy: The emergence of global educational governance (pp. 303–322). Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar