Spinoza, Deep Ecology and Education Informed by a (Post)human Sensibility

References

• Ansell-Pearson, K. (2016). Deleuze and new materialism: Naturalism, norms and ethics. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2006). Transpositions. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2012). Afterword: Complexity, materialism, difference. Angelaki, 17, 169–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burkhart, B. Y. (2004). What Coyote and Thales can teach us: An outline of American Indian epistemology. In A. Waters (Ed.), American Indian thought: Philosophical essays (pp. 15–26). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlbeck, J. (2017). A spinozistic model of moral education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36, 533–550.10.1007/s11217-016-9530-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza: Practical philosophy. (R. Hurley, Trans.). San Francisco, CA: City Light Books.
   Google Scholar
• Devall, B., & Sessions, G. (1985). Deep ecology: Living as if it mattered. Salt Lake City, UT: Peregrine Smith Books.
   Google Scholar
• Drengson, A. (1997). An ecophilosophy approach, the deep ecology movement, and diverse ecosophies. The Trumpeter, 14, 110–111.
   Google Scholar
• Drengson, A. (1999). Ecophilosophy. Ecosophy and the deep ecology movement: An overview. Retrieved from http://www.ecopherics.net/pages/DrengEcophil.html
   Google Scholar
• Drengson, A., Devall, B., & Schroll, M. (2011). The deep ecology movement: Origins, development, and future prospects (Toward a transpersonal ecosophy). International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 30, 101–117.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, S. B. (2009). Spinoza today: The current state of spinoza scholarship. Intellectual History Review, 19, 111–132.10.1080/17496970902722973
   Google Scholar
• Fox, W. (1984). On guiding stars to deep ecology. The Ecologist, 14, 5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Guilherme, A. (2011). Metaphysics as a basis for deep ecology: An enquiry into Spinoza’s system. The Trumpeter, 27, 60–78.
   Google Scholar
• Jonge, E. (2004). Spinoza and deep ecology: Challenging traditional approaches to environmentalism. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Keizer, H. (2012). Spinoza’s definition of attribute: An interpretation. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 20, 479–498.10.1080/09608788.2012.671582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisner, M. J. (2011). Spinoza and human freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511973512
   Google Scholar
• Le Grange, L. (2016). Sustainability education and (curriculum) improvisation. Southern African Journal of Environmental Education, 32, 26–36.
   Google Scholar
• Leopold, A. (1949). The land ethic. In A. Leopold (Ed.), A sand county almanac (pp. 201–226). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, G. (1980). Spinoza’s environmental ethics. Inquiry, 23, 313–325.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, F. (1988). Conservation and self-realisation: A deep ecology perspective. Environmental Ethics, 10, 347–355.10.5840/enviroethics198810433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, F. (1991). The ecological self. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merçon, J. (2011). Environmental ethics and Spinoza’s critique of anthropocentrism. Ethica, 18, 161–173.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. A. (2008). Indigenous and authentic: Hawaiian epistemology and the triangulation of meaning. In N.K. Denzin, Y.D. Lincoln, & L.T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and Indigenous methodologies (pp. 217–232). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary. Inquiry, 16, 95–100.10.1080/00201747308601682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naess, A. (1977). Spinoza and ecology. In S. Hessing (Ed.), Speculum Spinozanum 1677–1977 (pp. 418–425). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Naess, A. (1978). Through Spinoza to Mahayana Budhism or through Mahyana Budhism to Spinoza? In J. Wetlesen (Ed.), Spinoza’s philosophy of man: Proceedings of the Scandinavian symposium of 1977 (pp. 136–158). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Naess, A. (1981). Spinoza finite God. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 35, 120–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naess, A. (1994). Deep ecology. In C. Merchant (Ed.), Key concepts in critical theory: Ecology (pp. 120–124). New Jersey: Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scruton, R. (1985). Spinoza: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sessions, G. (1985). Western process metaphysics: Heraclitus, Whitehead and Spinoza. In B. Devall & G. Sessions (Eds.), Deep ecology: Living as if nature mattered (pp. 236–242). Salt Lake City, UT: Peregrine Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, H. (2011). Spinoza and the politics of renaturalization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226750750.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Singer, B. A. (1988). Spinoza on returning hatred with love. Journal of Moral Education, 17, 3–10.10.1080/0305724880170101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinoza, B. (1955). On the improvement of the understanding/The ethics/Correspondence. (R. H. M. Elwes, Trans.). London: Bell and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Spinoza, B. (2001). Ethics. (W. H. White, Trans.). Wordsworth: Hertfordshire.
   Google Scholar
• Styres, S., Haig-Brown, C., & Blimkie, M. (2013). Toward a pedagogy of land: The urban context. Canadian Journal of Education, 36, 188–221.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., McKenzie, M., & McCoy, K. (2014). Land education: Indigenous, post-colonial, and decolonizing perspectives on place and environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 20, 1–23.10.1080/13504622.2013.877708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar