Supporting evidence use in networked professional learning: the role of the middle leader

References

• Avalos, B. 2011. “Teacher Professional Development in Teaching and Teacher Education over Ten Years.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27: 10–20. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bore, A., and N. Wright. 2009. “The Wicked and Complex in Education: Developing a Transdisciplinary Perspective for Policy Formulation, Implementation and Professional Practice.” Journal of Education for Teaching 35 (3): 241–256. doi:10.1080/02607470903091286.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H. 2004. “Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain.” Educational Researcher 33: 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X033008003.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C., and B. Levin. 2009. “Using Data to Support Educational Improvement.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21 (1): 47–65. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9063-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and S. L. Lytle. 2009. Inquiry as Stance: Practitioner Research for the Next Generation. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A., B. Levin, and C. Campbell. 2009. “The Growing (but Still Limited) Importance of Evidence in Education Policy and Practice.” Journal of Educational Change 10: 159–171. doi:10.1007/s10833-009-9107-0.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2010. “Teacher Education and the American Future.” Journal of Teacher Education 61 (1–2): 35–47. doi:10.1177/0022487109348024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., and N. Richardson. 2009. “Research Review/Teacher Learning: What Matters.” Educational Leadership 66 (5): 46–53. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/feb09/vol66/num05/Teacher-Learning@-What-Matters¢.aspx.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, B., and D. J. Sumara. 2006. Complexity and Education: Inquiries into Learning, Teaching, and Research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, C., J. Shulha, U. Luhanga, L. M. Shulha, D. A. Klinger, and T. Christou. 2015. “Collaborative Inquiry as a Professional Learning Structure for Educators: A Scoping Review.” Professional Development in Education 41 (1): 640–670. doi:10.1080/19415257.2014.933120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. 2009. “Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures.” Educational Researcher 38 (3): 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donohoo, J. 2013. Collaborative Inquiry for Educators: A Facilitator’s Guide to School Improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, L., and S. Katz. 2006. Leading in a Data Rich World: Harnessing Data for School Improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. F. 2004. School Reform from the inside out: Policy, Practice, and Performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ermeling, B. A. 2010. “Tracing the Effects of Teacher Inquiry on Classroom Practice.” Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies 26 (3): 377–388. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2007. The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2009. “Large-Scale Reform Comes of Age.” Journal of Educational Change 10 (2–3): 101–113. doi:10.1007/s10833-009-9108-z.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2015. “Leadership from the Middle: A System Strategy.” Education Canada 56 (3): 22–26. http://www.cea-ace.ca/education-canada/article/leadership-middle.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., and J. Knight. 2011. “Coaches as System Leaders.” Educational Leadership 69 (2): 50–53. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/oct11/vol69/num02/Coaches-as-System-Leaders.aspx.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. 2014. “Measuring the Effectiveness of Educators’ Professional Development.” In Handbook of Professional Development in Education, edited by L. E. Martin, S. Kragler, D. J. Quatroche and K. L. Bauserman, 447–466. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T., and K. Yoon. 2009. “What Works in Professional Development?” Phi Delta Kappan 90: 495–500. http://www.keystoliteracy.com/wp-content/pdfs/orc-implement-science/What%20works%20in%20PD.pdf.10.1177/003172170909000709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., and M. Ainscow. 2015. “The Top and Bottom of Leadership and Change.” Phi Delta Kappan 97 (3): 42–48. doi:10.1177/0031721715614828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2013. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huffman, D., and J. Kalnin. 2003. “Collaborative Inquiry to Make Data-Based Decisions in Schools.” Teaching and Teacher Education 19 (6): 569–580. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00054-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, S., and L. Earl. 2010. “Learning about Networked Learning Communities.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 21 (1): 27–51. doi:10.1080/09243450903569718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A., A. Deuel, T. H. Nelson, and D. Slavit. 2011. “Requiring Collaboration or Distributing Leadership?” Phi Delta Kappan 92 (8): 20–24. http://mcpsonline.org/images/8/88/21CC2011_Requiring_Collaboration.pdf.10.1177/003172171109200805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killion, J. 2012. “Coaching in the K-12 Context.” In The SAGE Handbook of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, edited by S. J. Fletcher and C. A. Mullen, 273–294. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781446247549
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., R. Aitken, and D. Jantzi. 2006. Making Schools Smarter: Leading with Evidence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moolenaar, N. M. 2012. “A Social Network Perspective on Teacher Collaboration in Schools: Theory, Methodology, and Applications.” American Journal of Education 119 (1): 7–39. doi:10.1086/667715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., M. West, and M. Ainscow. 2010. “Why Network? Theoretical Perspectives on Networking.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 21 (1): 5–26. doi:10.1080/09243450903569692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namey, E., G. Guest, L. Thairu, and L. Johnson. 2008. “Data Reduction Techniques for Large Qualitative Data Sets.” In Handbook for Team-Based Qualitative Research, edited by G. Guest and K. M. MacQueen, 137–161. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. H., and D. Slavit. 2008. “Supported Teacher Collaborative Inquiry” Teacher Education Quarterly 35: 99–116. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ810660.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Opfer, V., and D. Pedder. 2011. “Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Learning.” Review of Educational Research 81 (3): 376–407. doi:10.3102/0034654311413609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Quatroche, D. J., K. L. Bauserman, and L. Nellis. 2014. “Supporting Professional Growth through External Resources.” In Handbook of Professional Development in Education, edited by L. E. Martin, S. Kragler, D. J. Quatroche and K. L. Bauserman, 431–442. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. A. 2010. School Perspectives on Collaborative Inquiry: Lessons Learned from New York City, 2009–2010. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., C. L. Poortman, and A. Handelzalts. 2016. “Data Teams for School Improvement.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 27 (2): 228–254. doi:10.1080/09243453.2015.1056192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sin, C. H. 2008. “The Role of Intermediaries in Getting Evidence into Policy and Practice: Some Useful Lessons from Examining Consultancy–Client Relationships.” Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 4 (1): 85–103. doi:10.1332/174426408783477828.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. 2011. Realizing the Power of Professional Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Vineyard, L. 2010. Collaborative Inquiry: A Strategy for Assessing Response to Instruction and Intervention (RtI2) for English Learner Students. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No. 3446801).
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B., and L. Lipton. 2004. Data-Driven Dialogue: A Facilitator’s Guide to Collaborative Inquiry. Arlington, MA: Mira Via, LLC.
   Google Scholar