Provoking contingent moments: Knowledge for ‘powerful teaching’ at the horizon

References

• Askew, Mike. 2008. “Mathematical Discipline Knowledge Requirements for Prospective Primary Teachers, and the Structure and Teaching Approaches of Programs Designed to Develop That Knowledge.” In Knowledge and Beliefs in Mathematics Teaching and Teaching Development. vol. 1, edited by Peter Sullivan and Terry Wood, 13–35. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• ACARA (Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority) 2013. The Australian Curriculum: Mathematics. V. 8.2. http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/mathematics/curriculum/f-10?layout=1.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, Deborah L. 1993. “With an Eye on the Mathematical Horizon: Dilemmas of Teaching Elementary School Mathematics.” Elementary School Journal 93 (4): 373–397.10.1086/461730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, Deborah L. 2014. “Developing Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching.” Presentation for the University of South Australia (via web conference), Adelaide, SA, June 16, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., and H. Bass. 2000. “Interweaving Content and Pedagogy in Teaching and Learning to Teach: Knowing and Using Mathematics.” In Multiple Perspectives on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, edited by J. Boaler, 83–104. London: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, Deborah L., Hyman Bass. 2009. “With an Eye on the Mathematical Horizon: Knowing Mathematics for Teaching to Learners’ Mathematical Futures.” Paper presented at the 2009 Curtis Center Mathematics and Teaching Conference, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Department of Mathematics, Los Angeles, CA, February 21, 2009. http://wwwpersonal.umich.edu/~dball/presentations/022109_UCLA.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, Deborah. L., Mark Thames, and Hyman Bass. 2008. “Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special?” Journal of Teacher Education 59 (5): 389–407. http://jte.sagepub.com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au/content/59/5/389.full.pdf+html.10.1177/0022487108324554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beswick, Kim, Rosemary Callingham, and Jane Watson. 2012. “The Nature and Development of Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Knowledge.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 15: 131–157. doi:10.1007/s10857-011-9177-9.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, Jere. 2002. “Teaching.” In Educational Practices Series – 1, edited by H. Walberg. Brussels: International Academy of Education and International Bureau of Education. http://www.ibe.unesco.org/fileadmin/user_upload/archive/Publications/educationalpracticesseriespdf/prac01e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, Randal I. 2005. “Big Ideas and Understandings as the Foundation for Early and Middle School Mathematics.” NCSM Journal of Educational Leadership 8 (1): 9–24.
   Google Scholar
• Chick, Helen, and Kaye Stacey. 2013. “Teachers of Mathematics as Problem-Solving Applied Mathematicians.” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 13 (2): 121–136. doi:10.1080/14926156.2013.784829.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, Robert, Cesare Aloisi, Steve Higgins, and Lee E. Major. 2014. “What Makes Great Teaching? Review of the Underpinning Research.” http://www.suttontrust.com/researcharchive/great-teaching/.
   Google Scholar
• Daggett, Willard ( Bill). 2014. “The Rigor/Relevance Framework.” http://www.leadered.com/our-philosophy/rigor-relevance-framework.php.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, Linda. 2010. “Teacher Knowledge and Student Learning: Making the Connection.” Presentation to the Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority. http://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/downloads/events/linda_darling_hammond.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, Linda. 2016. “Research on Teaching and Teacher Education and Its Influences on Policy and Practice.” Educational Researcher 45 (2): 83–91. http://edr.sagepub.com/content/45/2.toc. doi: 10.3102/0013189X16639597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Training. 2015. “Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group: Terms of Reference.” http://www.studentsfirst.gov.au/terms-reference.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, Merrilyn. 2013. “Knowledge for Teaching Secondary School Mathematics: What Counts?” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 44 (7): 972–983. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2013.826387.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, Heather, Deborah L. Ball, and Stephen G. Schilling. 2008. “Unpacking Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Conceptualizing and Measuring Teachers’ Topic-Specific Knowledge of Students.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 39 (4): 372–400. http://www.jstor.org.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au/stable/40539304?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgen, Jeremy. 2007. “The Situated Nature of Mathematics Teacher Knowledge.” Paper presented at the Nuffield seminar series on Mathematics Knowledge in Teaching, Cambridge. http://www.maths-ed.org.uk/mkit/Hodgen%20Nuffield%20Jan%202007.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hurst, Chris, and Derek Hurrell. 2014. “Developing the Big Ideas of Number.” International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics 1 (2): 1–18. ISSN: 2148 – 5984. http://www.ijesim.com/arsiv/volume-1-issue-2-december-2014.10.17278/ijesim
   Google Scholar
• Levenberg, Ilana, and Dorit Patkin. 2014. “The Contribution of in-Service Training Programs to the Professional Development of Mathematics Teachers.” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research 7 (1): 93–104. http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/140.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Liping. 1999. Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Makar, Katie, Arthur Bakkar, and Dani Ben-Zvi. 2015. “Scaffolding Norms of Argumentation-Based Inquiry in a Primary Mathematics Classroom.” ZDM 47 (7): 1107–1120. doi:10.1007/s11858-015-0732-1.
   Google Scholar
• Miao, Zhenzhen, and David Reynolds. 2014. How China Teaches Children Maths So Well. http://theconversation.com/how-china-teaches-children-maths-so-well-32052.
   Google Scholar
• Petrou, Marilena, and Maria Goulding. 2011. “Conceptualising Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge in Teaching.” In Mathematical Knowledge in Teaching, edited by Tim Rowland and Kenneth Ruthven, 9–25. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-9766-8
   Google Scholar
• Polya, George. 1962. Mathematical Discovery: On Understanding, Learning and Teaching Problem Solving. vol. 1. New York: Wil.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, Tim. 2015. “Powerful Teaching.” Keynote address presented to Conversations on Knowledge for Teaching Conference, Launceston, TAS. February 11–13, 2015. http://conversationsonkft.weebly.com/powerful-teaching.html.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, Tim, and Rina Zazkis. 2013. “Contingency in the Mathematics Classroom: Opportunities Taken and Opportunities Missed.” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 13 (2): 121–136. http://www.tandfonline.com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au/doi/full/10.1080/14926156.2013.784825#.VVvumbGQ-70.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, Tim, Faye Turner, Anne Thwaites, and Peter Huckstep. 2009. Developing Primary Mathematics Teaching. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, Tim, Anne Thwaites, and Libby Jared. 2015. “Triggers of Contingency in Mathematics Teaching.” Research in Mathematics Education 17 (2): 74–91.10.1080/14794802.2015.1018931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruthven, K. 2011. “Conceptualising Mathematical Knowledge in Teaching.” In Mathematical Knowledge in Teaching, edited by T. Rowland and K. Ruthven, 83–96. Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Julie, and Julian Williams. 1999. “Children’s Mathematical Understanding as a Work in Progress: Learning from Errors and Misconceptions.” In Issues in Teaching Numeracy in Primary Schools. 2nd ed, edited by I. Thompson, 146–157. Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, Lee. 1986. “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 15 (2): 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1987. “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57 (1): 1–23.10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemon, Dianne, John Bleckley, and D. Denise Neal. 2012. “Working with the Big Ideas in Number and the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics.” In Engaging the Australian National Curriculum: Mathematics – Perspectives from the Field, edited by B. Atweh, M. Goos, R. Jorgensen and D. Siemon, 19–45. Adelaide: Online Publication: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, Malcolm. 2003. “Making Sense of Mathematics.” In Enhancing Primary Mathematics Teaching, edited by I. Thompson, 112–124. Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thurston, William. 1994. “On Proof and Progress in Mathematics.” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 30 (2): 161–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkie, Karina J. 2014. “Upper Primary School Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Functional Thinking in Algebra.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 17: 397–428. doi:10.1007/s10857-013-9251-6.
   Google Scholar
• Zazkis, Rina, and Ami Mamolo. 2011. “Reconceptualising Knowledge at the Mathematical Horizon.” For the Learning of Mathematics 31 (2): 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Qinqiong, and Max Stephens. 2013. “Utilising a Construct of Teacher Capacity to Examine National Curriculum Reform in Mathematics.” Mathematics Education Research Journal 25: 481–502.10.1007/s13394-013-0072-9
   Google Scholar