References
- Anthony, M. (2005). Education for transformation: Integrated intelligence in the knowledge society and beyond. Journal of Future Studies, 9(3), 31– 46. https://jfsdigital.org/articles-and-essays/2005-2/vol-9-no-3-feb/
- Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
- Beauregard, M., Schwartz, G. E., Miller, L., Dossey, L., Moreira-Almeida, A., Schlitz, M., Sheldrake, R., & Tart, C. (2014). Manifesto for a post-materialist science. Explore (New York, N.Y.).), 10(5), 272–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2014.06.008
- Beauregard, M., Trent, N., & Schwartz, G. E. (2018, August). Toward a postmaterialist psychology: Theory, research, and applications. New Ideas in Psychology, 50, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2018.02.004
- Bernstein, P., Schild, R., Saniga, M., Pracna, P., Neslušan, L., & Perkins, K. (2011). Non-locality, cognition and cosmic structures. Journal of Cosmology, 14, 4601–4615. http://cosmology.com/Consciousness100.html
- Bodinet, J. E. (2016). Pedagogies of the futures: Shifting the educational paradigms. European Journal of Futures Research, 4(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-016-0106-0
- Borman, K. M. (1994). Changing American education: Recapturing the past or inventing the future? State University of New York.
- Bozalek, V., & McMillan, W. (2017). Diffracting learning/teaching entanglements: A South African vice- chancellor’s perspective. In B. Leibowitz, V. Bozalek, & P. Kahn, (Eds.), Theorising learning to teach in higher education (pp. 43–58). Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/swin/
- Brabant, O. (2016). More than meets the eye: Toward a post-materialist model of consciousness. EXPLORE, 12(5), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2016.06.006
- Cantley, I. (2015). How secure is a Newtonian paradigm for psychological and educational measurement? Theory & Psychology, 25(1), 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354314561141
- Cantley, I. (2017). A Quantum Measurement Paradigm for Educational Predicates: Implications for validity in educational measurement. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(4), 405–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1048668
- Carter, P. J. (2014). Consciousness and perception of higher-dimensional quantum space-time. NeuroQuantology, 12(1), 46–75. https://doi.org/doi: https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2014.12.1.724
- Christensen, W. J. (2017). God is a porcupine-brain: Consciousness and spacetime physics. Journal of Modern Physics, 8, 1294–1318. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2017.88084
- Di, X. (2018). The philosophical consciousness of the interconnected universe. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(14), 1376–1377. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1458795
- Dispenza, J. (2017). Becoming supernatural: How common people are doing the uncommon. [Kindle version]
- Dunne, B. J., & Jahn, R. G. (2007). Consciousness, information and living systems. Cellular and Molecular Biology, 3(3), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2007.04.002
- Ellis, G. F. R. (2013). The arrow of time and the nature of spacetime. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 44(3), 242–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.06.002
- Gaitanaru, A. (2013). Educational paradigms. Euromentor Journal, 4(2), 50–60. http://ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1449574706?accountid=14205
- Gitterman, M. (2012). A brief tour of modern quantum mechanics. World Scientific.
- Görnitz, T. (2018). Quantum theory and the nature of consciousness. Foundations of Science, 23(3), 475–510. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/10.1007/s10699-017-9536-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-017-9536-9
- Goswami, A. (2016). A new paradigm for education: What quantum physics tells us about how we should educate our kids. https://www.amitgoswami.org/2016/07/15/a-new-paradigm-for-education-what-quantum-physics-tells-us-about-how-we-should-educate-our-kids/
- Guba, E. G. (1990). The paradigm dialog. Sage Newbury Park. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/35.5.477-a
- Hagelin, J. S., Rainforth, M. V., Cavanaugh, K. L. C., Charles, N., Alexander, C. N., Shatkin, S. F., Davies, J. L., Hughes, A. O., Ross, E., & Orme-Johnson, D. W. (1999). Effects of group practice of the transcendental meditation program on preventing violent crime in Washington, D.C.: Results of the national demonstration project, June–July 1993. Social Indicators Research, 47(2), 153–201. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006978911496 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006978911496
- Hagelin, J. (2014). Is consciousness the unified field? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPhgDfT4Zpc
- Hasson, U., Ghazanfar, A. A., Galantucci, B., Garrod, S., & Keysers, C. (2012). Brain-to-brain coupling: A mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 114–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.007
- Heisenberg, W. (2015). Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science (1958). Unwin University Books.
- Heshusius, L. (1989). The Newtonian mechanistic paradigm, special education, and contours of alternatives: An overview. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(7), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948902200702
- Kauffman, S. (2016). Cosmic mind? Theology and Science, 14(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2015.1122324
- Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolution. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/68.3.700
- Ling, L. (2017). The power of the paradigm: Methods and paradigms in education research. In L. Ling & P. Ling (Eds.), Methods and paradigms in education research(pp. 19–41). IGI Global. https://www-igi-global-com.ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/gateway/book/164680
- Ling, P., & Ling, L. (2017). Introduction: Employing paradigms in education research. In L. Ling & P. Ling (Eds.), Methods and paradigms in education research (pp. 1–18). IGI Global. https://www-igi-global-com.ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/gateway/book/164680
- Lloyd, S., & Ng, Y. J. (2007). Black hole computers. Scientific American, 17(1), 82–92. Special Edition-Blac. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0407-82sp
- Lugo, J. E., Doti, R., Agarwal, R., Ray, K., & Faubert, J. (2015). Physical analogies in biology: Photons, phonons, bloch waves to non-linear oscillators. Advanced Science, Engineering and Medicine, 7(1), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1166/asem.2015.1647
- Mahmoudi, S., Jafari, E., Nasrabadi, H. A., & Liaghatdar, M. J. (2012). Holistic education: An approach for 21 century. International Education Studies, 5(3), 178–186. doi.org/https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n3p178
- Meijer, D. K. F., & Korf, J. (2013). Quantum modeling of the mental state: The concept of a cyclic mental workspace. Syntropy, 2013(1), 1–41. https://www.newdualism.org/papers/D.Meijer/Meijer-Syntropy2013-Quantum%20modelling%20of%20Mental%20state.pdf
- Meijer, D. K. F. (2014). The extended brain: Cyclic information flow in a quantum physical real. NeuroQuantology, 1(2), 180–200. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2014.12.2.754
- Meijer, D. K. F., & Geesink, H. J. H. (2017). Consciousness in the universe is scale invariant and implies an event horizon of the human brain. NeuroQuantology, 15(3), 41–79. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2017.15.3.1079
- Menskii˘, M. B. (2010). Consciousness and quantum mechanics: Life in parallel worlds – miracles of consciousness from quantum reality. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.lib.swin.edu.au/ehost/ebookviewer/ebook/
- Merriam-Webster. (2019). Quantum mechanics. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary
- Miller, R. (2000). Beyond reductionism: The emerging holistic paradigm in education. The Humanistic Psychologist, 28(1–3), 382–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873267.2000.9977003
- Mukhopadhyay, R. (2018). Quantum mechanics, objective reality, and the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 21, 57–80. https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.03606
- Murris, K., & Bozalek, V. (2019). Diffracting diffractive readings of texts as methodology: Some propositions. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(14), 1504–1517. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1570843
- Pereira, A., Nunn, C., Nixon, G. M., & Pregnolto, M. (2018). Consciousness and cosmos: Building an ontological framework. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 25(3–4), 181–205. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gregory_Nixon/publication/319632327_Consciousness_and_Cosmos_Building_an_Ontological_Framework/links/5ace44860f7e9b18965822c3/Consciousness-and-Cosmos-Building-an-Ontological-Framework.pdf
- Richards, T. L., Kozak, L., Johnson, L. C., & Standish, L. J. (2005). Replicable functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence of correlated brain signals between physically and sensory isolated subjects. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 11(6), 955–963. http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/79e5/4020f1cd65110856bbe57e5cf0b0606125b3.pdf https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2005.11.955
- Risjord, M. (2009). Nursing knowledge, paradigm, theory, and method. Wiley-Blackwell.
- Shashi, K. R. J., & Pereira, C. (2018). The emergence of mind as a quantum field phenomenon. NeuroQuantology, 16(11), 68–78. https://doi.org/doi: https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2018.16.11.1846
- Tomozii, S. E., & Topală, I. (2014). Why do we need to change the educational paradigms? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 586–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.670
- Turner, K., Wilson, A., & Atwa, S. (2019, December), Consciousness in education: Quantum mechanics and education paradigms [Roundtable presentation]. Australian Association for Research in Education. https://www.aareconference.com.au/public/assets/e5c7aaf7f9/Session-book-with-full-abstracts-v6.pdf
- Velasquez, M. G. (2005). Philosophy: A text with readings (9th ed.). Thomson/Wadsworth.
- Virk, H. S. (2014). Classical physics versus quantum physics: An overview. OmniScience: A Multi-disciplinary Journal, 4(2), 36–42. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/60d6/7c7ce6c3ac0189f21a683624edf830c9ce98.pdf
- Wackermann, J., Seiter, C., Keibel, H., & Walach, H. (2003). Correlations between brain electrical activities of two spatially separated human subjects. Neuroscience Letters, 336(1), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(02)01248-X
- Wigner, E. P. (1963). The problem of measurement. American Journal of Physics, 31(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1969254