The council of Europe’s competences for democratic culture: Employing Badiou and Plato to move beyond tensions in the values it promotes

References

• Badiou, A., & Feltham, O. (2015). Being and event. London: Bloomsbury Academic, an imprint of Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Badiou, A. (2012a). Ethics: An essay on the understanding of evil. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Badiou, A. (2012b). Plato’s republic: A dialogue in sixteen chapters, with a prologue and an epilogue. Wiley. Kindle Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Badiou, A. (2011). Metapolitics. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. (1994). The limits of competence, knowledge, higher education and society. Buckingham: SRHE and The Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, M. (2016). Competences for democratic culture: Living together as equals in culturally diverse democratic societies. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Barrow, R. (1987). Skill talk. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 21(2), 187–195. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9752.1987.tb00158.x
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, A. J. (2017). Education: Not impossible. In J. Clemens and J. Whyte (Eds.), What is education? (pp. 33–61). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, A. J. (2011). Badiou and Plato: An education by truths. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, A. J. (2006). Conditional notes on a New Republic. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 2 (1–2), 39–67.
   Google Scholar
• Benhabib, S. (2006). Another cosmopolitanism: Hospitality, sovereignty, and democratic iterations. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2004). “The Most We Can Hope For…”: Human rights and the politics of fatalism. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 103(2–3), 451–463. Duke University Press. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from Project MUSE database. doi: 10.1215/00382876-103-2-3-451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douzinas, C. (2013). The Paradoxes of Human Rights. Constellations, 20(1), 51–67. doi: 10.1111/cons.12021
   Google Scholar
• Ferri, G. (2018). Intercultural communication: Critical approaches and future challenges. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ferri, G. (2014). Ethical communication and intercultural responsibility: A philosophical perspective. Language and Intercultural Communication, 14(1), 7–23. doi: 10.1080/14708477.2013.866121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gozdecka, D. (2016). Rights, religious pluralism and the recognition of difference off the scales of justice. (p. 115). New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gozdecka, D. A., Ercan, S. A., & Kmak, M. (2014). From multiculturalism to post-multiculturalism: Trends and paradoxes. Journal of Sociology, 50(1), 51–64. doi: 10.1177/1440783314522191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilherme, M., Keating, C., & Hoppe, D. (2010). Intercultural responsibility. Power and ethics in intercultural dialogue and interaction. In M. Guilehrme, E. Glaser, & M. del Carmen Méndez Garcia (Eds.), The intercultural dynamics of multicultural working (pp. 77–94). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, J. T. (2005). Fearful Symbols: The Islamic Headscarf and the European Court of Human Rights. Strasbourg Consortium: Freedom of Conscience and Religion at the European Court of Human Rights. Retrieved from http://www.strasbourgconsortium.org/document.php?DocumentID=3846
   Google Scholar
• Holliday, A. (2010). Cultural descriptions as political cultural acts: An exploration. Language and Intercultural Communication, 10(3), 259–272. doi: 10.1080/14708470903348572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, M. (2017). Rediscovering Americanism: And the tyranny of progressivism. New York: Threshold Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas, E. (1994). Outside the subject. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinas, E. (2006). Otherwise than being, or, beyond essence. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., & Dervin, F. (2018). Interculturality in a different light. Intercultural Communication Education, 1(1), 12–26. doi: 10.29140/ice.v1n1.28
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2008). Upheavals of thought the intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phipps, A. (2014). ‘They are bombing now’: ‘Intercultural Dialogue’ in times of conflict. Language and Intercultural Communication, 14(1), 108–124. doi: 10.1080/14708477.2013.866127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. (1987). Skills: The middle way. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 21(2), 197–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9752.1987.tb00159.x
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I. G. (2010). Sites, truths and the logics of worlds: Alain Badiou and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(3), 431–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00385.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldenfels, B. (2002). In Simon Critchley & Robert Bernasconi (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Levinas (pp. 63–81). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M., & Bozalek, V. (2014). A critical engagement with the social and political consequences of human rights: The contribution of the affective turn and posthumanism. Acta Academia, 46(4), 29–47.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. (2016). Refugees, terror and other troubles with the neighbors: Against the double blackmail. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. (2006). Parallax view. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar