References
- Allen, T., & Blair, J. (Eds.). (2015). Material cultures in Canada. Wilfrid Laurier Press.
- Bartlett, A., & Henderson, M. (2016). What is a feminist object? Feminist material culture and the making of the activist object. Journal of Australian Studies, 40(2), 156–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14443058.2016.1157701
- Bauer, A. (2019). Itinerant objects. Annual Review of Anthropology, 48(1), 335–352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011111
- Bolt, B. (2019). When is a red shoe not a red shoe? Conceptual framing and the consequences of the ‘object’ in visual research. In A. Sinner, R. Irwin & J. Adams (Eds.), Provoking the field: International perspectives on visual arts PhDs in education (pp. 81–92). Intellect.
- Brien, D. L. (2019). Object biography and its potential in creative writing. New Writing: The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 17(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2019.1659373
- Brydon, A. (1998). Out of step: Toronto’s Bata Shoe Museum. American Quarterly, 50(4), 809–830. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.1998.0041
- Epp, A., & Price, L. (2010). The storied life of singularized objects: Forces of agency and network transformation. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 820–837. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/603547
- Epp, M. (2015). Grinning things: Object lessons in violent labour. In T. Allen & J. Blair (Eds.), Material cultures in Canada (pp. 155–170). Wilfrid Laurier Press.
- Grosz, E. (2017). The incorporeal: Ontology, ethics and the limits of materialism. Columbia University.
- Harris, S. (2017). From value to desirability: The allure of wordly things. World Archaeology, 49(5), 681–699. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2017.1413416
- Hickey-Moody, A., & Page, T. (Eds.). (2016). Arts, pedagogy and cultural resistance: New materialism. Rowman & Littlefield.
- Ingold, T. (2012). Towards an ecology of materials. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41(1), 427–442. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145920
- Irwin, R. L. (2013). Becoming a/r/tography. Studies in Art Education, 54(3), 198–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2013.11518894
- Joyce, R. (2015). Transforming archaeology, transforming materiality. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 26(1), 181–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/apaa.12064
- Lasczik Cutcher, A., & Irwin, R. L. (2017). Walkings-through paint: A c/a/r/tography of slow scholarship. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 14(2), 116–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2017.1310680
- Lasczik Cutcher, A., & Irwin, R. L. (Eds.). (2018). The flâneur and education research: A metaphor for knowing, ethical actions. Palgrave.
- Lather, P. (2013). Methodology-21: What do we do in the afterward? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 634–645. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788753
- MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 6, 658–667. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788755
- O’Sullivan, S. (2009). Art encounters Deleuze and Guattari: Thought beyond representation. Palgrave.
- Robb, J. (2015). What do things want? Object design as a middle range theory of material culture. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 26(1), 166–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/apaa.12069
- Ruopp, A., & Unrath, K. (2019). Making artistic learning visible: Theory building through a/r/tographic exploration. Visual Arts Research, 45(2), 29–48.
- Shaviro, S. (2014). The universe of things: On speculative realism. University of Minnesota.
- Sheldon, R. (2015). Form/matter/chora: Object-oriented ontology and feminist new materialism. In R. Grusin (Ed.), The nonhuman turn (pp. 193–222). University of Minnesota.
- Sinner, A. (2005). divining INTOXICATION. Canadian Journal of Education, 27(1), E1–E4. Available at: divining INTOXICATION | Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'éducation (sfu.ca).
- Sinner, A. (2008). Unfolding the unexpectedness of uncertainty – Arts research as a triptych installation: A conversation of processes, practices, products [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of British Columbia.
- Sinner, A. (2018). Possibility spaces: Traversing and as educational theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(14), 1410–1410. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1458803
- Sinner, A., Irwin, R., & Jokela, T. (Eds.). (2018). Visually provoking: Dissertations in art education. University of Lapland.
- Smith, K. (2018). Amidst things: New histories of commodities, capital, and consumption. The Historical Journal, 61(3), 841–861. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X17000516
- Springgay, S. (2011). The ethico-aesthetics of affect and a sensational pedagogy. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 9(1), 66–82.
- Springgay, S., Irwin, R. L., & Kind, S. (2005). A/r/tography as living inquiry through art and text. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(6), 897–912. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405280696
- Springgay, S., & Truman, S. E. (2017). On the need for methods beyond proceduralism: Speculative middles, (in)tensions, and response-ability in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(3), 1–12.
- Springgay, S., & Truman, S. E. (2018). Walking methodologies in a more-than-human world: WalkingLab. Routledge.
- St. Pierre, E. (2013). The posts continue: Becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 646–657. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788754
- Taylor, C. (2013). Objects, bodies and space: Gender and embodied practices of mattering in the classroom. Gender and Education, 25(6), 688–703. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.834864
- Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space/politics/affect. Routledge.
- Triggs, V., Irwin, R. L., & Leggo, C. (2014). Walking art: Sustaining ourselves as arts educators. Visual Inquiry, 3(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1386/vi.3.1.21_1
- Truman, S. E., & Springgay, S. (2016). Propositions for walking research. In K. Powell, P. Bernard & L. Mackinley (Eds.), International handbook for intercultural arts (pp. 259–267). Routledge.
- van Oorschot, R., Ballantyne, K., & Mitchell, R. (2010). Forensic trace DNA: A review. Investigative Genetics, 1(1), 14–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-2223-1-14
- Vist, T. (2016). Arts-based research processes in ECEC: Examples from preparing and conducting a data collection. Tidsskrift for Nordisk Barnehageforskning, 13(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7577/nbf.1371
- von Oswald, M., & Rodatus, V. (2017). Decolonising research, cosmo-optimistic collaboration? Making object biographies. Museum Worlds, 5(1), 211–223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3167/armw.2017.050117
- Wiebe, S., & Snowber, C. (2011). The visceral imagination: A fertile space for non-textual knowing. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 27(1), 101–113.