Intentions and flexibility: navigating complex literacy practices in primary education

References

• Aagaard, T., and A. Lund. 2013. “Mind the Gap: Divergent Objects of Assessment in Technology-Rich Learning Environments.” Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy 8 (4): 225–243. doi:10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2013-04-04.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlberg, A., ed. 2009. Specialpedagogisk Forskning: En Mångfasetterad Utmaning [Special Education Research: A Multifaceted Challenge]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Ainscow, M., R. Slee, and M. Best. 2019. “Editorial: The Salamanca Statement: 25 Years on.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 23 (7–8): 671–676. doi:10.1080/13603116.2019.1622800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åkerfeldt, A. 2014. Didaktisk design med digitala resurser: En studie av kunskapsrepresentationer i en digitaliserad skola [Didactic design with digital resources]. Doctoral thesis, Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Aspelin, J., ed. 2013. Relationell specialpedagogik: Iteori och praktik [Relational Education: In Theory and Practice], 13–25. Kristianstad: Kristianstad University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D. 2007. Literacy: An Introduction to the Ecology of Written Language. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Berge, K. L., G. Skar, S. Matre, R. Solheim, L. S. Evensen, H. Otnes, and R. Thygesen. 2019. “Introducing Teachers to New Semiotic Tools for Writing Instruction and Writing Assessment: Consequences for students’ Writing Proficiency.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 26 (1): 6–25. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2017.133025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blikstad-Balas, M., and R. Hvistendahl. 2013. “Students’ Digital Strategies and Shortcuts: Searching for Answers on Wikipedia as a Core Literacy Practice in Upper Secondary School.” Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy 8 (1–2): 32–49. doi:10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2013-01-02-03.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. 2012. “The Intersection of Cognitive and Sociocultural Factors in the Development of Reading Comprehension Among Immigrant Students.” Reading and Writing 25 (8): 1973–1990. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9290-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. 2017. Multi Language Students: Effective Education in Challenging Times. Stockholm: Natur & Kultur.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J., and R. Persad. 2014. “Teaching Through a Multilingual Lens: The Evolution of EAL Policy and Practice in Canada.” The Journal of Teaching and Learning 2 (4): 3–40.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, D. R., D. G. O’Brien, M. Sato, and C. M. Kelly. 2011. “Professional Development and Teacher Education for Reading Instruction.” In Handbook of Reading Research, edited by M. Kamil, P. Pearson, E. Moje, and P. Afflerbach, 629–660. 4th ed. NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elm Fristorp, A. 2012. Design för lärande barns meningsskapande i naturvetenskap [Design for Learning - Children´s Meaning-making in Science]. Doctoral thesis, Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Florian, L. 2014. “What Counts as Evidence of Inclusive Education?” European Journal of Special Needs Education 29 (3): 286–294. doi:10.1080/08856257.2014.933551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florian, L. 2021. Aligning Competence Frameworks for Teacher Professional Learning for Inclusion: Conceptual Working Paper. edited by L. Florian. Odense, Denmark: European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education.
   Google Scholar
• Forsling, K. 2017. Att överbrygga klyftor i ett digitalt lärandelandskap. Design och iscensättning för skriv- och läslärande i förskoleklass och lågstadium [Bridging gaps in a digital learning landscape. Design and setting for writing and reading education in preschool class and primary school]. Doctoral thesis, Åbo Akademi.
   Google Scholar
• Forsling, K. 2019. “Designs for Learning: Focus on Special Needs Designs for Digitalised Literacy Education in a Swedish Lower Primary School.” Designs for Learning 11 (1): 108–117. doi:10.16993/dfl.106.
   Google Scholar
• Forsling, K., and C. Tjernberg. 2020. “Design för skrivkraft. Lärares erfarenheter av skrivandets roll i unga elevers identitetsutveckling [Design for Writing Power. Teachers´Experiences of the Role of Writing in Young Students´ Identity Development].” In Bildning, utbildning, forskning. Trettonde nationella konferensen i svenska med didaktisk inriktning, edited by, M. Johansson, B.-G. Martinsson, and S. P. Swärd, 94–109. Linköping: Linköpings universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2004. What Videogames Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Haug, P. 1998. Pedagogiskt Dilemma: Specialundervisning [Pedagogical Dilemma: Special Education]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Howes, A., T. Booth, A. Dyson, and J. Frankham. 2005. “Teacher Learning and the Development of Inclusive Practices and Policies: Framing and Context.” Research Papers in Education 20 (2): 133–148. doi:10.1080/02671520500077947.
   Google Scholar
• Janks, H. 2010. Literacy and Power. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. 2009. Technology, Literacy and Learning: A Multimodal Approach. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kjällander, S. 2011. Designs for learning in an extended digital environment: Case studies of social interaction in the social science classroom. Doctoral thesis, Stockholms universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A., and M. A. Casey. 2014. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., and S. Brinkman. 2014. Den Kvalitativa Forskningsintervjun [The Qualitative Research Interview]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, J. A. 2004. Getting to Excellent: How to Create Better Schools. NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leijon, M., and F. Lindstrand. 2012. “Socialsemiotik och design för lärande: Två multimodala teorier om lärande, representation och teckenskapande.” Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige 17 (3–4): 171–192.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, A., and T. E. Hauge. 2011. “Designs for Teaching and Learning in Technology-Rich Learning Environments.” Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy 6 (4): 258–271. doi:10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2011-04-05.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. 2008. What Really Works in Special and Inclusive Education: Using Evidence-Based Teaching Strategies. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moats, L. C. 2010. Speech to Print: Language Essentials for Teachers. Baltimore, MA: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Myrberg, M. 2007. Dyslexi: En kunskapsöversikt [Dyslexia: An overview of knowledge] (Vetenskapsrådets rapportserie, 2007:2). Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
   Google Scholar
• Myrberg, M., and A. L. Lange. 2006. Identifiering, diagnostik samt specialpedagogiska insatser för elever med läs- och skrivsvårigheter. Konsensusprojektet, 2 [The Consensus Project II]). Stockholm: The Department of Individual, Environment and Learning. Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Olin-Scheller, C., and M. Tengberg. 2012. “‘If It Ain’t True, Then It’s Just a Book!’ the Reading and Teaching of Faction Literature.” Journal of Research in Reading 35 (2): 153–168. doi:10.1111/j.14679817.2010.01453.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., W. B. Dickinson, N. L. Leech, and A. G. Zoran. 2009. “A Qualitative Framework for Collecting and Analyzing Data in Focus Group Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 8 (3): 1–21. doi:10.1177/160940690900800301.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, A., and J. Tritter. 2006. “Focus Group Method and Methodology: Current Practice and Recent Debate.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 29 (1): 23–37. doi:10.1080/01406720500537304.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, B. 2013. Elevers Olikheter Och Specialpedagogisk Kunskap [Students´differences and Special Educational Knowledge]. Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., and R. Allington. 2015. Reading Instruction That Works: The Case for Balanced Teaching. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Qvortrup, A., and L. Qvortrup. 2018. “Inclusion: Dimensions of Inclusion in Education.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 22 (7): 803–817. doi:10.1080/13603116.2017.1412506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, R., and S. Carrington. 2002. “Professional Development for Inclusive Schooling.” International Journal of Educational Management 16 (5): 239–247. doi:10.1108/09513540210434612.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D., and J. R. Martin. 2013. Learning to Write, Reading to Learn: Genre, Knowledge and Pedagogy in the Sydney School. Alexandria, VA: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D. H., and A. Meyer. 2002. Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, G. W., and H. R. Bernard. 2003. “Techniques to Identify Themes.” Field Methods 15 (1): 85–109. doi:10.1177/1525822X02239569.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, C. 2013. Att bli en sån’ som läser: Barns menings- och identitetsskapande genom texter [Children’s meaning and identity creation through texts]. (Örebro studies in Education, 44). Doctoral thesis, Örebro University.
   Google Scholar
• Selander, S., and G. Kress. 2010. Design för lärande: Ett multimodalt perspektiv [Design for learning: a multimodal perspective]. Stockholm: Norstedts Akademiska Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Skrtic, T. M. 1991. Behind Special Education. Denver: Love.
   Google Scholar
• Skrtic, T. M. 2005. “A Political Economy of Learning Disabilities.” Learning Disability Quarterly 28 (2): 149–155. doi:10.2307/1593616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., and C. Juel. 2007. Teaching Children to Read: What Do We Know About How to Do it?, ed. I Snowling & Hulme, C. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. 2019. Det Professionella Lärandets Inneboende Kraft [The Inner Force of Professional Learning]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Tjernberg, C. 2013. Framgångsfaktorer i läs- och skrivlärande. En praxisorienterad studie med utgångspunkt i skolpraktiken [Success Factors in Teaching Reading and Writing: A praxis-oriented study based on school practices]. Doctoral thesis, Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Tjernberg, C., and E. Heimdahl Mattson. 2014. “Inclusion in Practice: A Matter of School Culture.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 29 (2): 247–256. doi:10.1080/08856257.2014.891336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjernberg, C., and E. Heimdahl Mattson. 2021. “Synthesising Inclusive and Didactic Research – a Way to Ensure the Participation and Learning of Every Student?” Nordic Studies in Education 41 (3): 1 16. doi:10.23865/nse.v41.2831.
   Google Scholar
• Vetenskapsrådet. 2017. Good Research Practice. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet (The Swedish Research Council).
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1964. Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wibeck, V. 2010. Fokusgrupper: Om Fokuserade Gruppintervjuer Som Undersökningsmetod [Focus Groups: About Focused Group Discussions as a Research Model]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar