Targeting efficient studying – first-semester psychology students’ experiences

References

• Baeten, M., E. Kyndt, K. Struyven, and F. Dochy. 2010. “Using Student-Centred Learning Environments to Stimulate Deep Approaches to Learning: Factors Encouraging or Discouraging Their Effectiveness.” Educational Research Review 53: 243–260. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baeten, M., K. Struyven, and F. Dochy. 2013. “Student-Centred Teaching Methods: Can They Optimise Students’ Approaches to Learning in Professional Higher Education?” Studies in Educational Evaluation 39 (1): 14–22. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balasooriya, C. D., C. Tetik, and P. Harris. 2011. “Why is My Design Not Working? The Role of Student Factors.” Research Papers in Education 262: 191–206. doi:10.1080/02671522.2011.561978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. 1998. “Assessment and Classroom Learning: A Role for Summative Assessment?” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 51: 103–110. doi:10.1080/0969595980050106.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. 2003. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. 2nd ed. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., and E. Cascallar. 2006. “How Far Have We Moved toward the Integration of Theory and Practice in Self-Regulation?” Educational Psychology Review 18 (3): 199–210. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9013-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., and L. Corno. 2005. “Self -Regulation in the Classroom: A Perspective on Assessment and Intervention.” Applied Psychology 54 (2): 199–231. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00205.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekkamp, H., and B. H. A. M. Van Hout-Wolters. 2007. “Students’ Adaptation of Study Strategies When Preparing for Classroom Tests.” Educational Psychology Review 194: 401–428. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9025-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, J., and R. Gunstone. 2010. “Metacognitive Development as a Shift in Approach to Learning: An in-Depth Study.” Studies in Higher Education 274: 459–470. doi:10.1080/0307507022000.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. 2009. Teaching for Understanding at University. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-09106-2
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., and V. McCune. 2004. “The Conceptual Bases of Study Strategy Inventories.” Educational Psychology Review 16 (4): 325–345. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0003-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., and P. Ramsden. 1983. Understanding Student Learning. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., and C. Smith. 2002. “Personal Understanding and Target Understanding: Mapping Influences on the Outcomes of Learning.” The British Journal of Educational Psychology 72: 321–342. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12396309.10.1348/000709902320634528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., V. McCune, and M. Scheja. 2006. Student Learning in Context: Understanding the Phenomenon and the Person. In Instructional Psychology: Past, Present, and Future Trends, edited by L. Verschaffel, F. Dochy, M. Boekaerts, & S. Vosniadou, 131–148. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Gijbels, D., G. Van de Watering, F. Dochy, and P. Van den Bossche. 2005. “The Relationship between Students’ Approaches to Learning and the Assessment of Learning Outcomes.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 20 (4): 327–341.10.1007/BF03173560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gijbels, D., M. Segers, and E. Struyf. 2008. “Constructivist Learning Environments and the Impossibility to Change Students’ Perceptions of Assessment Demands and Approaches to Learning.” Instructional Science 36: 431–443. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9064-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gijbels, D., L. Coertjens, G. Vanthournout, E. Struyf, and P. Van Petegem. 2009. “Changing Students' Approaches to Learning: A Two‐Year Study within a University Teacher Training Course.” Educational Studies 355: 503–513. doi:10.1080/03055690902879184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulikers, J. T. M., T. J. Bastiaens, P. A. Kirschner, and L. Kester. 2006. “Relations Between Student Perceptions of Assessment Authenticity, Study Approaches and Learning Outcome.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 324: 381–400. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2006.10.003.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkilä, A., and K. Lonka. 2006. “Studying in Higher Education: Students’ Approaches to Learning, Self‐Regulation, and Cognitive Strategies.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (1): 99–117. doi:10.1080/03075070500392433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkilä, A., M. Niemivirta, J. Nieminen, and K. Lonka. 2011. “Interrelations among University Students’ Approaches to Learning, Regulation of Learning, and Cognitive and Attributional Strategies: A Person Oriented Approach.” Higher Education 615: 513–529. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9346-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, P. J. 1996. “Studaxology: The Expertise Students Need to Be Effective in Higher Education.” Higher Education 31: 117–141.10.1007/BF00129110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowyck, J., J. Elen, and G. Clarebout. 2004. “Instructional Conceptions: Analysis from an Instructional Design Perspective.” International Journal of Educational Research 416: 429–444. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2005.08.010.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and S. Booth. 1997. Learning and Awareness. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Ass.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and R. Säljö. 1976b. “On Qualitative Differences in Learning-II Outcome as a Function of the Learner’s Conception of the Task.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 46: 115–127.10.1111/bjep.1976.46.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and R. Säljö. 1976a. “On Qualitative Differences in Learning, I. Outcome and Process.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 46: 4–11.10.1111/bjep.1976.46.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCune, V. 2000. “The Development of First-Year University Students’ Approaches to Studying.” Unpublished PhD thesis., University of Edinburgh, Faculty of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. M., and M. R. Parlett. 1974. Up to the Mark: A Study of the Examination Game. London: Society for Research into Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Moneta, G. B., and M. M. Spada. 2009. “Coping as a Mediator of the Relationships between Trait Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation and Approaches to Studying during Academic Exam Preparation.” Personality and Individual Differences 46: 664–669. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moneta, G. B., M. M. Spada, and F. M. Rost. 2007. “Approaches to Studying When Preparing for Final Exams as a Function of Coping Strategies.” Personality and Individual Differences 431: 191–202. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijhuis, J. F. H., M. S. R. Segers, and W. H. Gijselaers. 2005. “Influence of Redesigning a Learning Environment on Student Perceptions and Learning Strategies.” Learning Environments Research 81: 67–93. doi:10.1007/s10984-005-7950-3.
   Google Scholar
• Öhrstedt, M. 2017. Högskolestudenters lärande. ett lärstrategiskt perspektiv på studier i psykologi [Learning in Higher Education. Approaches to Learning Among Psychology Students]. Doctoral thesis, Stockholm University, Stockholm. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1129788&dswid=-433.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. E. 2006. “Investigating the Relationship between Variations in Students’ Perceptions of Their Academic Environment and Variations in Study Behaviour in Distance Education.” The British Journal of Educational Psychology 76: 867–893. doi:10.1348/000709905X69690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheja, M. 2006. “Delayed Understanding and Staying in Phase: Students’ Perceptions of Their Study Situation.” Higher Education 52: 421–445. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-7765-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segers, M., J. Nijhuis, and W. Gijselaers. 2006. “Redesigning a Learning and Assessment Environment: The Influence on Students’ Perceptions of Assessment Demands and Their Learning Strategies.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 32: 223–242.10.1016/j.stueduc.2006.08.004
   Google Scholar
• SFS (Swedish Code of Statutes) 2003. The Ethical Review Act. Stockholm: The Swedish Government: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• SFS (Swedish Code of Statutes) 2009. Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act. Stockholm: The Swedish Government: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, B. R. 1971. The Hidden Curriculum. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Spada, M. M., and G. B. Moneta. 2012. “A Metacognitive-Motivational Model of Surface Approach to Studying.” Educational Psychology 321: 45–62.10.1080/01443410.2011.625610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struyven, K., F. Dochy, S. Janssens, and S. Gielen. 2006. “On the Dynamics of Students’ Approaches to Learning: The Effects of the Teaching/Learning Environment.” Learning and Instruction 164: 279–294. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait, H., N. J. Entwistle, and V. McCune. 1998. “ASSIST: A Reconceptualisation of the Approaches to Studying Inventory.” In Improving Student Learning: Improving Students as Learners, edited by C. Rust, 262–271. Oxford: Oxford Brookers University, The Oxford Centre for Staff end Learning Development.
   Google Scholar
• Vermetten, Y. J., J. D. Vermunt, and H. G. Lodewijks. 2002. “Powerful Learning Environments? How University Students Differ in Their Response to Instructional Measures.” Learning and Instruction 123: 263–284. doi:10.1016/S0959-47520100013-5.
   Google Scholar