Revisiting the Analects for a modern reading of the Confucian dialogical spirit in education

References

• Analects. Transl. into English by Legge, J. (1930). The four books. Shanghai, China: The Chinese Book Co. (Transl. into English by Ames, R. T., & Rosemont, H., Jr. (1998). The Analects of Confucius. New York, NY: Ballantine Book; Transl. into Korean by Kim, H. C. (2013). Seoul, South Korea: Hongik).
   Google Scholar
• Elstein, D. (2009). The authority of the master in the Analects. Philosophy East & West, 59(2), 142–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grytzka, (1981). Die gegenwärtige Rezeption Martin Bubers in der Pädagogik. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 27, 53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. (1991). Democracy’s third wave. Journal of Democracy, 2(2), 12–34.
   Google Scholar
• Kato, M., Kwak, D.-J., & Hung, R. (2015, October). The task of philosophy of education in East Asia (Symposium). Paper presented at Annual Conference of Philosophy of Education Society of Japan (PESJ), Nara, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. E. (1999). Writing and authority in early China. Albandy, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lippitz, W. (2003). Differenz und Fremdheit. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lippitz, W., & Woo, J.-G. (2008). Pädagogischer Bezug, Erzieherisches Verhältnis. In U. Frost, et. al. (Eds.), Handbuch der Erziehungswissenschaft (Bd I., pp. 405–419). Paderborn: Schöningh.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Drawe, K. (1983). Spielraum der Kommunikation – Zu einer phänomenologischen Konzeption inter-subjektiver Erfahrung. Vierteljahrschrift für wissenschaftliche Pädagogik, 59(4), 403–418.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Drawe, K. (2001). Leiblichkeit und Sozialität. München: Fink.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Drawe, K. (1996). Tod des Subjekts – Ende der Erziehung? Zur Bedeutung “Postmoderner” Kritik für Theorien der Erziehung. Pädagogik, 48, 48–57.
   Google Scholar
• Mollenhauer, K. (1976). Theorien zum Erziehungsprozess (3th ed.). München: Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Y. H. (2002). What Confucius had done as an educator and its historical significance. History of Education, 12, 1–70.
   Google Scholar
• Reichenbach, R., & Kwak, D.-J. (Eds.). (2018) Learning and self-transformation from a Confucian perspective. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Seong, T. Y. (1992). Dialogue in Confucianism – with focus on Xun Zi . In Christian Academy (Ed.), Philosophy of dialogue (pp. 23–58). Seoul: Seogwangsa.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, C.-H. (2005). Xiuji – The core of Confucian philosophy of education. Seoul: Wonmisa.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, C.-H. (2012). System of the Confucian Pedagogy. Seoul: Korea University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, A. (2013). Confucianism, democracy, and the virtue of deference. Dao, 12(4), 441–459.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, S.-H. (2010). Authoritative master kong (Confucius) in an authoritarian age. Dao, 9, 137–149.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, S.-H. (2012). Democracy in Confucianism. Philosophy Compass, 7(5), 293–303.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, S.-H. (2016). Why equality and which inequalities? A modern confucian approach to democracy. Philosophy East & West, 66(2), 488–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldenfels, B. (1994). Antwortregister. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Waldenfels, B. (1998). Antwort auf das Fremde. Grundzüge einer responsiven Phänomenologie. In B. Waldenfels & I. Därmann (Eds.), Der Anspruch des Anderen (pp. 35–50). München: Wilhelm Fink.
   Google Scholar
• Waldenfels, B. (2000). Das leibliche Selbst. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, D. B. (2014). Cultivating the self in concert with others. In A. Olberding (Ed.), Dao companion to the Analects (pp. 171–197). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Woo, J.-G. (2007). Responsivität und Pädagogik. Hamburg: Dr. Kovac.
   Google Scholar
• Woo, J.-G. (2008a). Subjektivität und Responsivität. Vierteljahrschrift für wissenschaftliche Pädagogik, 84, 147–166.
   Google Scholar
• Woo, J.-G. (2008b). Konfuzianismus im pädagogischen Alltag. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 11, 475–491.
   Google Scholar
• Woo, J.-G. (2012). ‘Inclusion’ in Martin Buber’s dialogue pedagogy. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 15(4), 829–845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo, J.-G. (2014). Teaching the unknowable other: Humanism of the other by E. Levinas and pedagogy of responsivity. Asian Pacific Education Review, 15(1), 79–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yung, B. (2010). Can Confucian add value to democracy education? Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 1919–1926.
   Google Scholar