1,461
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The lived experience of actor training: Perezhivanie - A literature review

ORCID Icon
Pages 531-543 | Received 21 May 2022, Accepted 17 Sep 2022, Published online: 12 Oct 2022

References

  • Barrs, M. (2016). Vygotsky’s ‘thought and word. Changing English, 23(3), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2016.1203610
  • Blunden, A. (2016a). Perezhivanie: From the dictionary of psychology. Mind Culture and Activity, 23(4), 272–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2016.1225310
  • Blunden, A. (2016b). Translating Perezhivanie into English. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(4), 274–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2016.1186193
  • Capucci, R. D., & Silva, D. N. H. (2017). When life and art meet: A dialogue between Vygotsky and Stanislavsky. Psicologia em Estudo, 22(3), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.4025/psicolestud.v22i3.35869
  • Carnicke, S. (2009). Stanislavsky in focus: An acting master for the twenty-first century (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  • Clara, M. (2015). Representation and emotion causation: A cultural psychology approach. Culture & Psychology, 21(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X14568687
  • Clara, M. (2016). The many lives of the word Perezhivanie. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(4), 339–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2016.1199700
  • Clara, M. (2016). Vygotsky and Vasiluk on Perezhivanie: Two notions and one word. Mind, Culture and Activity, 23(4), 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2016.1186194
  • Clare, Y. (2016). A system behind the system: But is it Stanislavski? Stanislavski Studies, 4(2), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/20567790.2016.1234018
  • Davis, S. (2015). Perezhivanie and the experience of drama, metaxis and meaning making. NJ, 39(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14452294.2015.1083138
  • Davis, S., & Dolan, K. (2016). Contagious learning: Drama, experience and “Perezhivanie”. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 7(1), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.4225/03/580ff85e78066
  • Davis, S., & Phillips, L. G. (2021). Teaching during COVID 19 times – The experiences of drama and performing arts teachers and the human dimensions of learning. Drama Australia, 44(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14452294.2021.1943838
  • Fakhrutdinova, L. R. (2010). On the Phenomenon of "Perezhivanie”. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 48(2), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405480203
  • Ferholt, B. (2010). A synthetic-analytic method for the study of Perezhivanie: Vygotsky’s literary analysis applied to playworlds. In M. C. Connery, V. P. John-Steiner, & A. Marjanovic-Shane, (Eds.), Vygotsky and creativity: A cultural-historical approach to play, meaning making and the arts (1st ed., pp. 163–179).Peter Lang Publishing.
  • Ferholt, B., & Nilsson, M. (2016). Perezhivaniya as a means of creating the aesthetic form of consciousness. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(4), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2016.1186195
  • Gonzalez Rey, F. (2016). Vygotsky’s concept of Perezhivanie in The Psychology of Art and at the final moment of his work: Advancing his legacy. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(4), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2016.1186196
  • Gonzalez Rey, F. L. (2018). Vygotsky’s "The Psychology of Art": A foundational and still unexplored text. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 35(4), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02752018000400002
  • Gothberg, M., Bjorck, C., & Makitalo, A. (2018). From drama text to stage text: Transitions of text understanding in a student theatre production. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 25(3), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2018.1480633
  • Horta Nogueira, A. L. (2014). Emotional experience, meaning, and sense production: Interweaving concepts to dialogue with the funds of identity approach. Culture & Psychology, 20(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X13515939
  • Kozulin, A. (2016). The mystery of Perezhivanie. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(4), 356–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2016.1230134
  • Lantolf, J. P., & Swain, M. (2019). On the emotion – cognition dialectic: A sociocultural response to prior. The Modern Language Journal, 103(2), 528–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12574
  • Larrain, A., & Haye, A. (2020). The dialogical and political nature of emotions: A reading of Vygotsky’s The Psychology of Art. Theory & Psychology, 30(6), 800–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320955235
  • Marjanovic-Shane, A., Connery, M. C., & John-Steiner, V. P. (2010). A cultural-historical approach to creative education. In M. C. Connery, V. P. John-Steiner, & A. Marjanovic-Shane, (Eds.), Vygotsky and creativity: A cultural-historical approach to play, meaning making and the arts (1st ed., pp. 215–231). Peter Lang Publishing.
  • Merlin, B. (2015). This side of reality. Stanislavski Studies, 3(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/20567790.2015.11428611
  • Michell, M. (2016). Finding the "Prism": Understanding Vygotsky’s "Perezhivanie" as an ontogenetic unit of child consciousness. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 7(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.4225/03/584fa3e2a9779
  • Mok, N. (2017). On the concept of Perezhivanie: A quest for a critical review. In M. Fleer, F. Gonzalez Rey, & N. Veresov (Eds.), Perezhivanie, emotions and subjectivity. Perspectives in cultural-historical research (Vol. 1, pp. 19–45). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4534-9_3
  • Moran, S., Connery, M. C., John-Steiner, V. P., & Marjanovic-Shane, A. (2010). Commitment and creativity: Transforming experience into art. In M. C. Connery, V. P. John-Steiner, & A. Marjanovic-Shane (Eds.), Vygotsky and creativity: A cultural-historical approach to play, meaning making and the arts (1st ed., pp. 141–160). Peter Lang Publishing.
  • Morozov, S. M. (2017). New methodological view of Vygotsky. Revue International du CRIRES: Innover Dans la Tradition de Vygotsky, 4(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.51657/ric.v4i1.40994
  • Muller Mirza, N. (2016). Emotions, development and materiality at school: A cultural-historical approach. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 50(4), 634–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9348-4
  • Poole, A. (2020). Re-theorising the funds of identity concept from the perspective of subjectivity. Culture & Psychology, 26(3), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X19839070
  • Smagorinsky, P. (2011). Vygotsky’s stage theory: The psychology of art and the actor under the direction of Perezhivanie. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 18(4), 319–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2010.518300
  • Sobkin, V. S. (2017). Lev Vygotsky: From theator to psychology. Revue International du CRIRES: Innover Dans la Tradition de Vygotsky, 4(1), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.51657/ric.v4i1.40996
  • Souza, V. L. T. (2018). Psychology of art: Thematic section. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 35(4), 333–338. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02752018000400001e
  • Vadeboncoeur, J. A., & Collie, R. J. (2013). Locating social and emotional language in schooled environments: A Vygotskian perspective on learning as unified. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 20(3), 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2012.755205
  • Vassilieva, J., & Zavershneva, E. (2020). Vygotsky’s “height psychology”: Re-envisioning general psychology in dialogue with the humanities and the arts. Review of General Psychology, 24(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268020902723
  • Wei, G. (2021). Imagined professional identity: A narrative inquiry into a Chinese teacher’s perezhivaniya in life. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102(4), 103337–103310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103337
  • Weinbren, J. (2020). (Re)Animating Stanislavsky: Realizing aliveness in the virtual actor. Stanislavski Studies, 8(1), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/20567790.2020.1726086
  • Whyman, R. (2013). Stanislavski: The basics (1st ed.). Routledge.