1,275
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Beyond high-stakes exam: A neo-Confucian educational programme and its contemporary implications

ORCID Icon
Pages 137-148 | Received 22 Oct 2018, Accepted 21 Mar 2019, Published online: 25 Apr 2019

References

  • Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2003). The effects of high-stakes testing on student motivation and learning. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 32–38.
  • Ang, R. P., & Huan, V. S. (2006). Academic expectations stress inventory development, factor analysis, reliability, and validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 522–539.
  • Angle, S. C. (2009). Sagehood: The contemporary significance of neo-Confucian philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Angle, S. C. (2011). A productive dialogue: Contemporary moral education and Zhu Xi’s neo-Confucian ethics. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 38, 183–203. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6253.2012.01696.x
  • Apple, M. W. (2006). Educating the ‘right’ way: Markets, standards, god, and inequality. 2nd ed. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Au, W. (2009). Unequal by design: High-stakes testing and the standardisation of inequality. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Au, W. (2011). Teaching under a new Taylorism: High-stakes testing and the standardisation of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25–45.
  • Au, W. (2016). Meritocracy 2.0: High-stakes, standardised testing as a racial project of neoliberal multiculturalism. Educational Policy, 30(1), 39–62.
  • Banks, J., & Smyth, E. (2015). ‘Your whole life depends on it’: Academic stress and high-stakes testing in Ireland. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(5), 598–616.
  • Braun, A., Maguire, M., & Ball, S. (2010). Policy enactments in the UK secondary school: Examining policy, practice and school positioning. Journal of Education Policy, 25(4), 547–560. doi:10.1080/02680931003698544
  • Brown, C. P. (2015). Taking and teaching the test are not the same: A case study of first-year teachers’ experiences in high-stakes contexts. Teachers and Teaching, 21(8), 1026–1044. doi:10.1080/13540602.2015.1005870
  • Chan, W-T. (1963). A Sourcebook in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Cheng, C.-Y. (2006). Education for morality in global and cosmic contexts: The Confucian model. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 33(4), 557–570. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6253.2006.00382.x
  • Cochran-Smith, M. (2006). Policy, practice, and politics in teacher education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • de Bary, T. W. (1953). A reappraisal of Neo-Confucianism. In A. Wright (Ed.), Studies in Chinese thought (pp. 81–111). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.1086/ahr/59.4.934
  • De Bary, W. T. (1989). To message of the mind in neo-Confucianism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • De Bary, W. T. (2007). Confucian tradition and global education. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
  • De Bary, W. T., & Bloom, I. (1999). Sources of Chinese tradition: from earliest times to 1600. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • de Bary, T. W., & Chaffee, J. W. (1989). Neo-Confucian education: The formative stage. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Diamond, J. B. (2012). Accountability policy, school organisation, and classroom practice: Partial recoupling and educational opportunity. Education and Urban Society, 44(2), 151–182. doi:10.1177/0013124511431569
  • Ebenstein, A., Lavy, V., & Roth, S. (2016). The long run economic consequences of high-stakes examinations: Evidence from transitory variation in pollution. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 8(4), 36–65.
  • Fabricant, M., & Fine, M. (2013). The changing politics of education: Privatisation and the dispossessed lives of left behind. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
  • Gardner, D. K. (2007). The four books: The basic teachings of the later Confucian tradition. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co, Inc.
  • Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., & Yuan, K. (2008). Standards-based reform in the United States: History, research, and future directions. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
  • Hughes, A. (2013). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hursh, D. (2005). The growth of high-stakes testing in the USA: Accountability, markets and the decline in educational equality. British Education Research Journal, 31(5), 605–622.
  • Hwang, K. (2013). Educational modes of thinking in neo-Confucianism: A traditional lens for rethinking modern education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14(2), 243–253. doi:10.1007/s12564-013-9243-3
  • Kalton, M. C. (1988). To become a sage: Th ten diagrams on sage learning by Yi T’oegye. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Kılıçkaya, F. (2016). Washback effects of a high-stakes exam on lower secondary school English teachers’ practices in the classroom. Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature, 40(1), 116–134.
  • Låftman, S. B., Almquist, Y. B., & Östberg, V. (2013). Students' accounts of school-performance stress: A qualitative analysis of a high-achieving setting in Stockholm, Sweden. Journal of Youth Studies, 16(7), 932–949. doi:10.1080/13676261.2013.780126
  • Lai, C. (1999). The concepts of dao and li in Song-Ming neo-Confucian philosophy. Contemporary Chinese Thought, 30(4), 9–24. doi:10.2753/CSP1097-146730049
  • Lior, Y. (2018). Neo-Confucianism as a guide for contemporary Confucian education. In X. Liu & W. Ma (Eds.), Confucianism reconsidered: Insights for American and Chinese education in the twenty-first century (pp. 87–109). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Madaus, G. F. (1991). The effects of important tests on students: Implications for a national examination system. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(3), 226–231.
  • McGraw, K., Moore, S., Fuller, A., & Bates, G. (2008). Family, peer and school connectedness in final year secondary school students. Australian Psychologist, 43(1), 27–37.
  • Ministry of Education (2012). Jiaoyu bu guanyu jiji tuijin zhongxiaoxue pingjia yu kaoshi zhidu gaige de tongzhi [Notice of the Ministry of Education to actively promote the reform of appraisal and examination system for primary and secondary schools]. Retrieved from www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2003/content_62173.htm (accessed 28 October 2015)
  • Moss, P., Girard, B. J., & Haniford, L. C. (2006). Validity in educational assessment. Review of Research in Education, 30(1), 109–162. doi:10.3102/0091732X030001109
  • Murgatroyd, S., & Sahlberg, P. (2016). The two solitudes of educational policy and the challenge of development. Journal of Learning for Development, 3(3), 9–21.
  • Newmann, F. M., Lopez, A. S., & Bryk, A. S. (1998). The quality of intellectual work in Chicago schools: A baseline report. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
  • Nichols, S., Berliner, D., & Glass, G. (2006). High stakes testing and student achievement: Does accountability pressure increase student learning. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(1), 1–175. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v14n1/(Accessed May 12, 2005). doi:10.14507/epaa.v14n1.2006
  • Nie, S. (2014). Gaokao gaige mianling de zhuli ji duice [The resistance and counter-measure confronting the reform for national college entrance examination]. Hubei Zhaosheng Kaoshi, 3(393), 15–19.
  • Olson, K. (2009). Recapturing the joy in learning and standing up to old school culture. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Pan, Y., & Newfields, T. (2011). Teacher and student washback on test preparation evidenced from Taiwan’s English certification exit requirements. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 6(3), 260–272.
  • Putwain, D. W., Connor, S. L., & Symes, W. (2010). Do cognitive distortions mediate the test anxiety-examination performance relationship? Educational Psychology, 30(1), 11–26.
  • Resnick, L. B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13–20. doi:10.3102/0013189X016009013
  • Simmons, J., & MacLean, J. (2018). Physical education teachers’ perceptions of factors that inhibit and facilitate the enactment of curriculum change in a high-stakes exam climate. Sports, Education and Society, 23(2), 186–202.
  • Sprenger, A. (1991). Confucius and modernisation in China: An educational perspective. In S. Krieger & R. Trauzettel (Eds.), Confucianism and the modernisation of China (pp. 454–474). Mainz: v. Hase & Koehler Verlang.
  • Thompson, K. O. (2007). The archery of ‘wisdom’ in the stream of life: ‘Wisdom’ in the Four Books with Zhu Xi’s reflections. Philosophy East & West, 57(3), 330–344. doi:10.1353/pew.2007.0040
  • Tan, C. (2013). Confucius. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Tan, C. (2016). Educational policy borrowing in China: Looking West or looking East? Oxon: Routledge.
  • Tan, C. (2019). Rethinking the concept of mindfulness: A Neo-Confucian approach. Journal of Philosophy of Education, online. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12343
  • Tan, C. (in press). Beyond the competencies agenda in large-scale international assessment: A Confucian alternative. Philosophical Inquiry in Education.
  • Tu, W.-M. (1985). Confucian thought: Selfhood as creative transformation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Valli, L., Croninger, R., Chambliss, M., Graeber, A., & Buese, D. (2008). Test driven: High-stakes accountability in elementary schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Wepner, S. B. (2006). Teaching gone amok: Leave no teacher candidate behind. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33, 135–149.
  • Yao, X. (2000). An introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Yerdelen-Damar, S., & Elby, A. (2016). Sophisticated epistemologies of physics versus high-stakes tests: How do elite high school students respond to competency influences about how to learn physics?. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12, 1–21.
  • Yong, H. (2010). The self-centredness objection to virtue ethics: Zhu Xi’s neo-Confucian response. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 84(4), 651–692.
  • Yu, Y-S. (1986). Morality and knowledge in Chu Hsi's philosophical system. In W.-T. Chan (Ed.), Chu Hsi and neo-Confucianism (pp. 228–254). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Zhan, Y., & Andrews, S. (2014). Washback effects from a high-stakes examination on out-of-class English learning: Insights from possible self-theories. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(1), 71–89.
  • Zhu, X., & Lù, Z. (1967). Reflections on Things at Hand. New York, NY: Columbia University Press (translated by W.-T. Chan).
  • Zhu, X. (1990). Learning to be a sage: Selections from the conversations of Master Chu, arranged topically. Berkeley, LA: University of California Press (translated by D. K. Gardner).
  • Zhu, Z. (1991). Further reflections on things at hand. Lanham, MD: University Press of America (translated by A. Wittenborn).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.