Towards an understanding of metacognition(ing) through an agential realism framework

References

• Anderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. Education Resources Information Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.44.9.1175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe half way: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2010). Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance: Dis/continuities, spacetime enfoldings, and justice-to-come. Derrida Today, 3(2), 240–268. https://doi.org/10.3366/drt.2010.0206
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20(3), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2014.927623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2016). Epistemic (meta) cognition: Ways of thinking about knowledge and knowing. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 409–424). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beran, M., Brandl, L. J., Perner, J., & Proust, J. (2012). Foundations of metacognition. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhor, N. (1949). Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics. In Niels Bohr (Ed.), On Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. Ox Bow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. (1985). The role of metalearning in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55(3), 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1985.tb02625.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozalek, V., & Zembylas, M. (2017). Diffraction or reflection? Sketching the contours of two methodologies in educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1201166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other more mysterious mechanisms. In E. F. Weinert & H. R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 65–116). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. (2010). The relationship between language aptitude and language learning motivation. In E. Macaro (Ed.), Continuum companion to second language acquisition (pp. 247–267). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Efklides, A. (2020). Editorial. Metacognition and Learning. 15(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09221-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efklides, A., & Misailidi, P. (2010). The present and the future in metacognition. In A. Efklides & P. Misailidi (Eds.), Trends and prospects in metacognition research (pp. 1–18). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Dauque, D., Baird, A. J., & Posner, I. M. (2000). Executive attention and metacognitive regulation. Consciousness and Cognition, (9), 288–307. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.435.1852&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flavell, H. J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-development inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, H. J. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In E. F. Weinert & H. R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 21–30). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, H. J., Miller, H. P., & Miller, H. S. (2002). Cognitive Development (4th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, M. S., & Lau, C. H. (2014). How to measure metacognitions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15(8), 443.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, C. J. (2013). On rhizomes, lines of flight, mangles, and other assemblages. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 749–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788763
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., & Keener, M. C. (2008). Metacognition in education: A focus on calibration. In J. Dunlosky & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of metamemory and memory (pp. 429–455). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, H. J. (2001). Developing students' metacognitive knowledge and skills. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction (pp. 33–68). Kluwer Academic publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y. (2013). Posthumanist data analysis of mangling practices. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 741–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788762
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, N. (2004). Developing the concept of metalearning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(4), 391–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. (2015). Opinion: Paradigms, methods, and the (as yet) failed striving for methodological diversity in educational psychology published research. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, article 1370, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. (2008). Clarifying metacognition, self-regulation and self-regulated learning: What's the purpose? Educational Psychology Review, 20, 477– 484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9087-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasper, F. L. (1997). Assessing the metacognitive growth of ESL student writers. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 3(1), 20.
   Google Scholar
• Khaki, N., & Hessamy, G. (2013). Metacognitive strategies employed by EFL writers in integrated and independent writing tasks. World Applied Sciences Journal, 22(11), 1586–1593.
   Google Scholar
• Kluwe, R. H. (1987). Executive decisions and regulation of problem solving behavior. In Franz E. Weinert & Rainer H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 31–64). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koriat, A. (2007). Metacognition and consciousness. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 289–325). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816789.012
   Google Scholar
• Koriat, A. (2012). The subjective confidence in one's knowledge and judgments: some metatheoretical considerations. In M. J. Beran, J. Perner, & J. Proust (Eds.), The Foundations of Metacognition (pp. 213–233). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kormos, J. (2012). The role of individual differences in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 390–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, R. E. (2011). Metacognition: a literature review. Pearson Research Reports, 23, 1–40. https://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/Metacognition_Literature_Review_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2013). Methodology-21: What do we do in the afterward? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 634–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788753
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P., & St. Pierre, A. E. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 629–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788752
   Google Scholar
• Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T. (2010). A synthesis of research on second language writing in English. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788755
   Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, B. L., & Marzano, R. J. (1990). Putting the self in self-regulated learning: The self as agent in integrating will and skill. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 51–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J. (2012). Anoetic, noetic, and autonoetic metacognition. In J. M. Beran, J. Brand, J. Perner, & J. Proust (Eds.), Foundations of metacognition (pp. 289–301). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murris, K., & Bozalek, V. (2019). Diffraction and response-able reading of texts: the relational ontologies of Barad and Deleuze. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(7), 872–886.
   Google Scholar
• Nederhand, M. L., Tabbers, H. K., Jongerling, J., & Rikers, R. M. (2020). Reflection on exam grades to improve calibration of secondary school students: a longitudinal study. Metacognition and Learning, 15(3), 291–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09233-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negretti, R., & Kuteeva, M. (2011). Fostering metacognitive genre awareness in L2 academic reading and writing: A case study of pre-service English teachers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 95–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. The American Psychologist, 51(2), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, J. (2014). How do planning time and task conditions affect metacognitive processes of L2 writers? Journal of Second Language Writing, 23, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimi, M., & Abedi, S. (2015). The role of metacognitive awareness of listening strategies in listening proficiency: The case of language learners with different levels of academic self-regulation. In A. Peña-Ayala (Ed.), Metacognition: Fundaments, applications and trends: A profile of the current state-of-the art (pp. 169–192). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rosiek, L. J. (2013). Pragmatism and post-qualitative futures. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 692–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788758
   Google Scholar
• Rubio, D. F. (2014). Self-esteem and self-concept in foreign language learning. In S. Mercer & M. Williams (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA (pp. 41–58). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Sampasivam, S., & Clément, R. (2014). The dynamics of second language confidence: Contact and interaction. In. S. Mercer & M. Williams (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA (pp. 23–40). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1-2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003044231033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spada, M. M., Mohiyeddini, C., & Wells, A. (2008). Measuring metacognition associated with emotional distress. Factor structure and predictive validity of the metacognitions questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 238–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiro, J. (2014). Learners and writer voices: Learners as writers and the search for authorial voice. In D. Disney (Ed.), Exploring second language creative writing: Beyond Babel (Vol. 19). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, A. E. (2013). The posts continue: Becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 646–657.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (2011). Refusing human being in humanist qualitative inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & M. D. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and the global crisis (pp. 40–55). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Qualitative-Inquiry-and-Global-Crises/Denzin-Giardina/p/book/9781315421612
   Google Scholar
• Stoten, W. D. (2019). Metacognition, calibration, and self-regulated learning: An exploratory study of undergraduates in a business school. Learning: Research and Practice, 5(1), 24–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2018.1491616
   Google Scholar
• Tarricone, P. (2011). The taxonomy of metacognition. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ushioda, E. (2014). Motivational perspectives on the self in SLA: A developmental view. In S. Mercer & M. Williams (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA (pp. 127–141). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Weinert, E. F. (1987). Metacognition and motivation as determinants of effective learning and understanding. In E. F. Weinert & H. R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 1–16). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, N. S., & Bai, H. (2010). The relationships and impact of teachers’ metacognitive knowledge and pedagogical understandings of metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 5(3), 269–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H. (2014). Issues in researching self-regulated learning as patterns of events. Metacognition Learning, 9, 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9113-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, J. B. (1989). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In J. B. Zimmerman & H. D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research and practice (pp. 1–26). Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar