Biodigital technologies and the bioeconomy: The Global New Green Deal?

References

• Aguilar, A., Twardowski, T., & Wohlgemuth, R. (Eds.). (2020). Trends in bioeconomy. New biotechnology. Retrieved November 28, 2020, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/new-biotechnology/special-issue/10JHZ84SNZ2
   Google Scholar
• Bainbridge, W. S., & Roco, M. C. (2006). Managing nano-bio-info-cogno innovations: Converging technologies in society. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Biden for President. (2020). The Biden plan to build a modern, sustainable infrastructure and an equitable clean energy future. Retrieved November 24, 2020, from https://joebiden.com/clean-energy/#
   Google Scholar
• Birch, K., & Muniesa, F. (Eds.). (2020). Assetization: Turning things into assets in technoscientific capitalism. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonilla-Molina, L. (2020). Covid-19 on route of the fourth industrial revolution. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 562–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00179-4
   Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. (2020). Nationale Bioökonomiestrategie. Kabinettversion, 15.01.2020. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. Retrieved November 24, 2020, from https://www.bmbf.de/files/bio%c3%b6konomiestrategie%20kabinett.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cogdell, C. (2018). Towards a living architecture? Complexism and Biology in generative design (p. 214). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. (2009). Democracy and other neoliberal fantasies: Communicative capitalism and left politics. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2020). Proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the council establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 (European Climate Law). European Commission. Retrieved November 24, 2020, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52020PC0080&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• Ford, D. R. (2018). Queer communist study: The sinthomostudier against the capital-debt-learning regime. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 15(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2018.1437575.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2013, September 17). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Retrieved October 7, 2020, from https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Frey, C. B., Osborne, M. A., & Holmes, C. (2016, January). Technology at work v2.0: The future is not what it used to be. Citi GP: Global Perspectives & Solutions. Retrieved October 7, 2020, from https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/reports/Citi_GPS_Technology_Work_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2019). Karl Marx in the age of big data capitalism. In D. Chandler & C. Fuchs (Eds.), Digital objects, digital subjects: Interdisciplinary perspectives on capitalism, labour and politics in the age of big data (pp. 53–71). University of Westminster Press. https://doi.org/10.16997/book29.d.
   Google Scholar
• Heimann, T. (2020). Earth’s future: Bioeconomy and SDGs: Does the bioeconomy support the achievement of the SDGs? AGU. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001014
   Google Scholar
• Hetemäki, L., Hanewinkel, M., Muys, B., Ollikainen, M., Palahí, M., & Trasobares, A. (2017). Leading the way to a European circular bioeconomy strategy. From Science to Policy 5. European Forest Institute. Retrieved November 25, 2020, from https://efi.int/sites/default/files/files/publication-bank/2018/efi_fstp_5_2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. (2006). Globalization, biosecurity, and the future of the life sciences. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11567
   Google Scholar
• Jandrić, P. (2020). Postdigital research in the time of Covid-19. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(2), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00113-8
   Google Scholar
• Jandrić, P., & Ford, D. (2020). Postdigital ecopedagogies: Genealogies, contradictions, and possible futures. Postdigital Science and Education.
   Google Scholar
• Jandrić, P., Hayes, D., Truelove, I., Levinson, P., Mayo, P., Ryberg, T., Monzó, L. D., Allen, Q., Stewart, P. A., Carr, P. R., Jackson, L., Bridges, S., Escaño, C., Grauslund, D., Mañero, J., Lukoko, H. O., Bryant, P., Fuentes Martinez, A., Gibbons, A., … Hayes, S. (2020). Teaching in the age of Covid-19. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 1069–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00169-6
   Google Scholar
• Jandrić, P., Knox, J., Besley, T., Ryberg, T., Suoranta, J., & Hayes, S. (2018). Postdigital science and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10), 893–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1454000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerres, M. (2020). Against all odds: Education in Germany coping with Covid-19. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 690–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00130-7
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. E. (2020). Cities gone wild. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 597–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00120-9
   Google Scholar
• Mañero, J. (2020). Postdigital brave new world and its educational implications. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 670–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00129-0
   Google Scholar
• Marcy, S. (2009). High tech, low pay: A Marxist analysis of the changing character of the working class. World View Forum.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, P. (2020). Religious nationalism and the coronavirus pandemic: Soul-sucking evangelicals and branch covidians make america sick again. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 700–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00122-7
   Google Scholar
• Neary, M. (2020). Odyssean education plays the coronavirus: Ideation and the immune institution. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 665–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00136-1
   Google Scholar
• Niestroy, I., Hege, E., Dirth, E., Zondervan, R., et al. (2020). Europe's approach to implementing the sustainable development goals. In F. Dodds (Eds.), Governance for sustainable development, Volume 4: Challenges and opportunities for implementing the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Friends of Governance for Sustainable Development.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2009). The bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a policy agenda. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Palahí, M., Hetemäki, L., & Potočnik, J. (2020, March 20). Bioeconomy: The missing link to connect the dots in the EU Green Deal. European Forest Institute. Retrieved November 25, 2020, from https://pr.euractiv.com/pr/bioeconomy-missing-link-connect-dots-eu-green-deal-202385
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A. (2012). Bio-informational capitalism. Thesis Eleven, 110(1), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513612444562
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A. (2020). Critical philosophy of technological convergence: Education and the nano-bio-info-cogno paradigm. In M. Stocchetti (Ed.), The digital age and its discontents (pp. 235–252). Helsinki University Press. https://doi.org/10.33134/HUP-4-12.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A., & Jandrić, P. (2018). The digital university: A dialogue and manifesto. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A., Jandrić, P., & Hayes, S. (2020). Biodigital philosophy, technological convergence, and new knowledge ecologies. Postdigital Science and Education.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A., Jandrić, P., & Hayes, S. (forthcoming). Bioinformational philosophy and postdigital knowledge ecologies. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A., Jandrić, P., & Means, A. J. (Eds.). (2019). Education and technological unemployment. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• PlantForm. (2020). What is biopharming? Retrieved November 24, 2020, from https://www.plantformcorp.com/biopharming.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Philp, J., & Winickoff, D. E. (2018). Realising the circular bioeconomy. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 60. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/31bb2345-en.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, B., Zhou, Y., Datta, S., & Salter, C. (2016). Bioinformatics and the politics of innovation in the life sciences: Science and the state in the United Kingdom, China, and India. Science, Technology & Human Values, 41(5), 793–826. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916631022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapon-Shevin, M., & SooHoo, S. (2020). Embodied social justice pedagogy in a time of ‘no touch’. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 675–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00177-6
   Google Scholar
• Saachi, S., Lotti, M., & Branduardi, P. (2020). Education for a biobased economy: Integrating life and social sciences in flexible short courses accessible from different backgrounds. New Biotechnology, 60, 72–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2020.10.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suoranta, J. (2020). The Covid-19 world: Learning or downfall. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 538–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00189-2
   Google Scholar
• The Bioeconomy Council. (2019, June 26). Actively shaping a sustainable future: German Bioeconomy Council issues final call for action to politicians. Retrieved November 24, 2020, from https://biooekonomierat.de/en/press/press-releases/press-release-boer-190,626/index.html
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2020). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. Retrieved November 24, 2020, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48,223/pf0000374802
   Google Scholar
• Venter, J. C. (2012). What is life? A 21st century perspective. On the 70th Anniversary of Schroedinger's lecture at Trinity College. The Edge. Retrieved November 24, 2020, from https://www.edge.org/conversation/j_craig_venter-what-is-life-a-21st-century-perspective
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
   Google Scholar