Research on education in Southeast Asia (1996–2019): a bibliometric review

References

• Abramo, G., D’Angelo, A. C., & Murgia, G. (2017). The relationship among research productivity, research collaboration, and their determinants. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 1016–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association of Southeast Asian Nations. (2015). ASEAN economic community blueprint 2025. ASEAN Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Azer, S. A. (2015). The top-cited articles in medical education: A bibliometric analysis. Academic Medicine, 90(8), 1147–1161. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
   Google Scholar
• Barrot, J. (2021). Social media as a language learning environment: A systematic review of the literature (2008–2019). Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1883673
   Google Scholar
• Barrot, J. S. (2017). Research impact and productivity of Southeast Asian countries in language and linguistics. Scientometrics, 110(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2163-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrot, J. S. (2020). Scientific mapping of social media in education: A decade of exponential growth. Journal of Educational Computing Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120972010
   Google Scholar
• Barrot, J. S., Acomular, D., Alamodin, E., & Argonza, R. (2020). Scientific mapping of English language teaching research in the Philippines: A bibliometric review of doctoral and master’s theses (2010–2018). RELC Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220936764
   Google Scholar
• Bedenlier, S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2015). Internationalization of higher education and the impacts on academic faculty members. Research in Comparative and International Education, 10(2), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499915571707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begeny, J. C. (2018). A working definition and conceptual model of internationalization for school and educational psychology. Psychology in the Schools, 55(8), 924–940. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begeny, J. C., Levy, R. A., Hida, R., Norwalk, K., Field, S., Suzuki, H., Soriano-Ferrer, M., Scheunemann, A., Guerrant, M., Clinton, A., & Burneo, C. A. (2018). Geographically representative scholarship and internationalization in school and educational psychology: A bibliometric analysis of eight journals from 2002–2016. Journal of School Psychology, 70, 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordons, M., Fernández, M., & Gómez, I. (2002). Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance. Scientometrics, 53(2), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014800407876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diem, A., & Wolter, S. C. (2013). The use of bibliometrics to measure research performance in education sciences. Research in Higher Education, 54(1), 86–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9264-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, J., Liu, C., & Kandonga, G. A. (2020). Exploring the limitations of the h-index and h-type indexes in measuring the research performance of authors. Scientometrics, 222(3), 1303–1322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03364-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2019). Global innovation index 2019: Creating healthy lives, the future of medical innovation (12th ed.). Cornell University, INSEAD, and the World Intellectual Property Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Egbert, J. (2007). Quality analysis of journals in TESOL and applied linguistics. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00044.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010). Assessing Europe’s university-based research (EUR 24187 EN).
   Google Scholar
• Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellnhofer, K. (2019). Toward a taxonomy of entrepreneurship education research literature: A bibliometric mapping and visualization. Educational Research Review, 27, 28–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2016). Empirical analysis and classification of database errors in Scopus and Web of science. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 933–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B. S., & Rost, K. (2010). Do rankings reflect research quality? Journal of Applied Economics, 13(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1514-0326(10)60002-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, C. M., & Page, S. J. (2015). Following the impact factor: Utilitarianism or academic compliance? Tourism Management, 51, 309–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (2019). Science mapping the knowledge base on educational leadership and management from the emerging regions of Asia, Africa and Latin America, 1965–2018. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218822772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335–369. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319830380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamza, A. (2010). International experience. An opportunity for professional development in higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 14(1), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315308329793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Z. L., Geng, X. S., & Campbell-Hunt, C. (2009). Research collaboration and research output: A longitudinal study of 65 biomedical scientists in a New Zealand university. Research Policy, 38(2), 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heradio, R., De La Torre, L., Galan, D., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Dormido, S. (2016). Virtual and remote labs in education: A bibliometric analysis. Computers & Education, 98, 14–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hew, J. J., Lee, V. H., Ooi, K. B., & Lin, B. (2019). Computer science in ASEAN: A ten-year bibliometric analysis (2009–2018). Journal of Computer Information Systems. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2019.1601538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C., Yang, C., Wang, S., Wu, W., Su, J., & Liang, C. (2020). Evolution of topics in education research: A systematic review using bibliometric analysis. Educational Review, 72(3), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1566212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanović, L., & Ho, Y. S. (2019). Highly cited articles in the education and educational research category in the social science citation index: A bibliometric analysis. Educational Review, 71(3), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2017.1415297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacsó, P. (2009). The h-index for countries in Web of science and Scopus. Online Information Review, 33(4), 831–837. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520910985756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430(6997), 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1038/430311a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G.; PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nederhof, A. J., & Zwaan, R. A. (1991). Quality judgments of journals as indicators of research performance in the humanities and the social and behavioral sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 332–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199106)42:5<332::aid-asi3>3.0.co;2-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. V., & Pham, L. T. (2011). Scientific output and its relationship to knowledge economy: An analysis of ASEAN countries. Scientometrics, 89(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0446-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1996). The knowledge-based economy. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=OCDE/GD%2896%29102&docLanguage=En
   Google Scholar
• Osório, A. (2018). On the impossibility of a perfect counting method to allocate the credits of multi-authored publications. Scientometrics, 116(3), 2161–2173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2815-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrinos, H. A., & Psacharopoulos, G. (2011). Education: Past, present and future global challenges. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5616
   Google Scholar
• Rumbley, L., & De Wit, H. (2019). International faculty mobility. In K. Godwin & H. De Wit (Eds.), Global perspectives on higher education (pp. 33–36). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Sabharwal, M. (2013). Comparing research productivity across disciplines and career stages. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 15(2), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2013.785149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimanski, L. A., & Alperin, J. P. (2018). The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future. F1000Research, 7, 1605. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16493.1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scopus. (2021). Content. Scopus. https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/content
   Google Scholar
• Sombatsompop, N., Markpin, T., Ratchatahirun, P., Yochai, W., Ittiritmeechai, S., Premkamolnetr, N., & Wongkaew, C. (2011). Research productivity and impact of ASEAN countries and universities in the field of energy and fuel. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 16(1), 35–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolerman, I. P., & Stenius, K. (2008). The language barrier and institutional provincialism in science. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 92(1–3), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.07.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symaco, L. P. (2013). Education in the knowledge-based society: The case of the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 33(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2013.782800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien, F. F., & Blackburn, R. T. (1996). Faculty rank system, research motivation, and faculty research productivity: Measure refinement and theory testing. The Journal of Higher Education, 67(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2943901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tijssen, R. J., Van Leeuwen, T. N., & Van Wijk, E. (2009). Benchmarking university-industry research cooperation worldwide: Performance measurements and indicators based on co-authorship data for the world’s largest universities. Research Evaluation, 18(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820209x393145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ung, L., Hem, B., & Sangha, S. (2017). Academic promotion of higher education teaching personnel in Cambodia. In L. Wang & W. Teter (Eds.), Recalibrating careers in academia: Professional advancement policies and practices in Asia-Pacific (pp. 41–71). UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Van Raan, A. F. J. (2003). The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments. Technikfolgenabschätzung: Theorie und Praxis, 12(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.12.1.20
   Google Scholar
• Vinluan, L. R. (2012). Research productivity in education and psychology in the Philippines and comparison with ASEAN countries. Scientometrics, 91(1), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0496-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 365–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N. J. (2015). Field-normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 872–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L. B., & Teter, W. R. (2017). Synthesis report: Case studies on professional advancement policies and practices in higher education in Asia-Pacific. In L. Wang & W. Teter (Eds.), Recalibrating careers in academia: Professional advancement policies and practices in Asia-Pacific (pp. 1–16). UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. (2018). The panorama of the last decade’s theoretical groundings of educational leadership research: A concept co-occurrence network analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(3), 327–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x18761342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B., Wankat, P. C., & Neto, P. (2018). Not so global: A bibliometric look at engineering education research. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(2), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1153043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2020). Research and development expenditure. World Bank Group. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/gb.xpd.rsdv.gd.zs
   Google Scholar