927
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Towards neuroparenting? An analysis of the discourses underpinning social and emotional learning (SEL) initiatives in English schools

ORCID Icon
Pages 279-296 | Received 14 Sep 2018, Accepted 30 Nov 2018, Published online: 21 Jan 2019

References

  • Allen, G. (2011). Early intervention: The next steps. London: Cabinet Office.
  • Bailey, S. (2007, September 5–8). So what’s all the fuss about nurture groups? British Educational Research Conference, University of London. London: Institute of Education.
  • Bateman, T. (2017, 10 February). Independent school students gain extra time for exams. BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-38923034
  • Baumrind, D. (1967). Child care practices anteceding three patterns of pre-school behaviour. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 75(1), 43–88.
  • Beatty, B., Cahan, E. D., & Grant, J. (2006). When science encounters the child: Education, parenting and child welfare in 20th century America. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • BERA. (2011). Ethical guidelines for educational research. Retrieved from https://www.bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/BERA-Ethical-Guidelines-2011.pdf?noredirect=1
  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss (Vol. 1). New York: Basic Books.
  • Boxall, M. (2002). Nurture groups in school: Principles and practice. London: Paul Chapman.
  • Burns, J. (2015, 6 May). Head teachers offered help on preventing radicalisation. BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-32591414
  • Children’s Society. (2015). The good childhood report 2014. London: Author.
  • Cottam, S., & Espie, J. (2015). Discourses underpinning parenting training programmes: Positioning and power. Children and Society, 28, 465–477.
  • Craig, L., Powell, A., & Smyth, C. (2014). Towards intensive parenting? Changes in the composition and determinants of mothers’ and fathers’ time with children 1992–2006. British Journal of Sociology, 65(3), 555–579.
  • Dermott, E., & Pomati, M. (2016). “Good” parenting practices: How important are poverty, education and time pressure? Sociology, 50(1), 125–142.
  • DfE (Department for Education). (2015). School, pupils and their characteristics. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/433680/SFR16_2015_Main_Text.pdf
  • DfES (Department for Education and Skills). (2003). Every child matters. Nottingham: DfES.
  • DfES (Department for Education and Skills). (2005). Excellence and enjoyment: Social and emotional aspects of learning. Nottingham: DfES.
  • Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432.
  • Ecclestone, K. (2007). Resisting images of the “diminished self”: The implications of emotional well-being and emotional engagement in education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 22(4), 455–470.
  • Ecclestone, K. (2012). From emotional and psychological well-being to character education: Challenging policy discourses of behavioural science and “vulnerability”. Research Papers in Education, 27(4), 463–480.
  • Ecclestone, K. (2017). Behaviour change policy agendas for “vulnerable” subjectivities: The dangers of therapeutic governance and its new entrepreneurs. Journal of Education Policy, 32(1), 48–62.
  • Ecclestone, K., & Hayes, D. (2009). The dangerous rise of therapeutic education. London: Routledge.
  • Ecclestone, K., & Rawdin, C. (2016). Reinforcing the “diminished subject”? The implications of the “vulnerability zeitgeist” for well-being in educational settings. Cambridge Journal of Education, 46(3), 377–393.
  • Edwards, R., & Gillies, V. (2011). Clients or consumers, commonplace or pioneers? Navigating the contemporary class politics of family, parenting skills and education. Ethics and Education, 6(2), 141–154.
  • Every London school to be offered knife detection wand. (2017, 27 June). BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-40418732
  • Faircloth, C. (2014). Intensive parenting and the expansion of parenting. In E. Lee., J. Bristow, C. Fairclough, & J. Macvarish (Eds.), Parenting culture studies (pp. 25–50). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Furedi, F. (2001). Paranoid parenting: Abandon your anxieties and be a good parent. London: Penguin Press.
  • Furedi, F. (2004). Therapy culture: Cultivating vulnerability in an uncertain age. London: Sage.
  • Furedi, F. (2009). Wasted: Why education isn’t working. London: Continuum.
  • Gagen, E. (2013). Governing emotions: Citizenship, neuroscience and the education of youth. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40(1), 140–152.
  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Giddens, A. (1998). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Cambridge: Policy Press.
  • Gillies, V. (2005). Meeting parents’ needs? Discourses of “support” and “inclusion” in family policy. Critical Social Policy, 25(1), 70–90.
  • Gillies, V. (2007). Marginalised mothers: Exploring working-class experiences of parenting. London: Routledge.
  • Gillies, V. (2012). Family policy and the politics of parenting. In M. Richter & S. Andresen (Eds.), The politicisation of parenthood: Shifting private and public responsibilities in education and child-rearing (pp. 1–20). London: Springer.
  • Gillies, V. (2014). Troubling families: Parenting and the politics of early intervention. Retrieved from https://golds.academia.edu/ValGillies
  • Gillies, V. (2016). Pushed to the edge: Inclusion and behaviour support in schools. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Gillies, V., Edwards, R., & Horsley, N. (2016). Brave new brains: Sociology, family and the politics of knowledge. Sociological Review, 64, 219–237.
  • Hallam, S. (2009). An evaluation of the social and emotional aspects of learning (SEAL) programme: Promoting positive behaviours, effective learning and well-being in primary school children. Oxford Review of Education, 35(3), 313–330.
  • Humphrey, N. (2012). The social and emotional aspects of learning (SEAL) programme. In P. Adey (Ed.), Bad education: Debunking myths in education (pp. 143–160). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Humphrey, N. (2013). Social and emotional learning: A critical appraisal. London: Sage.
  • Jensen, F. E. (2015). The teenage brain: A neuroscientist’s survival guide to raising adolescents and young adults. London: Thorsons.
  • Kehily, M. J. (2008). Understanding childhood. In M. J. Kehily (Ed.), An introduction to childhood studies (2nd ed.) (pp. 1–16). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race and family life. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Layard, R. (2007, October 23). Presentation to the all-party parliamentary group seminar on well-being in the classroom. London, Oxford: Institute of the Mind.
  • Leadsom, A., Field, F., Burstow, P., & Lucas, C. (2014). 1001 critical days: The importance of the conception to age two period. London: Department for Health.
  • Lee, E. (2014). Experts and parenting culture. In E. Lee., J. Bristow, C. Fairclough, & J. Macvarish (Eds.), Parenting culture studies (pp. 51–75). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Lee, E., Bristow, J., Fairclough, C., & Macvarish, J. (eds.). (2014). Parenting culture studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Le-Phuong Nguyen, K., Harman, V., & Cappellini, B. (2016). Playing with class: Middle-class intensive mothering and the consumption of children’s toys in Vietnam. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41, 449–456.
  • Lowe, P., Lee, E., & Macvarish, J. (2015). Biologising parenting: Neuroscience discourse, English social and public health policy and understandings of the child. Sociology of Health and Illness, 37(2), 198–211.
  • Macvarish, J., Lee, E., & Lowe, P. (2014). The “first three years” movement and the infant brain: A review of critiques. Sociology Compass, 8(6), 792–804.
  • Macvarish, J., Lee, E., & Lowe, P. (2015). Neuroscience and family policy: What becomes of the parent? Critical Social Policy, 35(2), 248–269.
  • McLaughlin, K. (2012). Surviving identity: Vulnerability and the psychology of recognition. Hove: Routledge.
  • Nadesan, M. (2002). Engineering the entrepreneurial infant: Brain science, infant development toys and governmentality. Cultural Studies, 16(3), 401–432.
  • Obesity campaigners call for more salads and fewer puddings in school. (2017, 20 April). BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-39647449
  • Palmer, S. (2006). Toxic childhood: How the modern world is damaging our children and what we can do about it. Orion: London.
  • Paterson, C., Tyler, C., & Lexmond, J. (2014). Character and resilience manifesto. London: The All Party Parliamentary Group on Social Mobility.
  • Pledge to boost mental health support in school. (2017, 3 December). BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-42194524
  • Prior, L. (2008). Repositioning documents in social research. Sociology, 42(5), 821–836.
  • Rawdin, C. 2016. Professional subjectivities in a therapeutically-orientated education system ( Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Birmingham.
  • Rich-Harris, J. (1998). The nurture assumption: Why children turn out the way they do. Bloomsbury: London.
  • Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Free Association Books.
  • Rose, N., & Abi-Rached, J. M. (2013). Neuro: The new brain sciences and the management of the mind. London: Princeton University Press.
  • Timimi, S. (2002). Pathological child psychiatry and the medicalisation of childhood. Hove: Brunner Routledge.
  • UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre. (2007). Child poverty in perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries. Innocenti Report Card 7. Florence: UNICEF.
  • Valencia, L. (2015). Being a mother, practicing motherhood, mothering someone: The impact of psy-knowledge and processes of subjectification. Journal of Family Issues, 36(9), 1233–1252.
  • Wastell, D., & White, S. (2012). Blinded by neuroscience: Social policy, the family and the infant brain. Families, Relationships and Societies, 1(3), 397–414.
  • Widding, U. (2015). Parenting Ideals and (Un-)troubled Parent Positions. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 23(1), 45–64.
  • Wigelsworth, M., Humphrey, N., & Lendrum, A. (2012). A national evaluation of the impact of the secondary social and emotional aspects of learning (SEAL) programme. Educational Psychology, 32(2), 213–238.
  • Wood, P., & Warin, J. (2014). Social and emotional aspects of learning: complementing, compensating and countering parental practices. British Educational Research Journal, 40(6), 937–951.
  • Wright, K. (2010). The rise of the therapeutic society: Psychological knowledge and the contradictions of cultural change. Washington, DC: New Academia.
  • Wyness, M. (2006). Childhood and society: An introduction to the sociology of childhood. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.