References
- Aiston, S. J. (2014). Leading the academy or being led? Hong Kong women academics. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.864618
- Aiston, S. J., & Jung, J. (2015). Women academics and research productivity: an international comparison. Gender and Education, 27(3), 205–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1024617
- Aiston, S. J., & Yang, Z. (2017). Absent data, absent women”: Gender and higher education leadership. Policy Futures in Education, 15(3), 262–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317716298
- Altbach, P. G. (2001). Academic freedom: International realities and challenges. Higher Education, 41(1/2), 205–219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026791518365
- Baert, P., & Morgan, M. (2018). A performative framework for the study of intellectuals. European Journal of Social Theory, 21(3), 322–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431017690737
- Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Brew, A. (2008). Disciplinary and interdisciplinary affiliations of experienced researchers. Higher Education, 56(4), 423–438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9102-4
- Bryson, V. (2007). Gender and the politics of time: Feminist theory and contemporary debates. Policy Press.
- Burns, J. M. (1978). Intellectual Leadership: Ideas as Moral Power. In J. M. Burns (Ed.), Leadership. (pp. 141–168). HarperCollins.
- Cole, J. R., & Cole, S. (1974). Social stratification in science. The University of Chicago Press.
- Davies, K. (1989). Women and time, waving the strands of everyday life. Grahns Boktryckeri.
- Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Psychology Press.
- Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
- Giroux, H. A. (2009). The attack on higher education and the necessity of critical pedagogy. In S. Macrine (Ed.), Critical pedagogy in uncertain times, 11–26. Springer.
- Gumport, P. J. (2002). Academic pathfinders: Knowledge creation and feminist scholarship. Greenwood Publishing Group.
- Heijstra, T. M., Steinthorsdóttir, F. S., & Einarsdóttir, T. (2017). Academic career making and the double-edged role of academic housework. Gender and Education, 29(6), 764–780. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1171825
- Jackson, L. (2019). The smiling philosopher: Emotional labor, gender, and harassment in conference spaces. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(7), 693–701. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1343112
- Kayrooz, C., Kinnear, P., & Preston, P. (2001). Academic freedom and commercialisation of Australian universities (No. 37). The Australia Institute, Discussion Paper.
- Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Glynn, C. J., & Huge, M. (2013). The Matilda effect in science communication: an experiment on gender bias in publication quality perceptions and collaboration interest. Science Communication, 35(5), 603–625. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012472684
- Kuhn, T. S. (1963). The structure of scientific revolutions (Vol. 2). University of Chicago press.
- Larivière, V., Vignola-Gagné, E., Villeneuve, C., Gélinas, P., & Gingras, Y. (2011). Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: an analysis of Québec university professors. Scientometrics, 87(3), 483–498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0369-y
- Lee, E. (2012). Women in power and decision making. In S. Y. P. Choi & F. M. Cheung (Eds.), Women and girls in Hong Kong: Current situations and future challenges (pp. 191–222). Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies.
- Leišytė, l. (2016). Bridging the duality between universities and the academic profession: A tale of protected spaces, strategic gaming, and institutional entrepreneurs. In L. Leišytė & U. Wilkesmann (Eds.), Organising Academic Work in Higher Education. (pp. 75–87). Routledge.
- Lincoln, A. E., Pincus, S., Koster, J. B., & Leboy, P. S. (2012). The Matilda Effect in science: Awards and prizes in the U.S., 1990s and 2000s. Social Studies of Science, 42(2), 307–320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711435830
- Lucas, L. (2006). Research game in academic life. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Luke, C. (1998). “I got to where I am by my own strength”: Women in Hong Kong higher education management. Education Journal, 26(1), 31–58.
- Macfarlane, B. (2012). Intellectual leadership in higher education: Renewing the role of the university professor. Routledge.
- Macfarlane, B. (2019). The neoliberal academic: Illustrating shifting academic norms in an age of hyper-performativity. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1684262
- Macfarlane, B., & Burg, D. (2019). Women professors and the academic housework trap. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 41(3), 262–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1589682
- Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56
- Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis, 79(4), 606–623. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/354848
- Mok, K. H. (1999). The cost of managerialism: The implications for the ‘McDonaldisation’of higher education in Hong Kong. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 21(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080990210109
- Mok, K. H. (2008). Varieties of regulatory regimes in Asia: The liberalisation of the higher education market and changing governance in Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia. The Pacific Review, 21(2), 147–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740801990220
- Morley, L. (2014). Lost leaders: Women in the global academy. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(1), 114–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.864611
- Nelson, C. (2011). No university is an island: Saving academic freedom. New York University Press.
- Oleksiyenko, A., & Ruan, N. (2019). Intellectual leadership and academic communities: Issues for discussion and research. Higher Education Quarterly, 73(4), 406–413. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12199
- Philipsen, M. I., & Bostic, T. (2008). Challenges of the faculty career for women: Success and sacrifice. John Wiley & Sons.
- Poole, M., Bornholt, L., & Summers, F. (1997). An international study of the gendered nature of academic work: Some cross-cultural explorations. Higher Education, 34(3), 373–396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003075907126
- Postiglione, G. A., & Jung, J. (2017). The Changing Academic Profession in Hong Kong: Challenges and Future. In G. A. Postiglione & J. Jung (Eds.), The changing academic profession in Hong Kong (pp. 3–14). Springer International Publishing.
- Probert, B. (2005). ‘I just couldn’t fit it in’: Gender and unequal outcomes in academic careers. Gender, Work and Organization, 12(1), 50–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2005.00262.x
- Rhoads, R. A., & Gu, D. Y. (2012). A gendered point of view on the challenges of women academics in the People’s Republic of China. Higher Education, 63(6), 733–750. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9474-3
- Roberts, P. (2007). Intellectuals, tertiary education and questions of difference. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(5), 480–493. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00247.x
- Savigny, H. (2014). Women, know your limits: Cultural sexism in academia. Gender and Education, 26(7), 794–809. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2014.970977
- Schrecker, E. (2010). The lost soul of higher education: Corporatisation, the assault on academic freedom, and the end of the American university. The New Press.
- Shen, H. (2013). Inequality quantified: Mind the gender gap. https://www.nature.com/news/inequality-quantified-mind-the-gender-gap-1.12550
- Silverman, D. (2005). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. SAGE Publications limited.
- Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. ERIC.
- Spurling, N. (2012). Research strategies’ capital’ and the goods of social science research. In P. Trowler, M. Saunders, & V. Bamber (Eds.), Tribes and Territories in the 21st century (pp. 78–90). Routledge.
- The American Association of University Professors. (1940). 1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure. https://www.aaup.org/file/1940%20Statement.pdf
- The American Association of University Professors. (1940). 1940 Statement of principles on academic freedom and tenure (1940). https://www.aaup.org/file/1940%20Statement.pdf
- Tierney, W. (1993). Academic freedom and the parameters of knowledge. Harvard Educational Review, 63(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.63.2.5625h5mn0362hm00
- Trowler, P., Saunders, M., & Bamber, V. (2012). Tribes and territories in the 21st century: Rethinking the significance of disciplines in higher education. Routledge.
- Uslu, B., & Welch, A. (2018). The influence of universities’ organisational features on professorial intellectual leadership. Studies in Higher Education, 43(3), 571–515. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1185774
- Weiler, H. N. (2001). Knowledge, politics, and the future of higher education: critical observations on a worldwide transformation. In R. Hayhoe & J. Pan (Eds.), Knowledge across cultures: A contribution to dialogue among civilisations (pp. 25–43). Hong Kong University Press.
- Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
- Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. The Free Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/83.3.690
- Zuckerman, H. (1997). Accumulation of advantage and disadvantage: The theory and its intellectual biography. In C. Mongardini & S. Tabboni (Eds.), Robert K. Merton and contemporary sociology (pp. 139–161).