Revisiting Peirce’s account of scientific creativity to inform classroom practice

References

• Ainswoth, S., Tytler, R., & Prain, V. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333, 1096–1097.
   Google Scholar
• Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2012). Learning through constructing representations in science: A framework of representational construction affordances. International Journal of Science Education, 34(17), 2751–2773.
   Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., Prain, V., Hubber, P., & Waldrip, B. (2013). Constructing representation to learn in science. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J. P. (2017). A video-based analysis of science students' computer-mediated abductive reasoning (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30097364.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J.P. (2019). Students are not inferential misfits: Naturalising logic in the science classroom. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 51(8), 852–865.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, D. R. (1987). Creativity and the philosophy of C.S. Peirce. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ballabio, A. (2018). The genesis of the creative experience in C. S. Peirce. Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia, 19(2), 220–226.
   Google Scholar
• Bogen, J. (2019). Theory and observation in science. In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/science-theory-observation/
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, W., & Lambert, B. (2001). The theory-ladenness of observation and the theory-ladenness of the rest of the scientific process. Philosophy of Science, 68(3), S176–S186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos, D. (2011). On the distinction between Peirce’s abduction and Lipton’s inference to the best explanation. Synthese, 180(3), 419–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, P. (2019). The demon in the machine. How hidden webs of information are finally solving the mystery of life. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Deely, J., & Semetsky, I. (2017). Semiotics, edusemiotics and the culture of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(3), 207–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1991). How we think. New York: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dickes, A., & Sengupta, P. (2013). Learning natural selection in 4th grade with multi-agent-based computational models. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 921–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douven, I. (2017). Abduction. In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition), Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/abduction/
   Google Scholar
• Fann, K. (1970). Peirce’s theory of abduction. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbay, D. M., & Woods, J. (2005). The reach of abduction - A practical logic of cognitive systems, Vol. 2. North-Holland, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Hintikka, J. (1998). What is abduction? The fundamental problem of contemporary epistemology. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 34(3), 503–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnani, L. (2015a). The eco-cognitive model of abduction Ἀpacxc now: Naturalizing the logic of abduction. Journal of Applied Logic, 13(3), 285–315.
   Google Scholar
• Magnani, L. (2015b). Naturalizing logic: Errors of reasoning vindicated: Logic reapproaches cognitive science. Journal of Applied Logic, 13(1), 13–36.
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons. International comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Academy of Learned Academies (ACOLA).
   Google Scholar
• Means, B., Wang, H., Wei, X., Lynch, S., Peters, V., Young, V., & Allen, C. (2017). Expanding STEM opportunities through inclusive STEM-focused high schools. Science Education, 101(5), 681–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midtgarden, T. (2005). On the prospects of a semiotic theory of learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37(2), 239–252.
   Google Scholar
• Paavola, S. (2005). Peircean abduction: Instinct or inference. Semiotica, 153, 131–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paavola, S. (2015). Deweyan approaches to abduction. In U. Zackariasson (Ed.), Action, belief and inquiry—Pragmatist perspectives on science, society and religion (pp. 230–249). Nordic Studies in Pragmatism 3. Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network.
   Google Scholar
• Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor – An emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14(6), 535–557.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1967). On five grades of originality in logic. In R. S. Robin (Ed.), Annotated catalogue of the papers of Charles S. Peirce (pp. 1–17). Worcester: The University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1974a). Lessons from the history of science. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 1, pp. 19–49). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1974b). Deduction, induction, and hypothesis. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 2, pp. 372–388). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1974c). Pragmatism and abduction. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 5, pp. 112–131). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1974d). A neglected argument for the reality of god. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 2, pp. 372–388). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1974e). Evolutionary love. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 6, pp. 190–215). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1974f). Three types of reasoning. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 5, pp. 94–111). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1974g). Questions concerning certain faculties claimed for man. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 5, pp. 135–155). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Pietarinen, A.-V., & Bellucci, F. (2014). New light on Peirce's conceptions of retroduction, deduction, and scientific reasoning. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 28(4), 353–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semetsky, I. (2005a). Peirce’s semiotics, subdoxastic aboutness and the paradox of inquiry. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37(2), 227–238.
   Google Scholar
• Semetsky, I. (2005b). Learning by abduction: A geometrical interpretation. Semiotica, 157, 199–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semetsky, I. (2009). Meaning and abduction as process-structure: A diagram of reasoning. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 5(2), 191–209.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. D. (1968). The double helix: Being a personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. New York: Atheneum.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, J. (2013). Errors of reasoning - Naturalizing the logic of inference. London: College Publications.
   Google Scholar