Implementing reading interventions to support disadvantaged children in England: insights from a process evaluation

References

• Biggers, D. (2001). The argument against Accelerated Reader. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(1),72–75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brisco, S. (2003). AR: What are motives behind the motives? Teacher Librarian, 30(4), 33–62.
   Google Scholar
• British Educational Research Association (BERA). (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). BERA. Retrieved February 2019, from https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, G. (2016). What works for pupils and young people with literacy difficulties? Dyslexia-SpLD Trust. Retrieved August 2020, from http://www.interventionsforliteracy.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/What-Works-5th-edition-Rev-Oct-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Catch Up® Literacy. (2019, February). https://www.catchup.org/interventions/literacy.php
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C. (2014). The literacy lives of 8 – 11-year-olds: 2005–2013. National Literacy Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Clipson-Boyles, S. (2000). The catch up project: A reading intervention in Year 3 for Level 1 readers (Research Note). Journal of Research in Reading, 23(1), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00104
   Google Scholar
• Crenna-Jennings, W. (2018). Key drivers of the disadvantage gap, literature review. Education Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2015). Reading: The next steps.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2017). Guidance: Strategic school improvement fund.
   Google Scholar
• Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Falco, M., & Hansen, W. B. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health and Education Research, 18(2), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/18.2.237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Education Endowment Foundation. (2015). Catch Up® literacy evaluation report and executive summary. Retrieved February 2019, from www.educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• Education Endowment Foundation. (2018). The attainment gap report 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Education Endowment Foundation. (2019). Catch up® Literacy (re-grant). Retrieved June 2019, from https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/projects-and-evaluation/projects/catch-upliteracy-effectiveness-trial
   Google Scholar
• Gorard, S., Siddiqui, N., & See, B. H. (2015). Fresh start: Evaluation report and executive summary. Retrieved May 2020, from https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Projects/Evaluation_Reports/Fresh_Start.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gorard, S., Siddiqui, N., & See, B. H. (2016). An evaluation of fresh start as a catch-up intervention: A trial conducted by teachers. Educational Studies, 42(1), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1148587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, N., Lendrum, A., Ashworth, E., Frearson, K., Buck, R., & Kerr, K. (2016). Implementation and process evaluation (IPE) for interventions in education settings: An introductory handbook. Education Endowment Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, J., Bonetti, S., Crenna-Jennings, W., & Akhal, A. (2019). Education in England: Annual report 2019. Education Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Koutsouris, G., Norwich, B., & Bessudrov, A. (2019). Interpreting RCT, process evaluation and case study evidence in evaluating the Integrated Group Reading (IGR) programme: a teacher-led, classroom-based intervention for Year 2 and 3 pupils struggling to read. Educational Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1557597
   Google Scholar
• Lawton, K., & Warren, H. (2015). The power of reading, how the next government can unlock every child’s potential through reading. Save the Children.
   Google Scholar
• Lendrum, A., & Humphrey, N. (2012). The importance of studying the implementation of interventions in school settings. Oxford Review of Education, 38(5), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.734800
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G. F., Audrey, S., Barker, M., Bond, L., Bonell, C., Hardeman, W., … Baird, J. (2015). Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical research council guidance. BMJ, 350, h1258. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrisroe, J. (2014). Literacy changes lives 2014: A new perspective on health, employment and crime. National Literacy Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (2010). Reading by six: How the best schools do it.
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., Phillips, R. S., & Harris, C. J. (2014). Analysing teachers’ curriculum implementation from integrity and actor-oriented perspectives. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(6), 751–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2014.921841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, J., Salter, E., Wood, A., Woodhouse, F., & Zsargo, L. (2020). Strategic school improvement fund (SSIF) ‘Narrowing the gap in reading attainment for disadvantaged pupils’: A report into the impact of reading interventions in schools to support disadvantaged children. University of Huddersfield. https://huddersfield.box.com/s/knwbf6hmu3x5jrgqzxnl240fm0irxvtu
   Google Scholar
• Ruth Miskin Training. (2018). Read write inc. Fresh start. Retrieved February 2019, from https://ruthmiskin.com/en/programmes/fresh-start/?region=uk
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. (2008). Really reading: What does accelerated reader teach adults and children? Language Arts, 8(3), 202–211. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41962268
   Google Scholar
• See, B. H., Gorard, S., & Siddiqui, N. (2015). Best practice in conducting RCTs: Lessons learnt from an independent evaluation of the response-to-intervention programme. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 47, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui, N., Gorard, S., & Huat See, B. (2016). Accelerated reader as a literacy catchup intervention during primary to secondary school transition phase. Educational Review, 68(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2015.1067883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, G., Madhuri, M., & Taylor, D. (2008). How the accelerated reader program can become counterproductive for high school students. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 51(7), 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.51.7.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troyer, M. (2017). Teacher implementation of an adolescent reading intervention. Teaching and Teacher Education, 65, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Leroux, A., Roberts, G., Denton, C., Barth, A. & Fletcher, J. (2012). Effects of intensive reading intervention for eighth-grade students with persistently inadequate response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(6), 515–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411402692
   Google Scholar
• Walker, M., Sainsbury, M., Worth, J., Bamforth, H., & Betts, H. (2015). Phonics screening check evaluation: Final report. Gov.Uk. Retrieved February 2019, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/phonics-screening-check-evaluation-final-report
   Google Scholar
• Warren, H., & Paxton, W. (2014). How reading can help children escape from poverty. Save the Children.
   Google Scholar