Teacher evaluation of student ability: what roles do teacher gender, student gender, and their interaction play?

References

• Bem, S. 1981. “Gender Schema Theory: A Cognitive Account of Sex-typing.” Psychological Review 88: 354–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. K., and 1. A. Bennett. 1994. April. “Teachers’ Attributions and Beliefs in Relation to Gender and Success of Students.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED375 127).
   Google Scholar
• Cortina, J. M. 1993. “What is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications.” Journal of Applied Psychology 78 (1): 98–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushman, P. 2007. “The Male Teacher Shortage: Synthesis of Research and Worldwide Strategies for Addressing the Shortage.” KEDI Journal of Educational Policy 4: 79–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dee, T. S. 2006. “The Why Chromosome. How a Teacher’s Gender Affects Boys and Girls.” Education Next 6 (4): 69–75.
   Google Scholar
• Dee, T. S. 2007. “Teachers and the Gender Gaps in Student Achievement.” Journal of Human Resources 42 (3): 528–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demetriou, A., M. Platsidou, A. Efklides, Y. Metallidou, and M. Shayer. 1991. “The Development of Quantitative-relational Abilities from Childhood to Adolescence: Structure, Scaling, and Individual Differences.” Learning and Instruction: The Journal of European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction 1: 19–43.
   Google Scholar
• Demetriou, A., A. Pachaury, Y. Metallidou, and S. Kazi. 1996. “Universals and Specificities in the Structure and Development of Quantitative-relational Thought: A Cross-cultural Study in Greece and India.” International Journal of Behavioral Development 19 (2): 255–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, N. G., P. J. Hanges, and R. J. Hall. 2005. “Applying Multilevel Confirmatory Factor Analysis Techniques to the Study of Leadership.” The Leadership Quarterly 16: 149–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FNBE. 2004. National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2004. Finnish National Board of Education. http://www.oph.fi/english/sources_of_information/core_curricula_and_qualification_requirements/basic_education
   Google Scholar
• Hautamäki, J., P. Arinen, S. Eronen, A. Hautamäki, S. Kupiainen, B. Lindblom, M. Niemivirta, L. Pakaslahti, P. Rantanen, and P. Scheinin. 2002. Assessing Learning-to-learn: A Framework. Helsinki: National Board of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hautamäki, J. 1984. Peruskoululaisten loogisen ajattelun mittaamisesta ja esiintymisestä [Measuring and the Occurrence of Logical Thinking Among Basic School Students]. Joensuun yliopiston yhteiskuntatieteellisiä julkaisuja 1. Joensuu: Joensuun yliopistopaino.
   Google Scholar
• Holmlund, H., and K. Sund. 2006. “Is the Gender Gap in School Performance Affected by the Sex of the Teacher?” Labour Economics 15: 37–53.
   Google Scholar
• Hopf, D., and C. Hatzichristou. 1999. “Teacher Gender–related Influences in Greek Schools.” Educational Psychology 69 (1): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Inhelder, B., and J. Piaget. 1958. The Early Growth of Logic in the Child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. M., and K. Dindia. 2004. “A Meta-analytic Perspective on Sex Equity in the Classroom.” Review of Educational Research 74 (4): 443–47l.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., and J. Wheatley. 1990. “Gender Differences in Student–teacher Interactions.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27 (9): 861–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jussim, L., and K. D. Harber. 2005. “Teacher Expectations and Self-fulfilling Prophecies: Knowns and Unknowns, Resolved and Unresolved Controversies.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 9 (2): 131–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., and T. A. van Dijk. 1978. “Towards a Model of Text Comprehension and Production.” Psychological Review 8 (5): 363–394.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, P. 1999. The Handbook of Psychological Testing. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kupiainen, S., J. Marjanen, M.-P. Vainikainen, and J. Hautamäki. 2011. “Oppimaan oppiminen Vantaan peruskouluissa. Kolmas-, kuudes ja yhdeksäsluokkalaiset oppijoina keväällä 2010 [Learning to Learn in Vantaa Comprehensive Schools. 3rd, 6th and 9th Graders as Learners in Spring 2010].” City of Vantaa. http://www.vantaa.fi/instancedata/prime_product_julkaisu/vantaa/embeds/vantaawwwstructure/74425_web_kolmas_kuudes_yhdeksas.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lehto, J. E., P. Scheinin, S. Kupiainen, and J. Hautamäki. 2001. “National Survey of Reading Comprehension in Finland.” Journal of Research in Reading 24 (1): 99–110.
   Google Scholar
• Lyytinen, S., and J. E. Lehto. 1998. “Hierarchy Rating as a Measure of Text Macroprocessing: Relationship with Working Memory and School Achievement.” Educational Psychology 18 (2): 157–169.
   Google Scholar
• Madon, S., L. Jussim, and J. Eccles. 1997. “In Search of the Powerful Self-fulfilling Prophecy.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72: 791–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neugebauer, M., M. Helbig, and A. Landmann. 2011. “Unmasking the Myth of the Same-sex Teacher Advantage.” European Sociological Review 27 (5): 669–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nixon, L. A., and M. D. Robinson. 1999. “The Educational Attainment of Young Women: Role Model Effects of Female High School Faculty.” Demography 36 (2): 185–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2010. PISA 2009 at a Glance. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264095298-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2007. No More Failures: Ten Steps to Equity in Education. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Parker-Price, S., and A. F. Claxton. 1996. “Teachers’ Perceptions of Gender Differences in Students.” Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the National Association of School Psychologists, Atlanta, GA. Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED397373.
   Google Scholar
• Robst, J., J. Keil, and D. Russo. 1998. “The Effect of Gender Composition of Faculty on Student Retention. “Economics of Education Review 17 (4): 429–439. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(97)00049-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadker, D., and K. R. Zittleman. 2005. “Closing the Gender Gap-again!” Principal Magazine 84: 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Sadker, D., M. Sadker, and K. R. Zittleman. 2009. Still Failing at Fairness: How Gender Bias Cheats Girls and Boys and What We Can Do About it. New York: Charles Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. 2011. “PISA in Finland: An Education Miracle or an Obstacle to Change?” Centre for Education Policy Journal 1 (3): 119–140.
   Google Scholar
• Shayer, M. 1979. “Has Piaget’s Construct of Formal Operational Thinking any Utility?” British Journal of Educational Psychology 49 (3): 265–276.
   Google Scholar
• Shepardson, D. P., and E. L. Pizzini. 1992. “Gender Bias in Female Elementary Teachers’ Perceptions of the Scientific Ability of Students.” Science Education 76 (2): 147–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegle, D., and S. M. Reis. 1998. “Gender Differences in Teacher and Student Perceptions of Gifted Students’ Ability and Effort.” Gifted Child Quarterly 42 (1): 39–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spilt, J. J., H. M. Y. Koomen, and S. Jak. 2012. “Are Boys Better Off With Male and Girls with Female Teachers? A Multilevel Investigation of Measurement Invariance and Gender Match in Teacher-student Relationship Quality.” Journal of School Psychology 50: 363–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R., J. L. Castejon, M. D. Prieto, J. Hautamäki, and E. Grigorenko. 2001. “Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test in Three International Samples.” European Journal of Psychological Assessment 17 (1): 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., and L. S. Fidell. 2012. Using Multivariate Statistics 6th ed. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, P. J., J. Gervai, and R. A. Hinde. 1995. “Gender-typing in Young Children: Preferences, Behaviour and Cultural Differences.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 11 (4): 323–342.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, M. A., R. C. Haight, T. T. Swaim, and K. A. Pickering. 2013. “The Effect of Same-gender Teacher Assignment on Student Achievement in the Elementary and Secondary Grades: Evidence form Panel Data.” Economics of Education Review 34: 69–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaher, S.. 1996. “Gender and Curriculum in the School Room.” Education Canada 36 (1): 26–29.
   Google Scholar