Learning outcomes of teacher professional development activities: a meta-study

References

• Ackland, Robert. 1991. “A Review of the Peer Coaching Literature.” Journal of Staff Development 12 (1): 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• *Amobi, Funmi A. 2005. “Preservice Teachers’ Reflectivity on the Sequence and Consequences of Teaching Actions in a Microteaching Experience.” Teacher Education Quarterly 32 (1): 115–130.
   Google Scholar
• *Biasutti, Michele. 2011. “The Student Experience of a Collaborative E-Learning University Module.” Computers & Education 57 (3): 1865–1875. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, Hilda, and Ralph T. Putnam. 1995. “Expanding a Teachers’ Knowledge Base: A Cognitive Psychological Perspective on Professional Development.” In Professional Development in Education: New Paradigms and Practices, edited by Thomas R. Guskey and Michael Huberman, 35–66. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Burron, Bruce, M. Lynn James, and Anthony L. Ambrosio. 1993. “The Effects of Cooperative Learning in a Physical Science Course for Elementary /Middle Level Preservice Teachers.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30 (7): 697–707. doi:10.1002/tea.3660300708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, David, and Hilary Hollingsworth. 2002. “Elaborating a Model of Teacher Professional Growth.” Teaching and Teacher Education 18 (8): 947–967. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, Robert, Cesare Aloisi, Steve Higgins, and Lee Elliot Major. 2014. What Makes Great Teaching?: Review of the Underpinning Research. London: The Sutton Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, Laura M. 2009. “Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures.” Educational Researcher 38 (3): 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doppenberg, Jannet J., Anoucke Bakx, and Perry J. den Brok. 2012. “Collaborative Teacher Learning in Different Primary School Settings.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 18 (5): 547–566. doi:10.1080/13540602.2012.709731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Deghaidy, Heba, and Ahmed Nouby. 2008. “Effectiveness of a Blended E-Learning Cooperative Approach in an Egyptian Teacher Education Programme.” Computers & Education 51 (3): 988–1006. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Estebaranz, Araceli, Pilar Mingorance, and Carlos Marcelo. 2010. “Teachers’ Work Groups as Professional Development: What Do the Teachers Learn?” Teachers and Teaching 5 (2): 153–169. doi:10.1080/1354060990050202.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, Martin, and Icek Ajzen. 2010. Predicting and Changing Behaviour: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Grion, Valentina, and Bianca Maria Varisco. 2007. “On Line Collaboration for Building a Teacher Professional Identity.” PsychNology Journal 5 (3): 271–284.
   Google Scholar
• *Hamilton, Erica R. 2013. “His Ideas are in My Head: Peer-to-Peer Teacher Observations as Professional Development.” Professional Development in Education 39 (1): 42–64. doi:10.1080/19415257.2012.726202.
   Google Scholar
• *Hanewald, Ria, and Roland Gesthuizen. 2010. “Sustainability in an Online Community of Practice: The Case Study of a Group of Secondary School Educators in Victoria.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 34 (5): 26–42. doi:10.14221/ajte.2009v34n5.3.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, John A. C. 2009. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden, Béatrice I. J. M. 2000. “The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Multidimensional Measurement Instrument of Professional Expertise.” High Ability Studies 11 (1): 9–39. doi:10.1080/713669175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Huang, Kun, Ian A. Lubin, and Xun Ge. 2011. “Situated Learning in an Educational Technology Course for Pre-Service Teachers.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27 (8): 1200–1212. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huberman, Michael A. 1989. “The Professional Life Cycle of Teachers.” Teachers College Record 91 (1): 31–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, David H. 1999. “Designing Constructivist Learning Environments.” In Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory. II vols, edited by C. M. Reigeluth, 215–239. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, Donald L. 1994. Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• *Koc, Mustafa. 2011. “Let’s Make a Movie: Investigating Pre-Service Teachers’ Reflections on Using Video-Recorded Role Playing Cases in Turkey.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27 (1): 95–106. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, Jean, and Etienne C. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• *Lee, Hea-Jin, and Eun-ok Baek. 2012. “Facilitating Deep Learning in a Learning Community.” International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction 8 (1): 1–13. doi:10.4018/jthi.2012010101.
   Google Scholar
• Leeferink, Han, Maaike Koopman, Douwe Beijaard, and Evelien Ketelaar. 2015. “Unraveling the Complexity of Student Teachers' Learning in and from the Workplace.” Journal of Teacher Education 66 (4): 334–348. doi:10.1177/0022487115592163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenski, Gerhard. 1988. “Rethinking Macrosociological Theory.” American Sociological Review 53 (2): 163–171. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095685.10.2307/2095685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, Judith W. 1990. “The Persistence of Privacy: Autonomy and Initiative in Teachers’ Professional Relations.” Teachers College Record 91 (4): 509–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Hsiu-Lien. 2010. “Research on Peer Coaching in Preservice Teacher Education: A Review of Literature.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26 (4): 749–753. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manouchehri, Azita. 2001. “Collegial Interaction and Reflective Practice.” Action in Teacher Education 22 (4): 86–97. doi:10.1080/01626620.2001.10463032.
   Google Scholar
• *Meirink, Jacobiene A. 2007. “Individual Teacher Learning in a Context of Collaboration in Teams.” PhD diss., Universiteit Leiden, Leiden, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• *Nicholas, Howard, and Wan Ng. 2009. “Fostering Online Social Construction of Science Knowledge with Primary Pre-Service Teachers Working in Virtual Teams.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 37 (4): 379–398. doi:10.1080/13598660903050336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Olson, Joanne K. 2007. “Preservice Teachers’ Thinking within a Research-Based Framework: What Informs Decisions?” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 5: 49–83. doi:10.1007/s10763-005-9027-2.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, Barbara L., Sally E. Thorne, Connie Canam, and Carol Jillings. 2001. Meta-Study of Qualitative Health Research: A Practical Guide to Meta-Analysis and Meta-Synthesis. Thousand Oakes, CA: SAGE.10.4135/9781412985017
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Ralph T., and Hilda Borko. 2000. “What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say about Research on Teacher Learning?” Educational Researcher 29 (1): 4–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X029001004.
   Google Scholar
• *Rock, Tracy C., and Cathy Wilson. 2005. “Improving Teaching through Lesson Study.” Teacher Education Quarterly 32 (1): 77–92.
   Google Scholar
• *Schuck, Sandra. 2003. “The Use of Electronic Question and Answer Forums in Mathematics Teacher Education.” Mathematics Teacher Education and Development 5: 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• *Shin, Eui-kyung, Elizabeth A. Wilkins, and Janet Ainsworth. 2007. “The Nature and Effectiveness of Peer Feedback during an Early Clinical Experience in an Elementary Education Program.” Action in Teacher Education 28 (4): 40–52. doi:10.1080/01626620.2007.10463428.
   Google Scholar
• *Shriki, Atara, and Nitsa Movshovitz-Hadar. 2011. “Nurturing a Community of Practice through a Collaborative Design of Lesson Plans on a Wiki System.” Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects 7: 339–357.
   Google Scholar
• *Sluijsmans, Dominique M. A., Saskia Brand-Gruwel, and Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer. 2002. “Peer Assessment Training in Teacher Education: Effects on Performance and Perceptions.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (5): 443–454. doi:10.1080/026029302200000931.
   Google Scholar
• *Sluijsmans, Dominique M. A., Saskia Brand-Gruwel, Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer, and Rob L. Martens. 2004. “Training Teachers in Peer-Assessment Skills: Effects on Performance and Perceptions.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 41 (1): 59–78. doi:10.1080/1470329032000172720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stichter, Janine P., Timothy J. Lewis, Mary Richter, Nanci W. Johnson, and Linda Bradley. 2006. “Assessing Antecedent Variables: The Effects of Instructional Variables on Student Outcomes through in-Service and Peer Coaching Professional Development Models.” Education and Treatment of Children 29 (4): 665–692.
   Google Scholar
• Strijbos, Jan-Willem, Paul A. Kirschner, and Rob L. Martens. 2004. What we Know about CSCL, and Implementing it in Higher Education. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/1-4020-7921-4
   Google Scholar
• Thijs, Annette, and Ellen van den Berg. 2002. “Peer coaching as part of a professional development program for science teaches in Botswana.” International Journal of Educational Development 22 (1): 55–68. doi:10.1016/S0738-0593(00)00078-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timperley, Helen. 2008. “Teacher Professional Learning and Development.” In The Educational Practices Series – 18, edited by Jere Brophy, 32 pp. Brussels: International Academy of Education & International Bureau of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Van Veen, Klaas, Rosanne C. Zwart, and Jacobiene A. Meirink. 2012. “What Makes Teacher Professional Development Effective? A Literature Review.” In Teacher Learning That Matters: International Perspectives, edited by Mary Kooy and Klaas Van Veen, 3–21. New-York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• *Vincent, John, and Anthony Jones. 2008. “Using Models for Understanding Pedagogical Change in a Technology Environment: A Case Study of IWB Implementation in a Secondary School.” Australian Educational Computing 23 (2): 32–37. http://acce.edu.au/journal/23/2/using-models-understanding-pedagogical-change-technology-32-environment-case-study-iwb
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, Lev S. 1978. Mind in Society. Cambridge: MIT-Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, Joseph B., and Lisa C. Tidwell. 1995. “Nonverbal Cues in Computer‐Mediated Communication, and the Effect of Chronemics on Relational Communication.” Journal of Organizational Computing 5 (4): 355–378. doi:10.1080/10919399509540258.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, Etienne C. 1998. Community of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803932
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, Etienne C., and William M. Snyder. 2000. “Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier.” Harvard Business Review 78 (1): 139–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwart, Rosanne C. 2007. “Teacher Learning in a Context of Reciprocal Peer Coaching.” PhD diss., Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar
• Zwart, Rosanne C., Theo Wubbels, Theo C. M. Bergen, and Sanneke Bolhuis. 2007. “Experienced Teacher Learning within the Context of Reciprocal Peer Coaching.” Teachers and Teaching 13 (2): 165–187. doi:10.1080/13540600601152520.
   Google Scholar
• Zwart, Rosanne C., Theo Wubbels, Theo C. M. Bergen, and Sanneke Bolhuis. 2009. “Which Characteristics of a Reciprocal Peer Coaching Context Affect Teacher Learning as Perceived by Teachers and Their Students?” Journal of Teacher Education 60 (3): 243–257. doi:10.1177/0022487109336968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwart, Rosanne C., Theo Wubbels, Sanneke Bolhuis, and Theo C. M. Bergen. 2008. “Teacher Learning through Reciprocal Peer Coaching: An Analysis of Activity Sequences.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24 (4): 982–1002. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar