Home economics education: exploring integrative learning

References

• Baillat, G. 2010. “In Search of Interdisciplinarity in Schools in France: From Curriculum to Practice.” Issues in Integrative Studies 28: 170–207.
   Google Scholar
• Barrie, S. C. 2007. “A Conceptual Framework for the Teaching and Learning of Generic Graduate Attributes.” Studies in Higher Education 32 (4): 439–458. doi:10.1080/03075070701476100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berner, A.-S., H. Laaksolahti, and R. Kopola, eds. 2015. Maa, Jossa Kaikki Rakastavat Oppimista [A Country Where Everyone Loves Learning]. Helsinki: Sitra.
   Google Scholar
• Blackshields, D. 2015. Integrative Learning: International Research and Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brante, G., and A. Brunosson. 2014. “To Double a Recipe: Interdisciplinary Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Content Knowledge in a Home Economics Setting.” Education Inquiry 5 (2): 301–318. doi:10.3402/edui.v5.23925.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2018. Research Methods in Education. 8th ed. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity. 2013. Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct in Finland: Guidelines of the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity 2012. Helsinki: Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish National Core Curriculum for Basic Education (FNCC). 2004. National Core Curriculum for Basic Education. Vammala: Finnish National Board of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish National Core Curriculum for Basic Education (FNCC). 2014. National Curriculum for Basic Education 2014. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K. 2011. “Concept Development and Transfer in Context-Based Science Education.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (6): 817–837. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.493185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, A. 2007. “Vygotsky Goes Online: Learning Design from a Socio-Cultural Perspective.” Learning and Socio-Cultural Theory: Exploring Modern Vygotskian Perspectives 1 (1): 94–107.
   Google Scholar
• Höijer, K. 2013. “Contested Food: The Construction of Home and Consumer Studies as a Cultural Space.” PhD diss., Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., and S. Shannon. 2005. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 15 (9): 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, M. T., and P. Hutchings. 2004. Integrative Learning: Mapping the Terrain. The Academy in Transition. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
   Google Scholar
• Huutoniemi, K., J. T. Klein, H. Bruun, and J. Hukkinen. 2010. “Analyzing Interdisciplinarity: Typology and Indicators.” Research Policy 39 (1): 79–88. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. 2009a. “Redisciplining Generic Attributes: The Disciplinary Context in Focus.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (1): 85–100. doi:10.1080/03075070802602018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. 2009b. “Generic Attributes as Espoused Theory: The Importance of Context.” Higher Education: the International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning 58 (2): 175–191. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9189-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivilehto, S. 2011. ““Kyl Mä Varmaan Kohta Ymmärrän.”: Asunnon Suunnittelu -Opetusohjelma Oppilaiden Ajattelun Ja Oppimisen Haastajana Peruskoulun Kotitalousopetuksessa [“I Will Soon Understand.” The House Planning Program as an Enhancer of Pupils´ Thinking Skills and Learning in Home Economics at Comprehensive School].” PhD diss., Helsinki University.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. 2002. “Introduction. Interdisciplinarity Today: Why? What? and How?” In Interdisciplinarity Education in K-12 and College: A Foundation for K-16 Dialogue, edited by J. T. Klein, 1–17. New York, NY: Collage Board.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. 2010. “A Taxonomy of Interdisciplinarity.” In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, and C. Mitcham, 15–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, D. B., L. R. Lattuca, E. W. Kimball, and R. D. Reason. 2013. “Understanding Interdisciplinarity: Curricular and Organizational Features of Undergraduate Interdisciplinary Programs.” Innovative Higher Education 38 (2): 143–158. doi:10.1007/s10755-012-9232-1.
   Google Scholar
• Lattuca, L. R. 2001. Creating Interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary Research and Teaching among College and University Faculty. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lattuca, L. R. 2003. “Creating Interdisciplinarity: Grounded Definitions from College and University Faculty.” History of Intellectual Culture 3 (1): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lenoir, Y. 2010. “Interdisciplinarity in Quebec Schools: 40 Years of Problematic Implementation.” Issues in Integrative Studies 28: 238–294.
   Google Scholar
• Lenoir, Y., A. Hasni, and A. Froelich. 2015. “Curricular and Didactic Conceptions of Interdisciplinarity in the Field of Education: A Socio-Historical Perspective.” Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies 33: 39–93.
   Google Scholar
• Mansilla, V. B. 2005. “Assessing Student Work at Disciplinary Crossroads.” Change 37 (1): 14–21. doi:10.3200/CHNG.37.1.14-21.
   Google Scholar
• Mansilla, V. B. 2010. “Learning to Synthesize: The Development of Interdisciplinary Understanding.” In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by R. Frodeman, 288–306. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Culture. 2010. Perusopetus 2020 – Yleiset Valtakunnalliset Tavoitteet Ja Tuntijako [Basic Education 2020 – National Objectives and Distribution of Teaching Hours]. Helsinki: Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture, Department for Education and Science Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, W. H. 2010. “Undergraduate General Education.” In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by R. Frodeman, 360–371. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. 2014. “Methodology of Transdisciplinarity.” World Futures 70 (3–4): 186–199. doi:10.1080/02604027.2014.934631.
   Google Scholar
• Nikitina, S. 2006. “Three Strategies for Interdisciplinary Teaching: Contextualizing, Conceptualizing, and Problem‐Centring.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 38 (3): 251–271. doi:10.1080/00220270500422632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nind, M., D. Kilburn, and R. Wiles. 2015. “Using Video and Dialogue to Generate Pedagogic Knowledge: Teachers, Learners and Researchers Reflecting Together on the Pedagogy of Social Research Methods.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 18 (5): 561–576. doi:10.1080/13645579.2015.1062628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• POPS (Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet). 1994. Perusopetuksen Opetussuunnitelman Perusteet [National Core Curriculum for Basic Education]. Helsinki: Opetushallitus.
   Google Scholar
• POPS 1970 (Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet). 1970. Peruskoulun Opetussuunnitelman Mietintö 2. Oppiaineiden Opetussuunnitelmat [National Core Curriculum for Subjects in Basic Education 2.]. Helsinki: Valtion painatuskeskus.
   Google Scholar
• POPS 1985 (Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet). 1985. Perusopetuksen Opetussuunnitelman Perusteet [National Core Curriculum for Basic Education]. Helsinki: Kouluhallitus.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, E. 2005. “Conceptualising and Facilitating Active Learning: Teachers’ Video‐Stimulated Reflective Dialogues.” Reflective Practice 6 (3): 407–418. doi:10.1080/14623940500220202.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, J. G. 2010. “Interdisciplinarity and Research on Local Issues in Schools: Policies and Experiences from Colombia.” Issues in Integrative Studies 28: 109–137.
   Google Scholar
• Säljö, R. 2004. Oppimiskäytännöt: Sosiokulttuurinen Näkökulma [Learning Practices: Sociocultural Perspective]. 2. rev ed. Helsinki: WSOY.
   Google Scholar
• Segovia, I. 2010. “The Conception and Role of Interdisciplinarity in the Spanish Education System.” Issues in Integrative Studies 28: 138–169.
   Google Scholar
• Spelt, E. J. H., J. A. Hamr, H. T. Biemans, P. A. Luning, and M. Mulder. 2009. “Teaching and Learning in Interdisciplinary Higher Education: A Systematic Review.” Educational Psychology Review 21 (4): 365–378. doi:10.1007/s10648-009-9113-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tynjälä, P., and D. Gijbels. 2012. “Changing World: Changing Pedagogy.” In Transitions and Transformations in Learning and Education, edited by P. Tynjälä, M.-L. Stenström, and M. Saarnivaara, 205–222. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tynjälä, P., M.-L. Stenström, and M. Saarnivaara. 2012. “Introduction and Overview.” In Transitions and Transformations in Learning and Education, edited by P. Tynjälä, M.-L. Stenström, and M. Saarnivaara, 3–8. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tynjälä, P., P. Häkkinen, and R. Hämäläinen. 2014. “TEL@ Work: Toward Integration of Theory and Practice.” British Journal of Educational Technology 45 (6): 990–1000. doi:10.1111/bjet.12164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venäläinen, S. 2010. “Interaction in the Multicultural Classroom: Towards Culturally Sensitive Home Economics Education.” PhD diss., Helsinki University.
   Google Scholar
• Vitikka, E. 2009. “Opetussuunnitelman Mallin Jäsennys: Sisältö Ja Pedagogiikka Kokonaisuuden Rakentajina [Structuring of the Curriculum Design: Content and Pedagogy Constructing the Whole].” PhD diss., Helsinki University.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar