Adaptive teaching in mathematics: a review of the literature

References

• Arnold, D. H., Fisher, P. H., Doctoroff, G. L., & Dobbs, J. (2002). Accelerating math development in head start classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Artzt, A. F., & Armour-Thomas, E. (1998). Mathematics teaching as problem solving: A framework for studying teacher metacognition underlying instructional practice in mathematics. Instructional Science, 26(1–2), 5–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeije, H. (2010). Analysis in qualitative research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chazan, D., Herbst, P., & Clark, L. (2016). Research on the teaching of mathematics: A call to theorize the role of society and schooling in mathematics instruction. In D. Gitomer & C. Bell Eds., Handbook of research on teaching (5th, pp. 1039–1097). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• *Choppin, J. (2011). The impact of professional noticing on teachers’ adaptations of challenging tasks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning: An International Journal, 13(3), 175–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock & American Educational Research Association (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 255–296). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H. (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Corno, L. (2008). On teaching adaptively. Educational Psychologist, 43, 161–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, G. G. (2005). Developing metacognitive teachers: Visioning and the expert’s changing role in teacher education and professional development. In S. E. Israel, C. C. Block, K. L. Bauserman, & K. Kinnucan-Welsch (Eds.), Metacognition in literacy learning: Theory, assessment, instruction, and professional development (pp. 299–314). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, G. G., Miller, S. D., Parsons, S. A., & Meloth, M. (2009). Teachers as metacognitive professionals. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 240–256). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbanks, C. M., Duffy, G. G., Faircloth, B. S., He, Y., Levin, B. B., Rohr, J., & Stein, C. (2010). Beyond knowledge: Exploring why some teachers are more thoughtfully adaptive than others. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 161–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., & Carey, D. A. (1993). Using children’s mathematical knowledge in instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 555–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 653–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, D. J. (1998). Definitions and empirical foundations. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 1–23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, P., & Chazan, D. (2017). The role of theory development in increasing the subject specificity of research on mathematics teaching. In J. Cai (Ed.), First compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 102–127). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledgefor teaching and the mathematicalquality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 430–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 371–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Huang, R., & Li, Y. (2012). What matters most: A comparison of expert and novice teachers’ noticing of mathematics classroom events. School Science and Mathematics, 112(7), 420–432.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, V. R., & Spangle, D. (2017). Research on core practices in K-12 mathematics teaching. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. pp.766–792). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• *König, J., Blömeke, S., Klein, P., Suhl, U., Busse, A., & Kaiser, G. (2014). Is teachers’ general pedagogical knowledge a premise for noticing and interpreting classroom situations? A video-based assessment approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 76–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M., Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Turrou, A. C., Beasley, H., … Crowe, K. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 226–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Leikin, R., & Dinur, S. (2007). Teacher flexibility in mathematical discussion. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26, 328–347.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• *Muir, T., Beswick, K., & Williamson, J. (2010). Up, close and personal: Teachers’ responses to an individualised professional learning opportunity. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 38(2), 129–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mellone, M. (2011). The influence of theoretical tools on teachers’ orientation to notice and classroom practice: A case study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(4), 269–284.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council, & Mathematics Learning Study Committee. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council, & Mathematics Learning Study Committee. (2002). Helping children learn mathematics. J. Kilpatrick & J. Swafford Eds., Washington, DC: Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, S. A. (2012). Adaptive teaching in literacy instruction: Case studies of two teachers. Journal of Literacy Research, 44, 149–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, S. A., & Vaughn, M. (2016). Toward adaptability: Where to from here? Theory into Practice, 55(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1173998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, S. A., Vaughn, M., Scales, R. Q., Gallagher, M. A., Parsons, A. W., Davis, S. D., … Allen, M. (2018). Teachers’ instructional adaptations: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 205–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Robinson, N. N., & Leikin, R. (2012). One teacher, two lessons: The lesson study process. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 10(1), 139–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Runesson, U. (2013). Focusing on the object of learning and what is critical for learning: A case study of teachers’ inquiry into teaching and learning mathematics. Perspectives in Education, 31(3), 170–183.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• *Scherer, P., & Steinbring, H. (2006). Noticing children’s learning processes–teachers jointly reflect on their own classroom interaction for improving mathematics teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(2), 157–185.
   Google Scholar
• *Scherrer, J., & Stein, M. K. (2013). Effects of a coding intervention on what teachers learn to notice during whole-group discussion. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(2), 105–124.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77, 454–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sherin, M. G., Russ, R. S., Sherin, B. L., & Colestock, A. (2008). Professional vision in action: An exploratory study. Issues in Teacher Education, 17(2), 27.
   Google Scholar
• *Souto-Manning, M., & Dice, J. L. (2007). Reflective teaching in the early years: A case for mentoring diverse educators. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34(6), 425–430.
   Google Scholar
• Staiger, D. O., & Rockoff, J. E. (2010). Searching for effective teachers with imperfect information. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(3), 97–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• *van Es, E. A., & Conroy, J. (2009). Using the performance assessment for California teachers to examine pre-service teachers’ conceptions of teaching mathematics for understanding. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(1), 83.
   Google Scholar
• *van Es, E. A. (2012). Using video to collaborate around problems of practice. Teacher Education Quarterly, 39(2), 103–116.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, M., & Parsons, S. A. (2013). Adaptive teachers as innovators: Instructional adaptations opening spaces for enhanced literacy learning. Language Arts, 91, 81–93.
   Google Scholar
• *Wager, A. A. (2014). Noticing children’s participation: Insights into teacher positionality toward equitable mathematics pedagogy. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(3), 312–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Weiland, I. S., Hudson, R. A., & Amador, J. M. (2014). Preservice formative assessment interviews: The development of competent questioning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(2), 329–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M., & Goldenberg, M. P. (1998). Some conceptions are difficult to change: One middle school mathematics teacher’s struggle. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(3), 269–293.
   Google Scholar